Jay Scott Harding, Principal Mailing Address: 12 Salem Rd Tewksbury, MA 01876
Phone: (978) 640-7870 FAX: (978) 640-7874
This report card contains information required by the federal Elementary and Secondary Education Act (ESEA) for our school and district including: student enrollment and teacher qualifications, student achievement, accountability, and the progress our school is making toward narrowing proficiency gaps for different groups of students.
Enrollment and Educator Data (2015-16 School Year)
Percentage of Teachers Licensed in Teaching Assignment
100.0
100.0
97.4
Total Number of Classes in Core Academic Areas
96
1,163
348,472
Percentage of Core Academic Classes Taught by Teachers Who are Highly Qualified
100.0
99.6
96.3
Percentage of Core Academic Classes Taught by Teachers Who are Not Highly Qualified
0.0
0.4
3.7
Student/Teacher Ratio
12.9 to 1
14.1 to 1
13.2 to 1
Percentage of Public Elementary and Secondary School Teachers Issued Waivers
-
0.0
0.9
This organization is currently closed.
2016 MCAS Results by Student Group by Grade and Subject
NOTE: First-year ELL students are not included in achievement level or CPI results. However, first-year ELL students who took the ACCESS for ELLs test are counted as ELA participants; in addition, first-year ELL students who are present for Mathematics/Science and Technology/Engineering are counted as Mathematics/Science and Technology/Engineering participants. Please see the principal's administration manual (PAM) for details.
NOTE: Spring 2016 results in grades 3-8 ELA and Mathematics are not reported because all students in this organization participated in the PARCC test.
Data Under Review or Fewer than 10 students were tested.
2016 PARCC Results by Student Group by Grade and Subject
Achievement Levels: L5 = Level 5: Exceeded Expectations (varies by grade - 850) L4 = Level 4: Met Expectations (750 - varies by grade) L3 = Level 3: Approached Expectations (725-749) L2 = Level 2: Partially met Expectations (700-724) L1 = Level 1: Did not meet Expectations (650-699)
Trans. SGP = Transitional Student Growth Percentile
generated using current PARCC and prior MCAS scores Trans. CPI = Transitional Composite Performance Index
generated using linked PARCC and MCAS scores
NOTE: Since only a portion of students in grades 3-8 participated in 2016 PARCC in ELA/L and Mathematics, a representative sample of students from across Massachusetts was used to estimate student achievement at the state level in those subjects. NOTE: Students who took the Alternate Assessment are included in Mean CPI, but not in achievement level or growth results.
Data Last Updated on September 24, 2016
GRADE 3 ELA/L
Student Group
School
District
State
Included
Part. Rate
% at Each Level
Trans. CPI
Trans. SGP
Incl. in SGP (#)
Included
Part. Rate
% at Each Level
Trans. CPI
Trans. SGP
Incl. in SGP (#)
Included
Part. Rate
% at Each Level
Trans. CPI
Trans. SGP
Incl. in SGP (#)
#
%
L5
L4
L3
L2
L1
#
%
L5
L4
L3
L2
L1
#
%
L5
L4
L3
L2
L1
Subgroups
High needs
38
100
5
39
21
26
8
81.6
--
--
74
100
3
46
27
18
7
84.7
--
--
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Econ. disadvantaged
21
100
10
48
14
14
14
84.5
--
--
41
100
5
54
17
15
10
84.5
--
--
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
ELL/Formerly ELL
3
--
--
8
--
--
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Students w/disablities
22
100
0
23
18
45
14
70.5
--
--
43
100
0
30
30
28
12
77.2
--
--
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Asian
6
--
--
11
100
27
64
9
0
0
97.7
--
--
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Hispanic/Latino
3
--
--
6
--
--
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.
