Massachusetts School and District Profiles

Fenway High School

2018

2018 Official Accountability Report - Fenway High School

Organization Information
DISTRICT NAME Boston (00350000)	TITLE I STATUS Title I School
SCHOOL Fenway High School (00350540)	GRADES SERVED 09,10,11,12
REGION Coastal	FEDERAL DESIGNATION -

Accountability Information

Overall classification	Not requiring assistance or intervention

Reason for classification
Partially meeting targets

Progress toward improvement targets	Accountability percentile
36% - Partially meeting targets	21

OVERALL AND SUBGROUP DATA
DETAILED DATA FOR EACH INDICATOR

Overall results

Progress toward improvement targets
Indicator		All students (High school grades)			Lowest performing students (High school grades)
Indicator		Points earned	Total possible points	Weight %	Points earned	Total possible points	Weight %
Achievement	English language arts achievement	0	4	-	-	-	-
	Mathematics achievement	2	4	-	-	-	-
	Science achievement	1	4	-	-	-	-
	Achievement total	3	12	40.0	-	-	-
Growth	English language arts growth	3	4	-	-	-	-
	Mathematics growth	2	4	-	-	-	-
	Growth total	5	8	20.0	-	-	-
High school completion	Four-year cohort graduation rate	2	4	-	-	-	-
	Extended engagement rate	0	4	-	-	-	-
	Annual dropout rate	4	4	-	-	-	-
	High school completion total	6	12	20.0	-	-	-
Progress toward attaining English language proficiency	English language proficiency total	2	4	10.0	-	-	-
Additional indicators	Chronic absenteeism	0	4	-	-	-	-
	Advanced coursework completion	0	4	-	-	-	-
	Additional indicators total	0	8	10.0	-	-	-
Weighted total		3.6	10.0	-	-	-	-
Percentage of possible points		36%		-	-		-
Criterion-referenced target percentage		36%
Criterion-referenced target percentage		Partially meeting targets

Subgroup results

Progress toward improvement targets
Indicator		High needs Subgroup (High school grades)
Indicator		Points earned	Total possible points	Weight %
Achievement	English language arts achievement	0	4	-
	Mathematics achievement	3	4	-
	Science achievement	1	4	-
	Achievement total	4	12	47.5
Growth	English language arts growth	2	4	-
	Mathematics growth	2	4	-
	Growth total	4	8	22.5
High school completion	Four-year cohort graduation rate	2	4	-
	Extended engagement rate	0	4	-
	Annual dropout rate	4	4	-
	High school completion total	6	12	20.0
Progress toward attaining English language proficiency	English language proficiency total	-	-	-
Additional indicators	Chronic absenteeism	0	4	-
	Advanced coursework completion	0	4	-
	Additional indicators total	0	8	10.0
Weighted total		4.0	10.7	-
Percentage of possible points		37%		-
Criterion-referenced target percentage		37%
Criterion-referenced target percentage		Partially meeting targets
Subgroup percentile
This group's overall performance relative to the performance of the same subgroup in schools administering similar assessments		40

Detailed data for each indicator

English language arts achievement - legacy MCAS Composite Performance Index (CPI) - High school About the Data
Group	2017 Achievement	2018 Achievement	Change	2018 Target	N	Points	Reason
All Students	95.6	91.2	-4.4	97.3	91	0	Declined
Lowest Performing	-	-	-	-	23	-	-
High needs	94.4	88.7	-5.7	96.6	71	0	Declined
Econ. Disadvantaged	95.4	88.4	-7.0	97.2	58	0	Declined
EL and Former EL	91.4	82.9	-8.5	94.4	41	0	Declined
Students w/ disabilities	-	-	-	-	17	-	-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Asian	-	-	-	-	1	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black	99.0	97.5	-1.5	100.0	30	4	Exceeded Target
Hispanic/Latino	94.0	87.9	-6.1	96.0	58	0	Declined
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.	-	-	-	-	1	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White	-	-	-	-	1	-	-

Mathematics achievement - legacy MCAS Composite Performance Index (CPI) - High school About the Data
Group	2017 Achievement	2018 Achievement	Change	2018 Target	N	Points	Reason
All Students	85.1	85.3	0.2	87.3	92	2	Improved Below Target
Lowest Performing	-	-	-	-	23	-	-
High needs	80.7	81.9	1.2	83.1	72	3	Met Target
Econ. Disadvantaged	83.3	81.4	-1.9	85.8	59	1	No Change
EL and Former EL	77.5	77.4	-0.1	82.6	41	1	No Change
Students w/ disabilities	-	-	-	-	17	-	-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Asian	-	-	-	-	1	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black	91.3	88.3	-3.0	96.2	30	0	Declined
Hispanic/Latino	80.4	83.5	3.1	83.6	59	3	Met Target
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.	-	-	-	-	1	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White	-	-	-	-	1	-	-

