Massachusetts School and District Profiles

Harvard

Districts
Schools

2016

2016 Accountability Data - Harvard

District Information

District:

Harvard (01250000)

Region:

Central

Title I Status:

Yes

Accountability and Assistance Level:

Level 2

Summary > 2016

2016 English Language Arts Proficiency Gap Narrowing About the Data
	0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100	Baseline CPI	2015 CPI	2016 CPI	CPI Change	2016 Target	6 Year Goal	CPI Percentile in School Type	N	PPI Points	Rating
All students		95.9	96.4	94.7	-1.7	97.6	98.0	86	626	75	On Target
High needs		86.2	86.6	81.0	-5.6	92.0	93.1	68	120	0	Declined
Econ. Disadvantaged		91.4	91.4	83.6	-7.8	92.1	95.7	56	38	0	Declined
EL and Former EL		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	11	-	-
Students w/ disabilities		86.1	83.4	75.9	-7.5	91.9	93.1	73	82	0	Declined
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Asian		95.4	97.6	95.9	-1.7	97.3	97.7	65	73	100	Above Target
Afr. Amer./Black		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	14	-	-
Hispanic/Latino		93.2	-	-	-	-	96.6	-	26	-	-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	8	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White		96.3	96.8	95.0	-1.8	97.8	98.2	84	505	75	On Target

Summary > 2016

2016 Mathematics Proficiency Gap Narrowing About the Data
	0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100	Baseline CPI	2015 CPI	2016 CPI	CPI Change	2016 Target	6 Year Goal	CPI Percentile in School Type	N	PPI Points	Rating
All students		92.0	94.4	92.2	-2.2	95.3	96.0	88	625	75	On Target
High needs		78.8	82.0	77.1	-4.9	87.6	89.4	89	120	0	Declined
Econ. Disadvantaged		87.1	87.1	83.1	-4.0	88.2	93.6	91	37	75	On Target
EL and Former EL		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	11	-	-
Students w/ disabilities		78.5	78.2	72.0	-6.2	87.5	89.3	89	82	0	Declined
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Asian		93.1	98.3	98.3	0.0	96.0	96.6	93	72	100	Above Target
Afr. Amer./Black		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	14	-	-
Hispanic/Latino		86.3	-	-	-	-	93.2	-	25	-	-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	8	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White		92.2	94.7	92.1	-2.6	95.5	96.1	87	505	75	On Target

Summary > 2016

2016 Science Proficiency Gap Narrowing About the Data
	0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100	Baseline CPI	2015 CPI	2016 CPI	CPI Change	2016 Target	6 Year Goal	CPI Percentile in School Type	N	PPI Points	Rating
All students		94.6	96.0	94.2	-1.8	96.9	97.3	98	270	100	Above Target
High needs		82.7	89.8	79.0	-10.8	89.9	91.4	92	50	75	On Target
Econ. Disadvantaged		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	14	-	-
EL and Former EL		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	3	-	-
Students w/ disabilities		83.2	85.6	74.3	-11.3	90.2	91.6	91	35	75	On Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Asian		88.5	97.7	97.5	-0.2	93.3	94.3	96	30	100	Above Target
Afr. Amer./Black		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	6	-	-
Hispanic/Latino		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	7	-	-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	4	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White		95.2	95.9	94.9	-1.0	97.2	97.6	98	222	100	Above Target

Summary > 2016

2016 English Language Arts Extra Credit About the Data
	Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more)				Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
	2015 % Advanced	2016 % Advanced	N	PPI Points	2015 % Warning/Failing	2016 % Warning/Failing	N	PPI Points
All students	39.3	38.3	626	0	1.4	2.4	626	0
High needs	15.2	14.2	120	0	8.0	11.7	120	0
Econ. Disadvantaged	34.5	31.6	38	0	3.4	13.2	38	0
EL and Former EL	-	-	11	-	-	-	11	-
Students w/ disabilities	6.3	7.3	82	25	11.3	14.6	82	0
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Asian	54.8	58.9	73	0	1.4	1.4	73	0
Afr. Amer./Black	-	-	14	-	-	-	14	-
Hispanic/Latino	-	-	26	-	-	-	26	-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.	-	-	8	-	-	-	8	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White	37.9	37.2	505	0	1.0	2.2	505	0