2
--
--
5
--
--
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
White
108
99
7
62
19
9
2
92.8
--
--
222
100
6
64
21
7
2
93.4
--
--
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Male
51
100
10
57
22
10
2
92.2
--
--
128
100
5
64
23
6
2
93.7
--
--
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Female
68
99
9
65
16
7
3
93.8
--
--
124
99
8
66
18
6
2
94.2
--
--
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Non-Disabled
97
99
11
70
19
0
0
98.2
--
--
209
100
8
72
18
1
0
97.5
--
--
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Non-Econ. disadvantaged
98
99
9
64
19
7
0
94.9
--
--
211
100
7
67
21
4
0
95.8
--
--
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
ELL
3
--
--
8
--
--
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Former ELL
2
--
--
4
--
--
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Ever ELL
3
--
--
8
--
--
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
All Students
2016
119
99
9
61
18
8
3
93.1
--
--
252
100
7
65
20
6
2
93.9
--
--
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
GRADE 3 Math
Student Group
School
District
State
Included
Part. Rate
% at Each Level
Trans. CPI
Trans. SGP
Incl. in SGP (#)
Included
Part. Rate
% at Each Level
Trans. CPI
Trans. SGP
Incl. in SGP (#)
Included
Part. Rate
% at Each Level
Trans. CPI
Trans. SGP
Incl. in SGP (#)
#
%
L5
L4
L3
L2
L1
#
%
L5
L4
L3
L2
L1
#
%
L5
L4
L3
L2
L1
Subgroups
High needs
38
100
13
34
34
16
3
87.5
--
--
74
100
9
42
30
14
5
86.4
--
--
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Econ. disadvantaged
21
100
10
38
38
14
0
90.5
--
--
41
100
7
37
34
15
7
83.3
--
--
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
ELL/Formerly ELL
3
--
--
8
--
--
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Students w/disablities
22
100
9
23
41
23
5
81.8
--
--
43
100
7
37
28
21
7
81.7
--
--
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Asian
6
--
--
11
100
45
55
0
0
0
100.0
--
--
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Hispanic/Latino
3
--
--
6
--
--
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.
2
--
--
5
--
--
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
White
108
99
19
54
20
6
1
95.1
--
--
222
100
22
51
20
5
2
94.8
--
--
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Male
51
100
22
59
10
8
2
94.1
--
--
128
100
20
57
15
5
2
94.4
--
--
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Female
68
99
24
46
26
4
0
95.6
--
--
124
99
25
44
27
4
1
95.4
--
--
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Non-Disabled
97
99
26
58
14
2
0
97.9
--
--
209
100
26
53
19
1
0
97.7
--
--
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Non-Econ. disadvantaged
98
99
26
54
15
4
1
95.9
--
--
211
100
26
53
18
3
0
97.2
--
--
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
ELL
3
--
--
8
--
--
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Former ELL
2
--
--
4
--
--
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Ever ELL
3
--
--
8
--
--
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
All Students
2016
119
99
23
51
19
6
1
95.0
--
--
252
100
23
50
21
5
2
94.9
--
--
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
GRADE 4 ELA/L
Student Group
School
District
State
Included
Part. Rate
% at Each Level
Trans. CPI
Trans. SGP
Incl. in SGP (#)
Included
Part. Rate
% at Each Level
Trans. CPI
Trans. SGP
Incl. in SGP (#)
Included
Part. Rate
% at Each Level
Trans. CPI
Trans. SGP
Incl. in SGP (#)
#
%
L5
L4
L3
L2
L1
#
%
L5
L4
L3
L2
L1
#
%
L5
L4
L3
L2
L1
Subgroups
High needs
34
100
0
41
29
29
0
69.9
38.0
34
75
99
3
49
32
16
0
79.9
51.0
72
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Econ. disadvantaged
14
100
0
50
29
21
0
71.4
--
14
26
96
8
50
27
15
0
79.8
30.0
23
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Students w/disablities
24
100
0
29
33
38
0
64.6
45.0
24
52
100
0
42
40
17
0
76.9
55.0
52
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Afr. Amer./Black
1
--
1
6
--
6
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Asian
3
--
3
11
100
55
36
0
9
0
95.5
--
11
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Hispanic/Latino
2
--
2
3
--
3
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.
