Massachusetts School and District Profiles

Uxbridge

Districts
Schools

2016

2016 Accountability Data - Uxbridge

District Information

District:

Uxbridge (03040000)

Region:

Central

Title I Status:

Yes

Accountability and Assistance Level:

Level 2

Summary > 2016

2016 English Language Arts Proficiency Gap Narrowing About the Data
	0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100	Baseline CPI	2015 CPI	2016 CPI	CPI Change	2016 Target	6 Year Goal	CPI Percentile in School Type	N	PPI Points	Rating
All students		89.8	87.9	87.4	-0.5	94.1	94.9	34	972	25	No Change
High needs		78.9	77.3	75.6	-1.7	87.7	89.5	32	292	25	No Change
Econ. Disadvantaged		80.4	80.4	78.7	-1.7	82.0	90.2	27	181	25	No Change
EL and Former EL		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	15	-	-
Students w/ disabilities		71.4	66.2	66.6	0.4	83.3	85.7	40	145	50	Improved Below Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	4	-	-
Asian		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	19	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	8	-	-
Hispanic/Latino		81.1	88.6	80.8	-7.8	89.0	90.6	44	39	0	Declined
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	23	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White		90.2	88.2	87.8	-0.4	94.3	95.1	28	878	25	No Change

Summary > 2016

2016 Mathematics Proficiency Gap Narrowing About the Data
	0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100	Baseline CPI	2015 CPI	2016 CPI	CPI Change	2016 Target	6 Year Goal	CPI Percentile in School Type	N	PPI Points	Rating
All students		81.8	79.8	80.0	0.2	89.4	90.9	28	975	50	Improved Below Target
High needs		70.0	65.8	64.5	-1.3	82.5	85.0	21	294	25	No Change
Econ. Disadvantaged		68.1	68.1	71.3	3.2	70.8	84.1	34	181	75	On Target
EL and Former EL		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	15	-	-
Students w/ disabilities		61.6	53.6	50.7	-2.9	77.6	80.8	18	148	0	Declined
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	4	-	-
Asian		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	18	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	8	-	-
Hispanic/Latino		72.0	80.0	78.3	-1.7	83.7	86.0	69	38	25	No Change
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	21	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White		82.3	80.1	79.9	-0.2	89.7	91.2	18	885	25	No Change

Summary > 2016

2016 Science Proficiency Gap Narrowing About the Data
	0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100	Baseline CPI	2015 CPI	2016 CPI	CPI Change	2016 Target	6 Year Goal	CPI Percentile in School Type	N	PPI Points	Rating
All students		81.4	82.4	80.7	-1.7	89.2	90.7	42	386	25	No Change
High needs		67.0	76.5	68.8	-7.7	80.8	83.5	49	109	0	Declined
Econ. Disadvantaged		79.6	79.6	71.6	-8.0	81.3	89.8	48	66	0	Declined
EL and Former EL		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	7	-	-
Students w/ disabilities		66.4	64.8	60.2	-4.6	80.4	83.2	46	59	0	Declined
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	2	-	-
Asian		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	8	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	5	-	-
Hispanic/Latino		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	14	-	-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	7	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White		81.7	83.2	80.9	-2.3	89.3	90.9	34	350	25	No Change

Summary > 2016

2016 English Language Arts Extra Credit About the Data
	Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more)				Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
	2015 % Advanced	2016 % Advanced	N	PPI Points	2015 % Warning/Failing	2016 % Warning/Failing	N	PPI Points
All students	11.0	12.8	972	25	4.2	5.1	972	0
High needs	5.4	5.1	292	0	10.7	13.4	292	0
Econ. Disadvantaged	6.7	7.7	181	25	7.7	13.3	181	0
EL and Former EL	-	-	15	-	-	-	15	-
Students w/ disabilities	1.4	1.4	145	0	19.3	20.0	145	0
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.	-	-	4	-	-	-	4	-
Asian	-	-	19	-	-	-	19	-
Afr. Amer./Black	-	-	8	-	-	-	8	-
Hispanic/Latino	0.0	10.3	39	25	8.6	12.8	39	0
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.	-	-	23	-	-	-	23	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White	11.5	13.0	878	25	3.8	4.6	878	0

