Massachusetts School and District Profiles

Northbridge High

Districts Schools
Select an Org
print page

2019 Official Accountability Report - Northbridge High

Organization Information
DISTRICT NAME
Northbridge (02140000)
TITLE I STATUS
Non-Title I School
REGION
West/Central
GRADES SERVED
09,10,11,12

Accountability Information

Overall classificationNot requiring assistance or intervention
Reason for classification
Moderate progress toward targets
Progress toward improvement targetsAccountability percentile
40% - Moderate progress toward targets24

Overall progress toward improvement targets

 20182019
Annual criterion-referenced target percentage31%46%
Weight40%60%
Cumulative criterion-referenced target percentage
(2018 x 40%) + (2019 x 60%)
40%
Moderate progress toward targets
Weighted total------
Percentage of possible points ----
Criterion-referenced target percentage46%
Weighted total------ Percentage of possible points ---- Criterion-referenced target percentage31%

Overall progress toward improvement targets

 20182019
Annual criterion-referenced target percentage39%36%
Weight40%60%
Cumulative criterion-referenced target percentage
(2018 x 40%) + (2019 x 60%)
37%
Moderate progress toward targets
Weighted total--- Percentage of possible points -- 2019 Annual criterion-referenced target percentage36% Weighted total--- Percentage of possible points -- 2018 Annual criterion-referenced target percentage39%

Subgroup percentile

This group's overall performance relative to the performance of the same subgroup in schools serving similar grades
17

Detailed data for each indicator

English language arts achievement - MCAS Composite Performance Index (CPI) - High school
Group 2018 Achievement 2019 Achievement Change 2019 Target N Points Reason
All Students 93.6 97.7 4.1 95.1 1224Exceeded Target
Lowest Performing 80.8 92.0 11.2 83.6 284Exceeded Target
High needs 84.9 94.1 9.2 87.0 384Exceeded Target
Econ. Disadvantaged 87.9 97.5 9.6 90.0 304Exceeded Target
EL and Former EL---- 2--
Students w/ disabilities---- 13--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian---- 2--
Afr. Amer./Black-------
Hispanic/Latino---- 6--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 2--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White 93.4 97.8 4.4 95.0 1124Exceeded Target

Mathematics achievement - MCAS Composite Performance Index (CPI) - High school
Group 2018 Achievement 2019 Achievement Change 2019 Target N Points Reason
All Students 88.9 90.2 1.3 90.7 1173Met Target
Lowest Performing 61.7 62.0 0.3 65.8 252Improved Below Target
High needs 79.7 76.4 -3.3 82.3 360Declined
Econ. Disadvantaged 84.7 80.4 -4.3 87.3 280Declined
EL and Former EL---- 2--
Students w/ disabilities---- 13--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian---- 2--
Afr. Amer./Black-------
Hispanic/Latino---- 6--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 2--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White 88.6 90.9 2.3 90.6 1073Met Target

Science achievement - MCAS Composite Performance Index (CPI) - High school
Group 2018 Achievement 2019 Achievement Change 2019 Target N Points Reason
All Students 91.4 86.4 -5.0 93.3 1210Declined
Lowest Performing 75.8 60.7 -15.1 79.0 280Declined
High needs 86.5 76.3 -10.2 88.9 380Declined
Econ. Disadvantaged 89.3 76.7 -12.6 91.6 300Declined
EL and Former EL---- 2--
Students w/ disabilities---- 13--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian---- 2--
Afr. Amer./Black-------
Hispanic/Latino---- 6--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 2--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White 90.7 86.7 -4.0 92.5 1110Declined

English language arts growth - High school
Group 2019 Mean SGP N Points Reason
All Students 49.2 1132Typical Growth - Low
Lowest Performing 36.5 261Low Growth
High needs 42.7 352Typical Growth - Low
Econ. Disadvantaged 44.5 282Typical Growth - Low
EL and Former EL- 2--
Students w/ disabilities- 11--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.----
Asian- 2--
Afr. Amer./Black----
Hispanic/Latino- 6--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.- 2--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.----
White 49.7 1032Typical Growth - Low

Mathematics growth - High school
Group 2019 Mean SGP N Points Reason
All Students 34.1 1091Low Growth
Lowest Performing 24.4 240Very Low Growth
High needs 24.5 330Very Low Growth
Econ. Disadvantaged 22.8 260Very Low Growth
EL and Former EL- 2--
Students w/ disabilities- 11--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.----
Asian- 2--
Afr. Amer./Black----
Hispanic/Latino- 6--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.- 2--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.----
White 34.8 991Low Growth

