Massachusetts School and District Profiles

Graham and Parks
Districts Schools
Select an Org
View Previous Year
2016
View Next Year
print page

2016 Accountability Data - Graham and Parks
Organization Information
District:Cambridge (00490000)School type:Elementary School
School:Graham and Parks (00490080)Grades served:PK,K,01,02,03,04,05
Region:Greater BostonTitle I status:Title I School (SW)
Accountability and Assistance Level:Level 2
 Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 80.1, Target = 89.5CPI = 80.1, Target = 89.5CPI = 80.1, Target = 89.5 84.2 78.5 80.1 1.6 89.5 92.1 2712350Improved Below Target
High needsCPI = 67.8, Target = 81.7CPI = 67.8, Target = 81.7CPI = 67.8, Target = 81.7 72.5 62.7 67.8 5.1 81.7 86.3 187350Improved Below Target
Econ. DisadvantagedCPI = 63.9, Target = 67.6CPI = 63.9, Target = 67.6CPI = 63.9, Target = 67.6 64.6 64.6 63.9 -0.7 67.6 82.3 94525No Change
EL and Former EL  56.8---- 78.4-28--
Students w/ disabilitiesCPI = 61.5, Target = 82.7CPI = 61.5, Target = 82.7CPI = 61.5, Target = 82.7 74.1 55.8 61.5 5.7 82.7 87.1 423750Improved Below Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. ----------
Asian  87.5---- 93.8-25--
Afr. Amer./BlackCPI = 62.5, Target = 71CPI = 62.5, Target = 71CPI = 62.5, Target = 71 56.5 56.7 62.5 5.8 71.0 78.3 132450Improved Below Target
Hispanic/Latino -------7--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. -------6--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. ----------
WhiteCPI = 90.6, Target = 96.4CPI = 90.6, Target = 96.4CPI = 90.6, Target = 96.4 94.6 90.4 90.6 0.2 96.4 97.3 656150Improved Below Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 84.1, Target = 90.8CPI = 84.1, Target = 90.8CPI = 84.1, Target = 90.8 86.2 82.0 84.1 2.1 90.8 93.1 4412350Improved Below Target
High needsCPI = 74.7, Target = 83.3CPI = 74.7, Target = 83.3CPI = 74.7, Target = 83.3 75.0 69.2 74.7 5.5 83.3 87.5 457450Improved Below Target
Econ. DisadvantagedCPI = 66.7, Target = 73.2CPI = 66.7, Target = 73.2CPI = 66.7, Target = 73.2 70.8 70.8 66.7 -4.1 73.2 85.4 15450Declined
EL and Former EL  62.5---- 81.3-29--
Students w/ disabilitiesCPI = 68.9, Target = 79.2CPI = 68.9, Target = 79.2CPI = 68.9, Target = 79.2 68.8 60.5 68.9 8.4 79.2 84.4 623750Improved Below Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. ----------
Asian  90.0---- 95.0-25--
Afr. Amer./BlackCPI = 67.7, Target = 78.4CPI = 67.7, Target = 78.4CPI = 67.7, Target = 78.4 67.6 59.6 67.7 8.1 78.4 83.8 322450Improved Below Target
Hispanic/Latino -------7--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. -------6--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. ----------
WhiteCPI = 91.8, Target = 95.3CPI = 91.8, Target = 95.3CPI = 91.8, Target = 95.3 92.9 92.7 91.8 -0.9 95.3 96.5 746125No Change
Summary > 2016
2016 Science Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 84.8, Target = 91.3CPI = 84.8, Target = 91.3CPI = 84.8, Target = 91.3 86.9 72.1 84.8 12.7 91.3 93.5 644150Improved Below Target
High needs  73.8---- 86.9-22--
Econ. Disadvantaged -------13--
EL and Former EL -------8--
Students w/ disabilities -------10--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. ----------
Asian -------8--
Afr. Amer./Black -------7--
Hispanic/Latino -------1--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. ----------
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. ----------
White  96.6---- 98.3-25--
Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced		 2016
% Advanced		 N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing		 2016
% Warning/Failing		 N PPI Points
All students 15.9 18.712325 15.0 14.61230
High needs 3.4 8.27325 27.1 24.7730
Econ. Disadvantaged 2.8 4.44525 27.8 31.1450
EL and Former EL--28---28-
Students w/ disabilities 3.3 5.43725 33.3 27.03725
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--------
Asian--25---25-
Afr. Amer./Black 0.0 4.22425 34.6 29.22425
Hispanic/Latino--7---7-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--6---6-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--------
White 22.8 27.96125 5.3 4.9610
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced		 2016
% Advanced		 N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing		 2016
% Warning/Failing		 N PPI Points
All students 41.2 48.012325 14.9 8.912325
High needs 16.7 28.47425 26.7 14.97425
Econ. Disadvantaged 13.9 20.04525 22.2 22.2450
