Massachusetts School and District Profiles

Lt Elmer J McMahon Elementary

Districts
Schools

2016

2016 Accountability Data - Lt Elmer J McMahon Elementary

Organization Information

District:

Holyoke (01370000)

School type:

Elementary-Middle School

School:

Lt Elmer J McMahon Elementary (01370015)

Grades served:

K,01,02,03,04,05,06,07,08

Region:

Commissioner's Districts

Title I status:

Title I School (SW)

Accountability and Assistance Level:

Level 3

Summary > 2016

2016 English Language Arts Proficiency Gap Narrowing About the Data
	0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100	Baseline CPI	2015 CPI	2016 CPI	CPI Change	2016 Target	6 Year Goal	CPI Percentile in School Type	N	PPI Points	Rating
All students		74.3	68.1	78.0	9.9	85.0	87.2	33	242	50	Improved Below Target
High needs		70.1	62.3	73.5	11.2	82.6	85.1	40	168	50	Improved Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged		63.3	63.3	75.3	12.0	66.4	81.7	45	146	100	Above Target
EL and Former EL		49.4	55.3	71.1	15.8	70.5	74.7	54	38	75	On Target
Students w/ disabilities		53.2	43.4	59.8	16.4	72.7	76.6	46	56	50	Improved Below Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	1	-	-
Asian		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	2	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	3	-	-
Hispanic/Latino		66.8	59.2	71.9	12.7	80.6	83.4	31	151	50	Improved Below Target
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	2	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White		84.3	80.8	88.3	7.5	90.8	92.2	47	83	50	Improved Below Target

Summary > 2016

2016 Mathematics Proficiency Gap Narrowing About the Data
	0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100	Baseline CPI	2015 CPI	2016 CPI	CPI Change	2016 Target	6 Year Goal	CPI Percentile in School Type	N	PPI Points	Rating
All students		62.0	62.2	65.8	3.6	77.8	81.0	23	237	50	Improved Below Target
High needs		57.3	55.3	59.8	4.5	75.1	78.7	24	163	50	Improved Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged		56.8	56.8	62.3	5.5	60.4	78.4	29	142	100	Above Target
EL and Former EL		40.1	43.1	49.3	6.2	65.1	70.1	14	36	50	Improved Below Target
Students w/ disabilities		44.9	43.4	52.3	8.9	67.9	72.5	40	55	50	Improved Below Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	1	-	-
Asian		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	2	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	3	-	-
Hispanic/Latino		53.5	51.9	57.9	6.0	72.9	76.8	17	146	50	Improved Below Target
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	2	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White		72.9	79.3	78.6	-0.7	84.2	86.5	33	83	25	No Change

Summary > 2016

2016 Science Proficiency Gap Narrowing About the Data
	0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100	Baseline CPI	2015 CPI	2016 CPI	CPI Change	2016 Target	6 Year Goal	CPI Percentile in School Type	N	PPI Points	Rating
All students		47.9	52.7	56.0	3.3	69.6	74.0	29	71	50	Improved Below Target
High needs		43.2	46.6	50.6	4.0	66.9	71.6	34	44	50	Improved Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged		46.9	46.9	51.9	5.0	51.3	73.5	46	40	75	On Target
EL and Former EL		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	6	-	-
Students w/ disabilities		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	14	-	-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Asian		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	1	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	2	-	-
Hispanic/Latino		41.0	44.3	48.9	4.6	65.6	70.5	30	46	50	Improved Below Target
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	1	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White		56.1	68.8	65.5	-3.3	74.4	78.1	12	21	0	Declined

Summary > 2016

2016 English Language Arts Extra Credit About the Data
	Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more)				Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
	2015 % Advanced	2016 % Advanced	N	PPI Points	2015 % Warning/Failing	2016 % Warning/Failing	N	PPI Points
All students	3.8	5.8	242	25	21.8	11.2	242	25
High needs	1.8	4.2	168	25	26.7	14.3	168	25
Econ. Disadvantaged	2.1	4.1	146	25	25.9	12.3	146	25
EL and Former EL	2.1	2.6	38	25	29.8	18.4	38	25
Students w/ disabilities	0.0	1.8	56	25	51.0	26.8	56	25
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.	-	-	1	-	-	-	1	-
Asian	-	-	2	-	-	-	2	-
Afr. Amer./Black	-	-	3	-	-	-	3	-
Hispanic/Latino	1.4	2.0	151	25	29.3	15.2	151	25
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.	-	-	2	-	-	-	2	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White	6.1	12.0	83	25	11.0	4.8	83	25

Summary > 2016

2016 Mathematics Extra Credit About the Data
	Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more)				Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
	2015 % Advanced	2016 % Advanced	N	PPI Points	2015 % Warning/Failing	2016 % Warning/Failing	N	PPI Points
All students	7.1	11.8	237	25	31.4	26.6	237	25
High needs	3.6	8.6	163	25	39.4	32.5	163	25
Econ. Disadvantaged	4.2	9.2	142	25	37.8	28.9	142	25
EL and Former EL	0.0	0.0	36	0	57.4	44.4	36	25
Students w/ disabilities	2.0	7.3	55	25	61.2	43.6	55	25
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.	-	-	1	-	-	-	1	-
Asian	-	-	2	-	-	-	2	-
Afr. Amer./Black	-	-	3	-	-	-	3	-
Hispanic/Latino	2.0	5.5	146	25	42.9	35.6	146	25
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.	-	-	2	-	-	-	2	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White	15.9	21.7	83	25	13.4	12.0	83	25

