2017 Report Card - Wm J Dean Vocational Technical High
Wm J Dean Vocational Technical High (01370605)
Alan Gates, Principal Mailing Address: 1045 Main Street Holyoke, MA 01040
Phone: (413) 534-2071 FAX: (413) 536-9694
This report card contains information required by the federal Elementary and Secondary Education Act (ESEA) for our school and district including: student enrollment and teacher qualifications, student achievement, accountability, and the progress our school is making toward narrowing proficiency gaps for different groups of students.
Enrollment and Educator Data (2016-17 School Year)
Note: School achievement percentiles (1-99) compare each group’s average scaled score to the average scaled scores of the same group from all public schools across the state. Only students enrolled in the same school since October 1 are included in calculations, and groups with fewer than 10 students do not receive percentiles.
This organization is currently closed.
2017 MCAS Results by Student Group by Grade and Subject
NOTE: First-year ELL students are not included in achievement level or CPI results. However, first-year ELL students who took the ACCESS for ELLs test are counted as ELA participants; in addition, first-year ELL students who are present for Mathematics/Science and Technology/Engineering are counted as Mathematics/Science and Technology/Engineering participants.
* Note: Grade 10 Science and Technology/Engineering results represent the highest achievement level attained by students by the end of grade 10. In addition, only students enrolled for two full years in the state/district/school are included in state/district/school achievement level results.
ALL GRADES - SCIENCE AND TECH/ENG
Student Group
School
District
State
Stud. Incl
Part. Rate
% at Each Level
CPI
SGP
Incl. in SGP (#)
Stud. Incl
Part. Rate
% at Each Level
CPI
SGP
Incl. in SGP (#)
Stud. Incl
Part. Rate
% at Each Level
CPI
SGP
Incl. in SGP (#)
#
%
A
P
NI
W
#
%
A
P
NI
W
#
%
A
P
NI
W
Subgroups
Students w/ disabilities
24
96
0
8
50
42
46.9
N/A
N/A
246
96
0
3
26
71
39.3
N/A
N/A
39,271
98
4
18
41
38
59.1
N/A
N/A
EL and Former EL
16
95
0
6
56
38
45.3
N/A
N/A
308
97
0
5
29
66
36.9
N/A
N/A
20,120
99
3
16
44
37
54.7
N/A
N/A
Econ. Disadvantaged
46
97
0
13
59
28
54.9
N/A
N/A
764
97
2
12
36
51
46.7
N/A
N/A
66,270
99
7
25
43
26
65.2
N/A
N/A
High needs
51
97
0
12
61
27
54.9
N/A
N/A
815
97
2
11
35
52
46.5
N/A
N/A
93,555
99
6
25
43
26
65.2
N/A
N/A
Afr. Amer./Black
1
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
28
97
0
14
57
29
56.3
N/A
N/A
17,823
99
6
25
43
26
64.6
N/A
N/A
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
1
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
460
98
10
31
40
20
71.6
N/A
N/A
Asian
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
6
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
13,554
100
30
38
25
7
86.1
N/A
N/A
Hispanic/Latino
48
97
0
8
63
29
53.1
N/A
N/A
792
96
2
11
36
51
46.1
N/A
N/A
37,380
99
6
24
42
27
63.2
N/A
N/A
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
10
100
0
50
20
30
67.5
N/A
N/A
6,659
99
20
35
33
13
79.1
N/A
N/A
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
174
99
16
31
34
19
74.6
N/A
N/A
White
3
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
148
99
13
33
33
21
73.6
N/A
N/A
133,323
99
20
41
31
8
83.6
N/A
N/A
Male
29
97
0
17
55
28
56.9
N/A
N/A
526
97
3
14
38
44
51.0
N/A
N/A
106,879
99
17
36
33
14
77.8
N/A
N/A
Female
23
97
0
4
70
26
52.2
N/A
N/A
459
96
3
16
34
47
50.8
N/A
N/A
102,501
99
17
37
34
12
78.8
N/A
N/A
EL
15
94
0
7
53
40
45.0
N/A
N/A
229
97
0
1
21
78
30.9
N/A
N/A
11,915
98
1
7
40
52
43.7
N/A
N/A
Ever EL
30
97
0
13
63
23
58.3
N/A
N/A
409
97
2
9
32
57
42.7
N/A
N/A
34,852
99
8
25
40
26
64.4
N/A
N/A
Migrant
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
43
98
0
16
16
67
41.9
N/A
N/A
All Students
2017
52
97
0
12
62
27
54.8
N/A
N/A
985
97
3
15
36
46
50.9
N/A
N/A
209,416
99
17
36
34
13
78.3
N/A
N/A
2016
69
97
0
16
42
42
49.6
N/A
N/A
1,050
98
4
17
36
43
54.8
N/A
N/A
208,262
99
17
37
33
13
78.7
N/A
N/A
2017 Official Accountability Data - Wm J Dean Vocational Technical High
Accountability Information
Accountability and Assistance Level
Level 4
Among lowest achieving and least improving schools Persistently low graduation rate for one or more groups
Focus on Students w/disabilities -Hispanic/Latino -ELL and former ELL -High needs -All students -
This school's overall performance relative to other schools in same school type (School percentiles: 1-99)
All students:
1
Lowest performing
Highest performing
This school’s progress toward narrowing proficiency gaps (Cumulative Progress and Performance Index: 1-100)
Student Group (Click group to view subgroup data)
On Target = 75 or higher -
Less progress
More progress
All students
36
Did Not Meet Target
High needs
45
Did Not Meet Target
Econ. Disadvantaged
-
EL and Former EL
-
Students w/ disabilities
-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.
