Massachusetts School and District Profiles

Hurley K-8 School

Districts
Schools

2016

2016 Accountability Data - Joseph J Hurley

Organization Information

District:

Boston (00350000)

School type:

Elementary-Middle School

School:

Joseph J Hurley (00350182)

Grades served:

PK,K,01,02,03,04,05,06,07,08

Region:

Commissioner's Districts

Title I status:

Title I School (SW)

Accountability and Assistance Level:

Level 1

Summary > 2016

2016 English Language Arts Proficiency Gap Narrowing About the Data
	0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100	Baseline CPI	2015 CPI	2016 CPI	CPI Change	2016 Target	6 Year Goal	CPI Percentile in School Type	N	PPI Points	Rating
All students		73.0	81.7	86.7	5.0	84.3	86.5	64	178	100	Above Target
High needs		68.6	75.8	83.6	7.8	81.7	84.3	81	125	100	Above Target
Econ. Disadvantaged		74.1	74.1	84.9	10.8	76.3	87.1	82	83	100	Above Target
EL and Former EL		64.3	73.8	82.3	8.5	79.2	82.2	89	100	100	Above Target
Students w/ disabilities		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	23	-	-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Asian		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	4	-	-
Hispanic/Latino		69.6	77.7	83.9	6.2	82.3	84.8	76	138	100	Above Target
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	4	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White		100.0	97.3	96.9	-0.4	100.0	100.0	93	32	100	Above Target

Summary > 2016

2016 Mathematics Proficiency Gap Narrowing About the Data
	0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100	Baseline CPI	2015 CPI	2016 CPI	CPI Change	2016 Target	6 Year Goal	CPI Percentile in School Type	N	PPI Points	Rating
All students		73.0	79.9	82.9	3.0	84.3	86.5	70	178	50	Improved Below Target
High needs		67.8	74.6	78.8	4.2	81.2	83.9	85	125	50	Improved Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged		71.0	71.0	78.6	7.6	73.4	85.5	84	83	100	Above Target
EL and Former EL		67.4	73.5	76.5	3.0	81.0	83.7	81	100	50	Improved Below Target
Students w/ disabilities		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	23	-	-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Asian		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	4	-	-
Hispanic/Latino		70.0	76.0	78.6	2.6	82.5	85.0	80	138	50	Improved Below Target
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	4	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White		98.8	95.5	96.9	1.4	99.3	99.4	96	32	100	Above Target

Summary > 2016

2016 Science Proficiency Gap Narrowing About the Data
	0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100	Baseline CPI	2015 CPI	2016 CPI	CPI Change	2016 Target	6 Year Goal	CPI Percentile in School Type	N	PPI Points	Rating
All students		47.3	64.4	53.6	-10.8	69.3	73.7	24	55	0	Declined
High needs		40.3	60.3	47.0	-13.3	65.2	70.2	22	42	0	Declined
Econ. Disadvantaged		61.0	61.0	46.3	-14.7	64.3	80.5	28	27	0	Declined
EL and Former EL		43.1	58.0	45.4	-12.6	66.8	71.6	52	38	0	Declined
Students w/ disabilities		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	9	-	-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Asian		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	1	-	-
Hispanic/Latino		40.9	60.1	47.7	-12.4	65.5	70.5	28	44	0	Declined
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	1	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	9	-	-

Summary > 2016

2016 English Language Arts Extra Credit About the Data
	Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more)				Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
	2015 % Advanced	2016 % Advanced	N	PPI Points	2015 % Warning/Failing	2016 % Warning/Failing	N	PPI Points
All students	11.7	15.7	178	25	9.2	6.2	178	25
High needs	3.4	5.6	125	25	12.7	8.0	125	25
Econ. Disadvantaged	3.7	6.0	83	25	14.6	7.2	83	25
EL and Former EL	3.0	3.0	100	0	13.9	9.0	100	25
Students w/ disabilities	-	-	23	-	-	-	23	-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Asian	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black	-	-	4	-	-	-	4	-
Hispanic/Latino	6.2	8.7	138	25	11.6	7.2	138	25
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.	-	-	4	-	-	-	4	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White	32.1	46.9	32	25	0.0	3.1	32	0

Summary > 2016

2016 Mathematics Extra Credit About the Data
	Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more)				Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
	2015 % Advanced	2016 % Advanced	N	PPI Points	2015 % Warning/Failing	2016 % Warning/Failing	N	PPI Points
All students	20.2	35.4	178	25	9.2	9.6	178	0
High needs	10.2	25.6	125	25	11.9	12.8	125	0
Econ. Disadvantaged	9.8	25.3	83	25	15.9	13.3	83	25
EL and Former EL	7.9	20.0	100	25	10.9	15.0	100	0
Students w/ disabilities	-	-	23	-	-	-	23	-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Asian	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black	-	-	4	-	-	-	4	-
Hispanic/Latino	10.1	25.4	138	25	10.9	12.3	138	0
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.	-	-	4	-	-	-	4	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White	64.3	71.9	32	25	3.6	0.0	32	25

