Joshua Baumer, Principal Mailing Address: 72 Deerfield Avenue Westwood, MA 02090
Phone: (781) 326-7500 FAX: (781) 320-0189 Website: http://www.westwood.k12.ma.us
This report card contains information required by the federal Elementary and Secondary Education Act (ESEA) for our school and district including: student enrollment and teacher qualifications, student achievement, accountability, and the progress our school is making toward narrowing proficiency gaps for different groups of students.
Enrollment and Educator Data (2015-16 School Year)
Percentage of Teachers Licensed in Teaching Assignment
100.0
99.0
97.4
Total Number of Classes in Core Academic Areas
84
1,152
348,472
Percentage of Core Academic Classes Taught by Teachers Who are Highly Qualified
100.0
99.7
96.3
Percentage of Core Academic Classes Taught by Teachers Who are Not Highly Qualified
0.0
0.3
3.7
Student/Teacher Ratio
14.5 to 1
13.5 to 1
13.2 to 1
Percentage of Public Elementary and Secondary School Teachers Issued Waivers
-
0.0
0.9
This organization is currently closed.
2016 MCAS Results by Student Group by Grade and Subject
NOTE: First-year ELL students are not included in achievement level or CPI results. However, first-year ELL students who took the ACCESS for ELLs test are counted as ELA participants; in addition, first-year ELL students who are present for Mathematics/Science and Technology/Engineering are counted as Mathematics/Science and Technology/Engineering participants. Please see the principal's administration manual (PAM) for details.
NOTE: Spring 2016 results in grades 3-8 ELA and Mathematics are not reported because all students in this organization participated in the PARCC test.
2016 PARCC Results by Student Group by Grade and Subject
Achievement Levels: L5 = Level 5: Exceeded Expectations (varies by grade - 850) L4 = Level 4: Met Expectations (750 - varies by grade) L3 = Level 3: Approached Expectations (725-749) L2 = Level 2: Partially met Expectations (700-724) L1 = Level 1: Did not meet Expectations (650-699)
Trans. SGP = Transitional Student Growth Percentile
generated using current PARCC and prior MCAS scores Trans. CPI = Transitional Composite Performance Index
generated using linked PARCC and MCAS scores
NOTE: Since only a portion of students in grades 3-8 participated in 2016 PARCC in ELA/L and Mathematics, a representative sample of students from across Massachusetts was used to estimate student achievement at the state level in those subjects. NOTE: Students who took the Alternate Assessment are included in Mean CPI, but not in achievement level or growth results.
Data Last Updated on September 24, 2016
GRADE 3 ELA/L
Student Group
School
District
State
Included
Part. Rate
% at Each Level
Trans. CPI
Trans. SGP
Incl. in SGP (#)
Included
Part. Rate
% at Each Level
Trans. CPI
Trans. SGP
Incl. in SGP (#)
Included
Part. Rate
% at Each Level
Trans. CPI
Trans. SGP
Incl. in SGP (#)
#
%
L5
L4
L3
L2
L1
#
%
L5
L4
L3
L2
L1
#
%
L5
L4
L3
L2
L1
Subgroups
High needs
9
--
--
54
98
2
65
17
11
6
87.5
--
--
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Econ. disadvantaged
1
--
--
14
100
0
64
14
14
7
85.0
--
--
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
ELL/Formerly ELL
2
--
--
11
100
9
55
9
27
0
88.6
--
--
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Students w/disablities
7
--
--
35
97
0
63
17
14
6
85.1
--
--
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Asian
4
--
--
25
100
36
56
8
0
0
98.0
--
--
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Hispanic/Latino
2
--
--
7
--
--
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
White
43
100
12
67
14
5
2
93.6
--
--
178
99
7
75
12
4
2
94.8
--
--
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Male
25
100
12
64