-
Asian
-
Afr. Amer./Black
-
Hispanic/Latino
36
Did Not Meet Target
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.
-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.
-
White
-
Wm J Dean Vocational Technical High: Accountability Data Detail
2017 English Language Arts Proficiency Gap Narrowing
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100
Baseline CPI
2016 CPI
2017 CPI
CPI Change
2017 Target
6 Year Goal
CPI Percentile in School Type
N
PPI Points
Rating
All students
72.3
79.9
68.5
-11.4
86.2
86.2
1
62
0
Declined
High needs
70.7
78.7
68.0
-10.7
85.4
85.4
1
61
0
Declined
Econ. Disadvantaged
72.1
79.6
67.9
-11.7
76.8
86.1
1
56
0
Declined
EL and Former EL
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
19
-
-
Students w/ disabilities
56.7
57.0
59.0
2.0
78.4
78.4
1
25
50
Improved Below Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Asian
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Afr. Amer./Black
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
2
-
-
Hispanic/Latino
71.2
79.0
68.0
-11.0
85.6
85.6
1
57
0
Declined
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
White
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
3
-
-
2017 Mathematics Proficiency Gap Narrowing
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100
Baseline CPI
2016 CPI
2017 CPI
CPI Change
2017 Target
6 Year Goal
CPI Percentile in School Type
N
PPI Points
Rating
All students
63.7
53.8
47.6
-6.2
81.9
81.9
1
62
0
Declined
High needs
61.6
52.3
47.1
-5.2
80.8
80.8
1
61
0
Declined
Econ. Disadvantaged
50.9
52.1
46.9
-5.2
59.1
75.5
1
56
0
Declined
EL and Former EL
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
19
-
-
Students w/ disabilities
45.5
25.0
32.3
7.3
72.8
72.8
1
24
50
Improved Below Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Asian
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Afr. Amer./Black
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
2
-
-
Hispanic/Latino
61.8
53.4
48.2
-5.2
80.9
80.9
1
56
0
Declined
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
White
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
4
-
-
2017 Science Proficiency Gap Narrowing
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100
Baseline CPI
2016 CPI
2017 CPI
CPI Change
2017 Target
6 Year Goal
CPI Percentile in School Type
N
PPI Points
Rating
All students
53.1
49.6
54.8
5.2
76.6
76.6
1
52
50
Improved Below Target
High needs
51.1
48.0
54.9
6.9
75.6
75.6
1
51
50
Improved Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged
45.5
48.7
54.9
6.2
54.6
72.8
1
46
75
On Target
EL and Former EL
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
16
-
-
Students w/ disabilities
43.5
33.0
46.9
13.9
71.8
71.8
2
24
50
Improved Below Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Asian
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Afr. Amer./Black
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
1
-
-
Hispanic/Latino
51.3
48.8
53.1
4.3
75.7
75.7
2
48
50
Improved Below Target
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
White
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
3
-
-
2017 English Language Arts Extra Credit
Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more)
Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2016 % Advanced
2017 % Advanced
N
PPI Points
2016 % Warning/Failing
2017 % Warning/Failing
N
PPI Points
All students
1.4
0.0
62
0
12.5
22.6
62
0
High needs
1.5
0.0
61
0
13.4
23.0
61
0
Econ. Disadvantaged
1.7
0.0
56
0
13.3
23.2
56
0
EL and Former EL
-
-
19
-
-
-
19
-
Students w/ disabilities
0.0
0.0
25
0
32.0
28.0
25
25
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Asian
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Afr. Amer./Black
-
-
2
-
-
-
2
-
Hispanic/Latino
1.5
0.0
57
0
13.2
22.8
57
0
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
