Massachusetts School and District Profiles

Harmony Grove Elementary

Districts
Schools

2016

2016 Accountability Data - Woodrow Wilson

Organization Information

District:

Framingham (01000000)

School type:

Elementary School

School:

Woodrow Wilson (01000055)

Grades served:

K,01,02,03,04,05

Region:

Greater Boston

Title I status:

Title I School (SW)

Accountability and Assistance Level:

Level 3

Summary > 2016

2016 English Language Arts Proficiency Gap Narrowing About the Data
	0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100	Baseline CPI	2015 CPI	2016 CPI	CPI Change	2016 Target	6 Year Goal	CPI Percentile in School Type	N	PPI Points	Rating
All students		68.3	68.4	62.3	-6.1	81.5	84.2	3	238	0	Declined
High needs		66.9	64.9	59.7	-5.2	80.7	83.5	4	202	0	Declined
Econ. Disadvantaged		68.3	68.3	61.0	-7.3	70.9	84.2	5	130	0	Declined
EL and Former EL		63.6	57.3	52.7	-4.6	78.8	81.8	5	138	0	Declined
Students w/ disabilities		48.8	56.5	50.5	-6.0	70.1	74.4	15	47	0	Declined
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Asian		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	1	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	21	-	-
Hispanic/Latino		69.6	73.4	68.6	-4.8	82.3	84.8	33	35	0	Declined
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	5	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White		68.9	66.4	61.5	-4.9	81.9	84.5	2	176	0	Declined

Summary > 2016

2016 Mathematics Proficiency Gap Narrowing About the Data
	0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100	Baseline CPI	2015 CPI	2016 CPI	CPI Change	2016 Target	6 Year Goal	CPI Percentile in School Type	N	PPI Points	Rating
All students		69.4	66.6	66.2	-0.4	82.2	84.7	5	239	25	No Change
High needs		69.1	63.6	63.9	0.3	82.0	84.6	11	203	50	Improved Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged		64.6	64.6	63.5	-1.1	67.6	82.3	10	130	25	No Change
EL and Former EL		68.6	60.0	61.2	1.2	81.7	84.3	14	139	50	Improved Below Target
Students w/ disabilities		52.4	56.4	54.3	-2.1	72.2	76.2	21	47	25	No Change
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Asian		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	1	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	21	-	-
Hispanic/Latino		66.7	59.8	68.1	8.3	80.6	83.4	32	36	50	Improved Below Target
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	5	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White		70.4	68.4	66.9	-1.5	82.7	85.2	2	176	25	No Change

Summary > 2016

2016 Science Proficiency Gap Narrowing About the Data
	0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100	Baseline CPI	2015 CPI	2016 CPI	CPI Change	2016 Target	6 Year Goal	CPI Percentile in School Type	N	PPI Points	Rating
All students		54.7	60.1	56.4	-3.7	73.6	77.4	10	86	0	Declined
High needs		54.4	55.9	55.9	0.0	73.4	77.2	18	76	25	No Change
Econ. Disadvantaged		63.1	63.1	57.7	-5.4	66.2	81.6	32	49	0	Declined
EL and Former EL		49.0	48.8	50.0	1.2	70.3	74.5	37	49	50	Improved Below Target
Students w/ disabilities		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	17	-	-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Asian		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	7	-	-
Hispanic/Latino		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	11	-	-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	2	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White		55.2	61.9	58.0	-3.9	73.9	77.6	1	66	0	Declined

Summary > 2016

2016 English Language Arts Extra Credit About the Data
	Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more)				Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
	2015 % Advanced	2016 % Advanced	N	PPI Points	2015 % Warning/Failing	2016 % Warning/Failing	N	PPI Points
All students	2.4	0.4	238	0	17.5	23.5	238	0
High needs	0.5	0.0	202	0	20.4	27.2	202	0
Econ. Disadvantaged	0.8	0.0	130	0	17.3	26.9	130	0
EL and Former EL	0.0	0.0	138	0	27.0	36.2	138	0
Students w/ disabilities	0.0	0.0	47	0	32.8	38.3	47	0
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Asian	-	-	1	-	-	-	1	-
Afr. Amer./Black	-	-	21	-	-	-	21	-
Hispanic/Latino	3.1	2.9	35	0	6.3	14.3	35	0
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.	-	-	5	-	-	-	5	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White	2.6	0.0	176	0	20.5	25.6	176	0

Summary > 2016

2016 Mathematics Extra Credit About the Data
	Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more)				Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
	2015 % Advanced	2016 % Advanced	N	PPI Points	2015 % Warning/Failing	2016 % Warning/Failing	N	PPI Points
All students	8.4	7.9	239	0	17.6	19.7	239	0
High needs	6.5	7.4	203	25	20.0	22.7	203	0
Econ. Disadvantaged	7.9	8.5	130	0	16.5	21.5	130	0
EL and Former EL	3.7	7.9	139	25	23.0	25.2	139	0
Students w/ disabilities	1.7	2.1	47	25	33.9	38.3	47	0
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Asian	-	-	1	-	-	-	1	-
Afr. Amer./Black	-	-	21	-	-	-	21	-
Hispanic/Latino	3.0	11.1	36	25	30.3	27.8	36	0
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.	-	-	5	-	-	-	5	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White	10.1	7.4	176	0	17.0	17.0	176	0

