Massachusetts School and District Profiles

Barbieri Elementary

Districts
Schools

2016

2016 Accountability Data - Barbieri Elementary

Organization Information

District:

Framingham (01000000)

School type:

Elementary School

School:

Barbieri Elementary (01000035)

Grades served:

K,01,02,03,04,05

Region:

Greater Boston

Title I status:

Title I School (SW)

Accountability and Assistance Level:

Level 2

Summary > 2016

2016 English Language Arts Proficiency Gap Narrowing About the Data
	0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100	Baseline CPI	2015 CPI	2016 CPI	CPI Change	2016 Target	6 Year Goal	CPI Percentile in School Type	N	PPI Points	Rating
All students		76.2	82.2	77.2	-5.0	86.1	88.1	21	332	0	Declined
High needs		68.4	76.0	68.9	-7.1	81.6	84.2	21	221	0	Declined
Econ. Disadvantaged		77.0	77.0	67.9	-9.1	78.9	88.5	17	159	0	Declined
EL and Former EL		66.8	69.1	64.8	-4.3	80.6	83.4	31	122	0	Declined
Students w/ disabilities		48.1	75.3	62.5	-12.8	69.7	74.1	44	96	0	Declined
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Asian		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	1	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	9	-	-
Hispanic/Latino		68.9	77.6	72.2	-5.4	81.9	84.5	49	215	0	Declined
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	9	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White		94.5	93.4	88.0	-5.4	96.8	97.3	49	98	0	Declined

Summary > 2016

2016 Mathematics Proficiency Gap Narrowing About the Data
	0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100	Baseline CPI	2015 CPI	2016 CPI	CPI Change	2016 Target	6 Year Goal	CPI Percentile in School Type	N	PPI Points	Rating
All students		70.0	72.1	72.8	0.7	82.5	85.0	12	334	50	Improved Below Target
High needs		62.7	65.2	64.1	-1.1	78.2	81.4	11	223	25	No Change
Econ. Disadvantaged		67.4	67.4	63.3	-4.1	70.1	83.7	9	160	0	Declined
EL and Former EL		61.9	57.5	58.9	1.4	77.8	81.0	11	124	50	Improved Below Target
Students w/ disabilities		50.0	66.6	64.2	-2.4	70.8	75.0	49	97	25	No Change
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Asian		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	1	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	9	-	-
Hispanic/Latino		62.7	66.7	65.1	-1.6	78.2	81.4	22	217	25	No Change
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	9	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White		88.2	85.8	89.8	4.0	93.1	94.1	61	98	50	Improved Below Target

Summary > 2016

2016 Science Proficiency Gap Narrowing About the Data
	0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100	Baseline CPI	2015 CPI	2016 CPI	CPI Change	2016 Target	6 Year Goal	CPI Percentile in School Type	N	PPI Points	Rating
All students		59.8	65.8	61.8	-4.0	76.6	79.9	15	106	0	Declined
High needs		48.8	53.4	49.6	-3.8	70.1	74.4	10	66	0	Declined
Econ. Disadvantaged		55.1	55.1	47.8	-7.3	58.8	77.6	12	45	0	Declined
EL and Former EL		47.7	50.0	43.1	-6.9	69.5	73.9	21	40	0	Declined
Students w/ disabilities		45.2	-	54.2	1.0	58.9	72.6	29	30	50	Improved Below Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Asian		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	1	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	5	-	-
Hispanic/Latino		47.4	57.2	54.7	-2.5	69.3	73.7	35	69	25	No Change
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	2	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White		78.3	78.4	80.2	1.8	87.3	89.2	28	29	50	Improved Below Target

Summary > 2016

2016 English Language Arts Extra Credit About the Data
	Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more)				Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
	2015 % Advanced	2016 % Advanced	N	PPI Points	2015 % Warning/Failing	2016 % Warning/Failing	N	PPI Points
All students	10.1	9.0	332	0	6.7	14.5	332	0
High needs	2.0	0.5	221	0	9.8	20.8	221	0
Econ. Disadvantaged	1.4	0.6	159	0	10.8	22.0	159	0
EL and Former EL	1.7	0.0	122	0	12.6	22.1	122	0
Students w/ disabilities	0.0	0.0	96	0	14.5	29.2	96	0
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Asian	-	-	1	-	-	-	1	-
Afr. Amer./Black	-	-	9	-	-	-	9	-
Hispanic/Latino	4.5	2.8	215	0	8.9	17.7	215	0
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.	-	-	9	-	-	-	9	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White	24.1	22.4	98	0	1.3	7.1	98	0

Summary > 2016

2016 Mathematics Extra Credit About the Data
	Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more)				Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
	2015 % Advanced	2016 % Advanced	N	PPI Points	2015 % Warning/Failing	2016 % Warning/Failing	N	PPI Points
All students	12.6	16.2	334	25	18.1	18.6	334	0
High needs	6.0	6.3	223	0	25.0	26.5	223	0
Econ. Disadvantaged	6.2	6.9	160	25	22.1	26.9	160	0
EL and Former EL	5.5	4.8	124	0	31.5	29.8	124	0
Students w/ disabilities	1.3	1.0	97	0	22.1	30.9	97	0
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Asian	-	-	1	-	-	-	1	-
Afr. Amer./Black	-	-	9	-	-	-	9	-
Hispanic/Latino	8.5	8.8	217	0	23.5	24.4	217	0
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.	-	-	9	-	-	-	9	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White	24.7	32.7	98	25	4.9	5.1	98	0