1
--
1
5
--
2
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
White
102
100
12
54
23
12
0
85.3
44.0
101
238
100
13
57
24
6
0
88.5
45.0
234
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Male
57
100
4
60
23
14
0
83.8
39.0
56
140
100
9
59
25
7
0
87.5
44.0
137
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Female
52
100
23
48
21
8
0
88.0
48.0
52
124
98
19
56
20
4
1
90.7
46.0
120
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Non-Disabled
85
100
16
61
19
4
0
91.8
44.0
84
212
99
17
61
18
3
0
92.1
43.0
205
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Non-Econ. disadvantaged
95
100
15
55
21
9
0
87.9
45.0
94
238
100
15
58
22
5
0
90.0
45.0
234
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Ever ELL
1
--
1
8
--
8
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
All Students
2016
109
100
13
54
22
11
0
85.8
44.0
108
264
99
14
57
23
6
0
89.0
45.0
257
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
GRADE 4 Math
Student Group
School
District
State
Included
Part. Rate
% at Each Level
Trans. CPI
Trans. SGP
Incl. in SGP (#)
Included
Part. Rate
% at Each Level
Trans. CPI
Trans. SGP
Incl. in SGP (#)
Included
Part. Rate
% at Each Level
Trans. CPI
Trans. SGP
Incl. in SGP (#)
#
%
L5
L4
L3
L2
L1
#
%
L5
L4
L3
L2
L1
#
%
L5
L4
L3
L2
L1
Subgroups
High needs
34
100
3
32
32
21
12
70.6
43.0
34
75
99
4
41
33
15
7
77.9
50.0
72
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Econ. disadvantaged
14
100
7
43
43
7
0
85.7
--
14
26
96
12
38
38
8
4
84.6
63.0
23
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Students w/disablities
24
100
0
25
29
29
17
62.5
33.0
24
52
100
0
40
31
19
10
73.6
50.0
52
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Afr. Amer./Black
1
--
1
6
--
6
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Asian
3
--
3
11
100
55
36
9
0
0
97.7
--
11
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Hispanic/Latino
2
--
2
3
--
3
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.
1
--
1
5
--
2
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
White
102
100
10
55
24
8
4
86.5
42.0
101
238
100
11
58
21
7
3
88.5
47.0
234
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Male
57
100
9
51
26
11
4
83.8
42.0
56
140
100
10
59
22
7
2
88.2
45.0
137
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Female
52
100
13
54
23
6
4
88.5
43.0
52
124
98
15
54
23
6
2
88.7
49.0
120
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Non-Disabled
85
100
14
60
24
2
0
92.6
44.0
84
212
99
15
60
20
4
0
92.2
45.0
205
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Non-Econ. disadvantaged
95
100
12
54
22
8
4
86.1
40.0
94
238
100
12
58
21
7
2
88.9
45.0
234
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Ever ELL
1
--
1
8
--
8
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
All Students
2016
109
100
11
52
25
8
4
86.0
42.0
108
264
99
12
56
22
7
2
88.4
47.0
257
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
GRADES 3-8 ELA/L
Student Group
School
District
State
Included
Part. Rate
% at Each Level
Trans. CPI
Trans. SGP
Incl. in SGP (#)
Included
Part. Rate
% at Each Level
Trans. CPI
Trans. SGP
Incl. in SGP (#)
Included
Part. Rate
% at Each Level
Trans. CPI
Trans. SGP
Incl. in SGP (#)
#
%
L5
L4
L3
L2
L1
#
%
L5
L4
L3
L2
L1
#
%
L5
L4
L3
L2
L1
Subgroups
High needs
72
100
3
40
25
28
4
76.0
38.0
34
508
99
4
33
34
22
7
78.4
33.0
418
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Econ. disadvantaged
35
100
6
49
20
17
9
79.3
--
14
263
99
8
40
31
15
6
84.2
34.0
210
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
ELL/Formerly ELL
3
--
--
26
100
0
54
15
23
8
82.7
--
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Students w/disablities
46
100
0
26
26
41
7
67.4
45.0
24
310
99
1
21
37
30
11
70.7
31.0
264
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Afr. Amer./Black
1
--
1
35
97
9
49
26
17
0
89.3
42.0
26
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Asian
9
100
--
3
56
100
38
46
13
4
0
96.5
38.0
43
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Hispanic/Latino
5
--
2
40
100
15
43
20
20
3
88.4
30.0
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.
