Massachusetts School and District Profiles

Fort River Elementary
District not selectedDistricts School selectedSchools
Select an Org
View Previous Year
2016
View Next Year
print page

2016 Accountability Data - Fort River Elementary
Organization Information
District:Amherst (00080000)School type:Elementary School
School:Fort River Elementary (00080020)Grades served:K,01,02,03,04,05,06
Region:Pioneer ValleyTitle I status:Title I School (TA)
Accountability and Assistance Level:Level 2
 Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 77.4, Target = 89.1 - All Students75 or Higher All StudentsAll Students CPI = 77.4, Target = 89.1 75 or Higher All Students 81.3 81.4 77.4 -4.0 89.1 90.7 212060Declined
High needsCPI = 61.4, Target = 79 - High needs75 or Higher High needsHigh needs CPI = 61.4, Target = 79 75 or Higher High needs 64.0 64.2 61.4 -2.8 79.0 82.0 61030Declined
Econ. DisadvantagedCPI = 58.7, Target = 66.3 - Econ. Disadvantaged75 or Higher Econ. DisadvantagedEcon. Disadvantaged CPI = 58.7, Target = 66.3 75 or Higher Econ. Disadvantaged 63.2 63.2 58.7 -4.5 66.3 81.6 3750Declined
EL and Former ELCPI = 56.6, Target = 69.6 - EL and Former EL75 or Higher EL and Former ELEL and Former EL CPI = 56.6, Target = 69.6 75 or Higher EL and Former EL 47.9 55.3 56.6 1.3 69.6 74.0 103450Improved Below Target
Students w/ disabilitiesCPI = 52, Target = 71.9 - Students w/ disabilities75 or Higher Students w/ disabilitiesStudents w/ disabilities CPI = 52, Target = 71.9 75 or Higher Students w/ disabilities 51.8 48.9 52.0 3.1 71.9 75.9 185150Improved Below Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. -------1--
Asian -------18--
Afr. Amer./Black -------24--
Hispanic/LatinoCPI = 61.9, Target = 81.9 - Hispanic/Latino75 or Higher Hispanic/LatinoHispanic/Latino CPI = 61.9, Target = 81.9 75 or Higher Hispanic/Latino 68.9 65.2 61.9 -3.3 81.9 84.5 11440Declined
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. -------10--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. -------1--
WhiteCPI = 89.1, Target = 93.5 - White75 or Higher WhiteWhite CPI = 89.1, Target = 93.5 75 or Higher White 88.8 90.3 89.1 -1.2 93.5 94.4 5610825No Change
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 77, Target = 87.3 - All Students75 or Higher All StudentsAll Students CPI = 77, Target = 87.3 75 or Higher All Students 78.2 79.1 77.0 -2.1 87.3 89.1 1920525No Change
High needsCPI = 58.3, Target = 77.4 - High needs75 or Higher High needsHigh needs CPI = 58.3, Target = 77.4 75 or Higher High needs 61.3 59.2 58.3 -0.9 77.4 80.7 310325No Change
Econ. DisadvantagedCPI = 56.1, Target = 60.8 - Econ. Disadvantaged75 or Higher Econ. DisadvantagedEcon. Disadvantaged CPI = 56.1, Target = 60.8 75 or Higher Econ. Disadvantaged 57.2 57.2 56.1 -1.1 60.8 78.6 37425No Change
EL and Former ELCPI = 52.9, Target = 70.8 - EL and Former EL75 or Higher EL and Former ELEL and Former EL CPI = 52.9, Target = 70.8 75 or Higher EL and Former EL 50.0 50.7 52.9 2.2 70.8 75.0 53450Improved Below Target
Students w/ disabilitiesCPI = 46.6, Target = 71.7 - Students w/ disabilities75 or Higher Students w/ disabilitiesStudents w/ disabilities CPI = 46.6, Target = 71.7 75 or Higher Students w/ disabilities 51.4 50.6 46.6 -4.0 71.7 75.7 10510Declined
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. -------1--
Asian -------17--
Afr. Amer./Black -------24--
Hispanic/LatinoCPI = 63.3, Target = 72.6 - Hispanic/Latino75 or Higher Hispanic/LatinoHispanic/Latino CPI = 63.3, Target = 72.6 75 or Higher Hispanic/Latino 53.0 62.0 63.3 1.3 72.6 76.5 174550Improved Below Target
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. -------10--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. ----------
WhiteCPI = 87, Target = 92.4 - White75 or Higher WhiteWhite CPI = 87, Target = 92.4 75 or Higher White 86.9 88.8 87.0 -1.8 92.4 93.5 4410825No Change
Summary > 2016
2016 Science Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 66.2, Target = 92.6 - All Students75 or Higher All StudentsAll Students CPI = 66.2, Target = 92.6 75 or Higher All Students 87.3 82.3 66.2 -16.1 92.6 93.7 18370Declined
High needs  78.1---- 89.1-21--
Econ. Disadvantaged -------17--
EL and Former EL -------8--
Students w/ disabilities -------11--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. ----------
Asian -------3--
Afr. Amer./Black -------3--
Hispanic/Latino -------8--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. -------3--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. ----------
WhiteCPI = 76.3, Target = 95.8 - White75 or Higher WhiteWhite CPI = 76.3, Target = 95.8 75 or Higher White 92.8 87.5 76.3 -11.2 95.8 96.4 18200Declined
Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced		 2016
% Advanced		 N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing		 2016
% Warning/Failing		 N PPI Points
All students 20.0 15.52060 13.5 13.62060
High needs 4.2 2.91030 27.4 26.21030
Econ. Disadvantaged 5.9 4.0750 27.9 28.0750
EL and Former EL 0.0 0.0340 42.1 35.33425
Students w/ disabilities 0.0 0.0510 45.5 39.25125
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--1---1-
Asian--18---18-
Afr. Amer./Black--24---24-
Hispanic/Latino 8.7 4.5440 28.3 25.04425
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--10---10-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--1---1-
White 25.7 22.21080 5.0 4.61080
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced		 2016