Summary > 2016

2016 Mathematics Extra Credit About the Data
	Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more)				Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
	2015 % Advanced	2016 % Advanced	N	PPI Points	2015 % Warning/Failing	2016 % Warning/Failing	N	PPI Points
All students	50.5	51.4	625	0	2.6	3.5	625	0
High needs	19.8	21.7	120	0	10.8	13.3	120	0
Econ. Disadvantaged	27.6	29.7	37	0	6.9	13.5	37	0
EL and Former EL	-	-	11	-	-	-	11	-
Students w/ disabilities	16.5	14.6	82	0	15.2	17.1	82	0
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Asian	74.0	75.0	72	0	1.4	0.0	72	25
Afr. Amer./Black	-	-	14	-	-	-	14	-
Hispanic/Latino	-	-	25	-	-	-	25	-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.	-	-	8	-	-	-	8	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White	47.6	48.3	505	0	2.1	3.8	505	0

Summary > 2016

2016 Science Extra Credit About the Data
	Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more)				Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
	2015 % Advanced	2016 % Advanced	N	PPI Points	2015 % Warning/Failing	2016 % Warning/Failing	N	PPI Points
All students	40.7	41.5	270	0	0.7	2.2	270	0
High needs	12.2	12.0	50	0	4.1	10.0	50	0
Econ. Disadvantaged	-	-	14	-	-	-	14	-
EL and Former EL	-	-	3	-	-	-	3	-
Students w/ disabilities	6.1	5.7	35	0	6.1	14.3	35	0
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Asian	66.7	60.0	30	0	3.0	0.0	30	25
Afr. Amer./Black	-	-	6	-	-	-	6	-
Hispanic/Latino	-	-	7	-	-	-	7	-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.	-	-	4	-	-	-	4	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White	38.6	39.6	222	0	0.4	1.4	222	0

Summary > 2016

2016 English Language Arts Growth About the Data
	0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100	2015 SGP	2016 SGP	SGP Change	6 Year Goal	Met Safe Harbor?	N	PPI Points	Rating
All students		60.0	59.0	-1.0	51.0	No	477	75	On Target
High needs		43.0	50.0	7.0	51.0	No	83	50	Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged		-	-	-	51.0	-	23	-	-
EL and Former EL		-	-	-	51.0	-	7	-	-
Students w/ disabilities		39.0	49.0	10.0	51.0	No	57	75	On Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.		-	-	-	51.0	-	-	-	-
Asian		57.0	66.0	9.0	51.0	No	56	100	Above Target
Afr. Amer./Black		-	-	-	51.0	-	11	-	-
Hispanic/Latino		-	-	-	51.0	-	16	-	-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.		-	-	-	51.0	-	6	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.		-	-	-	51.0	-	-	-	-
White		61.0	58.5	-2.5	51.0	No	388	75	On Target

Summary > 2016

2016 Mathematics Growth About the Data
	0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100	2015 SGP	2016 SGP	SGP Change	6 Year Goal	Met Safe Harbor?	N	PPI Points	Rating
All students		56.5	50.0	-6.5	51.0	No	508	50	Below Target
High needs		47.5	45.0	-2.5	51.0	No	85	50	Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged		-	-	-	51.0	-	24	-	-
EL and Former EL		-	-	-	51.0	-	7	-	-
Students w/ disabilities		50.0	43.0	-7.0	51.0	No	57	50	Below Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.		-	-	-	51.0	-	-	-	-
Asian		62.5	53.0	-9.5	51.0	No	61	75	On Target
Afr. Amer./Black		-	-	-	51.0	-	11	-	-
Hispanic/Latino		-	-	-	51.0	-	14	-	-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.		-	-	-	51.0	-	8	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.		-	-	-	51.0	-	-	-	-
White		56.0	49.5	-6.5	51.0	No	414	50	Below Target

Summary > 2016

2016 Extra credit for English language proficiency growth About the Data
	2016 SGPA	2016 Target	SGPA N Included	PPI Points
All students	-	60.0	10.00	-
High needs	-	60.0	10.00	-
EL and Former EL	-	60.0	10.00	-