20
0
4
92.0
--
--
120
100
8
68
18
4
2
93.5
--
--
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Female
24
100
13
75
4
8
0
96.9
--
--
95
98
13
78
4
4
1
96.6
--
--
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Non-Disabled
42
100
14
71
12
2
0
96.4
--
--
180
99
12
74
11
2
1
96.9
--
--
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Non-Econ. disadvantaged
48
100
13
71
10
4
2
94.8
--
--
201
99
11
73
11
3
1
95.7
--
--
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
ELL
2
--
--
3
--
--
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Ever ELL
3
--
--
12
100
8
58
8
25
0
89.6
--
--
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
All Students
2016
49
100
12
69
12
4
2
94.4
--
--
215
99
10
73
12
4
1
94.9
--
--
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
GRADE 3 Math
Student Group
School
District
State
Included
Part. Rate
% at Each Level
Trans. CPI
Trans. SGP
Incl. in SGP (#)
Included
Part. Rate
% at Each Level
Trans. CPI
Trans. SGP
Incl. in SGP (#)
Included
Part. Rate
% at Each Level
Trans. CPI
Trans. SGP
Incl. in SGP (#)
#
%
L5
L4
L3
L2
L1
#
%
L5
L4
L3
L2
L1
#
%
L5
L4
L3
L2
L1
Subgroups
High needs
9
--
--
54
98
13
56
19
9
4
91.1
--
--
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Econ. disadvantaged
1
--
--
14
100
7
43
29
14
7
88.3
--
--
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
ELL/Formerly ELL
2
--
--
11
100
36
45
9
0
9
90.9
--
--
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Students w/disablities
7
--
--
35
97
6
57
20
11
6
87.8
--
--
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Asian
4
--
--
25
100
56
40
4
0
0
100.0
--
--
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Hispanic/Latino
2
--
--
7
--
--
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
White
43
100
21
72
7
0
0
98.8
--
--
178
99
24
61
11
3
2
96.2
--
--
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Male
25
100
40
56
4
0
0
99.0
--
--
120
100
30
58
8
3
2
96.5
--
--
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Female
24
100
13
79
8
0
0
99.0
--
--
95
98
22
57
16
4
1
96.6
--
--
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Non-Disabled
42
100
31
67
2
0
0
100.0
--
--
180
99
31
58
9
2
1
98.3
--
--
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Non-Econ. disadvantaged
48
100
27
69
4
0
0
99.0
--
--
201
99
28
59
10
2
1
97.2
--
--
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
ELL
2
--
--
3
--
--
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Ever ELL
3
--
--
12
100
33
50
8
0
8
91.7
--
--
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
All Students
2016
49
100
27
67
6
0
0
99.0
--
--
215
99
27
58
11
3
1
96.5
--
--
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
GRADE 4 ELA/L
Student Group
School
District
State
Included
Part. Rate
% at Each Level
Trans. CPI
Trans. SGP
Incl. in SGP (#)
Included
Part. Rate
% at Each Level
Trans. CPI
Trans. SGP
Incl. in SGP (#)
Included
Part. Rate
% at Each Level
Trans. CPI
Trans. SGP
Incl. in SGP (#)
#
%
L5
L4
L3
L2
L1
#
%
L5
L4
L3
L2
L1
#
%
L5
L4
L3
L2
L1
Subgroups
High needs
8
100
--
8
62
100
8
50
32
8
2
81.3
61.0
61
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Econ. disadvantaged
--
--
16
100
13
63
19
6
0
85.3
--
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
ELL/Formerly ELL
1
--
1
11
100
18
64
18
0
0
93.2
--
11
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Students w/disablities
7
100
--
7
47
100
4
47
36
11
2
77.6
58.0
46
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Asian
5
--
5
33
100
52
42
6
0
0
97.0
75.0
33
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Hispanic/Latino
1
--
1
8
--
7
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
White
40
100
50
38
13
0
0
94.6
82.0
39
205
100
33
52
14
1
0
93.5
70.0
200
