Massachusetts School and District Profiles

Miriam F McCarthy School

Districts
Schools

2016

2016 Accountability Data - Miriam F McCarthy School

Organization Information

District:

Framingham (01000000)

School type:

Elementary School

School:

Miriam F McCarthy School (01000050)

Grades served:

K,01,02,03,04,05

Region:

Greater Boston

Title I status:

Title I School (SW)

Accountability and Assistance Level:

Level 3

Summary > 2016

2016 English Language Arts Proficiency Gap Narrowing About the Data
	0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100	Baseline CPI	2015 CPI	2016 CPI	CPI Change	2016 Target	6 Year Goal	CPI Percentile in School Type	N	PPI Points	Rating
All students		79.0	75.0	70.5	-4.5	87.8	89.5	9	275	0	Declined
High needs		68.9	63.4	60.4	-3.0	81.9	84.5	5	181	0	Declined
Econ. Disadvantaged		61.1	61.1	60.4	-0.7	64.3	80.6	4	125	25	No Change
EL and Former EL		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	21	-	-
Students w/ disabilities		59.8	55.0	52.0	-3.0	76.6	79.9	18	127	0	Declined
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Asian		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	7	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black		77.8	70.8	60.0	-10.8	87.1	88.9	8	35	0	Declined
Hispanic/Latino		67.2	56.3	54.9	-1.4	80.9	83.6	3	66	25	No Change
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	19	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White		81.8	82.1	76.7	-5.4	89.4	90.9	8	148	0	Declined

Summary > 2016

2016 Mathematics Proficiency Gap Narrowing About the Data
	0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100	Baseline CPI	2015 CPI	2016 CPI	CPI Change	2016 Target	6 Year Goal	CPI Percentile in School Type	N	PPI Points	Rating
All students		74.7	68.6	66.1	-2.5	85.2	87.4	5	274	25	No Change
High needs		65.8	57.1	56.5	-0.6	80.1	82.9	3	182	25	No Change
Econ. Disadvantaged		54.9	54.9	55.0	0.1	58.7	77.5	2	126	50	Improved Below Target
EL and Former EL		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	21	-	-
Students w/ disabilities		60.8	48.9	49.0	0.1	77.1	80.4	12	129	50	Improved Below Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Asian		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	7	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black		64.8	57.6	47.8	-9.8	79.5	82.4	2	34	0	Declined
Hispanic/Latino		60.8	52.4	51.1	-1.3	77.1	80.4	4	67	25	No Change
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	17	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White		79.1	76.2	74.8	-1.4	87.8	89.6	7	149	25	No Change

Summary > 2016

2016 Science Proficiency Gap Narrowing About the Data
	0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100	Baseline CPI	2015 CPI	2016 CPI	CPI Change	2016 Target	6 Year Goal	CPI Percentile in School Type	N	PPI Points	Rating
All students		73.2	64.4	60.0	-4.4	84.4	86.6	13	95	0	Declined
High needs		66.8	53.3	52.9	-0.4	80.6	83.4	15	60	25	No Change
Econ. Disadvantaged		52.6	52.6	48.3	-4.3	56.6	76.3	13	45	0	Declined
EL and Former EL		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	11	-	-
Students w/ disabilities		62.5	45.6	51.7	6.1	78.1	81.3	21	43	50	Improved Below Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Asian		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	3	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	14	-	-
Hispanic/Latino		67.0	39.4	51.2	11.8	80.8	83.5	26	21	50	Improved Below Target
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	5	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White		76.2	75.0	65.9	-9.1	86.1	88.1	5	52	0	Declined

Summary > 2016

2016 English Language Arts Extra Credit About the Data
	Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more)				Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
	2015 % Advanced	2016 % Advanced	N	PPI Points	2015 % Warning/Failing	2016 % Warning/Failing	N	PPI Points
All students	7.3	7.3	275	0	15.6	19.6	275	0
High needs	3.7	2.2	181	0	24.7	29.3	181	0
Econ. Disadvantaged	1.6	3.2	125	25	27.9	29.6	125	0
EL and Former EL	-	-	21	-	-	-	21	-
Students w/ disabilities	4.3	0.0	127	0	32.2	39.4	127	0
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Asian	-	-	7	-	-	-	7	-
Afr. Amer./Black	0.0	5.7	35	25	16.7	31.4	35	0
Hispanic/Latino	1.6	1.5	66	0	31.7	33.3	66	0
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.	-	-	19	-	-	-	19	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White	9.3	9.5	148	0	9.3	13.5	148	0

Summary > 2016

2016 Mathematics Extra Credit About the Data
	Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more)				Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
	2015 % Advanced	2016 % Advanced	N	PPI Points	2015 % Warning/Failing	2016 % Warning/Failing	N	PPI Points
All students	12.2	15.0	274	25	21.3	24.8	274	0
High needs	4.3	7.1	182	25	32.7	35.2	182	0
Econ. Disadvantaged	3.3	7.1	126	25	36.9	38.9	126	0
EL and Former EL	-	-	21	-	-	-	21	-
Students w/ disabilities	2.6	3.9	129	25	40.9	42.6	129	0
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Asian	-	-	7	-	-	-	7	-
Afr. Amer./Black	0.0	2.9	34	25	30.6	50.0	34	0
Hispanic/Latino	0.0	3.0	67	25	39.7	43.3	67	0
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.	-	-	17	-	-	-	17	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White	17.7	20.1	149	25	12.8	12.8	149	0