Summary > 2016

2016 Mathematics Extra Credit About the Data
	Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more)				Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
	2015 % Advanced	2016 % Advanced	N	PPI Points	2015 % Warning/Failing	2016 % Warning/Failing	N	PPI Points
All students	21.3	24.1	975	25	12.3	11.5	975	0
High needs	9.3	9.2	294	0	28.0	27.9	294	0
Econ. Disadvantaged	10.8	12.2	181	25	23.1	18.2	181	25
EL and Former EL	-	-	15	-	-	-	15	-
Students w/ disabilities	5.5	4.1	148	0	46.2	45.9	148	0
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.	-	-	4	-	-	-	4	-
Asian	-	-	18	-	-	-	18	-
Afr. Amer./Black	-	-	8	-	-	-	8	-
Hispanic/Latino	20.0	18.4	38	0	14.3	13.2	38	0
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.	-	-	21	-	-	-	21	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White	21.5	24.3	885	25	12.1	11.5	885	0

Summary > 2016

2016 Science Extra Credit About the Data
	Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more)				Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
	2015 % Advanced	2016 % Advanced	N	PPI Points	2015 % Warning/Failing	2016 % Warning/Failing	N	PPI Points
All students	10.5	11.1	386	0	7.5	7.3	386	0
High needs	2.5	8.3	109	25	11.8	17.4	109	0
Econ. Disadvantaged	3.9	10.6	66	25	10.5	18.2	66	0
EL and Former EL	-	-	7	-	-	-	7	-
Students w/ disabilities	1.9	5.1	59	25	22.2	25.4	59	0
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.	-	-	2	-	-	-	2	-
Asian	-	-	8	-	-	-	8	-
Afr. Amer./Black	-	-	5	-	-	-	5	-
Hispanic/Latino	-	-	14	-	-	-	14	-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.	-	-	7	-	-	-	7	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White	10.9	11.4	350	0	6.6	7.1	350	0

Summary > 2016

2016 English Language Arts Growth About the Data
	0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100	2015 SGP	2016 SGP	SGP Change	6 Year Goal	Met Safe Harbor?	N	PPI Points	Rating
All students		41.5	50.0	8.5	51.0	No	781	50	Below Target
High needs		43.0	43.0	0.0	51.0	No	211	50	Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged		41.5	43.0	1.5	51.0	No	135	50	Below Target
EL and Former EL		-	-	-	51.0	-	8	-	-
Students w/ disabilities		40.0	39.0	-1.0	51.0	No	101	25	Below Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.		-	-	-	51.0	-	3	-	-
Asian		-	-	-	51.0	-	16	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black		-	-	-	51.0	-	7	-	-
Hispanic/Latino		46.5	47.5	1.0	51.0	No	28	50	Below Target
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.		-	-	-	51.0	-	22	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.		-	-	-	51.0	-	-	-	-
White		40.0	49.0	9.0	51.0	No	705	50	Below Target

Summary > 2016

2016 Mathematics Growth About the Data
	0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100	2015 SGP	2016 SGP	SGP Change	6 Year Goal	Met Safe Harbor?	N	PPI Points	Rating
All students		39.0	50.0	11.0	51.0	No	783	75	On Target
High needs		32.0	46.0	14.0	51.0	No	214	75	On Target
Econ. Disadvantaged		33.0	52.5	19.5	51.0	Yes	136	100	Above Target
EL and Former EL		-	-	-	51.0	-	8	-	-
Students w/ disabilities		28.5	38.0	9.5	51.0	No	105	75	On Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.		-	-	-	51.0	-	3	-	-
Asian		-	-	-	51.0	-	15	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black		-	-	-	51.0	-	7	-	-
Hispanic/Latino		57.5	51.0	-6.5	51.0	No	29	75	On Target
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.		-	-	-	51.0	-	20	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.		-	-	-	51.0	-	-	-	-
White		39.0	50.0	11.0	51.0	No	709	75	On Target

Summary > 2016

2016 Extra credit for English language proficiency growth About the Data
	2016 SGPA	2016 Target	SGPA N Included	PPI Points
All students	-	60.0	7.00	-
High needs	-	60.0	7.00	-
EL and Former EL	-	60.0	7.00	-