Science achievement - legacy MCAS Composite Performance Index (CPI) - High school About the Data
Group	2017 Achievement	2018 Achievement	Change	2018 Target	N	Points	Reason
All Students	84.5	82.7	-1.8	87.0	88	1	No Change
Lowest Performing	-	-	-	-	23	-	-
High needs	81.1	79.8	-1.3	83.4	68	1	No Change
Econ. Disadvantaged	80.7	78.9	-1.8	83.6	57	1	No Change
EL and Former EL	77.7	77.0	-0.7	81.0	38	1	No Change
Students w/ disabilities	-	-	-	-	16	-	-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Asian	-	-	-	-	1	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black	88.0	85.8	-2.2	91.2	30	1	No Change
Hispanic/Latino	80.9	82.3	1.4	84.9	55	2	Improved Below Target
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.	-	-	-	-	1	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White	-	-	-	-	1	-	-

English language arts growth - High school About the Data
Group	2018 Mean SGP	2018 Target	N	Points	Reason
All Students	50.0	50.0	79	3	Met Target
Lowest Performing	-	-	16	-	-
High needs	46.2	50.0	60	2	Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged	43.0	50.0	52	2	Below Target
EL and Former EL	46.6	50.0	30	2	Below Target
Students w/ disabilities	-	-	17	-	-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.	-	-	-	-	-
Asian	-	-	1	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black	47.2	50.0	28	2	Below Target
Hispanic/Latino	53.8	50.0	48	3	Met Target
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.	-	-	1	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.	-	-	-	-	-
White	-	-	1	-	-

Mathematics growth - High school About the Data
Group	2018 Mean SGP	2018 Target	N	Points	Reason
All Students	42.4	50.0	83	2	Below Target
Lowest Performing	-	-	19	-	-
High needs	42.4	50.0	64	2	Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged	41.6	50.0	56	2	Below Target
EL and Former EL	46.7	50.0	33	2	Below Target
Students w/ disabilities	-	-	17	-	-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.	-	-	-	-	-
Asian	-	-	1	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black	33.3	50.0	28	1	Below Target
Hispanic/Latino	48.2	50.0	52	2	Below Target
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.	-	-	1	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.	-	-	-	-	-
White	-	-	1	-	-

Four-year cohort graduation rate - High school About the Data
Group	2016 Rate (%)	2017 Rate (%)	Change	Target (%)	N	Points	Reason
All Students	87.7	90.0	2.3	91.5	80	2	Improved Below Target
Lowest Performing	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
High needs	85.9	86.7	0.8	90.0	60	2	Improved Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged	85.5	87.0	1.5	90.4	54	2	Improved Below Target
EL and Former EL	-	-	-	-	8	-	-
Students w/ disabilities	-	-	-	-	19	-	-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Asian	-	-	-	-	1	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black	93.1	84.8	-8.3	99.4	33	0	Declined
Hispanic/Latino	82.9	92.5	9.6	88.0	40	4	Exceeded Target
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.	-	-	-	-	1	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White	-	-	-	-	5	-	-

Extended engagement rate - High school About the Data
Group	2015 Rate (%)	2016 Rate (%)	Change	Target (%)	N	Points	Reason
All Students	96.3	94.5	-1.8	99.4	73	0	Declined
Lowest Performing	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
High needs	95.8	93.8	-2.0	100.0	64	0	Declined
Econ. Disadvantaged	95.4	93.5	-1.9	100.0	62	0	Declined
EL and Former EL	-	-	-	-	13	-	-
Students w/ disabilities	-	-	-	-	17	-	-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.	-	-	-	-	1	-	-
Asian	-	-	-	-	4	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black	100.0	100.0	0.0	100.0	29	4	Exceeded Target
Hispanic/Latino	97.2	88.6	-8.6	100.0	35	0	Declined
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.	-	-	-	-	1	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White	-	-	-	-	3	-	-

Annual dropout rate - High school About the Data
Group	2016 Rate (%)	2017 Rate (%)	Change	Target (%)	N	Points	Reason
All Students	1.5	0.3	1.2	1.4	360	4	Exceeded Target
Lowest Performing	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
High needs	0.9	0.0	0.9	1.0	241	4	Exceeded Target
Econ. Disadvantaged	1.4	0.0	1.4	1.3	174	4	Exceeded Target
EL and Former EL	0.0	0.0	0.0	1.0	72	4	Exceeded Target
Students w/ disabilities	-	-	-	-	71	-	-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Asian	-	-	-	-	13	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black	1.7	0.8	0.9	1.5	122	4	Exceeded Target
Hispanic/Latino	1.7	0.0	1.7	1.5	199	4	Exceeded Target
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.	-	-	-	-	6	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.	-	-	-	-	1	-	-
White	-	-	-	-	19	-	-

Progress toward attaining English language proficiency - High school About the Data
Group	2017 Rate (%)	2018 Rate (%)	Change	Target	N	Points	Reason
All Students	27.3	28.8	1.5	38.8	80	2	Improved Below Target
Lowest Performing	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
High needs	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Econ. Disadvantaged	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
EL and Former EL	27.3	28.8	1.5	38.8	80	2	Improved Below Target
Students w/ disabilities	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Asian	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Hispanic/Latino	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White	-	-	-	-	-	-	-