Summary > 2016

2016 Science Extra Credit About the Data
	Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more)				Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
	2015 % Advanced	2016 % Advanced	N	PPI Points	2015 % Warning/Failing	2016 % Warning/Failing	N	PPI Points
All students	1.2	1.4	71	25	36.6	32.4	71	25
High needs	0.0	0.0	44	0	44.8	38.6	44	25
Econ. Disadvantaged	0.0	0.0	40	0	42.9	37.5	40	25
EL and Former EL	-	-	6	-	-	-	6	-
Students w/ disabilities	-	-	14	-	-	-	14	-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Asian	-	-	1	-	-	-	1	-
Afr. Amer./Black	-	-	2	-	-	-	2	-
Hispanic/Latino	0.0	0.0	46	0	47.2	41.3	46	25
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.	-	-	1	-	-	-	1	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White	3.6	0.0	21	0	17.9	19.0	21	0

Summary > 2016

2016 English Language Arts Growth About the Data
	0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100	2015 SGP	2016 SGP	SGP Change	6 Year Goal	Met Safe Harbor?	N	PPI Points	Rating
All students		41.0	58.0	17.0	51.0	Yes	196	100	Above Target
High needs		41.0	57.0	16.0	51.0	Yes	131	100	Above Target
Econ. Disadvantaged		41.0	61.5	20.5	51.0	Yes	116	100	Above Target
EL and Former EL		37.0	66.0	29.0	51.0	Yes	30	100	Above Target
Students w/ disabilities		39.0	50.5	11.5	51.0	Yes	40	75	On Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.		-	-	-	51.0	-	1	-	-
Asian		-	-	-	51.0	-	1	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black		-	-	-	51.0	-	2	-	-
Hispanic/Latino		39.0	57.0	18.0	51.0	Yes	122	100	Above Target
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.		-	-	-	51.0	-	2	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.		-	-	-	51.0	-	-	-	-
White		42.5	58.0	15.5	51.0	Yes	68	100	Above Target

Summary > 2016

2016 Mathematics Growth About the Data
	0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100	2015 SGP	2016 SGP	SGP Change	6 Year Goal	Met Safe Harbor?	N	PPI Points	Rating
All students		33.0	39.0	6.0	51.0	No	191	50	Below Target
High needs		32.0	42.5	10.5	51.0	No	126	75	On Target
Econ. Disadvantaged		32.0	46.5	14.5	51.0	No	112	100	Above Target
EL and Former EL		23.5	27.0	3.5	51.0	No	28	50	Below Target
Students w/ disabilities		34.0	53.0	19.0	51.0	No	39	100	Above Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.		-	-	-	51.0	-	1	-	-
Asian		-	-	-	51.0	-	1	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black		-	-	-	51.0	-	2	-	-
Hispanic/Latino		32.0	45.0	13.0	51.0	No	117	75	On Target
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.		-	-	-	51.0	-	2	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.		-	-	-	51.0	-	-	-	-
White		35.0	37.5	2.5	51.0	No	68	50	Below Target

Summary > 2016

2016 Extra credit for English language proficiency growth About the Data
	2016 SGPA	2016 Target	SGPA N Included	PPI Points
All students	57.0	60.0	27.00	0
High needs	57.0	60.0	27.00	0
EL and Former EL	57.0	60.0	27.00	0

Summary > 2016

2016 Assessment Participation About the Data
	English Language Arts				Mathematics				Science
	Enrolled	Assessed	%	Met Target (95%)	Enrolled	Assessed	%	Met Target (95%)	Enrolled	Assessed	%	Met Target (95%)
All students	274	272	99	Yes	271	264	97	Yes	78	78	100	Yes
High needs	192	192	100	Yes	190	185	97	Yes	48	48	100	Yes
Econ. Disadvantaged	169	169	100	Yes	167	163	98	Yes	44	44	100	Yes
EL and Former EL	48	48	100	Yes	47	45	96	Yes	8	-	-	-
Students w/ disabilities	63	63	100	Yes	63	62	98	Yes	14	-	-	-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.	1	-	-	-	1	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Asian	2	-	-	-	2	-	-	-	1	-	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black	3	-	-	-	3	-	-	-	2	-	-	-
Hispanic/Latino	179	177	99	Yes	176	169	96	Yes	51	51	100	Yes
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.	2	-	-	-	2	-	-	-	1	-	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White	87	87	100	Yes	87	87	100	Yes	23	23	100	Yes

NOTE: In 2016, assessment participation was calculated two ways: First, the 2016 participation rate for each subgroup in each subject area test was calculated. If the actual 2016 participation rate was lower than 95 percent for any group in any subject, that rate was compared to the average of the most recent two years of assessment participation data for that group and subject. The higher of the two resulting rates was factored into the assignment of the school or district's 2016 accountability and assistance level.