3
--
1
23
100
0
52
30
9
9
85.4
--
10
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
White
210
100
10
58
21
10
1
89.2
44.0
101
1,538
99
13
51
25
9
3
90.1
37.0
1,285
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Male
108
100
6
58
22
12
1
87.7
39.0
56
852
100
9
50
26
11
4
87.3
33.0
700
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Female
120
99
15
57
18
8
2
91.3
48.0
52
843
99
19
51
22
7
1
93.0
40.0
699
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Non-Disabled
182
99
14
66
19
2
0
95.2
44.0
84
1,385
99
17
57
21
5
1
94.7
38.0
1,135
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Non-Econ. disadvantaged
193
99
12
60
20
8
0
91.5
45.0
94
1,432
100
15
52
23
8
2
91.3
37.0
1,189
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
ELL
3
--
--
23
100
0
57
17
22
4
84.8
--
13
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Former ELL
2
--
--
12
100
0
67
17
8
8
91.7
--
8
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Ever ELL
4
--
1
42
100
10
48
17
21
5
85.5
42.0
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
All Students
2016
228
100
11
58
20
10
1
89.6
44.0
108
1,695
99
14
51
24
9
2
90.1
37.0
1,399
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
2015
238
100
15
55
16
11
3
86.9
56.0
124
1,765
99
17
54
20
7
3
91.3
62.0
1,463
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
GRADES 3-8 MATH
Student Group
School
District
State
Included
Part. Rate
% at Each Level
Trans. CPI
Trans. SGP
Incl. in SGP (#)
Included
Part. Rate
% at Each Level
Trans. CPI
Trans. SGP
Incl. in SGP (#)
Included
Part. Rate
% at Each Level
Trans. CPI
Trans. SGP
Incl. in SGP (#)
#
%
L5
L4
L3
L2
L1
#
%
L5
L4
L3
L2
L1
#
%
L5
L4
L3
L2
L1
Subgroups
High needs
72
100
8
33
33
18
7
79.5
43.0
34
507
99
4
27
29
28
11
65.5
37.0
417
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Econ. disadvantaged
35
100
9
40
40
11
0
88.6
--
14
265
99
6
33
28
24
10
70.6
39.0
211
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
ELL/Formerly ELL
3
--
--
27
100
7
44
30
15
4
77.8
--
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Students w/disablities
46
100
4
24
35
26
11
71.7
33.0
24
309
98
1
17
28
36
17
56.4
34.0
264
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Afr. Amer./Black
1
--
1
35
97
0
43
31
17
9
74.3
28.0
26
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Asian
9
100
--
3
56
100
43
45
11
2
0
97.8
57.0
44
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Hispanic/Latino
5
--
2
41
100
7
41
27
15
10
75.6
48.0
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.
3
--
1
24
100
4
29
25
33
8
64.6
--
11
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
White
210
100
15
54
22
7
2
91.0
42.0
101
1,532
99
11
48
25
13
4
83.6
41.0
1,281
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Male
108
100
15
55
19
9
3
88.7
42.0
56
851
99
10
47
24
14
5
81.7
39.0
702
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Female
120
99
19
49
25
5
2
92.5
43.0
52
840
99
12
48
25
12
3
85.0
45.0
695
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Non-Disabled
182
99
20
59
19
2
0
95.5
44.0
84
1,382
99
13
54
23
8
1
89.7
44.0
1,133
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Non-Econ. disadvantaged
193
99
19
54
19
6
3
91.1
40.0
94
1,426
99
12
50
24
11
3
85.7
42.0
1,186
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
ELL
3
--
--
24
100
4
50
33
13
0
81.3
--
13
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Former ELL
2
--
--
12
100
17
58
8
8
8
83.3
--
8
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Ever ELL
4
--
1
43
100
14
40
26
14
7
77.8
45.0
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
All Students
2016
228
100
17
52
22
7
2
90.7
42.0
108
1,691
99
11
47
24
13
4
83.3
42.0
1,397
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
2015
238
100
9
53
23
13
2
87.2
49.0
124
1,770
100
10
48
26
13
3
84.5
56.0
1,463
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
2016 Accountability Data - Louise Davy Trahan
Accountability Information
Accountability and Assistance Level
Level 2
Not meeting gap narrowing goals
This school's overall performance relative to other schools in same school type (School percentiles: 1-99)
All students:
58
Lowest performing
Highest performing
This school’s progress toward narrowing proficiency gaps (Cumulative Progress and Performance Index: 1-100)
Student Group (Click group to view subgroup data)
On Target = 75 or higher -
Less progress
More progress
All students
78
Met Target
High needs
63
Did Not Meet Target
Econ. Disadvantaged
-
EL and Former EL
-
Students w/ disabilities
61
Did Not Meet Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.
