Michael C Devoll, Principal Mailing Address: 135 Marion Rd Mattapoisett, MA 02739
Phone: (508) 758-3745 FAX: (508) 758-3167 Website: http://https://www.oldrochester.org
This report card contains information required by the federal Elementary and Secondary Education Act (ESEA) for our school and district including: student enrollment and teacher qualifications, student achievement, accountability, and the progress our school is making toward narrowing proficiency gaps for different groups of students.
Enrollment and Educator Data (2015-16 School Year)
Percentage of Teachers Licensed in Teaching Assignment
100.0
100.0
97.4
Total Number of Classes in Core Academic Areas
249
416
348,472
Percentage of Core Academic Classes Taught by Teachers Who are Highly Qualified
100.0
100.0
96.3
Percentage of Core Academic Classes Taught by Teachers Who are Not Highly Qualified
0.0
0.0
3.7
Student/Teacher Ratio
15.2 to 1
14.0 to 1
13.2 to 1
Percentage of Public Elementary and Secondary School Teachers Issued Waivers
-
0.0
0.9
2016 MCAS Results by Student Group by Grade and Subject
NOTE: First-year ELL students are not included in achievement level or CPI results. However, first-year ELL students who took the ACCESS for ELLs test are counted as ELA participants; in addition, first-year ELL students who are present for Mathematics/Science and Technology/Engineering are counted as Mathematics/Science and Technology/Engineering participants. Please see the principal's administration manual (PAM) for details.
* Note: Grade 10 Science and Technology/Engineering results represent the highest achievement level attained by students by the end of grade 10. In addition, only students enrolled for two full years in the state/district/school are included in state/district/school achievement level results.
ALL GRADES - ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS
Student Group
School
District
State
Stud. Incl
Part. Rate
% at Each Level
CPI
SGP
Incl. in SGP (#)
Stud. Incl
Part. Rate
% at Each Level
CPI
SGP
Incl. in SGP (#)
Stud. Incl
Part. Rate
% at Each Level
CPI
SGP
Incl. in SGP (#)
#
%
A
P
NI
W
#
%
A
P
NI
W
#
%
A
P
NI
W
Subgroups
Students w/ disabilities
33
97
3
85
9
3
95.5
50.0
27
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
EL and Former EL
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Econ. Disadvantaged
17
100
41
53
6
0
98.5
N/A
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
High needs
45
98
18
73
7
2
96.7
52.0
39
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Afr. Amer./Black
5
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.
2
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Asian
6
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Hispanic/Latino
2
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.
2
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
White
183
99
57
40
2
1
99.2
46.0
171
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Male
99
100
43
54
2
1
98.7
48.5
92
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Female
101
97
66
33
1
0
99.8
45.5
94
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
EL
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Ever EL
3
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
All Students
2016
200
99
55
43
2
1
99.3
46.5
186
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
2015
185
98
53
45
1
1
99.1
37.0
177
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
216,396
99
-
-
-
-
-
50.0
175,934
ALL GRADES - MATHEMATICS
Student Group
School
District
State
Stud. Incl
Part. Rate
% at Each Level
CPI
SGP
Incl. in SGP (#)
Stud. Incl
Part. Rate
% at Each Level
CPI
SGP
Incl. in SGP (#)
Stud. Incl
Part. Rate
% at Each Level
CPI
SGP
Incl. in SGP (#)
#
%
A
P
NI
W
#
%
A
P
NI
W
#
%
A
P
NI
W
Subgroups
Students w/ disabilities
34
100
15
35
38
12
78.7
49.5
28
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
EL and Former EL
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Econ. Disadvantaged
16
94
38
50
13
0
95.3
N/A
14
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
High needs
45
98
22
40
29
9
83.9
49.5
38
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Afr. Amer./Black
5
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.
1
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Asian
7
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Hispanic/Latino
2
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.
