Massachusetts School and District Profiles

Great Oak

District not selectedDistricts School selectedSchools
Select an Org
print page

2016 Accountability Data - Great Oak

Organization Information
District:Danvers (00710000)School type:Elementary School
School:Great Oak (00710015)Grades served:K,01,02,03,04,05
Region:NortheastTitle I status:Title I School (TA)
Accountability and Assistance Level:Level 2
Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 87.7, Target = 93 - All Students75 or Higher All StudentsAll Students CPI = 87.7, Target = 93 75 or Higher All Students 88.0 89.9 87.7 -2.2 93.0 94.0 6017725No Change
High needsCPI = 72.2, Target = 87.4 - High needs75 or Higher High needsHigh needs CPI = 72.2, Target = 87.4 75 or Higher High needs 78.4 73.5 72.2 -1.3 87.4 89.2 334525No Change
Econ. DisadvantagedCPI = 74.3, Target = 79 - Econ. Disadvantaged75 or Higher Econ. DisadvantagedEcon. Disadvantaged CPI = 74.3, Target = 79 75 or Higher Econ. Disadvantaged 77.1 77.1 74.3 -2.8 79.0 88.6 38340Declined
EL and Former EL -------5--
Students w/ disabilities -------21--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. ----------
Asian ----------
Afr. Amer./Black -------3--
Hispanic/Latino -------19--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. -------6--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. ----------
WhiteCPI = 88.9, Target = 92.8 - White75 or Higher WhiteWhite CPI = 88.9, Target = 92.8 75 or Higher White 87.7 90.8 88.9 -1.9 92.8 93.9 5414925No Change
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 89, Target = 89.1 - All StudentsAll Students-CPI = 89, Target = 89.175 or Higher All Students 81.3 86.2 89.0 2.8 89.1 90.7 6617775On Target
High needsCPI = 72.8, Target = 84 - High needs75 or Higher High needsHigh needs CPI = 72.8, Target = 84 75 or Higher High needs 72.5 69.6 72.8 3.2 84.0 86.3 364550Improved Below Target
Econ. DisadvantagedCPI = 73.5, Target = 70.6 - Econ. DisadvantagedEcon. Disadvantaged-CPI = 73.5, Target = 70.6CPI = 73.5, Target = 70.675 or Higher Econ. Disadvantaged 67.9 67.9 73.5 5.6 70.6 84.0 3834100Above Target
EL and Former EL -------5--
Students w/ disabilities -------21--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. ----------
Asian ----------
Afr. Amer./Black -------3--
Hispanic/Latino -------19--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. -------6--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. ----------
WhiteCPI = 89.9, Target = 89.2 - WhiteWhite-CPI = 89.9, Target = 89.275 or Higher White 81.4 87.0 89.9 2.9 89.2 90.7 6214975On Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Science Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 78.4, Target = 89.8 - All Students75 or Higher All StudentsAll Students CPI = 78.4, Target = 89.8 75 or Higher All Students 82.5 81.5 78.4 -3.1 89.8 91.3 41670Declined
High needs  63.6---- 81.8-23--
Econ. Disadvantaged -------17--
EL and Former EL -------3--
Students w/ disabilities -------12--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. ----------
Asian ----------
Afr. Amer./Black -------1--
Hispanic/Latino -------7--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. -------1--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. ----------
WhiteCPI = 82.3, Target = 90.2 - White75 or Higher WhiteWhite CPI = 82.3, Target = 90.2 75 or Higher White 83.2 83.9 82.3 -1.6 90.2 91.6 365825No Change
Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced
2016
% Advanced
N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing
2016
% Warning/Failing
N PPI Points
All students 20.8 18.11770 2.2 4.01770
High needs 0.0 2.24525 7.8 15.6450
Econ. Disadvantaged 0.0 2.93425 8.6 17.6340
EL and Former EL--5---5-
Students w/ disabilities--21---21-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--------
Asian--------
Afr. Amer./Black--3---3-
Hispanic/Latino--19---19-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--6---6-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--------
White 21.5 18.81490 1.8 3.41490
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced
2016
% Advanced
N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing
2016
% Warning/Failing
N PPI Points
All students 31.1 37.317725 4.9 4.51770
High needs 5.9 8.94525 11.8 13.3450
Econ. Disadvantaged 5.7 11.83425 11.4 11.8340
EL and Former EL--5---5-
Students w/ disabilities--21---21-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--------
Asian--------
Afr. Amer./Black--3---3-