-
Asian
-
Afr. Amer./Black
-
Hispanic/Latino
-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.
-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.
-
White
71
Did Not Meet Target
Louise Davy Trahan: Accountability Data Detail
2016 English Language Arts Proficiency Gap Narrowing
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100
Baseline CPI
2015 CPI
2016 CPI
CPI Change
2016 Target
6 Year Goal
CPI Percentile in School Type
N
PPI Points
Rating
All students
84.0
86.9
89.6
2.7
90.7
92.0
68
228
75
On Target
High needs
68.5
71.5
76.0
4.5
81.6
84.3
51
72
50
Improved Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged
79.2
79.2
79.3
0.1
80.9
89.6
62
35
50
Improved Below Target
EL and Former EL
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
3
-
-
Students w/ disabilities
59.7
63.0
67.4
4.4
76.5
79.9
59
46
50
Improved Below Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Asian
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
9
-
-
Afr. Amer./Black
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
1
-
-
Hispanic/Latino
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
5
-
-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
3
-
-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
White
84.1
86.8
89.2
2.4
90.7
92.1
57
210
50
Improved Below Target
2016 Mathematics Proficiency Gap Narrowing
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100
Baseline CPI
2015 CPI
2016 CPI
CPI Change
2016 Target
6 Year Goal
CPI Percentile in School Type
N
PPI Points
Rating
All students
82.6
87.2
90.7
3.5
89.9
91.3
75
228
75
On Target
High needs
63.3
72.8
79.5
6.7
78.6
81.7
66
72
75
On Target
Econ. Disadvantaged
81.9
81.9
88.6
6.7
83.4
91.0
94
35
100
Above Target
EL and Former EL
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
3
-
-
Students w/ disabilities
57.4
65.3
71.7
6.4
75.2
78.7
69
46
50
Improved Below Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Asian
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
9
-
-
Afr. Amer./Black
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
1
-
-
Hispanic/Latino
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
5
-
-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
3
-
-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
White
82.6
87.1
91.0
3.9
89.9
91.3
69
210
75
On Target
2016 Science Proficiency Gap Narrowing
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100
Baseline CPI
2015 CPI
2016 CPI
CPI Change
2016 Target
6 Year Goal
CPI Percentile in School Type
N
PPI Points
Rating
All students
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
High needs
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Econ. Disadvantaged
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
EL and Former EL
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Students w/ disabilities
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Asian
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Afr. Amer./Black
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Hispanic/Latino
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
White
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
2016 English Language Arts Extra Credit
Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more)
Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015 % Advanced
2016 % Advanced
N
PPI Points
2015 % Warning/Failing
2016 % Warning/Failing
N
PPI Points
All students
12.6
16.7
228
25
4.2
2.6
228
25
High needs
2.5
6.9
72
25
11.4
8.3
72
25
Econ. Disadvantaged
5.6
14.3
35
25
8.3
11.4
35
0
EL and Former EL
-
-
3
-
-
-
3
-
Students w/ disabilities
0.0
0.0
46
0
14.8
10.9
46
25
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Asian
-
-
9
-
-
-
9
-
Afr. Amer./Black
-
-
1
-
-
-
1
-
Hispanic/Latino
-
-
5
-
-
-
5
-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.