2
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
White
183
99
66
25
8
2
96.2
50.0
170
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Male
97
98
60
27
10
3
94.8
47.0
89
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Female
103
99
68
22
9
1
95.6
53.5
96
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
EL
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Ever EL
3
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
All Students
2016
200
99
64
25
10
2
95.3
50.0
185
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
2015
187
99
63
26
8
3
95.3
42.0
179
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
216,363
99
-
-
-
-
-
50.0
176,568
ALL GRADES - SCIENCE AND TECH/ENG
Student Group
School
District
State
Stud. Incl
Part. Rate
% at Each Level
CPI
SGP
Incl. in SGP (#)
Stud. Incl
Part. Rate
% at Each Level
CPI
SGP
Incl. in SGP (#)
Stud. Incl
Part. Rate
% at Each Level
CPI
SGP
Incl. in SGP (#)
#
%
A
P
NI
W
#
%
A
P
NI
W
#
%
A
P
NI
W
Subgroups
Students w/ disabilities
32
97
3
28
66
3
73.4
N/A
N/A
56
97
2
27
54
18
68.8
N/A
N/A
38,109
98
3
18
41
38
59.7
N/A
N/A
EL and Former EL
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
1
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
18,594
99
3
16
43
39
54.1
N/A
N/A
Econ. Disadvantaged
17
100
24
41
35
0
85.3
N/A
N/A
36
97
11
36
50
3
77.1
N/A
N/A
61,476
98
6
26
43
25
65.8
N/A
N/A
High needs
44
98
11
32
55
2
78.4
N/A
N/A
83
98
7
30
51
12
73.2
N/A
N/A
89,857
98
6
25
43
26
65.4
N/A
N/A
Afr. Amer./Black
4
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
8
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
17,761
99
5
24
44
27
63.9
N/A
N/A
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.
1
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
1
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
422
98
9
33
40
19
71.9
N/A
N/A
Asian
7
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
11
100
27
36
36
0
86.4
N/A
N/A
13,043
99
30
39
23
7
86.8
N/A
N/A
Hispanic/Latino
1
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
5
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
35,316
99
5
24
42
28
62.9
N/A
N/A
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.
2
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
6
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
6,053
99
19
36
33
12
79.5
N/A
N/A
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
208
100
18
32
32
18
75.8
N/A
N/A
White
180
100
23
56
20
1
93.1
N/A
N/A
381
99
12
52
31
4
86.1
N/A
N/A
135,382
99
20
42
30
8
84.1
N/A
N/A
Male
95
100
20
54
25
1
90.8
N/A
N/A
210
100
11
51
33
5
85.2
N/A
N/A
106,211
99
17
37
33
14
78.4
N/A
N/A
Female
100
99
25
56
19
0
93.0
N/A
N/A
202
99
13
50
32
4
85.1
N/A
N/A
102,022
99
17
37
34
12
79.1
N/A
N/A
EL
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
11,822
98
1
8
39
51
45.3
N/A
N/A
Ever EL
2
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
4
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
33,065
99
8
25
40
27
64.2
N/A
N/A
All Students
2016
195
100
23
55
22
1
91.9
N/A
N/A
412
99
12
51
33
4
85.2
N/A
N/A
208,262
99
17
37
33
13
78.7
N/A
N/A
2015
175
99
34
47
19
1
93.6
N/A
N/A
421
100
15
49
32
4
86.0
N/A
N/A
210,454
99
15
39
33
12
79.4
N/A
N/A
2016 Accountability Data - Old Rochester Regional High
Accountability Information
Accountability and Assistance Level
Level 2
Not meeting gap narrowing goals
This school's overall performance relative to other schools in same school type (School percentiles: 1-99)
All students:
51
Lowest performing
Highest performing
This school’s progress toward narrowing proficiency gaps (Cumulative Progress and Performance Index: 1-100)
Student Group (Click group to view subgroup data)
On Target = 75 or higher -
Less progress
More progress
All students
72
Did Not Meet Target
High needs
75
Met Target
Econ. Disadvantaged
-
EL and Former EL
-
Students w/ disabilities
-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.
-
Asian
-
Afr. Amer./Black
-
Hispanic/Latino
-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.
-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.
