Massachusetts School and District Profiles

Douglas

Districts
Schools

2016

2016 Accountability Data - Douglas

District Information

District:

Douglas (00770000)

Region:

Central

Title I Status:

Yes

Accountability and Assistance Level:

Level 2

Summary > 2016

2016 English Language Arts Proficiency Gap Narrowing About the Data
	0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100	Baseline CPI	2015 CPI	2016 CPI	CPI Change	2016 Target	6 Year Goal	CPI Percentile in School Type	N	PPI Points	Rating
All students		87.8	88.3	90.3	2.0	92.9	93.9	56	846	50	Improved Below Target
High needs		75.4	73.3	78.9	5.6	85.7	87.7	51	253	50	Improved Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged		79.8	79.8	83.3	3.5	81.5	89.9	54	145	100	Above Target
EL and Former EL		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	1	-	-
Students w/ disabilities		69.3	62.4	69.3	6.9	82.1	84.7	52	149	50	Improved Below Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Asian		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	17	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	5	-	-
Hispanic/Latino		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	23	-	-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	18	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	3	-	-
White		87.7	88.3	90.6	2.3	92.8	93.9	51	780	50	Improved Below Target

Summary > 2016

2016 Mathematics Proficiency Gap Narrowing About the Data
	0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100	Baseline CPI	2015 CPI	2016 CPI	CPI Change	2016 Target	6 Year Goal	CPI Percentile in School Type	N	PPI Points	Rating
All students		78.7	80.1	82.5	2.4	87.6	89.4	43	848	50	Improved Below Target
High needs		61.8	62.8	66.7	3.9	77.7	80.9	31	256	50	Improved Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged		70.4	70.4	73.6	3.2	72.9	85.2	49	146	75	On Target
EL and Former EL		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	1	-	-
Students w/ disabilities		57.1	51.4	55.6	4.2	75.0	78.6	40	151	50	Improved Below Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Asian		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	17	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	5	-	-
Hispanic/Latino		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	23	-	-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	18	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	3	-	-
White		78.6	80.2	82.7	2.5	87.5	89.3	35	782	50	Improved Below Target

Summary > 2016

2016 Science Proficiency Gap Narrowing About the Data
	0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100	Baseline CPI	2015 CPI	2016 CPI	CPI Change	2016 Target	6 Year Goal	CPI Percentile in School Type	N	PPI Points	Rating
All students		82.2	83.6	79.2	-4.4	89.6	91.1	34	339	0	Declined
High needs		69.4	68.4	67.1	-1.3	82.2	84.7	35	98	25	No Change
Econ. Disadvantaged		73.1	73.1	75.0	1.9	75.3	86.6	68	50	75	On Target
EL and Former EL		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Students w/ disabilities		64.5	57.7	60.2	2.5	79.3	82.3	46	61	50	Improved Below Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Asian		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	7	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Hispanic/Latino		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	11	-	-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	5	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	1	-	-
White		82.0	83.6	79.4	-4.2	89.5	91.0	26	315	0	Declined

Summary > 2016

2016 English Language Arts Extra Credit About the Data
	Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more)				Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
	2015 % Advanced	2016 % Advanced	N	PPI Points	2015 % Warning/Failing	2016 % Warning/Failing	N	PPI Points
All students	17.3	19.6	846	25	5.0	4.6	846	0
High needs	4.4	7.9	253	25	15.1	12.3	253	25
Econ. Disadvantaged	6.1	10.3	145	25	9.5	11.0	145	0
EL and Former EL	-	-	1	-	-	-	1	-
Students w/ disabilities	1.4	3.4	149	25	23.0	19.5	149	25
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Asian	-	-	17	-	-	-	17	-
Afr. Amer./Black	-	-	5	-	-	-	5	-
Hispanic/Latino	-	-	23	-	-	-	23	-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.	-	-	18	-	-	-	18	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.	-	-	3	-	-	-	3	-
White	17.1	19.4	780	25	5.1	4.6	780	0

