Massachusetts School and District Profiles

Kennedy John F Elementary School

Districts
Schools

2016

2016 Accountability Data - John F Kennedy

Organization Information

District:

Boston (00350000)

School type:

Elementary School

School:

John F Kennedy (00350166)

Grades served:

PK,K,01,02,03,04,05

Region:

Commissioner's Districts

Title I status:

Title I School (SW)

Accountability and Assistance Level:

Level 3

Summary > 2016

2016 English Language Arts Proficiency Gap Narrowing About the Data
	0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100	Baseline CPI	2015 CPI	2016 CPI	CPI Change	2016 Target	6 Year Goal	CPI Percentile in School Type	N	PPI Points	Rating
All students		65.9	85.0	82.4	-2.6	80.1	83.0	35	186	100	Above Target
High needs		65.9	84.7	81.2	-3.5	80.1	83.0	75	166	75	On Target
Econ. Disadvantaged		84.4	84.4	82.2	-2.2	85.7	92.2	76	136	25	No Change
EL and Former EL		60.3	82.1	77.8	-4.3	76.8	80.2	74	98	75	On Target
Students w/ disabilities		45.1	64.8	53.8	-11.0	68.0	72.6	22	39	0	Declined
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Asian		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	1	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black		76.9	85.7	87.9	2.2	86.5	88.5	92	35	100	Above Target
Hispanic/Latino		63.5	84.2	80.9	-3.3	78.7	81.8	83	144	100	Above Target
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	4	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	2	-	-

Summary > 2016

2016 Mathematics Proficiency Gap Narrowing About the Data
	0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100	Baseline CPI	2015 CPI	2016 CPI	CPI Change	2016 Target	6 Year Goal	CPI Percentile in School Type	N	PPI Points	Rating
All students		78.9	84.2	80.8	-3.4	87.7	89.5	30	186	0	Declined
High needs		78.8	84.0	80.1	-3.9	87.6	89.4	68	166	0	Declined
Econ. Disadvantaged		83.8	83.8	79.8	-4.0	85.2	91.9	65	136	0	Declined
EL and Former EL		76.5	83.8	76.8	-7.0	86.3	88.3	58	98	0	Declined
Students w/ disabilities		62.0	73.4	53.8	-19.6	77.8	81.0	20	39	0	Declined
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Asian		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	1	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black		76.9	84.3	84.3	0.0	86.5	88.5	90	35	75	On Target
Hispanic/Latino		78.2	83.4	80.0	-3.4	87.3	89.1	74	144	0	Declined
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	4	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	2	-	-

Summary > 2016

2016 Science Proficiency Gap Narrowing About the Data
	0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100	Baseline CPI	2015 CPI	2016 CPI	CPI Change	2016 Target	6 Year Goal	CPI Percentile in School Type	N	PPI Points	Rating
All students		50.9	51.6	41.7	-9.9	71.4	75.5	2	45	0	Declined
High needs		50.9	51.1	39.3	-11.8	71.4	75.5	2	35	0	Declined
Econ. Disadvantaged		51.4	51.4	41.4	-10.0	55.5	75.7	4	29	0	Declined
EL and Former EL		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	18	-	-
Students w/ disabilities		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	9	-	-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Asian		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	9	-	-
Hispanic/Latino		48.3	50.0	39.4	-10.6	69.8	74.2	3	33	0	Declined
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	1	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	2	-	-

Summary > 2016

2016 English Language Arts Extra Credit About the Data
	Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more)				Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
	2015 % Advanced	2016 % Advanced	N	PPI Points	2015 % Warning/Failing	2016 % Warning/Failing	N	PPI Points
All students	4.3	3.2	186	0	6.1	10.2	186	0
High needs	3.9	3.0	166	0	6.6	10.8	166	0
Econ. Disadvantaged	4.8	3.7	136	0	6.4	11.0	136	0
EL and Former EL	2.4	1.0	98	0	8.2	14.3	98	0
Students w/ disabilities	0.0	0.0	39	0	25.0	38.5	39	0
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Asian	-	-	1	-	-	-	1	-
Afr. Amer./Black	8.6	5.7	35	0	8.6	5.7	35	25
Hispanic/Latino	2.5	0.7	144	0	5.7	11.1	144	0
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.	-	-	4	-	-	-	4	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White	-	-	2	-	-	-	2	-

Summary > 2016

2016 Mathematics Extra Credit About the Data
	Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more)				Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
	2015 % Advanced	2016 % Advanced	N	PPI Points	2015 % Warning/Failing	2016 % Warning/Failing	N	PPI Points
All students	21.5	21.0	186	0	4.9	11.3	186	0
High needs	21.7	20.5	166	0	5.3	12.7	166	0
Econ. Disadvantaged	22.4	22.1	136	0	4.0	14.0	136	0
EL and Former EL	20.0	17.3	98	0	5.9	17.3	98	0
Students w/ disabilities	18.8	5.1	39	0	12.5	43.6	39	0
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Asian	-	-	1	-	-	-	1	-
Afr. Amer./Black	20.0	20.0	35	0	2.9	2.9	35	0
Hispanic/Latino	19.7	19.4	144	0	5.7	13.2	144	0
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.	-	-	4	-	-	-	4	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White	-	-	2	-	-	-	2	-