-
White
76
Met Target
Old Rochester Regional High: Accountability Data Detail
2016 English Language Arts Proficiency Gap Narrowing
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100
Baseline CPI
2015 CPI
2016 CPI
CPI Change
2016 Target
6 Year Goal
CPI Percentile in School Type
N
PPI Points
Rating
All students
96.5
99.1
99.3
0.2
98.0
98.3
78
200
100
Above Target
High needs
84.8
95.0
96.7
1.7
91.1
92.4
69
45
100
Above Target
Econ. Disadvantaged
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
17
-
-
EL and Former EL
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Students w/ disabilities
92.5
-
-
-
-
96.3
-
33
-
-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
2
-
-
Asian
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
6
-
-
Afr. Amer./Black
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
5
-
-
Hispanic/Latino
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
2
-
-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
2
-
-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
White
96.3
99.0
99.2
0.2
97.8
98.2
62
183
100
Above Target
2016 Mathematics Proficiency Gap Narrowing
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100
Baseline CPI
2015 CPI
2016 CPI
CPI Change
2016 Target
6 Year Goal
CPI Percentile in School Type
N
PPI Points
Rating
All students
94.4
95.3
95.3
0.0
96.7
97.2
68
200
25
No Change
High needs
79.3
82.6
83.9
1.3
87.9
89.7
57
45
50
Improved Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
16
-
-
EL and Former EL
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Students w/ disabilities
90.0
-
-
-
-
95.0
-
34
-
-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
1
-
-
Asian
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
7
-
-
Afr. Amer./Black
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
5
-
-
Hispanic/Latino
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
2
-
-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
2
-
-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
White
94.9
96.2
96.2
0.0
97.0
97.5
68
183
75
On Target
2016 Science Proficiency Gap Narrowing
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100
Baseline CPI
2015 CPI
2016 CPI
CPI Change
2016 Target
6 Year Goal
CPI Percentile in School Type
N
PPI Points
Rating
All students
91.2
93.6
91.9
-1.7
94.9
95.6
48
195
25
No Change
High needs
80.0
85.9
78.4
-7.5
88.3
90.0
26
44
0
Declined
Econ. Disadvantaged
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
17
-
-
EL and Former EL
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Students w/ disabilities
64.4
-
-
-
-
82.2
-
32
-
-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
1
-
-
Asian
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
7
-
-
Afr. Amer./Black
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
4
-
-
Hispanic/Latino
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
1
-
-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
2
-
-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
White
91.2
93.9
93.1
-0.8
94.9
95.6
42
180
25
No Change
2016 English Language Arts Extra Credit
Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more)
Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015 % Advanced
2016 % Advanced
N
PPI Points
2015 % Warning/Failing
2016 % Warning/Failing
N
PPI Points
All students
53.0
55.0
200
0
0.5
0.5
200
0
High needs
25.7
17.8
45
0
2.9
2.2
45
25
Econ. Disadvantaged
-
-
17
-
-
-
17
-
EL and Former EL
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Students w/ disabilities
-
-
33
-
-
-
33
-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.
-
-
2
-
-
-
2
-
Asian
-
-
6
-
-
-
6
-
Afr. Amer./Black
-
-
5
-
-
-
5
-
Hispanic/Latino
-
-
2
-
-
-
2
-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.
-
-
2
-
-
-
2
-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
White
53.9
57.4
183
0
0.6
0.5
183
25
2016 Mathematics Extra Credit
Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more)
Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015 % Advanced
2016 % Advanced
N
PPI Points
2015 % Warning/Failing
2016 % Warning/Failing
N
PPI Points
All students
63.1
64.0
200
0
2.7
1.5
200
25
High needs
38.9
22.2
45
0
11.1
6.7
45
25
Econ. Disadvantaged
-
-
16
-
-
-
16
-
EL and Former EL
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Students w/ disabilities
-
-
34
-
-
-
34
-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.
-
-
1
-
-
-
1
-
Asian
-
-
7
-
-
-
7
-
Afr. Amer./Black
-
-
5
-
-
-
5
-
Hispanic/Latino
-
-
2
-
-
-
2
-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.