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Male
23
100
43
39
17
0
0
94.8
76.0
23
140
99
31
54
11
3
1
93.3
71.0
138
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Female
23
100
57
35
9
0
0
94.8
86.0
22
115
100
40
45
14
1
0
93.8
72.0
110
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Non-Disabled
39
100
59
38
3
0
0
99.4
83.0
38
208
99
42
50
7
0
0
97.2
74.0
202
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Non-Econ. disadvantaged
46
100
50
37
13
0
0
95.7
78.0
45
239
99
37
49
12
2
0
94.1
72.0
232
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
ELL
1
--
1
2
--
2
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Former ELL
1
--
1
10
100
20
60
20
0
0
92.5
--
10
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Ever ELL
3
--
3
16
100
31
56
13
0
0
95.3
--
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
All Students
2016
46
100
50
37
13
0
0
94.8
78.0
45
255
99
35
50
13
2
0
93.5
72.0
248
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
GRADE 4 Math
Student Group
School
District
State
Included
Part. Rate
% at Each Level
Trans. CPI
Trans. SGP
Incl. in SGP (#)
Included
Part. Rate
% at Each Level
Trans. CPI
Trans. SGP
Incl. in SGP (#)
Included
Part. Rate
% at Each Level
Trans. CPI
Trans. SGP
Incl. in SGP (#)
#
%
L5
L4
L3
L2
L1
#
%
L5
L4
L3
L2
L1
#
%
L5
L4
L3
L2
L1
Subgroups
High needs
8
100
--
8
62
100
8
48
18
26
0
79.3
55.0
61
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Econ. disadvantaged
--
--
16
100
19
56
6
19
0
86.8
--
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
ELL/Formerly ELL
1
--
1
11
100
27
73
0
0
0
100.0
--
11
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Students w/disablities
7
100
--
7
47
100
2
45
21
32
0
74.5
54.0
46
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Asian
5
--
5
33
100
45
52
3
0
0
99.2
58.0
33
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Hispanic/Latino
1
--
1
8
--
7
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
White
40
100
5
88
8
0
0
97.6
56.0
39
204
99
8
69
15
8
0
91.3
56.0
199
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Male
23
100
9
83
9
0
0
97.9
44.0
23
140
99
14
70
10
6
0
93.4
54.0
138
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Female
23
100
13
78
4
4
0
94.8
63.0
22
114
99
13
61
16
10
0
89.8
57.0
109
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Non-Disabled
39
100
13
87
0
0
0
100.0
60.0
38
207
99
16
71
11
2
0
95.9
57.0
201
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Non-Econ. disadvantaged
46
100
11
80
7
2
0
96.8
58.0
45
238
99
13
67
13
7
0
92.2
56.0
231
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
ELL
1
--
1
2
--
2
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Former ELL
1
--
1
10
100
30
70
0
0
0
100.0
--
10
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Ever ELL
3
--
3
16
100
38
63
0
0
0
100.0
--
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
All Students
2016
46
100
11
80
7
2
0
96.4
58.0
45
254
99
13
66
13
8
0
91.8
56.0
247
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
GRADE 5 ELA/L
Student Group
School
District
State
Included
Part. Rate
% at Each Level
Trans. CPI
Trans. SGP
Incl. in SGP (#)
Included
Part. Rate
% at Each Level
Trans. CPI
Trans. SGP
Incl. in SGP (#)
Included
Part. Rate
% at Each Level
Trans. CPI
Trans. SGP
Incl. in SGP (#)
#
%
L5
L4
L3
L2
L1
#
%
L5
L4
L3
L2
L1
#
%
L5
L4
L3
L2
L1
Subgroups
High needs
7
100
--
7
62
100
5
55
32
5
3
89.4
61.0
56
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
ELL/Formerly ELL
1
--
1
6
--
4
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Students w/disablities
6
--
6
45
100
2
44
42
7
4
85.7
59.0
43
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Asian
3
--
3
21
100
24
62
14
0
0
96.4
--
19
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.
