Massachusetts School and District Profiles

Barry

Districts
Schools

2016

2016 Accountability Data - Barry

Organization Information

District:

Chicopee (00610000)

School type:

Elementary School

School:

Barry (00610003)

Grades served:

K,01,02,03,04,05

Region:

Berkshires +

Title I status:

Title I School (SW)

Accountability and Assistance Level:

Level 1

Summary > 2016

2016 English Language Arts Proficiency Gap Narrowing About the Data
	0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100	Baseline CPI	2015 CPI	2016 CPI	CPI Change	2016 Target	6 Year Goal	CPI Percentile in School Type	N	PPI Points	Rating
All students		86.6	86.6	92.7	6.1	92.2	93.3	83	222	75	On Target
High needs		83.3	83.3	91.4	8.1	90.3	91.7	99	151	75	On Target
Econ. Disadvantaged		83.1	83.1	91.3	8.2	84.5	91.6	98	130	100	Above Target
EL and Former EL		77.8	85.2	90.6	5.4	87.1	88.9	96	32	100	Above Target
Students w/ disabilities		75.0	74.4	89.0	14.6	85.4	87.5	99	43	100	Above Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Asian		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	5	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	4	-	-
Hispanic/Latino		82.7	84.3	89.8	5.5	89.9	91.4	97	61	75	On Target
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	8	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White		86.9	88.2	93.4	5.2	92.4	93.5	81	144	75	On Target

Summary > 2016

2016 Mathematics Proficiency Gap Narrowing About the Data
	0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100	Baseline CPI	2015 CPI	2016 CPI	CPI Change	2016 Target	6 Year Goal	CPI Percentile in School Type	N	PPI Points	Rating
All students		88.6	92.2	96.2	4.0	93.4	94.3	97	222	100	Above Target
High needs		86.9	89.9	95.5	5.6	92.4	93.5	99	151	100	Above Target
Econ. Disadvantaged		89.5	89.5	95.2	5.7	90.4	94.8	99	130	100	Above Target
EL and Former EL		88.4	94.4	96.1	1.7	93.2	94.2	98	32	100	Above Target
Students w/ disabilities		78.1	82.2	95.9	13.7	87.2	89.1	99	43	100	Above Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Asian		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	5	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	4	-	-
Hispanic/Latino		80.8	88.2	94.3	6.1	88.8	90.4	98	61	100	Above Target
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	8	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White		89.4	93.9	96.7	2.8	93.8	94.7	97	144	100	Above Target

Summary > 2016

2016 Science Proficiency Gap Narrowing About the Data
	0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100	Baseline CPI	2015 CPI	2016 CPI	CPI Change	2016 Target	6 Year Goal	CPI Percentile in School Type	N	PPI Points	Rating
All students		68.3	80.2	81.6	1.4	81.5	84.2	52	79	75	On Target
High needs		63.8	75.5	76.4	0.9	78.9	81.9	78	54	50	Improved Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged		70.8	70.8	76.7	5.9	73.2	85.4	84	45	100	Above Target
EL and Former EL		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	8	-	-
Students w/ disabilities		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	17	-	-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Asian		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	1	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	3	-	-
Hispanic/Latino		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	19	-	-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White		70.5	83.2	87.5	4.3	82.8	85.3	63	56	100	Above Target

Summary > 2016

2016 English Language Arts Extra Credit About the Data
	Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more)				Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
	2015 % Advanced	2016 % Advanced	N	PPI Points	2015 % Warning/Failing	2016 % Warning/Failing	N	PPI Points
All students	7.7	18.9	222	25	2.3	1.8	222	25
High needs	6.7	17.2	151	25	3.3	2.6	151	25
Econ. Disadvantaged	5.5	16.2	130	25	3.9	3.1	130	25
EL and Former EL	11.1	18.8	32	25	3.7	6.3	32	0
Students w/ disabilities	4.4	16.3	43	25	2.2	4.7	43	0
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Asian	-	-	5	-	-	-	5	-
Afr. Amer./Black	-	-	4	-	-	-	4	-
Hispanic/Latino	5.6	6.6	61	25	1.9	3.3	61	0
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.	-	-	8	-	-	-	8	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White	9.0	23.6	144	25	1.9	1.4	144	25

Summary > 2016

2016 Mathematics Extra Credit About the Data
	Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more)				Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
	2015 % Advanced	2016 % Advanced	N	PPI Points	2015 % Warning/Failing	2016 % Warning/Failing	N	PPI Points
All students	35.3	53.2	222	25	1.4	0.0	222	25
High needs	28.2	51.0	151	25	2.0	0.0	151	25
Econ. Disadvantaged	29.4	49.2	130	25	1.6	0.0	130	25
EL and Former EL	44.4	65.6	32	25	0.0	0.0	32	25
Students w/ disabilities	20.0	46.5	43	25	4.4	0.0	43	25
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Asian	-	-	5	-	-	-	5	-
Afr. Amer./Black	-	-	4	-	-	-	4	-
Hispanic/Latino	28.3	47.5	61	25	3.8	0.0	61	25
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.	-	-	8	-	-	-	8	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White	38.1	56.3	144	25	0.6	0.0	144	25