Summary > 2016

2015 4-Year Cohort Graduation Rate About the Data
	0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100	2014 Rate	2015 Rate	Change	Annual Target	6 Year Goal	N	PPI Points	Rating
All students		84.6	70.6	-14.0	80.0	90.0	126	0	Declined
High needs		64.4	63.8	-0.6	80.0	90.0	47	25	No Change
Econ. Disadvantaged		-	-	-	80.0	90.0	-	-	-
EL and Former EL		-	-	-	80.0	90.0	1	-	-
Students w/ disabilities		56.0	69.6	13.6	80.0	90.0	23	50	Improved Below Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.		-	-	-	80.0	90.0	-	-	-
Asian		-	-	-	80.0	90.0	1	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black		-	-	-	80.0	90.0	2	-	-
Hispanic/Latino		-	-	-	80.0	90.0	12	-	-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.		-	-	-	80.0	90.0	6	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.		-	-	-	80.0	90.0	-	-	-
White		84.3	77.1	-7.2	80.0	90.0	105	0	Declined

Summary > 2016

2014 5-Year Cohort Graduation Rate About the Data
	0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100	2013 Rate	2014 Rate	Change	Annual Target	6 Year Goal	N	PPI Points	Rating
All students		89.4	88.9	-0.5	85.0	95.0	117	75	On Target
High needs		73.2	73.3	0.1	85.0	95.0	45	25	No Change
Econ. Disadvantaged		-	-	-	85.0	95.0	-	-	-
EL and Former EL		-	-	-	85.0	95.0	-	-	-
Students w/ disabilities		-	-	-	85.0	95.0	25	-	-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.		-	-	-	85.0	95.0	-	-	-
Asian		-	-	-	85.0	95.0	-	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black		-	-	-	85.0	95.0	-	-	-
Hispanic/Latino		-	-	-	85.0	95.0	2	-	-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.		-	-	-	85.0	95.0	-	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.		-	-	-	85.0	95.0	-	-	-
White		89.7	88.7	-1.0	85.0	95.0	115	75	On Target

Summary > 2016

2015 Annual Dropout Rate About the Data
	0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20	Baseline Rate	2014 Rate	2015 Rate	Change	Annual Target	6 Year Goal	Dropout Percentile in School Type	N	PPI Points	Rating
All students		3.1	1.3	3.1	-1.8	1.8	1.6	15	485	0	Declined
High needs		7.8	2.8	5.1	-2.3	4.6	3.9	15	118	0	Declined
Econ. Disadvantaged		7.1	-	-	-	-	3.6	-	56	-	-
EL and Former EL		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	2	-	-
Students w/ disabilities		12.7	3.3	2.7	0.6	7.4	6.4	48	73	100	Above Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	1	-	-
Asian		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	14	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	5	-	-
Hispanic/Latino		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	19	-	-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	5	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White		3.0	1.2	2.9	-1.7	1.8	1.5	13	441	0	Declined

Summary > 2016

2016 Assessment Participation About the Data
	English Language Arts				Mathematics				Science
	Enrolled	Assessed	%	Met Target (95%)	Enrolled	Assessed	%	Met Target (95%)	Enrolled	Assessed	%	Met Target (95%)
All students	990	973	98	Yes	989	976	99	Yes	403	399	99	Yes
High needs	302	293	97	Yes	302	295	98	Yes	117	115	98	Yes
Econ. Disadvantaged	187	181	97	Yes	187	181	97	Yes	72	70	97	Yes
EL and Former EL	16	-	-	-	16	-	-	-	7	-	-	-
Students w/ disabilities	152	145	95	Yes	152	148	97	Yes	63	62	98	Yes
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.	4	-	-	-	4	-	-	-	2	-	-	-
Asian	20	-	-	-	20	-	-	-	8	-	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black	8	-	-	-	8	-	-	-	5	-	-	-
Hispanic/Latino	40	39	98	Yes	40	38	95	Yes	17	-	-	-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.	23	-	-	-	21	-	-	-	7	-	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White	894	878	98	Yes	895	885	99	Yes	364	360	99	Yes

NOTE: In 2016, assessment participation was calculated two ways: First, the 2016 participation rate for each subgroup in each subject area test was calculated. If the actual 2016 participation rate was lower than 95 percent for any group in any subject, that rate was compared to the average of the most recent two years of assessment participation data for that group and subject. The higher of the two resulting rates was factored into the assignment of the school or district's 2016 accountability and assistance level.