White
-
-
3
-
-
-
3
-
2017 Mathematics Extra Credit
Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more)
Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2016 % Advanced
2017 % Advanced
N
PPI Points
2016 % Warning/Failing
2017 % Warning/Failing
N
PPI Points
All students
4.2
0.0
62
0
40.3
50.0
62
0
High needs
4.5
0.0
61
0
43.9
50.8
61
0
Econ. Disadvantaged
3.3
0.0
56
0
43.3
50.0
56
0
EL and Former EL
-
-
19
-
-
-
19
-
Students w/ disabilities
0.0
0.0
24
0
84.0
70.8
24
25
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Asian
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Afr. Amer./Black
-
-
2
-
-
-
2
-
Hispanic/Latino
4.5
0.0
56
0
40.3
50.0
56
0
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
White
-
-
4
-
-
-
4
-
2017 Science Extra Credit
Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more)
Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2016 % Advanced
2017 % Advanced
N
PPI Points
2016 % Warning/Failing
2017 % Warning/Failing
N
PPI Points
All students
0.0
0.0
52
0
42.0
26.9
52
25
High needs
0.0
0.0
51
0
45.3
27.5
51
25
Econ. Disadvantaged
0.0
0.0
46
0
42.4
28.3
46
25
EL and Former EL
-
-
16
-
-
-
16
-
Students w/ disabilities
0.0
0.0
24
0
80.0
41.7
24
25
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Asian
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Afr. Amer./Black
-
-
1
-
-
-
1
-
Hispanic/Latino
0.0
0.0
48
0
43.1
29.2
48
25
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
White
-
-
3
-
-
-
3
-
2017 English Language Arts Growth
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100
2016 SGP
2017 SGP
SGP Change
6 Year Goal
Met Safe Harbor?
N
PPI Points
Rating
All students
36.0
25.0
-11.0
51.0
No
51
0
Below Target
High needs
35.5
22.5
-13.0
51.0
No
50
0
Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged
35.0
18.5
-16.5
51.0
No
46
0
Below Target
EL and Former EL
-
-
-
51.0
-
15
-
-
Students w/ disabilities
33.5
21.5
-12.0
51.0
No
20
0
Below Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.
-
-
-
51.0
-
-
-
-
Asian
-
-
-
51.0
-
-
-
-
Afr. Amer./Black
-
-
-
51.0
-
1
-
-
Hispanic/Latino
37.0
18.5
-18.5
51.0
No
48
0
Below Target
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.
-
-
-
51.0
-
-
-
-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.
-
-
-
51.0
-
-
-
-
White
-
-
-
51.0
-
2
-
-
2017 Mathematics Growth
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100
2016 SGP
2017 SGP
SGP Change
6 Year Goal
Met Safe Harbor?
N
PPI Points
Rating
All students
27.0
22.0
-5.0
51.0
No
51
0
Below Target
High needs
27.0
22.0
-5.0
51.0
No
50
0
Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged
19.5
21.0
1.5
51.0
No
46
50
Below Target
EL and Former EL
-
-
-
51.0
-
16
-
-
Students w/ disabilities
12.5
22.5
10.0
51.0
No
20
75
On Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.
-
-
-
51.0
-
-
-
-
Asian
-
-
-
51.0
-
-
-
-
Afr. Amer./Black
-
-
-
51.0
-
1
-
-
Hispanic/Latino
26.0
21.5
-4.5
51.0
No
48
0
Below Target
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.
-
-
-
51.0
-
-
-
-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.
-
-
-
51.0
-
-
-
-
White
-
-
-
51.0
-
2
-
-
2017 Extra credit for English language proficiency growth
2017 SGPA
2017 Target
SGPA N Included
PPI Points
All students
55.0
60.0
22
0
High needs
55.0
60.0
22
0
EL and Former EL
-
60.0
22
-
2016 4-Year Cohort Graduation Rate
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100
2015 Rate
2016 Rate
Change
Annual Target
6 Year Goal
N
PPI Points
Rating
All students
39.5
40.0
0.5
80.0
90.0
115
25
No Change
High needs
40.8
39.8
-1.0
80.0
90.0
113
25
No Change
Econ. Disadvantaged
-
-
-
80.0
90.0
-
-
-
EL and Former EL
-
-
-
80.0
90.0
34
-
-
Students w/ disabilities
19.7
25.6
5.9
80.0
90.0
43
50
Improved Below Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.