2
--
2
12
100
33
58
0
0
8
93.8
--
11
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
White
33
100
18
70
12
0
0
97.9
58.0
32
206
99
23
62
12
2
0
96.5
65.0
200
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Male
26
100
12
85
4
0
0
99.1
61.0
25
122
98
19
66
11
2
2
95.6
63.0
119
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Female
12
100
33
42
25
0
0
96.2
--
12
125
99
26
58
13
2
0
97.0
67.0
119
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Non-Disabled
32
100
19
78
3
0
0
100.0
61.0
31
202
99
27
66
5
1
0
98.9
67.0
195
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Non-Econ. disadvantaged
38
100
18
71
11
0
0
98.1
61.0
37
233
99
23
61
12
2
1
96.2
65.0
227
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Former ELL
1
--
1
6
--
4
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Ever ELL
2
--
2
7
--
5
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
All Students
2016
38
100
18
71
11
0
0
98.1
61.0
37
247
99
23
62
12
2
1
96.3
66.0
238
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
GRADE 5 Math
Student Group
School
District
State
Included
Part. Rate
% at Each Level
Trans. CPI
Trans. SGP
Incl. in SGP (#)
Included
Part. Rate
% at Each Level
Trans. CPI
Trans. SGP
Incl. in SGP (#)
Included
Part. Rate
% at Each Level
Trans. CPI
Trans. SGP
Incl. in SGP (#)
#
%
L5
L4
L3
L2
L1
#
%
L5
L4
L3
L2
L1
#
%
L5
L4
L3
L2
L1
Subgroups
High needs
7
100
--
7
61
100
5
36
44
8
7
84.5
53.0
55
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
ELL/Formerly ELL
1
--
1
6
--
4
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Students w/disablities
6
--
6
44
100
2
20
57
11
9
79.6
45.0
42
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Asian
3
--
3
21
100
52
33
14
0
0
97.6
--
19
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.
2
--
2
12
100
25
50
17
0
8
93.8
--
11
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
White
33
100
18
67
15
0
0
97.9
67.0
32
203
98
16
60
19
3
1
94.6
64.0
197
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Male
26
100
35
62
4
0
0
99.1
75.0
25
120
98
23
57
17
2
2
95.0
65.0
117
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Female
12
100
17
50
33
0
0
96.2
--
12
124
98
15
57
23
3
2
94.6
65.0
118
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Non-Disabled
32
100
31
63
6
0
0
99.2
71.0
31
200
98
23
65
12
1
0
98.5
69.0
193
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Non-Econ. disadvantaged
38
100
29
58
13
0
0
98.1
68.0
37
230
98
20
56
20
3
2
94.6
65.0
224
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Former ELL
1
--
1
6
--
4
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Ever ELL
2
--
2
7
--
5
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
All Students
2016
38
100
29
58
13
0
0
98.1
68.0
37
244
98
19
57
20
2
2
94.8
65.0
235
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
GRADES 3-8 ELA/L
Student Group
School
District
State
Included
Part. Rate
% at Each Level
Trans. CPI
Trans. SGP
Incl. in SGP (#)
Included
Part. Rate
% at Each Level
Trans. CPI
Trans. SGP
Incl. in SGP (#)
Included
Part. Rate
% at Each Level
Trans. CPI
Trans. SGP
Incl. in SGP (#)
#
%
L5
L4
L3
L2
L1
#
%
L5
L4
L3
L2
L1
#
%
L5
L4
L3
L2
L1
Subgroups
High needs
24
100
4
42
42
8
4
83.0
--
15
337
98
7
52
28
8
5
87.6
58.0
263
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Econ. disadvantaged
1
--
--
87
100
18
54
17
6
5
91.4
63.0
65
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
ELL/Formerly ELL
4
--
2
41
100
10
63
15
10
2
92.7
77.0
26
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Students w/disablities
20
100
5
40
45
5
5
82.3
--
13
252
98
2
49
33
10
6
85.0
58.0
206
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Asian
12
100
33
67
0
0
0
100.0
--
8
156
99
53
40
6
1
0
98.1
72.0
123
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Hispanic/Latino
3
--
1
45
98
22
60
11
7
0
93.5
56.0
36
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.
