Massachusetts School and District Profiles

Lt Peter M Hansen
Districts Schools
Select an Org
View Previous Year
2016
View Next Year
print page

2016 Accountability Data - Lt Peter M Hansen
Organization Information
District:Canton (00500000)School type:Elementary School
School:Lt Peter M Hansen (00500012)Grades served:K,01,02,03,04,05
Region:Greater BostonTitle I status:Title I School (TA)
Accountability and Assistance Level:Level 1
 Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 93.9, Target = 93.2CPI = 93.9, Target = 93.2 88.4 91.6 93.9 2.3 93.2 94.2 8923075On Target
High needsCPI = 86.1, Target = 81.7CPI = 86.1, Target = 81.7CPI = 86.1, Target = 81.7 68.6 81.0 86.1 5.1 81.7 84.3 9063100Above Target
Econ. DisadvantagedCPI = 88.2, Target = 89.6CPI = 88.2, Target = 89.6CPI = 88.2, Target = 89.6 88.6 88.6 88.2 -0.4 89.6 94.3 943675On Target
EL and Former EL -------9--
Students w/ disabilitiesCPI = 75.9, Target = 76.5CPI = 75.9, Target = 76.5 59.7 70.5 75.9 5.4 76.5 79.9 802775On Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. -------1--
Asian -------22--
Afr. Amer./BlackCPI = 86.2, Target = 85.4CPI = 86.2, Target = 85.4 75.0 84.5 86.2 1.7 85.4 87.5 902975On Target
Hispanic/Latino -------12--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. -------7--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. ----------
WhiteCPI = 95.4, Target = 94.4CPI = 95.4, Target = 94.4 90.4 92.7 95.4 2.7 94.4 95.2 93159100Above Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 91.5, Target = 91.4CPI = 91.5, Target = 91.4 85.3 89.4 91.5 2.1 91.4 92.7 7823175On Target
High needsCPI = 82.9, Target = 76CPI = 82.9, Target = 76CPI = 82.9, Target = 76 58.9 76.2 82.9 6.7 76.0 79.5 7963100Above Target
Econ. DisadvantagedCPI = 86.1, Target = 81.7CPI = 86.1, Target = 81.7CPI = 86.1, Target = 81.7 80.0 80.0 86.1 6.1 81.7 90.0 8836100Above Target
EL and Former EL -------9--
Students w/ disabilitiesCPI = 76.9, Target = 69.7CPI = 76.9, Target = 69.7CPI = 76.9, Target = 69.7 48.0 71.6 76.9 5.3 69.7 74.0 8127100Above Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. -------1--
Asian -------22--
Afr. Amer./BlackCPI = 86.2, Target = 76.1CPI = 86.2, Target = 76.1CPI = 86.2, Target = 76.1 59.0 78.3 86.2 7.9 76.1 79.5 9429100Above Target
Hispanic/Latino -------12--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. -------7--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. ----------
WhiteCPI = 91.3, Target = 93.2CPI = 91.3, Target = 93.2CPI = 91.3, Target = 93.2 88.3 92.5 91.3 -1.2 93.2 94.2 7116025No Change
Summary > 2016
2016 Science Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 84.2, Target = 90.3CPI = 84.2, Target = 90.3CPI = 84.2, Target = 90.3 83.3 87.6 84.2 -3.4 90.3 91.7 62730Declined
High needs  55.0---- 77.5-21--
Econ. Disadvantaged -------11--
EL and Former EL -------3--
Students w/ disabilities -------8--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. ----------
Asian -------6--
Afr. Amer./Black -------7--
Hispanic/Latino -------1--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. -------2--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. ----------
WhiteCPI = 84.2, Target = 92.5CPI = 84.2, Target = 92.5CPI = 84.2, Target = 92.5 87.2 92.5 84.2 -8.3 92.5 93.6 46570Declined
Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced		 2016
% Advanced		 N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing		 2016
% Warning/Failing		 N PPI Points
All students 22.4 18.32300 2.4 0.923025
High needs 8.1 7.9630 6.5 3.26325
Econ. Disadvantaged 14.3 13.9360 0.0 2.8360
EL and Former EL--9---9-
Students w/ disabilities 0.0 0.0270 14.3 3.72725
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--1---1-
Asian--22---22-
Afr. Amer./Black 8.1 3.4290 5.4 3.42925
Hispanic/Latino--12---12-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--7---7-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--------
White 27.9 19.51590 2.2 0.615925
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced		 2016
% Advanced		 N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing		 2016
% Warning/Failing		 N PPI Points
All students 35.8 42.023125 3.5 2.223125
High needs 20.6 22.2630 11.1 4.86325
Econ. Disadvantaged 31.4 30.6360 11.4 2.83625
EL and Former EL--9---9-
Students w/ disabilities 10.3 0.0270 13.8 7.42725