Summary > 2016

2016 Science Extra Credit About the Data
	Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more)				Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
	2015 % Advanced	2016 % Advanced	N	PPI Points	2015 % Warning/Failing	2016 % Warning/Failing	N	PPI Points
All students	1.0	6.3	95	25	24.7	23.2	95	0
High needs	0.0	1.7	60	25	37.7	33.3	60	25
Econ. Disadvantaged	0.0	0.0	45	0	41.0	37.8	45	0
EL and Former EL	-	-	11	-	-	-	11	-
Students w/ disabilities	0.0	2.3	43	25	47.5	34.9	43	25
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Asian	-	-	3	-	-	-	3	-
Afr. Amer./Black	-	-	14	-	-	-	14	-
Hispanic/Latino	0.0	0.0	21	0	53.8	23.8	21	25
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.	-	-	5	-	-	-	5	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White	0.0	7.7	52	25	11.5	17.3	52	0

Summary > 2016

2016 English Language Arts Growth About the Data
	0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100	2015 SGP	2016 SGP	SGP Change	6 Year Goal	Met Safe Harbor?	N	PPI Points	Rating
All students		48.0	33.0	-15.0	51.0	No	165	25	Below Target
High needs		47.0	28.0	-19.0	51.0	No	106	0	Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged		48.0	31.0	-17.0	51.0	No	77	25	Below Target
EL and Former EL		-	-	-	51.0	-	15	-	-
Students w/ disabilities		54.0	27.5	-26.5	51.0	No	78	0	Below Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.		-	-	-	51.0	-	-	-	-
Asian		-	-	-	51.0	-	5	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black		-	-	-	51.0	-	24	-	-
Hispanic/Latino		42.5	32.0	-10.5	51.0	No	39	25	Below Target
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.		-	-	-	51.0	-	10	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.		-	-	-	51.0	-	-	-	-
White		48.0	37.0	-11.0	51.0	No	87	25	Below Target

Summary > 2016

2016 Mathematics Growth About the Data
	0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100	2015 SGP	2016 SGP	SGP Change	6 Year Goal	Met Safe Harbor?	N	PPI Points	Rating
All students		43.5	26.5	-17.0	51.0	No	166	0	Below Target
High needs		45.0	26.0	-19.0	51.0	No	107	0	Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged		49.0	25.0	-24.0	51.0	No	78	0	Below Target
EL and Former EL		-	-	-	51.0	-	15	-	-
Students w/ disabilities		36.5	26.5	-10.0	51.0	No	80	0	Below Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.		-	-	-	51.0	-	-	-	-
Asian		-	-	-	51.0	-	5	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black		-	-	-	51.0	-	23	-	-
Hispanic/Latino		49.0	23.0	-26.0	51.0	No	40	0	Below Target
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.		-	-	-	51.0	-	9	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.		-	-	-	51.0	-	-	-	-
White		37.0	37.0	0.0	51.0	No	89	25	Below Target

Summary > 2016

2016 Extra credit for English language proficiency growth About the Data
	2016 SGPA	2016 Target	SGPA N Included	PPI Points
All students	57.0	60.0	44.00	0
High needs	57.0	60.0	44.00	0
EL and Former EL	-	60.0	44.00	-

Summary > 2016

2016 Assessment Participation About the Data
	English Language Arts				Mathematics				Science
	Enrolled	Assessed	%	Met Target (95%)	Enrolled	Assessed	%	Met Target (95%)	Enrolled	Assessed	%	Met Target (95%)
All students	310	292	94	No	308	291	94	No	105	101	96	Yes
High needs	202	191	95	Yes	201	192	96	Yes	65	61	97	Yes
Econ. Disadvantaged	138	131	95	Yes	137	132	96	Yes	48	46	96	Yes
EL and Former EL	25	-	-	-	25	-	-	-	12	-	-	-
Students w/ disabilities	138	131	95	Yes	138	133	96	Yes	45	43	96	Yes
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.	1	-	-	-	1	-	-	-	1	-	-	-
Asian	7	-	-	-	7	-	-	-	3	-	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black	39	39	100	Yes	38	38	100	Yes	15	-	-	-
Hispanic/Latino	75	72	96	Yes	75	73	97	Yes	23	22	96	Yes
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.	20	-	-	-	19	-	-	-	6	-	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White	168	153	91	No	168	154	92	No	57	54	95	Yes

NOTE: In 2016, assessment participation was calculated two ways: First, the 2016 participation rate for each subgroup in each subject area test was calculated. If the actual 2016 participation rate was lower than 95 percent for any group in any subject, that rate was compared to the average of the most recent two years of assessment participation data for that group and subject. The higher of the two resulting rates was factored into the assignment of the school or district's 2016 accountability and assistance level.