2
--
2
36
100
33
44
11
3
8
91.7
90.0
28
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
White
116
100
27
58
13
2
1
95.2
72.0
71
1,199
97
31
55
11
2
1
96.1
63.0
993
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Male
74
100
22
64
14
0
1
95.4
68.0
48
727
98
24
57
14
3
2
94.5
64.0
582
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Female
59
100
34
53
10
3
0
95.9
77.0
34
741
97
41
49
8
2
0
97.5
64.0
624
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Non-Disabled
113
100
31
62
6
1
0
98.5
75.0
69
1,216
98
39
54
6
1
0
98.4
65.0
1,000
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Non-Econ. disadvantaged
132
100
27
59
11
2
1
96.1
73.0
82
1,381
98
33
53
11
2
1
96.3
64.0
1,141
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
ELL
3
--
1
8
--
4
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Former ELL
2
--
2
34
100
12
71
15
0
3
95.6
78.0
23
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Ever ELL
8
--
5
71
100
27
56
10
6
1
95.4
74.0
55
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
All Students
2016
133
100
27
59
12
2
1
95.6
73.0
82
1,468
98
33
53
11
2
1
96.0
64.0
1,206
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
2015
120
100
18
64
14
3
2
93.1
61.0
77
1,530
98
23
54
17
5
1
93.5
44.0
1,240
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
GRADES 3-8 MATH
Student Group
School
District
State
Included
Part. Rate
% at Each Level
Trans. CPI
Trans. SGP
Incl. in SGP (#)
Included
Part. Rate
% at Each Level
Trans. CPI
Trans. SGP
Incl. in SGP (#)
Included
Part. Rate
% at Each Level
Trans. CPI
Trans. SGP
Incl. in SGP (#)
#
%
L5
L4
L3
L2
L1
#
%
L5
L4
L3
L2
L1
#
%
L5
L4
L3
L2
L1
Subgroups
High needs
24
100
4
54
38
4
0
90.2
--
15
337
99
6
37
29
22
6
75.8
46.0
262
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Econ. disadvantaged
1
--
--
87
100
10
52
18
15
5
84.7
55.0
64
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
ELL/Formerly ELL
4
--
2
41
100
20
59
12
5
5
89.0
64.0
26
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Students w/disablities
20
100
5
50
40
5
0
88.5
--
13
252
98
3
28
35
27
7
70.0
42.0
205
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Asian
12
100
83
17
0
0
0
100.0
--
8
156
99
48
46
4
1
0
98.6
66.0
121
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Hispanic/Latino
3
--
1
45
98
0
58
29
11
2
87.0
38.0
36
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.
2
--
2
36
100
22
50
19
3
6
93.1
70.0
28
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
White
116
100
15
76
9
0
0
98.1
58.0
71
1,191
97
17
58
17
7
1
91.4
54.0
988
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Male
74
100
28
66
5
0
0
98.7
61.0
48
721
97
20
55
15
8
2
90.0
52.0
578
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Female
59
100
14
73
12
2
0
96.7
63.0
34
739
97
20
57
18
5
1
93.4
58.0
621
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Non-Disabled
113
100
25
73
3
0
0
99.8
63.0
69
1,208
97
24
62
13
2
0
96.5
59.0
994
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Non-Econ. disadvantaged
132
100
22
70
8
1
0
98.0
63.0
82
1,373
97
21
56
16
6
1
92.2
55.0
1,135
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
ELL
3
--
1
8
--
4
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Former ELL
2
--
2
34
100
24
65
6
6
0
94.1
67.0
23
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Ever ELL
8
--
5
71
100
27
58
8
4
3
93.0
70.0
55
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
All Students
2016
133
100
22
69
8
1
0
97.8
63.0
82
1,460
97
20
56
16
7
1
91.7
55.0
1,199
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
2015
120
100
20
56
20
3
1
94.2
44.0
77
1,531
98
12
59
21
7
1
90.2
37.0
1,241
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
2016 Accountability Data - Deerfield School
Accountability Information
Accountability and Assistance Level
Level 1
Meeting gap narrowing goals
This school's overall performance relative to other schools in same school type (School percentiles: 1-99)
All students:
94
Lowest performing
Highest performing
This school’s progress toward narrowing proficiency gaps (Cumulative Progress and Performance Index: 1-100)
Student Group (Click group to view subgroup data)
On Target = 75 or higher -
Less progress
More progress
All students
100
Met Target
High needs
-
Econ. Disadvantaged
-
EL and Former EL
-
Students w/ disabilities
-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.
-
Asian
-
Afr. Amer./Black
-
Hispanic/Latino
-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.
-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.