-
-
2
-
-
-
2
-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
White
65.7
65.6
183
0
2.4
1.1
183
25
2016 Science Extra Credit
Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more)
Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015 % Advanced
2016 % Advanced
N
PPI Points
2015 % Warning/Failing
2016 % Warning/Failing
N
PPI Points
All students
33.7
22.6
195
0
0.6
0.0
195
25
High needs
18.8
11.4
44
0
3.1
0.0
44
25
Econ. Disadvantaged
-
-
17
-
-
-
17
-
EL and Former EL
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Students w/ disabilities
-
-
32
-
-
-
32
-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.
-
-
1
-
-
-
1
-
Asian
-
-
7
-
-
-
7
-
Afr. Amer./Black
-
-
4
-
-
-
4
-
Hispanic/Latino
-
-
1
-
-
-
1
-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.
-
-
2
-
-
-
2
-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
White
35.8
23.3
180
0
0.6
0.0
180
25
2016 English Language Arts Growth
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100
2015 SGP
2016 SGP
SGP Change
6 Year Goal
Met Safe Harbor?
N
PPI Points
Rating
All students
37.0
46.5
9.5
51.0
No
186
75
On Target
High needs
33.0
52.0
19.0
51.0
No
39
100
Above Target
Econ. Disadvantaged
-
-
-
51.0
-
16
-
-
EL and Former EL
-
-
-
51.0
-
-
-
-
Students w/ disabilities
-
-
-
51.0
-
27
-
-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.
-
-
-
51.0
-
2
-
-
Asian
-
-
-
51.0
-
6
-
-
Afr. Amer./Black
-
-
-
51.0
-
5
-
-
Hispanic/Latino
-
-
-
51.0
-
1
-
-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.
-
-
-
51.0
-
1
-
-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.
-
-
-
51.0
-
-
-
-
White
37.0
46.0
9.0
51.0
No
171
50
Below Target
2016 Mathematics Growth
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100
2015 SGP
2016 SGP
SGP Change
6 Year Goal
Met Safe Harbor?
N
PPI Points
Rating
All students
42.0
50.0
8.0
51.0
No
185
50
Below Target
High needs
43.5
49.5
6.0
51.0
No
38
50
Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged
-
-
-
51.0
-
14
-
-
EL and Former EL
-
-
-
51.0
-
-
-
-
Students w/ disabilities
-
-
-
51.0
-
28
-
-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.
-
-
-
51.0
-
1
-
-
Asian
-
-
-
51.0
-
7
-
-
Afr. Amer./Black
-
-
-
51.0
-
5
-
-
Hispanic/Latino
-
-
-
51.0
-
1
-
-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.
-
-
-
51.0
-
1
-
-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.
-
-
-
51.0
-
-
-
-
White
42.0
50.0
8.0
51.0
No
170
50
Below Target
2016 Extra credit for English language proficiency growth
2016 SGPA
2016 Target
SGPA N Included
PPI Points
All students
-
60.0
2
-
High needs
-
60.0
2
-
EL and Former EL
-
60.0
2
-
2015 4-Year Cohort Graduation Rate
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100
2014 Rate
2015 Rate
Change
Annual Target
6 Year Goal
N
PPI Points
Rating
All students
93.4
95.7
2.3
80.0
90.0
184
100
Above Target
High needs
85.1
90.9
5.8
80.0
90.0
44
75
On Target
Econ. Disadvantaged
-
-
-
80.0
90.0
-
-
-
EL and Former EL
-
-
-
80.0
90.0
-
-
-
Students w/ disabilities
-
-
-
80.0
90.0
26
-
-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.
-
-
-
80.0
90.0
-
-
-
Asian
-
-
-
80.0
90.0
4
-
-
Afr. Amer./Black
-
-
-
80.0
90.0
2
-
-
Hispanic/Latino
-
-
-
80.0
90.0
-
-
-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.
-
-
-
80.0
90.0
8
-
-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.