Summary > 2016

2016 Science Extra Credit About the Data
	Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more)				Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
	2015 % Advanced	2016 % Advanced	N	PPI Points	2015 % Warning/Failing	2016 % Warning/Failing	N	PPI Points
All students	0.0	1.8	55	25	17.0	38.2	55	0
High needs	0.0	0.0	42	0	20.6	45.2	42	0
Econ. Disadvantaged	0.0	0.0	27	0	20.0	44.4	27	0
EL and Former EL	0.0	0.0	38	0	21.4	47.4	38	0
Students w/ disabilities	-	-	9	-	-	-	9	-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Asian	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black	-	-	1	-	-	-	1	-
Hispanic/Latino	0.0	0.0	44	0	21.6	43.2	44	0
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.	-	-	1	-	-	-	1	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White	-	-	9	-	-	-	9	-

Summary > 2016

2016 English Language Arts Growth About the Data
	0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100	2015 SGP	2016 SGP	SGP Change	6 Year Goal	Met Safe Harbor?	N	PPI Points	Rating
All students		46.5	56.0	9.5	51.0	Yes	132	75	On Target
High needs		43.5	55.0	11.5	51.0	Yes	95	75	On Target
Econ. Disadvantaged		43.0	54.0	11.0	51.0	Yes	66	75	On Target
EL and Former EL		42.0	54.0	12.0	51.0	Yes	77	75	On Target
Students w/ disabilities		-	-	-	51.0	-	19	-	-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.		-	-	-	51.0	-	-	-	-
Asian		-	-	-	51.0	-	-	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black		-	-	-	51.0	-	1	-	-
Hispanic/Latino		46.0	54.0	8.0	51.0	Yes	104	75	On Target
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.		-	-	-	51.0	-	4	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.		-	-	-	51.0	-	-	-	-
White		-	-	-	51.0	-	23	-	-

Summary > 2016

2016 Mathematics Growth About the Data
	0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100	2015 SGP	2016 SGP	SGP Change	6 Year Goal	Met Safe Harbor?	N	PPI Points	Rating
All students		37.0	55.5	18.5	51.0	Yes	132	100	Above Target
High needs		36.0	55.0	19.0	51.0	Yes	95	100	Above Target
Econ. Disadvantaged		33.5	53.0	19.5	51.0	Yes	66	100	Above Target
EL and Former EL		36.0	50.0	14.0	51.0	Yes	77	75	On Target
Students w/ disabilities		-	-	-	51.0	-	19	-	-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.		-	-	-	51.0	-	-	-	-
Asian		-	-	-	51.0	-	-	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black		-	-	-	51.0	-	1	-	-
Hispanic/Latino		36.0	50.5	14.5	51.0	Yes	104	100	Above Target
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.		-	-	-	51.0	-	4	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.		-	-	-	51.0	-	-	-	-
White		-	-	-	51.0	-	23	-	-

Summary > 2016

2016 Extra credit for English language proficiency growth About the Data
	2016 SGPA	2016 Target	SGPA N Included	PPI Points
All students	62.5	60.0	132.00	25
High needs	62.5	60.0	132.00	25
EL and Former EL	62.5	60.0	132.00	25

Summary > 2016

2016 Assessment Participation About the Data
	English Language Arts				Mathematics				Science
	Enrolled	Assessed	%	Met Target (95%)	Enrolled	Assessed	%	Met Target (95%)	Enrolled	Assessed	%	Met Target (95%)
All students	181	181	100	Yes	181	181	100	Yes	56	56	100	Yes
High needs	128	128	100	Yes	128	128	100	Yes	43	43	100	Yes
Econ. Disadvantaged	86	86	100	Yes	86	86	100	Yes	28	28	100	Yes
EL and Former EL	103	103	100	Yes	103	103	100	Yes	39	39	100	Yes
Students w/ disabilities	23	-	-	-	23	-	-	-	9	-	-	-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Asian	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black	4	-	-	-	4	-	-	-	1	-	-	-
Hispanic/Latino	141	141	100	Yes	141	141	100	Yes	45	45	100	Yes
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.	4	-	-	-	4	-	-	-	1	-	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White	32	32	100	Yes	32	32	100	Yes	9	-	-	-

NOTE: In 2016, assessment participation was calculated two ways: First, the 2016 participation rate for each subgroup in each subject area test was calculated. If the actual 2016 participation rate was lower than 95 percent for any group in any subject, that rate was compared to the average of the most recent two years of assessment participation data for that group and subject. The higher of the two resulting rates was factored into the assignment of the school or district's 2016 accountability and assistance level.