% Advanced		 N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing		 2016
% Warning/Failing		 N PPI Points
All students 35.0 29.32050 12.7 18.02050
High needs 6.5 11.710325 27.2 35.91030
Econ. Disadvantaged 7.6 12.27425 31.8 40.5740
EL and Former EL 2.7 5.93425 32.4 44.1340
Students w/ disabilities 2.3 5.95125 39.5 56.9510
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--1---1-
Asian--17---17-
Afr. Amer./Black--24---24-
Hispanic/Latino 8.7 17.84525 23.9 35.6450
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--10---10-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--------
White 47.0 38.91080 6.0 7.41080
Summary > 2016
2016 Science Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced		 2016
% Advanced		 N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing		 2016
% Warning/Failing		 N PPI Points
All students 14.5 16.23725 5.5 27.0370
High needs--21---21-
Econ. Disadvantaged--17---17-
EL and Former EL--8---8-
Students w/ disabilities--11---11-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--------
Asian--3---3-
Afr. Amer./Black--3---3-
Hispanic/Latino--8---8-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--3---3-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--------
White 23.5 20.0200 2.9 10.0200
Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Growth
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 2015 SGP 2016 SGP SGP Change 6 Year Goal Met Safe Harbor? N PPI Points Rating
All studentsSGP = 37, Target = 51 - All Students75 or Higher All StudentsAll Students SGP = 37, Target = 51 75 or Higher All Students 48.0 37.0 -11.0 51.0No13925Below Target
High needsSGP = 32.5, Target = 51 - High needs75 or Higher High needsHigh needs SGP = 32.5, Target = 51 75 or Higher High needs 46.5 32.5 -14.0 51.0No6825Below Target
Econ. DisadvantagedSGP = 33, Target = 51 - Econ. Disadvantaged75 or Higher Econ. DisadvantagedEcon. Disadvantaged SGP = 33, Target = 51 75 or Higher Econ. Disadvantaged 44.5 33.0 -11.5 51.0No4925Below Target
EL and Former EL --- 51.0-25--
Students w/ disabilitiesSGP = 32, Target = 51 - Students w/ disabilities75 or Higher Students w/ disabilitiesStudents w/ disabilities SGP = 32, Target = 51 75 or Higher Students w/ disabilities 47.0 32.0 -15.0 51.0No3425Below Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. --- 51.0----
Asian --- 51.0-10--
Afr. Amer./Black --- 51.0-17--
Hispanic/LatinoSGP = 33, Target = 51 - Hispanic/Latino75 or Higher Hispanic/LatinoHispanic/Latino SGP = 33, Target = 51 75 or Higher Hispanic/Latino 44.0 33.0 -11.0 51.0No3125Below Target
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. --- 51.0-8--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. --- 51.0-1--
WhiteSGP = 48, Target = 51 - White75 or Higher WhiteWhite SGP = 48, Target = 51 75 or Higher White 47.0 48.0 1.0 51.0No7250Below Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Growth
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 2015 SGP 2016 SGP SGP Change 6 Year Goal Met Safe Harbor? N PPI Points Rating
All studentsSGP = 51, Target = 51 - All StudentsAll Students-SGP = 51, Target = 5175 or Higher All Students 45.0 51.0 6.0 51.0No13975On Target
High needsSGP = 39, Target = 51 - High needs75 or Higher High needsHigh needs SGP = 39, Target = 51 75 or Higher High needs 44.0 39.0 -5.0 51.0No6825Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged --- 51.0-49--
EL and Former EL --- 51.0-25--
Students w/ disabilities --- 51.0-33--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. --- 51.0----
Asian --- 51.0-9--
Afr. Amer./Black --- 51.0-17--
Hispanic/Latino --- 51.0-32--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. --- 51.0-8--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. --- 51.0-0--
WhiteSGP = 53, Target = 51 - WhiteWhite-SGP = 53, Target = 51SGP = 53, Target = 5175 or Higher White 46.0 53.0 7.0 51.0No7375On Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Extra credit for English language proficiency growth
  2016 SGPA 2016 Target SGPA N Included PPI Points
All students 66.0 60.041.0025
High needs 66.0 60.041.0025
EL and Former EL 66.0 60.041.0025
Summary > 2016
2016 Assessment Participation
  English Language Arts Mathematics Science
Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%) Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%) Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%)
All students22622298Yes22622298Yes393897Yes
High needs11811597Yes11811597Yes2222100Yes
Econ. Disadvantaged828098Yes827996Yes18---
EL and Former EL4242100Yes4242100Yes9---
Students w/ disabilities555396Yes555396Yes11---
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.1---1-------
Asian24---24---5---
Afr. Amer./Black24---24---3---
Hispanic/Latino494697Yes494796Yes8---
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.11---11---3---
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.1---1-------
White11611599Yes116116100Yes2020100Yes

NOTE: In 2016, assessment participation was calculated two ways: First, the 2016 participation rate for each subgroup in each subject area test was calculated. If the actual 2016 participation rate was lower than 95 percent for any group in any subject, that rate was compared to the average of the most recent two years of assessment participation data for that group and subject. The higher of the two resulting rates was factored into the assignment of the school or district's 2016 accountability and assistance level.

School and District Profiles