EL and Former EL--29---29-
Students w/ disabilities 12.9 21.63725 35.5 24.33725
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--------
Asian--25---25-
Afr. Amer./Black 7.7 8.3240 30.8 20.82425
Hispanic/Latino--7---7-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--6---6-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--------
White 58.6 65.66125 6.9 3.36125
Summary > 2016
2016 Science Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced		 2016
% Advanced		 N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing		 2016
% Warning/Failing		 N PPI Points
All students 26.5 34.14125 20.6 7.34125
High needs--22---22-
Econ. Disadvantaged--13---13-
EL and Former EL--8---8-
Students w/ disabilities--10---10-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--------
Asian--8---8-
Afr. Amer./Black--7---7-
Hispanic/Latino--1---1-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--------
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--------
White--25---25-
Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Growth
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 2015 SGP 2016 SGP SGP Change 6 Year Goal Met Safe Harbor? N PPI Points Rating
All studentsSGP = 54, Target = 51SGP = 54, Target = 51SGP = 54, Target = 51 63.0 54.0 -9.0 51.0Yes6575On Target
High needsSGP = 44, Target = 51SGP = 44, Target = 51SGP = 44, Target = 51 53.0 44.0 -9.0 51.0Yes3575On Target
Econ. Disadvantaged --- 51.0-24--
EL and Former EL --- 51.0-8--
Students w/ disabilities --- 51.0-21--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. --- 51.0----
Asian --- 51.0-9--
Afr. Amer./Black --- 51.0-13--
Hispanic/Latino --- 51.0-6--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. --- 51.0-2--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. --- 51.0----
WhiteSGP = 65, Target = 51SGP = 65, Target = 51SGP = 65, Target = 51 68.0 65.0 -3.0 51.0Yes35100Above Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Growth
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 2015 SGP 2016 SGP SGP Change 6 Year Goal Met Safe Harbor? N PPI Points Rating
All studentsSGP = 48, Target = 51SGP = 48, Target = 51SGP = 48, Target = 51 71.5 48.0 -23.5 51.0No6550Below Target
High needsSGP = 29.5, Target = 51SGP = 29.5, Target = 51SGP = 29.5, Target = 51 51.5 29.5 -22.0 51.0No340Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged --- 51.0-23--
EL and Former EL --- 51.0-8--
Students w/ disabilities --- 51.0-20--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. --- 51.0----
Asian --- 51.0-9--
Afr. Amer./Black --- 51.0-13--
Hispanic/Latino --- 51.0-6--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. --- 51.0-1--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. --- 51.0----
WhiteSGP = 55.5, Target = 51SGP = 55.5, Target = 51SGP = 55.5, Target = 51 77.0 55.5 -21.5 51.0No3675On Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Extra credit for English language proficiency growth
  2016 SGPA 2016 Target SGPA N Included PPI Points
All students 89.0 60.04925
High needs 89.0 60.04925
EL and Former EL 89.0 60.049-
Summary > 2016
2016 Assessment Participation
  English Language Arts Mathematics Science
Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%) Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%) Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%)
All students16215596Yes16415497Yes474698Yes
High needs10810597Yes10910495Yes2727100Yes
Econ. Disadvantaged525198Yes525198Yes13---
EL and Former EL626097Yes635994No13---
Students w/ disabilities393897Yes393897Yes10---
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.------------
Asian373697Yes373595Yes9---
Afr. Amer./Black2828100Yes2828100Yes8---
Hispanic/Latino13---13---1---
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.7---7-------
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.------------
White777296Yes797296Yes292897Yes

NOTE: In 2016, assessment participation was calculated two ways: First, the 2016 participation rate for each subgroup in each subject area test was calculated. If the actual 2016 participation rate was lower than 95 percent for any group in any subject, that rate was compared to the average of the most recent two years of assessment participation data for that group and subject. The higher of the two resulting rates was factored into the assignment of the school or district's 2016 accountability and assistance level.

School and District Profiles