Summary > 2016

2016 Mathematics Extra Credit About the Data
	Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more)				Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
	2015 % Advanced	2016 % Advanced	N	PPI Points	2015 % Warning/Failing	2016 % Warning/Failing	N	PPI Points
All students	19.4	23.9	848	25	11.5	10.6	848	0
High needs	6.8	9.8	256	25	26.5	25.0	256	0
Econ. Disadvantaged	7.5	13.0	146	25	17.8	17.1	146	0
EL and Former EL	-	-	1	-	-	-	1	-
Students w/ disabilities	4.3	5.3	151	25	39.1	36.4	151	0
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Asian	-	-	17	-	-	-	17	-
Afr. Amer./Black	-	-	5	-	-	-	5	-
Hispanic/Latino	-	-	23	-	-	-	23	-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.	-	-	18	-	-	-	18	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.	-	-	3	-	-	-	3	-
White	19.9	24.4	782	25	10.9	10.2	782	0

Summary > 2016

2016 Science Extra Credit About the Data
	Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more)				Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
	2015 % Advanced	2016 % Advanced	N	PPI Points	2015 % Warning/Failing	2016 % Warning/Failing	N	PPI Points
All students	20.3	9.1	339	0	6.1	8.6	339	0
High needs	3.3	3.1	98	0	16.5	17.3	98	0
Econ. Disadvantaged	3.8	4.0	50	0	15.4	2.0	50	25
EL and Former EL	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Students w/ disabilities	1.8	1.6	61	0	25.5	27.9	61	0
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Asian	-	-	7	-	-	-	7	-
Afr. Amer./Black	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Hispanic/Latino	-	-	11	-	-	-	11	-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.	-	-	5	-	-	-	5	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.	-	-	1	-	-	-	1	-
White	20.5	8.9	315	0	5.8	8.3	315	0

Summary > 2016

2016 English Language Arts Growth About the Data
	0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100	2015 SGP	2016 SGP	SGP Change	6 Year Goal	Met Safe Harbor?	N	PPI Points	Rating
All students		51.0	55.0	4.0	51.0	Yes	705	75	On Target
High needs		41.0	53.0	12.0	51.0	Yes	200	75	On Target
Econ. Disadvantaged		50.0	52.0	2.0	51.0	Yes	119	75	On Target
EL and Former EL		-	-	-	51.0	-	1	-	-
Students w/ disabilities		36.0	53.0	17.0	51.0	Yes	112	100	Above Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.		-	-	-	51.0	-	-	-	-
Asian		-	-	-	51.0	-	11	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black		-	-	-	51.0	-	4	-	-
Hispanic/Latino		-	-	-	51.0	-	17	-	-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.		-	-	-	51.0	-	14	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.		-	-	-	51.0	-	3	-	-
White		51.0	54.0	3.0	51.0	Yes	656	75	On Target

Summary > 2016

2016 Mathematics Growth About the Data
	0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100	2015 SGP	2016 SGP	SGP Change	6 Year Goal	Met Safe Harbor?	N	PPI Points	Rating
All students		45.0	48.0	3.0	51.0	Yes	704	75	On Target
High needs		42.0	43.0	1.0	51.0	No	201	50	Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged		47.0	46.5	-0.5	51.0	Yes	120	75	On Target
EL and Former EL		-	-	-	51.0	-	1	-	-
Students w/ disabilities		40.0	38.0	-2.0	51.0	No	112	25	Below Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.		-	-	-	51.0	-	-	-	-
Asian		-	-	-	51.0	-	11	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black		-	-	-	51.0	-	4	-	-
Hispanic/Latino		-	-	-	51.0	-	17	-	-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.		-	-	-	51.0	-	13	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.		-	-	-	51.0	-	3	-	-
White		45.0	48.0	3.0	51.0	Yes	656	75	On Target

Summary > 2016

2016 Extra credit for English language proficiency growth About the Data
	2016 SGPA	2016 Target	SGPA N Included	PPI Points
All students	-	60.0	1.00	-
High needs	-	60.0	1.00	-
EL and Former EL	-	60.0	1.00	-

