Massachusetts School and District Profiles

Hill-Roberts Elementary School

View selected organization
print page

2016 Accountability Data - Hill-Roberts Elementary School

Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 79.5, Target = 95.5 - All Students75 or Higher All StudentsAll Students CPI = 79.5, Target = 95.5 75 or Higher All Students 92.2 76.4 79.5 3.1 95.5 96.1 2619550Improved Below Target
High needsCPI = 67.2, Target = 92.4 - High needs75 or Higher High needsHigh needs CPI = 67.2, Target = 92.4 75 or Higher High needs 86.9 66.2 67.2 1.0 92.4 93.5 166750Improved Below Target
Econ. DisadvantagedCPI = 71.7, Target = 75.5 - Econ. Disadvantaged75 or Higher Econ. DisadvantagedEcon. Disadvantaged CPI = 71.7, Target = 75.5 75 or Higher Econ. Disadvantaged 73.3 73.3 71.7 -1.6 75.5 86.7 273825No Change
EL and Former EL -------16--
Students w/ disabilitiesCPI = 58.6, Target = 90.6 - Students w/ disabilities75 or Higher Students w/ disabilitiesStudents w/ disabilities CPI = 58.6, Target = 90.6 75 or Higher Students w/ disabilities 83.9 54.5 58.6 4.1 90.6 92.0 322950Improved Below Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. ----------
Asian -------9--
Afr. Amer./Black -------8--
Hispanic/Latino -------24--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. -------14--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. ----------
WhiteCPI = 78.6, Target = 95.6 - White75 or Higher WhiteWhite CPI = 78.6, Target = 95.6 75 or Higher White 92.5 76.2 78.6 2.4 95.6 96.3 1114050Improved Below Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 82.8, Target = 93.4 - All Students75 or Higher All StudentsAll Students CPI = 82.8, Target = 93.4 75 or Higher All Students 88.7 81.3 82.8 1.5 93.4 94.4 3719550Improved Below Target
High needsCPI = 71.3, Target = 91.4 - High needs75 or Higher High needsHigh needs CPI = 71.3, Target = 91.4 75 or Higher High needs 85.2 68.8 71.3 2.5 91.4 92.6 296750Improved Below Target
Econ. DisadvantagedCPI = 69.1, Target = 73.9 - Econ. Disadvantaged75 or Higher Econ. DisadvantagedEcon. Disadvantaged CPI = 69.1, Target = 73.9 75 or Higher Econ. Disadvantaged 71.5 71.5 69.1 -2.4 73.9 85.8 223825No Change
EL and Former EL -------16--
Students w/ disabilitiesCPI = 69, Target = 90.6 - Students w/ disabilities75 or Higher Students w/ disabilitiesStudents w/ disabilities CPI = 69, Target = 90.6 75 or Higher Students w/ disabilities 83.9 58.9 69.0 10.1 90.6 92.0 632950Improved Below Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. ----------
Asian -------9--
Afr. Amer./Black -------8--
Hispanic/Latino -------24--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. -------14--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. ----------
WhiteCPI = 84.6, Target = 94.6 - White75 or Higher WhiteWhite CPI = 84.6, Target = 94.6 75 or Higher White 90.7 80.8 84.6 3.8 94.6 95.4 3114050Improved Below Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Science Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All students ----------
High needs ----------
Econ. Disadvantaged ----------
EL and Former EL ----------
Students w/ disabilities ----------
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. ----------
Asian ----------
Afr. Amer./Black ----------
Hispanic/Latino ----------
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. ----------
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. ----------
White ----------
Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced
2016
% Advanced
N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing
2016
% Warning/Failing
N PPI Points
All students 1.7 5.119525 10.3 9.219525
High needs 0.0 0.0670 19.1 22.4670
Econ. Disadvantaged 0.0 0.0380 11.6 21.1380
EL and Former EL--16---16-
Students w/ disabilities 0.0 0.0290 32.1 31.0290
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--------
Asian--9---9-
Afr. Amer./Black--8---8-
Hispanic/Latino--24---24-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--14---14-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--------
White 2.4 5.014025 10.5 10.01400
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced
2016
% Advanced
N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing
2016
% Warning/Failing
N PPI Points
All students 20.6 26.719525 10.9 9.219525
High needs 7.4 11.96725 20.6 19.4670
Econ. Disadvantaged 11.6 18.43825 18.6 21.1380
EL and Former EL--16---16-
Students w/ disabilities 3.6 6.92925 35.7 13.82925
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--------