-
-
-
80.0
90.0
-
-
-
Asian
-
-
-
80.0
90.0
-
-
-
Afr. Amer./Black
-
-
-
80.0
90.0
-
-
-
Hispanic/Latino
39.3
41.9
2.6
80.0
90.0
105
50
Improved Below Target
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.
-
-
-
80.0
90.0
-
-
-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.
-
-
-
80.0
90.0
-
-
-
White
-
-
-
80.0
90.0
10
-
-
2015 5-Year Cohort Graduation Rate
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100
2014 Rate
2015 Rate
Change
Annual Target
6 Year Goal
N
PPI Points
Rating
All students
45.8
46.8
1.0
85.0
95.0
124
25
No Change
High needs
45.0
47.5
2.5
85.0
95.0
120
50
Improved Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged
-
-
-
85.0
95.0
-
-
-
EL and Former EL
-
-
-
85.0
95.0
50
-
-
Students w/ disabilities
32.4
23.0
-9.4
85.0
95.0
61
0
Declined
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.
-
-
-
85.0
95.0
-
-
-
Asian
-
-
-
85.0
95.0
-
-
-
Afr. Amer./Black
-
-
-
85.0
95.0
5
-
-
Hispanic/Latino
43.8
44.6
0.8
85.0
95.0
112
25
No Change
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.
-
-
-
85.0
95.0
-
-
-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.
-
-
-
85.0
95.0
-
-
-
White
-
-
-
85.0
95.0
7
-
-
2016 Annual Dropout Rate
0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20
Baseline Rate
2015 Rate
2016 Rate
Change
Annual Target
6 Year Goal
Dropout Percentile in School Type
N
PPI Points
Rating
All students
14.1
13.2
6.7
6.5
7.1
7.1
14
360
75
On Target
High needs
14.0
13.3
6.3
7.0
7.0
7.0
16
316
75
On Target
Econ. Disadvantaged
12.1
12.1
5.8
6.3
11.1
6.1
19
258
100
Above Target
EL and Former EL
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
105
-
-
Students w/ disabilities
17.5
14.8
3.1
11.7
8.8
8.8
34
131
100
Above Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
0
-
-
Asian
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
2
-
-
Afr. Amer./Black
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
10
-
-
Hispanic/Latino
14.2
13.4
6.9
6.5
7.1
7.1
18
331
75
On Target
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
0
-
-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
0
-
-
White
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
17
-
-
2017 Assessment Participation
English Language Arts
Mathematics
Science
Enrolled
Assessed
%
Met Target
Enrolled
Assessed
%
Met Target
Enrolled
Assessed
%
Met Target
All students
66
64
97
Yes
65
63
97
Yes
65
63
97
Yes
High needs
64
62
97
Yes
63
61
97
Yes
63
61
97
Yes
Econ. Disadvantaged
59
57
97
Yes
58
56
97
Yes
58
56
97
Yes
EL and Former EL
20
19
95
Yes
20
19
95
Yes
20
19
95
Yes
Students w/ disabilities
25
25
100
Yes
25
24
96
Yes
25
24
96
Yes
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Asian
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Afr. Amer./Black
3
-
-
-
3
-
-
-
3
-
-
-
Hispanic/Latino
59
58
98
Yes
58
56
97
Yes
58
56
97
Yes
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
White
4
-
-
-
4
-
-
-
4
-
-
-
NOTE: In 2017, assessment participation was calculated two ways: First, the 2017 participation rate for each subgroup in each subject area test was calculated. If the actual 2017 participation rate was lower than 95 percent (high schools) or 90 percent (schools and districts administering Next-Generation MCAS test in grades 3-8) for any group in any subject, that rate was compared to the average of the most recent two years of assessment participation data for that group and subject. The higher of the two resulting rates was factored into the assignment of the school or district's 2017 accountability and assistance level.