Four-year cohort graduation rate - High school
Group 2017 Rate (%) 2018 Rate (%) Change Target (%) N Points Reason
All Students 94.9 91.9 -3.0 97.0 1600Declined
Lowest Performing-------
High needs 90.2 82.8 -7.4 94.1 640Declined
Econ. Disadvantaged 88.9 87.0 -1.9 93.0 460Declined
EL and Former EL---- 3--
Students w/ disabilities---- 26--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian---- 2--
Afr. Amer./Black---- 1--
Hispanic/Latino---- 19--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 4--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White 95.8 91.8 -4.0 98.3 1340Declined

Extended engagement rate - High school
Group 2016 Rate (%) 2017 Rate (%) Change Target (%) N Points Reason
All Students 90.8 95.6 4.8 92.7 1364Exceeded Target
Lowest Performing-------
High needs 82.1 91.8 9.7 85.4 614Exceeded Target
Econ. Disadvantaged 81.5 90.7 9.2 84.4 544Exceeded Target
EL and Former EL---- 1--
Students w/ disabilities---- 20--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian---- 3--
Afr. Amer./Black-------
Hispanic/Latino---- 7--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 6--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White 92.6 96.7 4.1 94.4 1204Exceeded Target

Annual dropout rate - High school
Group 2017 Rate (%) 2018 Rate (%) Change Target (%) N Points Reason
All Students 1.0 2.6 1.6 1.0 5670Declined
Lowest Performing-------
High needs 2.1 7.0 4.9 1.9 1860Declined
Econ. Disadvantaged 1.4 5.8 4.4 1.3 1390Declined
EL and Former EL---- 5--
Students w/ disabilities---- 78--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian---- 5--
Afr. Amer./Black---- 3--
Hispanic/Latino---- 40--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 14--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.---- 1--
White 0.8 2.4 1.6 1.0 5040Declined

Progress toward attaining English language proficiency - High school
Group 2018 Rate (%) 2019 Rate (%) Change Target N Points Reason
All Students-------
Lowest Performing-------
High needs-------
Econ. Disadvantaged-------
EL and Former EL-------
Students w/ disabilities-------
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian-------
Afr. Amer./Black-------
Hispanic/Latino-------
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.-------
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White-------

Chronic absenteeism - High school
Group 2018 Rate (%) 2019 Rate (%) Change Target N Points Reason
All Students 21.4 19.1 -2.3 19.1 5543Met Target
Lowest Performing 6.7 32.1 25.4 0.9 280Declined
High needs 35.7 31.4 -4.3 31.9 1883Met Target
Econ. Disadvantaged 36.0 31.7 -4.3 30.9 1392Improved Below Target
EL and Former EL---- 14--
Students w/ disabilities---- 58--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian---- 6--
Afr. Amer./Black---- 7--
Hispanic/Latino---- 31--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 16--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.---- 1--
White 20.7 18.9 -1.8 18.2 4932Improved Below Target

Advanced coursework completion - High school
Group 2018 Rate (%) 2019 Rate (%) Change Target N Points Reason
All Students 61.1 65.4 4.3 67.6 2542Improved Below Target
Lowest Performing-------
High needs 37.0 49.4 12.4 44.4 774Exceeded Target
Econ. Disadvantaged 41.6 53.7 12.1 49.4 674Exceeded Target
EL and Former EL---- 5--
Students w/ disabilities---- 16--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian---- 1--
Afr. Amer./Black---- 3--
Hispanic/Latino---- 15--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 6--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White 62.4 67.2 4.8 68.9 2292Improved Below Target


About this Report

Overall classification: All Massachusetts districts and schools with sufficient data are classified into one of two accountability categories: districts and schools requiring assistance or intervention, and districts and schools not requiring assistance or intervention. The reason(s) for the district's or school's classification are noted on this report.

Progress toward improvement targets: The criterion-referenced target percentage combines multiple years of data related to achievement, growth, high school completion, English learner progress, advanced coursework completion, and chronic absenteeism into a single number between 0 and 100. For a group to be considered to be meeting targets it must have a cumulative criterion-referenced target percentage of 75% or higher.

The annual criterion-referenced target percentage is calculated by dividing the weighted total points earned by the weighted total possible points. The calculation for each is displayed below.

Weighted total of points earned = (Total achievement points earned x Achievement weight) + (Total growth points earned x Growth weight) + (Total high school completion points earned x high school completion weight) + (EL progress points earned x EL progress weight) + (Total additional indicator points earned x Additional indicator weight)

The cumulative criterion-referenced target percentage represents a weighted average of the annual criterion-referenced target percentages. At a minimum, a group must have an annual criterion-referenced target percentage for the most recent year in order to receive a cumulative percentage.

Accountability percentile: An accountability percentile between 1 and 99 is reported for most schools. This number is an indication of the school's overall performance relative to other schools that serve similar grades, and is calculated using multiple years of data for all accountability indicators. School percentiles are not calculated for districts.


Resources
Interpretive Materials Interpretive Materials
Glossary of Accountability Terms Glossary of 2019 Accountability Terms

School and District Profiles