Summary > 2016

2016 Science Extra Credit About the Data
	Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more)				Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
	2015 % Advanced	2016 % Advanced	N	PPI Points	2015 % Warning/Failing	2016 % Warning/Failing	N	PPI Points
All students	2.1	4.7	106	25	18.9	29.2	106	0
High needs	0.0	0.0	66	0	30.5	43.9	66	0
Econ. Disadvantaged	0.0	0.0	45	0	26.5	46.7	45	0
EL and Former EL	0.0	0.0	40	0	35.7	45.0	40	0
Students w/ disabilities	0.0	0.0	30	0	48.4	43.3	30	25
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Asian	-	-	1	-	-	-	1	-
Afr. Amer./Black	-	-	5	-	-	-	5	-
Hispanic/Latino	0.0	1.4	69	25	25.4	36.2	69	0
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.	-	-	2	-	-	-	2	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White	6.9	10.3	29	25	10.3	13.8	29	0

Summary > 2016

2016 English Language Arts Growth About the Data
	0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100	2015 SGP	2016 SGP	SGP Change	6 Year Goal	Met Safe Harbor?	N	PPI Points	Rating
All students		72.5	45.5	-27.0	51.0	No	164	50	Below Target
High needs		73.0	43.0	-30.0	51.0	No	102	50	Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged		68.5	39.0	-29.5	51.0	No	76	25	Below Target
EL and Former EL		75.0	43.0	-32.0	51.0	No	67	50	Below Target
Students w/ disabilities		72.0	27.0	-45.0	51.0	No	30	0	Below Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.		-	-	-	51.0	-	-	-	-
Asian		-	-	-	51.0	-	1	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black		-	-	-	51.0	-	4	-	-
Hispanic/Latino		73.0	43.0	-30.0	51.0	No	117	50	Below Target
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.		-	-	-	51.0	-	3	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.		-	-	-	51.0	-	-	-	-
White		71.5	50.0	-21.5	51.0	No	39	50	Below Target

Summary > 2016

2016 Mathematics Growth About the Data
	0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100	2015 SGP	2016 SGP	SGP Change	6 Year Goal	Met Safe Harbor?	N	PPI Points	Rating
All students		38.0	32.0	-6.0	51.0	No	179	25	Below Target
High needs		36.0	31.0	-5.0	51.0	No	115	25	Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged		38.0	29.0	-9.0	51.0	No	83	0	Below Target
EL and Former EL		36.0	31.5	-4.5	51.0	No	76	25	Below Target
Students w/ disabilities		43.0	37.5	-5.5	51.0	No	34	25	Below Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.		-	-	-	51.0	-	-	-	-
Asian		-	-	-	51.0	-	1	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black		-	-	-	51.0	-	4	-	-
Hispanic/Latino		36.0	30.5	-5.5	51.0	No	130	25	Below Target
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.		-	-	-	51.0	-	3	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.		-	-	-	51.0	-	-	-	-
White		40.0	37.0	-3.0	51.0	Yes	41	75	On Target

Summary > 2016

2016 Extra credit for English language proficiency growth About the Data
	2016 SGPA	2016 Target	SGPA N Included	PPI Points
All students	67.0	60.0	200.00	25
High needs	67.0	60.0	200.00	25
EL and Former EL	67.0	60.0	200.00	25

Summary > 2016

2016 Assessment Participation About the Data
	English Language Arts				Mathematics				Science
	Enrolled	Assessed	%	Met Target (95%)	Enrolled	Assessed	%	Met Target (95%)	Enrolled	Assessed	%	Met Target (95%)
All students	343	341	99	Yes	344	343	100	Yes	109	108	99	Yes
High needs	231	229	99	Yes	232	231	100	Yes	68	67	99	Yes
Econ. Disadvantaged	167	166	99	Yes	168	167	99	Yes	46	45	98	Yes
EL and Former EL	129	128	99	Yes	130	130	100	Yes	41	41	100	Yes
Students w/ disabilities	101	100	99	Yes	102	101	99	Yes	31	30	97	Yes
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Asian	1	-	-	-	1	-	-	-	1	-	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black	12	-	-	-	12	-	-	-	6	-	-	-
Hispanic/Latino	222	221	100	Yes	223	223	100	Yes	70	70	100	Yes
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.	9	-	-	-	9	-	-	-	2	-	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White	98	98	100	Yes	98	98	100	Yes	29	29	100	Yes

NOTE: In 2016, assessment participation was calculated two ways: First, the 2016 participation rate for each subgroup in each subject area test was calculated. If the actual 2016 participation rate was lower than 95 percent for any group in any subject, that rate was compared to the average of the most recent two years of assessment participation data for that group and subject. The higher of the two resulting rates was factored into the assignment of the school or district's 2016 accountability and assistance level.