2015 Massachusetts and Nationwide NAEP Results by Student Group Average Scaled Scores and Percentages of Students at Each Achievement Level
NAEP, or the National Assessment of Educational Progress, is often called the "Nation's Report Card." It is the only measure of student achievement in the United States that allows you to compare the performance of students in Massachusetts with the performance of students across the nation or in other states. Students take the NAEP in reading and mathematics every two years. When reviewing these results, it is important to keep in mind that the NAEP results are based on a small sample of students across Massachusetts, not the population of Massachusetts students. For more information, please visit http://www.doe.mass.edu/mcas/naep/faq.html.
The following symbols are used to denote the NAEP achievement levels: A for Advanced, P+ for Proficient and above, B+ for Basic and above, BB for Below Basic. The symbol "#" means that the estimated number of students rounds to zero.
GRADE LEVEL 4 - READING
Student Group
Massachusetts
National Public
Avg. Scaled Score
% at Each Level
Avg. Scaled Score
% at Each Level
A
P+
B+
BB
% Assessed
A
P+
B+
BB
% Assessed
All Students
235
14
50
82
18
100
221
8
35
68
32
100
Stud. w/ Disab
209
2
20
55
45
18
186
2
12
33
67
13
LEP
200
1
12
44
56
9
189
1
8
32
68
11
African American/Black
217
3
25
65
35
7
206
2
18
51
49
15
Asian/Pacific Islander
249
31
68
89
11
6
238
19
53
81
19
5
Hispanic/Latino
215
3
25
61
39
19
208
3
21
54
46
26
White
242
17
58
89
11
65
232
11
46
79
21
49
Econ. Disadvantaged
220
5
29
67
33
42
209
3
21
56
44
55
GRADE LEVEL 4 - MATHEMATICS
Student Group
Massachusetts
National Public
Avg. Scaled Score
% at Each Level
Avg. Scaled Score
% at Each Level
A
P+
B+
BB
% Assessed
A
P+
B+
BB
% Assessed
All Students
251
13
54
90
10
100
240
7
39
81
19
100
Stud. w/ Disab
231
4
25
74
26
18
217
2
16
54
46
13
LEP
223
2
17
65
35
9
218
1
15
57
43
11
African American/Black
230
1
26
73
27
7
224
1
19
65
35
15
Asian/Pacific Islander
273
38
81
98
2
6
256
22
61
90
10
5
Hispanic/Latino
232
3
28
74
26
19
230
3
26
73
27
26
White
256
15
62
95
5
65
248
10
51
90
10
49
Econ. Disadvantaged
236
4
31
80
20
42
229
2
24
72
28
55
GRADE LEVEL 8 - READING
Student Group
Massachusetts
National Public
Avg. Scaled Score
% at Each Level
Avg. Scaled Score
% at Each Level
A
P+
B+
BB
% Assessed
A
P+
B+
BB
% Assessed
All Students
274
6
46
83
17
100
264
3
33
75
25
100
Stud. w/ Disab
245
1
15
54
46
18
229
#
8
36
64
12
LEP
225
#
6
35
65
5
223
#
3
28
72
6
African American/Black
252
1
18
63
37
9
247
1
15
58
42
15
Asian/Pacific Islander
290
18
64
90
10
7
279
9
50
85
15
6
Hispanic/Latino
249
#
17
61
39
14
253
1
20
65
35
25
White
281
7
53
90
10
67
273
4
42
84
16
51
Econ. Disadvantaged
260
3
28
71
29
44
253
1
20
64
36
52
GRADE LEVEL 8 - MATHEMATICS
Student Group
Massachusetts
National Public
Avg. Scaled Score
% at Each Level
Avg. Scaled Score
% at Each Level
A
P+
B+
BB
% Assessed
A
P+
B+
BB
% Assessed
All Students
297
18
51
81
19
100
281
8
32
70
30
100
Stud. w/ Disab
264
3
16
51
49
18
246
1
8
32
68
12
LEP
251
2
10
38
62
6
246
1
5
31
69
6
African American/Black
268
4
22
54
46
9
260
1
12
47
53
15
Asian/Pacific Islander
324
44
73
94
6
7
305
25
58
86
14
6
Hispanic/Latino
271
4
24
61
39
15
269
3
19
60
40
25
White
304
20
59
88
12
66
291
10
42
81
19
51
Econ. Disadvantaged
279
7
31
67
33
43
268
2
18
58
42
52
Participation Rates for Students with Disabilities and for English Language Learner Students
The NAEP program has always endeavored to assess all students selected for testing. In all NAEP schools, accommodations are provided as necessary for students with disabilities and/or English language learners. School staff who are familiar with these students are asked a series of questions to help them decide whether each student should participate in the assessment and whether the student needs accommodations.