-
White
100
Met Target
Deerfield School: Accountability Data Detail
2016 English Language Arts Proficiency Gap Narrowing
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100
Baseline CPI
2015 CPI
2016 CPI
CPI Change
2016 Target
6 Year Goal
CPI Percentile in School Type
N
PPI Points
Rating
All students
98.6
93.1
95.6
2.5
99.2
99.3
97
137
100
Above Target
High needs
98.8
-
83.0
4.0
99.3
99.4
81
28
50
Improved Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
2
-
-
EL and Former EL
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
4
-
-
Students w/ disabilities
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
24
-
-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Asian
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
12
-
-
Afr. Amer./Black
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Hispanic/Latino
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
3
-
-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
2
-
-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
White
98.5
93.1
95.2
2.1
99.1
99.3
92
120
100
Above Target
2016 Mathematics Proficiency Gap Narrowing
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100
Baseline CPI
2015 CPI
2016 CPI
CPI Change
2016 Target
6 Year Goal
CPI Percentile in School Type
N
PPI Points
Rating
All students
96.5
94.2
97.8
3.6
98.0
98.3
99
137
100
Above Target
High needs
90.5
-
90.2
8.7
94.5
95.3
96
28
75
On Target
Econ. Disadvantaged
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
2
-
-
EL and Former EL
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
4
-
-
Students w/ disabilities
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
24
-
-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Asian
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
12
-
-
Afr. Amer./Black
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Hispanic/Latino
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
3
-
-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
2
-
-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
White
96.6
94.4
98.1
3.7
98.0
98.3
99
120
100
Above Target
2016 Science Proficiency Gap Narrowing
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100
Baseline CPI
2015 CPI
2016 CPI
CPI Change
2016 Target
6 Year Goal
CPI Percentile in School Type
N
PPI Points
Rating
All students
93.9
88.1
90.0
1.9
96.4
97.0
83
40
75
On Target
High needs
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
9
-
-
Econ. Disadvantaged
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
EL and Former EL
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
1
-
-
Students w/ disabilities
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
8
-
-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Asian
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
3
-
-
Afr. Amer./Black
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Hispanic/Latino
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
2
-
-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
White
93.3
87.8
88.6
0.8
96.1
96.7
68
35
50
Improved Below Target
2016 English Language Arts Extra Credit
Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more)
Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015 % Advanced
2016 % Advanced
N
PPI Points
2015 % Warning/Failing
2016 % Warning/Failing
N
PPI Points
All students
29.0
34.3
137
25
2.4
0.7
137
25
High needs
0.0
3.6
28
25
6.5
3.6
28
25
Econ. Disadvantaged
-
-
2
-
-
-
2
-
EL and Former EL
-
-
4
-
-
-
4
-
Students w/ disabilities
-
-
24
-
-
-
24
-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Asian
-
-
12
-
-
-
12
-
Afr. Amer./Black
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Hispanic/Latino
-
-
3
-
-
-
3
-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.
-
-
2
-
-
-
2
-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
White
26.9
32.5
120
25
2.8
0.8
120
25
2016 Mathematics Extra Credit
Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more)
Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015 % Advanced
2016 % Advanced
N
PPI Points
2015 % Warning/Failing
2016 % Warning/Failing
N
PPI Points
All students
46.8
59.1
137
25
1.6
0.7
137
25
High needs
16.1
10.7
28
0
9.7
3.6
28
25
Econ. Disadvantaged
-
-
2
-
-
-
2
-
EL and Former EL
-
-
4
-
-
-
4
-
Students w/ disabilities
-
-
24
-
-
-
24
-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Asian
-
-
12
-
-
-
12
-
Afr. Amer./Black
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Hispanic/Latino
-
-
3
-
-
-
3
-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.
-
-
2
-
-
-
2
-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
White
44.4
55.8
120
25
0.9
0.0
120
25
2016 Science Extra Credit
Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more)
Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015 % Advanced
2016 % Advanced
N
PPI Points
2015 % Warning/Failing
2016 % Warning/Failing
N
PPI Points
All students
14.3
37.5
40
25
0.0
2.5
40
0
High needs
-
-
9
-
-
-
9
-
Econ. Disadvantaged
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
EL and Former EL
-
-
1
-
-
-
1
-
Students w/ disabilities
-
-
8
-
-
-
8
-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Asian
-
-
3
-
-
-
3
-
Afr. Amer./Black
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Hispanic/Latino
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.