Hispanic/Latino--19---19-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--6---6-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--------
White 31.9 40.914925 3.7 3.41490
Summary > 2016
2016 Science Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced
2016
% Advanced
N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing
2016
% Warning/Failing
N PPI Points
All students 7.2 13.46725 10.1 10.4670
High needs--23---23-
Econ. Disadvantaged--17---17-
EL and Former EL--3---3-
Students w/ disabilities--12---12-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--------
Asian--------
Afr. Amer./Black--1---1-
Hispanic/Latino--7---7-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--1---1-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--------
White 6.5 13.85825 6.5 5.25825
Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Growth
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 2015 SGP 2016 SGP SGP Change 6 Year Goal Met Safe Harbor? N PPI Points Rating
All studentsSGP = 41, Target = 51 - All Students75 or Higher All StudentsAll Students SGP = 41, Target = 51 75 or Higher All Students 61.0 41.0 -20.0 51.0No11450Below Target
High needsSGP = 29.5, Target = 51 - High needs75 or Higher High needsHigh needs SGP = 29.5, Target = 51 75 or Higher High needs 53.0 29.5 -23.5 51.0Yes3275On Target
Econ. Disadvantaged --- 51.0-23--
EL and Former EL --- 51.0-3--
Students w/ disabilities --- 51.0-16--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. --- 51.0----
Asian --- 51.0----
Afr. Amer./Black --- 51.0-3--
Hispanic/Latino --- 51.0-11--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. --- 51.0-3--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. --- 51.0----
WhiteSGP = 42, Target = 51 - White75 or Higher WhiteWhite SGP = 42, Target = 51 75 or Higher White 60.0 42.0 -18.0 51.0No9750Below Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Growth
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 2015 SGP 2016 SGP SGP Change 6 Year Goal Met Safe Harbor? N PPI Points Rating
All studentsSGP = 40, Target = 51 - All Students75 or Higher All StudentsAll Students SGP = 40, Target = 51 75 or Higher All Students 45.0 40.0 -5.0 51.0Yes11575On Target
High needsSGP = 37, Target = 51 - High needs75 or Higher High needsHigh needs SGP = 37, Target = 51 75 or Higher High needs 51.0 37.0 -14.0 51.0No3225Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged --- 51.0-23--
EL and Former EL --- 51.0-3--
Students w/ disabilities --- 51.0-16--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. --- 51.0----
Asian --- 51.0----
Afr. Amer./Black --- 51.0-3--
Hispanic/Latino --- 51.0-11--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. --- 51.0-3--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. --- 51.0----
WhiteSGP = 43.5, Target = 51 - White75 or Higher WhiteWhite SGP = 43.5, Target = 51 75 or Higher White 44.0 43.5 -0.5 51.0Yes9875On Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Extra credit for English language proficiency growth
  2016 SGPA 2016 Target SGPA N Included PPI Points
All students- 60.01.00-
High needs- 60.01.00-
EL and Former EL- 60.01.00-
Summary > 2016
2016 Assessment Participation
  English Language Arts Mathematics Science
Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%) Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%) Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%)
All students184184100Yes184184100Yes6868100Yes
High needs4949100Yes4949100Yes2323100Yes
Econ. Disadvantaged3838100Yes3838100Yes17---
EL and Former EL7---7---3---
Students w/ disabilities22---22---12---
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.------------
Asian------------
Afr. Amer./Black4---4---1---
Hispanic/Latino20---20---8---
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.6---6---1---
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.------------
White154154100Yes154154100Yes5858100Yes

NOTE: In 2016, assessment participation was calculated two ways: First, the 2016 participation rate for each subgroup in each subject area test was calculated. If the actual 2016 participation rate was lower than 95 percent for any group in any subject, that rate was compared to the average of the most recent two years of assessment participation data for that group and subject. The higher of the two resulting rates was factored into the assignment of the school or district's 2016 accountability and assistance level.


School and District Profiles