Summary > 2016

2016 Science Extra Credit About the Data
	Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more)				Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
	2015 % Advanced	2016 % Advanced	N	PPI Points	2015 % Warning/Failing	2016 % Warning/Failing	N	PPI Points
All students	0.0	2.2	45	25	35.4	46.7	45	0
High needs	0.0	2.9	35	25	36.2	54.3	35	0
Econ. Disadvantaged	0.0	3.4	29	25	33.3	48.3	29	0
EL and Former EL	-	-	18	-	-	-	18	-
Students w/ disabilities	-	-	9	-	-	-	9	-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Asian	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black	-	-	9	-	-	-	9	-
Hispanic/Latino	0.0	3.0	33	25	37.8	48.5	33	0
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.	-	-	1	-	-	-	1	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White	-	-	2	-	-	-	2	-

Summary > 2016

2016 English Language Arts Growth About the Data
	0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100	2015 SGP	2016 SGP	SGP Change	6 Year Goal	Met Safe Harbor?	N	PPI Points	Rating
All students		51.0	38.0	-13.0	51.0	No	105	25	Below Target
High needs		51.0	37.0	-14.0	51.0	No	91	25	Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged		51.0	38.0	-13.0	51.0	No	75	25	Below Target
EL and Former EL		63.0	37.0	-26.0	51.0	No	50	25	Below Target
Students w/ disabilities		-	-	-	51.0	-	22	-	-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.		-	-	-	51.0	-	-	-	-
Asian		-	-	-	51.0	-	-	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black		-	-	-	51.0	-	20	-	-
Hispanic/Latino		52.0	38.0	-14.0	51.0	No	80	25	Below Target
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.		-	-	-	51.0	-	3	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.		-	-	-	51.0	-	-	-	-
White		-	-	-	51.0	-	2	-	-

Summary > 2016

2016 Mathematics Growth About the Data
	0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100	2015 SGP	2016 SGP	SGP Change	6 Year Goal	Met Safe Harbor?	N	PPI Points	Rating
All students		35.0	17.0	-18.0	51.0	No	107	0	Below Target
High needs		34.0	17.0	-17.0	51.0	No	93	0	Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged		33.5	17.0	-16.5	51.0	No	77	0	Below Target
EL and Former EL		43.0	16.0	-27.0	51.0	No	51	0	Below Target
Students w/ disabilities		-	-	-	51.0	-	23	-	-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.		-	-	-	51.0	-	-	-	-
Asian		-	-	-	51.0	-	-	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black		-	-	-	51.0	-	21	-	-
Hispanic/Latino		33.5	15.0	-18.5	51.0	No	81	0	Below Target
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.		-	-	-	51.0	-	3	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.		-	-	-	51.0	-	-	-	-
White		-	-	-	51.0	-	2	-	-

Summary > 2016

2016 Extra credit for English language proficiency growth About the Data
	2016 SGPA	2016 Target	SGPA N Included	PPI Points
All students	51.5	60.0	132.00	0
High needs	51.5	60.0	132.00	0
EL and Former EL	51.5	60.0	132.00	0

Summary > 2016

2016 Assessment Participation About the Data
	English Language Arts				Mathematics				Science
	Enrolled	Assessed	%	Met Target (95%)	Enrolled	Assessed	%	Met Target (95%)	Enrolled	Assessed	%	Met Target (95%)
All students	189	189	100	Yes	189	189	100	Yes	46	46	100	Yes
High needs	168	168	100	Yes	168	168	100	Yes	36	36	100	Yes
Econ. Disadvantaged	138	138	100	Yes	138	138	100	Yes	30	30	100	Yes
EL and Former EL	100	100	100	Yes	100	100	100	Yes	19	-	-	-
Students w/ disabilities	39	39	100	Yes	39	39	100	Yes	9	-	-	-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Asian	1	-	-	-	1	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black	36	36	100	Yes	36	36	100	Yes	9	-	-	-
Hispanic/Latino	146	146	100	Yes	146	146	100	Yes	34	34	100	Yes
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.	4	-	-	-	4	-	-	-	1	-	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White	2	-	-	-	2	-	-	-	2	-	-	-

NOTE: In 2016, assessment participation was calculated two ways: First, the 2016 participation rate for each subgroup in each subject area test was calculated. If the actual 2016 participation rate was lower than 95 percent for any group in any subject, that rate was compared to the average of the most recent two years of assessment participation data for that group and subject. The higher of the two resulting rates was factored into the assignment of the school or district's 2016 accountability and assistance level.