-
-
2
-
-
-
2
-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
White
16.2
31.4
35
25
0.0
2.9
35
0
2016 English Language Arts Growth
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100
2015 SGP
2016 SGP
SGP Change
6 Year Goal
Met Safe Harbor?
N
PPI Points
Rating
All students
61.0
72.5
11.5
51.0
Yes
82
100
Above Target
High needs
-
-
-
51.0
-
15
-
-
Econ. Disadvantaged
-
-
-
51.0
-
-
-
-
EL and Former EL
-
-
-
51.0
-
2
-
-
Students w/ disabilities
-
-
-
51.0
-
13
-
-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.
-
-
-
51.0
-
-
-
-
Asian
-
-
-
51.0
-
8
-
-
Afr. Amer./Black
-
-
-
51.0
-
-
-
-
Hispanic/Latino
-
-
-
51.0
-
1
-
-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.
-
-
-
51.0
-
2
-
-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.
-
-
-
51.0
-
-
-
-
White
54.0
72.0
18.0
51.0
Yes
71
100
Above Target
2016 Mathematics Growth
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100
2015 SGP
2016 SGP
SGP Change
6 Year Goal
Met Safe Harbor?
N
PPI Points
Rating
All students
44.0
62.5
18.5
51.0
Yes
82
100
Above Target
High needs
-
-
-
51.0
-
15
-
-
Econ. Disadvantaged
-
-
-
51.0
-
-
-
-
EL and Former EL
-
-
-
51.0
-
2
-
-
Students w/ disabilities
-
-
-
51.0
-
13
-
-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.
-
-
-
51.0
-
-
-
-
Asian
-
-
-
51.0
-
8
-
-
Afr. Amer./Black
-
-
-
51.0
-
-
-
-
Hispanic/Latino
-
-
-
51.0
-
1
-
-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.
-
-
-
51.0
-
2
-
-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.
-
-
-
51.0
-
-
-
-
White
44.0
58.0
14.0
51.0
Yes
71
75
On Target
2016 Extra credit for English language proficiency growth
2016 SGPA
2016 Target
SGPA N Included
PPI Points
All students
-
60.0
8
-
High needs
-
60.0
8
-
EL and Former EL
-
60.0
8
-
2016 Assessment Participation
English Language Arts
Mathematics
Science
Enrolled
Assessed
%
Met Target (95%)
Enrolled
Assessed
%
Met Target (95%)
Enrolled
Assessed
%
Met Target (95%)
All students
139
139
100
Yes
139
139
100
Yes
41
41
100
Yes
High needs
30
30
100
Yes
30
30
100
Yes
10
-
-
-
Econ. Disadvantaged
2
-
-
-
2
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
EL and Former EL
5
-
-
-
5
-
-
-
2
-
-
-
Students w/ disabilities
25
-
-
-
25
-
-
-
8
-
-
-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Asian
13
-
-
-
13
-
-
-
4
-
-
-
Afr. Amer./Black
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Hispanic/Latino
3
-
-
-
3
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.
2
-
-
-
2
-
-
-
2
-
-
-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
White
121
121
100
Yes
121
121
100
Yes
35
35
100
Yes
NOTE: In 2016, assessment participation was calculated two ways: First, the 2016 participation rate for each subgroup in each subject area test was calculated. If the actual 2016 participation rate was lower than 95 percent for any group in any subject, that rate was compared to the average of the most recent two years of assessment participation data for that group and subject. The higher of the two resulting rates was factored into the assignment of the school or district's 2016 accountability and assistance level.
2015 Massachusetts and Nationwide NAEP Results by Student Group Average Scaled Scores and Percentages of Students at Each Achievement Level
NAEP, or the National Assessment of Educational Progress, is often called the "Nation's Report Card." It is the only measure of student achievement in the United States that allows you to compare the performance of students in Massachusetts with the performance of students across the nation or in other states. Students take the NAEP in reading and mathematics every two years. When reviewing these results, it is important to keep in mind that the NAEP results are based on a small sample of students across Massachusetts, not the population of Massachusetts students. For more information, please visit http://www.doe.mass.edu/mcas/naep/faq.html.