-
-
-
80.0
90.0
-
-
-
White
94.2
97.1
2.9
80.0
90.0
170
100
Above Target
2014 5-Year Cohort Graduation Rate
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100
2013 Rate
2014 Rate
Change
Annual Target
6 Year Goal
N
PPI Points
Rating
All students
95.3
94.6
-0.7
85.0
95.0
166
75
On Target
High needs
83.8
89.4
5.6
85.0
95.0
47
75
On Target
Econ. Disadvantaged
-
-
-
85.0
95.0
-
-
-
EL and Former EL
-
-
-
85.0
95.0
1
-
-
Students w/ disabilities
-
-
-
85.0
95.0
17
-
-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.
-
-
-
85.0
95.0
-
-
-
Asian
-
-
-
85.0
95.0
2
-
-
Afr. Amer./Black
-
-
-
85.0
95.0
4
-
-
Hispanic/Latino
-
-
-
85.0
95.0
1
-
-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.
-
-
-
85.0
95.0
4
-
-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.
-
-
-
85.0
95.0
-
-
-
White
96.1
94.8
-1.3
85.0
95.0
155
75
On Target
2015 Annual Dropout Rate
0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20
Baseline Rate
2014 Rate
2015 Rate
Change
Annual Target
6 Year Goal
Dropout Percentile in School Type
N
PPI Points
Rating
All students
0.7
1.1
0.5
0.6
0.4
0.4
71
785
50
Improved Below Target
High needs
3.3
3.8
1.4
2.4
1.9
1.7
59
148
75
On Target
Econ. Disadvantaged
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
61
-
-
EL and Former EL
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Students w/ disabilities
4.0
4.1
2.0
2.1
2.3
2.0
52
102
-
-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
1
-
-
Asian
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
14
-
-
Afr. Amer./Black
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
17
-
-
Hispanic/Latino
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
8
-
-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
22
-
-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
White
0.8
1.0
0.4
0.6
0.5
0.4
67
723
75
On Target
2016 Assessment Participation
English Language Arts
Mathematics
Science
Enrolled
Assessed
%
Met Target (95%)
Enrolled
Assessed
%
Met Target (95%)
Enrolled
Assessed
%
Met Target (95%)
All students
206
203
99
Yes
206
203
99
Yes
206
205
100
Yes
High needs
47
46
98
Yes
47
46
98
Yes
47
46
98
Yes
Econ. Disadvantaged
17
-
-
-
17
-
-
-
17
-
-
-
EL and Former EL
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Students w/ disabilities
35
34
97
Yes
35
35
100
Yes
35
34
97
Yes
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.
2
-
-
-
2
-
-
-
2
-
-
-
Asian
7
-
-
-
7
-
-
-
7
-
-
-
Afr. Amer./Black
5
-
-
-
5
-
-
-
5
-
-
-
Hispanic/Latino
2
-
-
-
2
-
-
-
2
-
-
-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.
2
-
-
-
2
-
-
-
2
-
-
-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
White
188
186
99
Yes
188
186
99
Yes
188
188
100
Yes
NOTE: In 2016, assessment participation was calculated two ways: First, the 2016 participation rate for each subgroup in each subject area test was calculated. If the actual 2016 participation rate was lower than 95 percent for any group in any subject, that rate was compared to the average of the most recent two years of assessment participation data for that group and subject. The higher of the two resulting rates was factored into the assignment of the school or district's 2016 accountability and assistance level.
2015 Massachusetts and Nationwide NAEP Results by Student Group Average Scaled Scores and Percentages of Students at Each Achievement Level
NAEP, or the National Assessment of Educational Progress, is often called the "Nation's Report Card." It is the only measure of student achievement in the United States that allows you to compare the performance of students in Massachusetts with the performance of students across the nation or in other states. Students take the NAEP in reading and mathematics every two years. When reviewing these results, it is important to keep in mind that the NAEP results are based on a small sample of students across Massachusetts, not the population of Massachusetts students. For more information, please visit http://www.doe.mass.edu/mcas/naep/faq.html.
The following symbols are used to denote the NAEP achievement levels: A for Advanced, P+ for Proficient and above, B+ for Basic and above, BB for Below Basic. The symbol "#" means that the estimated number of students rounds to zero.