Chronic absenteeism - High school About the Data
Group	2017 Rate (%)	2018 Rate (%)	Change	Target	N	Points	Reason
All Students	19.5	21.1	-1.6	17.1	360	0	Declined
Lowest Performing	-	-	-	-	23	-	-
High needs	22.3	23.9	-1.6	19.1	268	0	Declined
Econ. Disadvantaged	25.1	26.5	-1.4	21.8	189	0	Declined
EL and Former EL	17.2	14.7	2.5	12.2	143	2	Improved Below Target
Students w/ disabilities	-	-	-	-	73	-	-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Asian	-	-	-	-	12	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black	16.7	20.5	-3.8	12.3	112	0	Declined
Hispanic/Latino	20.2	20.0	0.2	16.3	215	2	Improved Below Target
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.	-	-	-	-	5	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.	-	-	-	-	1	-	-
White	-	-	-	-	15	-	-

Advanced coursework completion - High school About the Data
Group	2017 Rate (%)	2018 Rate (%)	Change	Target	N	Points	Reason
All Students	65.6	50.3	-15.3	71.7	165	0	Declined
Lowest Performing	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
High needs	52.7	41.3	-11.4	59.0	109	0	Declined
Econ. Disadvantaged	55.9	43.9	-12.0	62.4	82	0	Declined
EL and Former EL	46.9	34.0	-12.9	51.1	53	0	Declined
Students w/ disabilities	-	-	-	-	34	-	-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Asian	-	-	-	-	9	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black	61.3	63.0	1.7	70.5	54	2	Improved Below Target
Hispanic/Latino	70.1	43.2	-26.9	77.6	88	0	Declined
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.	-	-	-	-	3	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.	-	-	-	-	1	-	-
White	-	-	-	-	10	-	-

Assessment participation About the Data
Group	English language arts					Mathematics					Science
Group	Enrolled	Assessed	%	Met Target?	Years in Rate	Enrolled	Assessed	%	Met Target?	Years in Rate	Enrolled	Assessed	%	Met Target?	Years in Rate
All Students	92	91	99	Yes	1	92	92	100	Yes	1	92	92	100	Yes	1
Lowest Performing	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
High needs	72	71	99	Yes	1	72	72	100	Yes	1	72	72	100	Yes	1
Econ. Disadvantaged	59	58	98	Yes	1	59	59	100	Yes	1	59	59	100	Yes	1
EL and Former EL	41	41	100	Yes	1	41	41	100	Yes	1	41	41	100	Yes	1
Students w/ disabilities	17	-	-	-	-	17	-	-	-	-	17	-	-	-	-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Asian	1	-	-	-	-	1	-	-	-	-	1	-	-	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black	30	30	100	Yes	1	30	30	100	Yes	1	30	30	100	Yes	1
Hispanic/Latino	59	58	98	Yes	1	59	59	100	Yes	1	59	59	100	Yes	1
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.	1	-	-	-	-	1	-	-	-	-	1	-	-	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White	1	-	-	-	-	1	-	-	-	-	1	-	-	-	-

About this Report

Overall classification: All Massachusetts districts and schools with sufficient data are classified into one of two accountability categories: districts and schools requiring assistance or intervention, and districts and schools without required assistance or intervention. The reason(s) for the district or school's classification are noted on this report.

Progress toward improvement targets: The criterion-referenced target percentage combines information about achievement, growth, high school completion, English learner progress, advanced coursework completion, and chronic absenteeism into a single number between 0 and 100. For a group to be considered to be meeting targets it must have a criterion-referenced target percentage of 75% or higher.

The criterion-referenced target percentage is calculated by dividing the weighted total points earned by the weighted total possible points. The calculation for each is displayed below.

Weighted total of points earned = (Total achievement points earned x Achievement weight) + (Total growth points earned x Growth weight) + (Total high school completion points earned x high school completion weight) + (EL progress points earned x EL progress weight) + (Total additional indicator points earned x Additional indicator weight)

Weighted total of possible points = (Total achievement possible points x Achievement weight) + (Total growth possible points x Growth weight) + (Total high school completion possible points x high school completion weight) + (EL progress possible points x EL progress weight) + (Total additional indicator possible points x Additional indicator weight)

Accountability percentile: An accountability percentile between 1 and 99 is reported for most schools. This number is an indication of the school's overall performance relative to other schools that serve similar grades, and is calculated using data for all accountability indicators. School percentiles are not calculated for districts.

Determination of need for special education technical assistance or intervention: The U.S. Department of Education requires Massachusetts to determine which districts (including single school districts) have specific needs for technical assistance or intervention in the area of special education. A district's determination is based on four categories: Meets Requirements (MR); Needs Assistance (NA); Needs Intervention (NI); and Needs Substantial Intervention (NSI). In most cases these categories correspond to the district's results, except when the district has specific compliance needs. This designation helps signal whether outcomes for all students in the district indicate progress, including that of students with disabilities, or whether technical assistance and/or intervention is needed to improve outcomes for all children, especially students with disabilities.

Resources
Interpretive Materials
Glossary of 2018 Accountability Terms