The following symbols are used to denote the NAEP achievement levels: A for Advanced, P+ for Proficient and above, B+ for Basic and above, BB for Below Basic. The symbol "#" means that the estimated number of students rounds to zero.
GRADE LEVEL 4 - READING
Student Group
Massachusetts
National Public
Avg. Scaled Score
% at Each Level
Avg. Scaled Score
% at Each Level
A
P+
B+
BB
% Assessed
A
P+
B+
BB
% Assessed
All Students
235
14
50
82
18
100
221
8
35
68
32
100
Stud. w/ Disab
209
2
20
55
45
18
186
2
12
33
67
13
LEP
200
1
12
44
56
9
189
1
8
32
68
11
African American/Black
217
3
25
65
35
7
206
2
18
51
49
15
Asian/Pacific Islander
249
31
68
89
11
6
238
19
53
81
19
5
Hispanic/Latino
215
3
25
61
39
19
208
3
21
54
46
26
White
242
17
58
89
11
65
232
11
46
79
21
49
Econ. Disadvantaged
220
5
29
67
33
42
209
3
21
56
44
55
GRADE LEVEL 4 - MATHEMATICS
Student Group
Massachusetts
National Public
Avg. Scaled Score
% at Each Level
Avg. Scaled Score
% at Each Level
A
P+
B+
BB
% Assessed
A
P+
B+
BB
% Assessed
All Students
251
13
54
90
10
100
240
7
39
81
19
100
Stud. w/ Disab
231
4
25
74
26
18
217
2
16
54
46
13
LEP
223
2
17
65
35
9
218
1
15
57
43
11
African American/Black
230
1
26
73
27
7
224
1
19
65
35
15
Asian/Pacific Islander
273
38
81
98
2
6
256
22
61
90
10
5
Hispanic/Latino
232
3
28
74
26
19
230
3
26
73
27
26
White
256
15
62
95
5
65
248
10
51
90
10
49
Econ. Disadvantaged
236
4
31
80
20
42
229
2
24
72
28
55
GRADE LEVEL 8 - READING
Student Group
Massachusetts
National Public
Avg. Scaled Score
% at Each Level
Avg. Scaled Score
% at Each Level
A
P+
B+
BB
% Assessed
A
P+
B+
BB
% Assessed
All Students
274
6
46
83
17
100
264
3
33
75
25
100
Stud. w/ Disab
245
1
15
54
46
18
229
#
8
36
64
12
LEP
225
#
6
35
65
5
223
#
3
28
72
6
African American/Black
252
1
18
63
37
9
247
1
15
58
42
15
Asian/Pacific Islander
290
18
64
90
10
7
279
9
50
85
15
6
Hispanic/Latino
249
#
17
61
39
14
253
1
20
65
35
25
White
281
7
53
90
10
67
273
4
42
84
16
51
Econ. Disadvantaged
260
3
28
71
29
44
253
1
20
64
36
52
GRADE LEVEL 8 - MATHEMATICS
Student Group
Massachusetts
National Public
Avg. Scaled Score
% at Each Level
Avg. Scaled Score
% at Each Level
A
P+
B+
BB
% Assessed
A
P+
B+
BB
% Assessed
All Students
297
18
51
81
19
100
281
8
32
70
30
100
Stud. w/ Disab
264
3
16
51
49
18
246
1
8
32
68
12
LEP
251
2
10
38
62
6
246
1
5
31
69
6
African American/Black
268
4
22
54
46
9
260
1
12
47
53
15
Asian/Pacific Islander
324
44
73
94
6
7
305
25
58
86
14
6
Hispanic/Latino
271
4
24
61
39
15
269
3
19
60
40
25
White
304
20
59
88
12
66
291
10
42
81
19
51
Econ. Disadvantaged
279
7
31
67
33
43
268
2
18
58
42
52
Participation Rates for Students with Disabilities and for English Language Learner Students
The NAEP program has always endeavored to assess all students selected for testing. In all NAEP schools, accommodations are provided as necessary for students with disabilities and/or English language learners. School staff who are familiar with these students are asked a series of questions to help them decide whether each student should participate in the assessment and whether the student needs accommodations.