GRADE LEVEL 4 - READING
Student Group
Massachusetts
National Public
Avg. Scaled Score
% at Each Level
Avg. Scaled Score
% at Each Level
A
P+
B+
BB
% Assessed
A
P+
B+
BB
% Assessed
All Students
235
14
50
82
18
100
221
8
35
68
32
100
Stud. w/ Disab
209
2
20
55
45
18
186
2
12
33
67
13
LEP
200
1
12
44
56
9
189
1
8
32
68
11
African American/Black
217
3
25
65
35
7
206
2
18
51
49
15
Asian/Pacific Islander
249
31
68
89
11
6
238
19
53
81
19
5
Hispanic/Latino
215
3
25
61
39
19
208
3
21
54
46
26
White
242
17
58
89
11
65
232
11
46
79
21
49
Econ. Disadvantaged
220
5
29
67
33
42
209
3
21
56
44
55
GRADE LEVEL 4 - MATHEMATICS
Student Group
Massachusetts
National Public
Avg. Scaled Score
% at Each Level
Avg. Scaled Score
% at Each Level
A
P+
B+
BB
% Assessed
A
P+
B+
BB
% Assessed
All Students
251
13
54
90
10
100
240
7
39
81
19
100
Stud. w/ Disab
231
4
25
74
26
18
217
2
16
54
46
13
LEP
223
2
17
65
35
9
218
1
15
57
43
11
African American/Black
230
1
26
73
27
7
224
1
19
65
35
15
Asian/Pacific Islander
273
38
81
98
2
6
256
22
61
90
10
5
Hispanic/Latino
232
3
28
74
26
19
230
3
26
73
27
26
White
256
15
62
95
5
65
248
10
51
90
10
49
Econ. Disadvantaged
236
4
31
80
20
42
229
2
24
72
28
55
GRADE LEVEL 8 - READING
Student Group
Massachusetts
National Public
Avg. Scaled Score
% at Each Level
Avg. Scaled Score
% at Each Level
A
P+
B+
BB
% Assessed
A
P+
B+
BB
% Assessed
All Students
274
6
46
83
17
100
264
3
33
75
25
100
Stud. w/ Disab
245
1
15
54
46
18
229
#
8
36
64
12
LEP
225
#
6
35
65
5
223
#
3
28
72
6
African American/Black
252
1
18
63
37
9
247
1
15
58
42
15
Asian/Pacific Islander
290
18
64
90
10
7
279
9
50
85
15
6
Hispanic/Latino
249
#
17
61
39
14
253
1
20
65
35
25
White
281
7
53
90
10
67
273
4
42
84
16
51
Econ. Disadvantaged
260
3
28
71
29
44
253
1
20
64
36
52
GRADE LEVEL 8 - MATHEMATICS
Student Group
Massachusetts
National Public
Avg. Scaled Score
% at Each Level
Avg. Scaled Score
% at Each Level
A
P+
B+
BB
% Assessed
A
P+
B+
BB
% Assessed
All Students
297
18
51
81
19
100
281
8
32
70
30
100
Stud. w/ Disab
264
3
16
51
49
18
246
1
8
32
68
12
LEP
251
2
10
38
62
6
246
1
5
31
69
6
African American/Black
268
4
22
54
46
9
260
1
12
47
53
15
Asian/Pacific Islander
324
44
73
94
6
7
305
25
58
86
14
6
Hispanic/Latino
271
4
24
61
39
15
269
3
19
60
40
25
White
304
20
59
88
12
66
291
10
42
81
19
51
Econ. Disadvantaged
279
7
31
67
33
43
268
2
18
58
42
52
Participation Rates for Students with Disabilities and for English Language Learner Students
The NAEP program has always endeavored to assess all students selected for testing. In all NAEP schools, accommodations are provided as necessary for students with disabilities and/or English language learners. School staff who are familiar with these students are asked a series of questions to help them decide whether each student should participate in the assessment and whether the student needs accommodations.