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--1---1-
Asian--22---22-
Afr. Amer./Black 23.7 24.1290 15.8 6.92925
Hispanic/Latino--12---12-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--7---7-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--------
White 38.5 43.116025 1.1 1.91600
Summary > 2016
2016 Science Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced		 2016
% Advanced		 N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing		 2016
% Warning/Failing		 N PPI Points
All students 26.3 17.8730 3.2 5.5730
High needs--21---21-
Econ. Disadvantaged--11---11-
EL and Former EL--3---3-
Students w/ disabilities--8---8-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--------
Asian--6---6-
Afr. Amer./Black--7---7-
Hispanic/Latino--1---1-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--2---2-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--------
White 28.6 19.3570 0.0 7.0570
Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Growth
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 2015 SGP 2016 SGP SGP Change 6 Year Goal Met Safe Harbor? N PPI Points Rating
All studentsSGP = 64.5, Target = 51SGP = 64.5, Target = 51SGP = 64.5, Target = 51 67.0 64.5 -2.5 51.0Yes156100Above Target
High needsSGP = 68, Target = 51SGP = 68, Target = 51SGP = 68, Target = 51 68.0 68.0 0.0 51.0Yes41100Above Target
Econ. Disadvantaged --- 51.0-23--
EL and Former EL --- 51.0-4--
Students w/ disabilities --- 51.0-16--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. --- 51.0-1--
Asian --- 51.0-13--
Afr. Amer./Black --- 51.0-17--
Hispanic/Latino --- 51.0-8--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. --- 51.0-5--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. --- 51.0----
WhiteSGP = 63.5, Target = 51SGP = 63.5, Target = 51SGP = 63.5, Target = 51 74.0 63.5 -10.5 51.0Yes112100Above Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Growth
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 2015 SGP 2016 SGP SGP Change 6 Year Goal Met Safe Harbor? N PPI Points Rating
All studentsSGP = 62, Target = 51SGP = 62, Target = 51SGP = 62, Target = 51 62.0 62.0 0.0 51.0Yes158100Above Target
High needsSGP = 56, Target = 51SGP = 56, Target = 51SGP = 56, Target = 51 65.5 56.0 -9.5 51.0Yes4275On Target
Econ. Disadvantaged --- 51.0-23--
EL and Former EL --- 51.0-5--
Students w/ disabilities --- 51.0-17--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. --- 51.0-1--
Asian --- 51.0-13--
Afr. Amer./Black --- 51.0-17--
Hispanic/Latino --- 51.0-9--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. --- 51.0-5--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. --- 51.0----
WhiteSGP = 56, Target = 51SGP = 56, Target = 51SGP = 56, Target = 51 64.0 56.0 -8.0 51.0No11375On Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Extra credit for English language proficiency growth
  2016 SGPA 2016 Target SGPA N Included PPI Points
All students- 60.09-
High needs- 60.09-
EL and Former EL- 60.09-
Summary > 2016
2016 Assessment Participation
  English Language Arts Mathematics Science
Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%) Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%) Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%)
All students24223999Yes24224099Yes7676100Yes
High needs6868100Yes6868100Yes2424100Yes
Econ. Disadvantaged4040100Yes4040100Yes13---
EL and Former EL11---11---5---
Students w/ disabilities2727100Yes2727100Yes8---
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.1---1-------
Asian25---25---7---
Afr. Amer./Black3131100Yes3131100Yes8---
Hispanic/Latino12---12---1---
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.7---7---2---
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.------------
White16616398Yes16616499Yes5858100Yes

NOTE: In 2016, assessment participation was calculated two ways: First, the 2016 participation rate for each subgroup in each subject area test was calculated. If the actual 2016 participation rate was lower than 95 percent for any group in any subject, that rate was compared to the average of the most recent two years of assessment participation data for that group and subject. The higher of the two resulting rates was factored into the assignment of the school or district's 2016 accountability and assistance level.

School and District Profiles