Summary > 2016

2015 4-Year Cohort Graduation Rate About the Data
	0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100	2014 Rate	2015 Rate	Change	Annual Target	6 Year Goal	N	PPI Points	Rating
All students		97.1	92.3	-4.8	80.0	90.0	117	75	On Target
High needs		-	-	-	80.0	90.0	22	-	-
Econ. Disadvantaged		-	-	-	80.0	90.0	-	-	-
EL and Former EL		-	-	-	80.0	90.0	-	-	-
Students w/ disabilities		-	-	-	80.0	90.0	17	-	-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.		-	-	-	80.0	90.0	1	-	-
Asian		-	-	-	80.0	90.0	8	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black		-	-	-	80.0	90.0	-	-	-
Hispanic/Latino		-	-	-	80.0	90.0	2	-	-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.		-	-	-	80.0	90.0	4	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.		-	-	-	80.0	90.0	1	-	-
White		96.7	94.1	-2.6	80.0	90.0	101	75	On Target

Summary > 2016

2014 5-Year Cohort Graduation Rate About the Data
	0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100	2013 Rate	2014 Rate	Change	Annual Target	6 Year Goal	N	PPI Points	Rating
All students		98.3	97.1	-1.2	85.0	95.0	103	100	Above Target
High needs		-	-	-	85.0	95.0	17	-	-
Econ. Disadvantaged		-	-	-	85.0	95.0	-	-	-
EL and Former EL		-	-	-	85.0	95.0	-	-	-
Students w/ disabilities		-	-	-	85.0	95.0	14	-	-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.		-	-	-	85.0	95.0	-	-	-
Asian		-	-	-	85.0	95.0	7	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black		-	-	-	85.0	95.0	4	-	-
Hispanic/Latino		-	-	-	85.0	95.0	1	-	-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.		-	-	-	85.0	95.0	-	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.		-	-	-	85.0	95.0	-	-	-
White		98.1	96.7	-1.4	85.0	95.0	91	100	Above Target

Summary > 2016

2015 Annual Dropout Rate About the Data
	0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20	Baseline Rate	2014 Rate	2015 Rate	Change	Annual Target	6 Year Goal	Dropout Percentile in School Type	N	PPI Points	Rating
All students		0.0	0.0	1.0	-1.0	0.0	0.0	53	414	0	Declined
High needs		0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	94	45	100	Above Target
Econ. Disadvantaged		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	4	-	-
EL and Former EL		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	1	-	-
Students w/ disabilities		0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	91	40	100	Above Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Asian		0.0	0.0	2.6	-2.6	0.0	0.0	9	38	0	Declined
Afr. Amer./Black		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	2	-	-
Hispanic/Latino		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	4	-	-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	8	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	1	-	-
White		0.0	0.0	0.3	-0.3	0.0	0.0	81	361	75	On Target

Summary > 2016

2016 Assessment Participation About the Data
	English Language Arts				Mathematics				Science
	Enrolled	Assessed	%	Met Target (95%)	Enrolled	Assessed	%	Met Target (95%)	Enrolled	Assessed	%	Met Target (95%)
All students	629	627	100	Yes	629	626	100	Yes	277	275	99	Yes
High needs	122	121	99	Yes	122	121	99	Yes	52	51	98	Yes
Econ. Disadvantaged	39	39	100	Yes	38	38	100	Yes	15	-	-	-
EL and Former EL	12	-	-	-	12	-	-	-	3	-	-	-
Students w/ disabilities	83	82	99	Yes	83	82	99	Yes	37	36	97	Yes
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Asian	73	73	100	Yes	73	72	99	Yes	31	31	100	Yes
Afr. Amer./Black	14	-	-	-	14	-	-	-	6	-	-	-
Hispanic/Latino	27	27	100	Yes	26	26	100	Yes	8	-	-	-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.	8	-	-	-	8	-	-	-	4	-	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White	507	505	100	Yes	507	505	100	Yes	227	225	99	Yes

NOTE: In 2016, assessment participation was calculated two ways: First, the 2016 participation rate for each subgroup in each subject area test was calculated. If the actual 2016 participation rate was lower than 95 percent for any group in any subject, that rate was compared to the average of the most recent two years of assessment participation data for that group and subject. The higher of the two resulting rates was factored into the assignment of the school or district's 2016 accountability and assistance level.