Summary > 2016

2016 Science Extra Credit About the Data
	Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more)				Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
	2015 % Advanced	2016 % Advanced	N	PPI Points	2015 % Warning/Failing	2016 % Warning/Failing	N	PPI Points
All students	0.0	1.2	86	25	23.6	29.1	86	0
High needs	0.0	1.3	76	25	27.8	27.6	76	0
Econ. Disadvantaged	0.0	2.0	49	25	14.3	22.4	49	0
EL and Former EL	0.0	0.0	49	0	35.7	36.7	49	0
Students w/ disabilities	-	-	17	-	-	-	17	-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Asian	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black	-	-	7	-	-	-	7	-
Hispanic/Latino	-	-	11	-	-	-	11	-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.	-	-	2	-	-	-	2	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White	0.0	1.5	66	25	22.4	27.3	66	0

Summary > 2016

2016 English Language Arts Growth About the Data
	0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100	2015 SGP	2016 SGP	SGP Change	6 Year Goal	Met Safe Harbor?	N	PPI Points	Rating
All students		60.0	31.5	-28.5	51.0	No	140	25	Below Target
High needs		57.0	32.0	-25.0	51.0	No	120	25	Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged		53.0	32.0	-21.0	51.0	No	78	25	Below Target
EL and Former EL		57.0	27.0	-30.0	51.0	No	80	0	Below Target
Students w/ disabilities		46.0	38.0	-8.0	51.0	No	27	25	Below Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.		-	-	-	51.0	-	-	-	-
Asian		-	-	-	51.0	-	1	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black		-	-	-	51.0	-	11	-	-
Hispanic/Latino		-	-	-	51.0	-	16	-	-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.		-	-	-	51.0	-	4	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.		-	-	-	51.0	-	-	-	-
White		57.5	33.0	-24.5	51.0	No	108	25	Below Target

Summary > 2016

2016 Mathematics Growth About the Data
	0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100	2015 SGP	2016 SGP	SGP Change	6 Year Goal	Met Safe Harbor?	N	PPI Points	Rating
All students		43.5	29.5	-14.0	51.0	No	140	0	Below Target
High needs		42.5	30.5	-12.0	51.0	No	120	25	Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged		42.0	36.0	-6.0	51.0	No	77	25	Below Target
EL and Former EL		43.5	30.5	-13.0	51.0	No	80	25	Below Target
Students w/ disabilities		35.5	31.0	-4.5	51.0	No	27	25	Below Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.		-	-	-	51.0	-	-	-	-
Asian		-	-	-	51.0	-	1	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black		-	-	-	51.0	-	11	-	-
Hispanic/Latino		-	-	-	51.0	-	16	-	-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.		-	-	-	51.0	-	4	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.		-	-	-	51.0	-	-	-	-
White		43.0	34.5	-8.5	51.0	No	108	25	Below Target

Summary > 2016

2016 Extra credit for English language proficiency growth About the Data
	2016 SGPA	2016 Target	SGPA N Included	PPI Points
All students	71.0	60.0	178.00	25
High needs	71.0	60.0	178.00	25
EL and Former EL	71.0	60.0	178.00	25

Summary > 2016

2016 Assessment Participation About the Data
	English Language Arts				Mathematics				Science
	Enrolled	Assessed	%	Met Target (95%)	Enrolled	Assessed	%	Met Target (95%)	Enrolled	Assessed	%	Met Target (95%)
All students	285	280	98	Yes	289	288	100	Yes	100	100	100	Yes
High needs	248	243	98	Yes	252	251	100	Yes	90	90	100	Yes
Econ. Disadvantaged	155	154	99	Yes	156	156	100	Yes	59	59	100	Yes
EL and Former EL	182	178	98	Yes	186	186	100	Yes	63	63	100	Yes
Students w/ disabilities	50	48	96	Yes	50	49	98	Yes	19	-	-	-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Asian	2	-	-	-	2	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black	24	-	-	-	24	-	-	-	7	-	-	-
Hispanic/Latino	38	36	95	Yes	39	38	97	Yes	13	-	-	-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.	5	-	-	-	5	-	-	-	2	-	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White	216	213	99	Yes	219	219	100	Yes	78	78	100	Yes

NOTE: In 2016, assessment participation was calculated two ways: First, the 2016 participation rate for each subgroup in each subject area test was calculated. If the actual 2016 participation rate was lower than 95 percent for any group in any subject, that rate was compared to the average of the most recent two years of assessment participation data for that group and subject. The higher of the two resulting rates was factored into the assignment of the school or district's 2016 accountability and assistance level.