Summary > 2016

2015 4-Year Cohort Graduation Rate About the Data
	0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100	2014 Rate	2015 Rate	Change	Annual Target	6 Year Goal	N	PPI Points	Rating
All students		92.1	91.7	-0.4	80.0	90.0	109	75	On Target
High needs		82.4	81.4	-1.0	80.0	90.0	43	75	On Target
Econ. Disadvantaged		-	-	-	80.0	90.0	-	-	-
EL and Former EL		-	-	-	80.0	90.0	-	-	-
Students w/ disabilities		-	-	-	80.0	90.0	23	-	-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.		-	-	-	80.0	90.0	-	-	-
Asian		-	-	-	80.0	90.0	1	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black		-	-	-	80.0	90.0	-	-	-
Hispanic/Latino		-	-	-	80.0	90.0	1	-	-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.		-	-	-	80.0	90.0	1	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.		-	-	-	80.0	90.0	-	-	-
White		92.0	92.5	0.5	80.0	90.0	106	75	On Target

Summary > 2016

2014 5-Year Cohort Graduation Rate About the Data
	0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100	2013 Rate	2014 Rate	Change	Annual Target	6 Year Goal	N	PPI Points	Rating
All students		87.1	92.1	5.0	85.0	95.0	127	75	On Target
High needs		71.9	82.4	10.5	85.0	95.0	34	50	Improved Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged		-	-	-	85.0	95.0	-	-	-
EL and Former EL		-	-	-	85.0	95.0	-	-	-
Students w/ disabilities		-	-	-	85.0	95.0	19	-	-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.		-	-	-	85.0	95.0	-	-	-
Asian		-	-	-	85.0	95.0	1	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black		-	-	-	85.0	95.0	-	-	-
Hispanic/Latino		-	-	-	85.0	95.0	-	-	-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.		-	-	-	85.0	95.0	1	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.		-	-	-	85.0	95.0	-	-	-
White		87.6	92.0	4.4	85.0	95.0	125	75	On Target

Summary > 2016

2015 Annual Dropout Rate About the Data
	0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20	Baseline Rate	2014 Rate	2015 Rate	Change	Annual Target	6 Year Goal	Dropout Percentile in School Type	N	PPI Points	Rating
All students		2.7	1.3	0.5	0.8	1.6	1.4	75	409	75	On Target
High needs		8.0	1.5	0.9	0.6	4.7	4.0	79	110	100	Above Target
Econ. Disadvantaged		2.2	-	-	-	-	1.1	-	45	-	-
EL and Former EL		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Students w/ disabilities		6.8	1.8	0.0	1.8	4.0	3.4	91	76	100	Above Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Asian		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	2	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	1	-	-
Hispanic/Latino		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	8	-	-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	2	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White		2.8	1.1	0.5	0.6	1.6	1.4	67	396	75	On Target

Summary > 2016

2016 Assessment Participation About the Data
	English Language Arts				Mathematics				Science
	Enrolled	Assessed	%	Met Target (95%)	Enrolled	Assessed	%	Met Target (95%)	Enrolled	Assessed	%	Met Target (95%)
All students	849	846	100	Yes	851	848	100	Yes	346	345	100	Yes
High needs	254	253	100	Yes	256	256	100	Yes	103	103	100	Yes
Econ. Disadvantaged	146	145	99	Yes	146	146	100	Yes	52	52	100	Yes
EL and Former EL	1	-	-	-	1	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Students w/ disabilities	149	149	100	Yes	151	151	100	Yes	64	64	100	Yes
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Asian	17	-	-	-	17	-	-	-	7	-	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black	5	-	-	-	5	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Hispanic/Latino	23	-	-	-	23	-	-	-	11	-	-	-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.	18	-	-	-	18	-	-	-	5	-	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.	3	-	-	-	3	-	-	-	1	-	-	-
White	783	780	100	Yes	785	782	100	Yes	322	321	100	Yes

NOTE: In 2016, assessment participation was calculated two ways: First, the 2016 participation rate for each subgroup in each subject area test was calculated. If the actual 2016 participation rate was lower than 95 percent for any group in any subject, that rate was compared to the average of the most recent two years of assessment participation data for that group and subject. The higher of the two resulting rates was factored into the assignment of the school or district's 2016 accountability and assistance level.