Summary > 2016

2016 Science Extra Credit About the Data
	Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more)				Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
	2015 % Advanced	2016 % Advanced	N	PPI Points	2015 % Warning/Failing	2016 % Warning/Failing	N	PPI Points
All students	14.3	16.5	79	25	10.4	5.1	79	25
High needs	3.9	16.7	54	25	13.7	7.4	54	25
Econ. Disadvantaged	2.4	13.3	45	25	16.7	4.4	45	25
EL and Former EL	-	-	8	-	-	-	8	-
Students w/ disabilities	-	-	17	-	-	-	17	-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Asian	-	-	1	-	-	-	1	-
Afr. Amer./Black	-	-	3	-	-	-	3	-
Hispanic/Latino	-	-	19	-	-	-	19	-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White	16.4	21.4	56	25	9.1	3.6	56	25

Summary > 2016

2016 English Language Arts Growth About the Data
	0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100	2015 SGP	2016 SGP	SGP Change	6 Year Goal	Met Safe Harbor?	N	PPI Points	Rating
All students		48.0	63.0	15.0	51.0	Yes	145	100	Above Target
High needs		48.0	65.0	17.0	51.0	Yes	92	100	Above Target
Econ. Disadvantaged		46.0	63.5	17.5	51.0	Yes	80	100	Above Target
EL and Former EL		-	-	-	51.0	-	13	-	-
Students w/ disabilities		40.0	68.0	28.0	51.0	Yes	27	100	Above Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.		-	-	-	51.0	-	-	-	-
Asian		-	-	-	51.0	-	1	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black		-	-	-	51.0	-	4	-	-
Hispanic/Latino		40.5	53.0	12.5	51.0	Yes	43	75	On Target
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.		-	-	-	51.0	-	3	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.		-	-	-	51.0	-	-	-	-
White		50.5	67.0	16.5	51.0	Yes	94	100	Above Target

Summary > 2016

2016 Mathematics Growth About the Data
	0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100	2015 SGP	2016 SGP	SGP Change	6 Year Goal	Met Safe Harbor?	N	PPI Points	Rating
All students		46.0	50.0	4.0	51.0	Yes	145	75	On Target
High needs		42.5	53.5	11.0	51.0	Yes	92	75	On Target
Econ. Disadvantaged		42.5	51.0	8.5	51.0	Yes	80	75	On Target
EL and Former EL		-	-	-	51.0	-	13	-	-
Students w/ disabilities		41.0	64.0	23.0	51.0	Yes	27	100	Above Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.		-	-	-	51.0	-	-	-	-
Asian		-	-	-	51.0	-	1	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black		-	-	-	51.0	-	4	-	-
Hispanic/Latino		39.0	52.0	13.0	51.0	Yes	43	75	On Target
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.		-	-	-	51.0	-	3	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.		-	-	-	51.0	-	-	-	-
White		48.0	49.5	1.5	51.0	Yes	94	75	On Target

Summary > 2016

2016 Extra credit for English language proficiency growth About the Data
	2016 SGPA	2016 Target	SGPA N Included	PPI Points
All students	74.0	60.0	45.00	25
High needs	74.0	60.0	45.00	25
EL and Former EL	74.0	60.0	45.00	25

Summary > 2016

2016 Assessment Participation About the Data
	English Language Arts				Mathematics				Science
	Enrolled	Assessed	%	Met Target (95%)	Enrolled	Assessed	%	Met Target (95%)	Enrolled	Assessed	%	Met Target (95%)
All students	231	230	100	Yes	231	230	100	Yes	81	81	100	Yes
High needs	158	157	99	Yes	158	157	99	Yes	56	56	100	Yes
Econ. Disadvantaged	135	135	100	Yes	135	135	100	Yes	47	47	100	Yes
EL and Former EL	34	34	100	Yes	34	34	100	Yes	8	-	-	-
Students w/ disabilities	45	44	98	Yes	45	44	98	Yes	17	-	-	-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Asian	6	-	-	-	6	-	-	-	1	-	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black	4	-	-	-	4	-	-	-	3	-	-	-
Hispanic/Latino	67	67	100	Yes	67	67	100	Yes	21	-	-	-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.	8	-	-	-	8	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White	146	145	99	Yes	146	145	99	Yes	56	56	100	Yes

NOTE: In 2016, assessment participation was calculated two ways: First, the 2016 participation rate for each subgroup in each subject area test was calculated. If the actual 2016 participation rate was lower than 95 percent for any group in any subject, that rate was compared to the average of the most recent two years of assessment participation data for that group and subject. The higher of the two resulting rates was factored into the assignment of the school or district's 2016 accountability and assistance level.