Asian--9---9-
Afr. Amer./Black--8---8-
Hispanic/Latino--24---24-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--14---14-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--------
White 19.4 28.614025 12.1 7.914025
Summary > 2016
2016 Science Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced
2016
% Advanced
N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing
2016
% Warning/Failing
N PPI Points
All students--------
High needs--------
Econ. Disadvantaged--------
EL and Former EL--------
Students w/ disabilities--------
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--------
Asian--------
Afr. Amer./Black--------
Hispanic/Latino--------
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--------
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--------
White--------
Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Growth
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 2015 SGP 2016 SGP SGP Change 6 Year Goal Met Safe Harbor? N PPI Points Rating
All studentsSGP = 48, Target = 51 - All Students75 or Higher All StudentsAll Students SGP = 48, Target = 51 75 or Higher All Students 27.0 48.0 21.0 51.0Yes91100Above Target
High needsSGP = 39, Target = 51 - High needs75 or Higher High needsHigh needs SGP = 39, Target = 51 75 or Higher High needs 22.0 39.0 17.0 51.0No31100Above Target
Econ. Disadvantaged --- 51.0-17--
EL and Former EL --- 51.0-5--
Students w/ disabilities --- 51.0-15--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. --- 51.0----
Asian --- 51.0-7--
Afr. Amer./Black --- 51.0-3--
Hispanic/Latino --- 51.0-12--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. --- 51.0-8--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. --- 51.0----
WhiteSGP = 44, Target = 51 - White75 or Higher WhiteWhite SGP = 44, Target = 51 75 or Higher White 25.0 44.0 19.0 51.0No61100Above Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Growth
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 2015 SGP 2016 SGP SGP Change 6 Year Goal Met Safe Harbor? N PPI Points Rating
All studentsSGP = 65, Target = 51 - All StudentsAll Students-SGP = 65, Target = 51SGP = 65, Target = 5175 or Higher All Students 35.0 65.0 30.0 51.0Yes91100Above Target
High needsSGP = 59, Target = 51 - High needsHigh needs-SGP = 59, Target = 51SGP = 59, Target = 5175 or Higher High needs 31.5 59.0 27.5 51.0Yes31100Above Target
Econ. Disadvantaged --- 51.0-17--
EL and Former EL --- 51.0-5--
Students w/ disabilities --- 51.0-15--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. --- 51.0----
Asian --- 51.0-7--
Afr. Amer./Black --- 51.0-3--
Hispanic/Latino --- 51.0-12--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. --- 51.0-8--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. --- 51.0----
WhiteSGP = 68, Target = 51 - WhiteWhite-SGP = 68, Target = 51SGP = 68, Target = 5175 or Higher White 33.5 68.0 34.5 51.0Yes61100Above Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Extra credit for English language proficiency growth
  2016 SGPA 2016 Target SGPA N Included PPI Points
All students 72.5 60.026.0025
High needs 72.5 60.026.0025
EL and Former EL- 60.026.00-
Summary > 2016
2016 Assessment Participation
  English Language Arts Mathematics Science
Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%) Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%) Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%)
All students206206100Yes206206100Yes----
High needs7474100Yes7474100Yes----
Econ. Disadvantaged4343100Yes4343100Yes----
EL and Former EL17---17-------
Students w/ disabilities3232100Yes3232100Yes----
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.------------
Asian9---9-------
Afr. Amer./Black8---8-------
Hispanic/Latino27---27-------
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.15---15-------
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.------------
White147147100Yes147147100Yes----

NOTE: In 2016, assessment participation was calculated two ways: First, the 2016 participation rate for each subgroup in each subject area test was calculated. If the actual 2016 participation rate was lower than 95 percent for any group in any subject, that rate was compared to the average of the most recent two years of assessment participation data for that group and subject. The higher of the two resulting rates was factored into the assignment of the school or district's 2016 accountability and assistance level.


School and District Profiles