-
-
3
-
-
-
3
-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
White
12.0
14.3
210
25
4.4
2.9
210
25
2016 Mathematics Extra Credit
Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more)
Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015 % Advanced
2016 % Advanced
N
PPI Points
2015 % Warning/Failing
2016 % Warning/Failing
N
PPI Points
All students
23.9
39.0
228
25
2.9
3.9
228
0
High needs
8.9
22.2
72
25
8.9
12.5
72
0
Econ. Disadvantaged
13.9
25.7
35
25
5.6
2.9
35
25
EL and Former EL
-
-
3
-
-
-
3
-
Students w/ disabilities
3.7
10.9
46
25
13.0
19.6
46
0
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Asian
-
-
9
-
-
-
9
-
Afr. Amer./Black
-
-
1
-
-
-
1
-
Hispanic/Latino
-
-
5
-
-
-
5
-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.
-
-
3
-
-
-
3
-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
White
24.0
37.1
210
25
3.1
3.8
210
0
2016 Science Extra Credit
Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more)
Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015 % Advanced
2016 % Advanced
N
PPI Points
2015 % Warning/Failing
2016 % Warning/Failing
N
PPI Points
All students
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
High needs
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Econ. Disadvantaged
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
EL and Former EL
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Students w/ disabilities
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Asian
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Afr. Amer./Black
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Hispanic/Latino
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
White
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
2016 English Language Arts Growth
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100
2015 SGP
2016 SGP
SGP Change
6 Year Goal
Met Safe Harbor?
N
PPI Points
Rating
All students
56.0
44.0
-12.0
51.0
Yes
108
75
On Target
High needs
59.5
38.0
-21.5
51.0
No
34
25
Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged
-
-
-
51.0
-
14
-
-
EL and Former EL
-
-
-
51.0
-
-
-
-
Students w/ disabilities
60.5
45.0
-15.5
51.0
No
24
50
Below Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.
-
-
-
51.0
-
-
-
-
Asian
-
-
-
51.0
-
3
-
-
Afr. Amer./Black
-
-
-
51.0
-
1
-
-
Hispanic/Latino
-
-
-
51.0
-
2
-
-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.
-
-
-
51.0
-
1
-
-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.
-
-
-
51.0
-
-
-
-
White
56.0
44.0
-12.0
51.0
No
101
50
Below Target
2016 Mathematics Growth
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100
2015 SGP
2016 SGP
SGP Change
6 Year Goal
Met Safe Harbor?
N
PPI Points
Rating
All students
49.0
42.0
-7.0
51.0
Yes
108
75
On Target
High needs
40.0
42.5
2.5
51.0
Yes
34
75
On Target
Econ. Disadvantaged
-
-
-
51.0
-
14
-
-
EL and Former EL
-
-
-
51.0
-
-
-
-
Students w/ disabilities
32.0
32.5
0.5
51.0
Yes
24
75
On Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.
-
-
-
51.0
-
-
-
-
Asian
-
-
-
51.0
-
3
-
-
Afr. Amer./Black
-
-
-
51.0
-
1
-
-
Hispanic/Latino
-
-
-
51.0
-
2
-
-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.
-
-
-
51.0
-
1
-
-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.
-
-
-
51.0
-
-
-
-
White
49.0
42.0
-7.0
51.0
Yes
101
75
On Target
2016 Extra credit for English language proficiency growth
2016 SGPA
2016 Target
SGPA N Included
PPI Points
All students
-
60.0
2
-
High needs
-
60.0
2
-
EL and Former EL
-
60.0
2
-
2016 Assessment Participation
English Language Arts
Mathematics
Science
Enrolled
Assessed
%
Met Target (95%)
Enrolled
Assessed
%
Met Target (95%)
Enrolled
Assessed
%
Met Target (95%)
All students
231
230
100
Yes
231
230
100
Yes
-
-
-
-
High needs
73
73
100
Yes
73
73
100
Yes
-
-
-
-
Econ. Disadvantaged
36
36
100
Yes
36
36
100
Yes
-
-
-
-
EL and Former EL
3
-
-
-
3
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Students w/ disabilities
47
47
100
Yes
47
47
100
Yes
-
-
-
-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Asian
10
-
-
-
10
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Afr. Amer./Black
1
-
-
-
1
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Hispanic/Latino
5
-
-
-
5
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.
3
-
-
-
3
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
White
212
211
100
Yes
212
211
100
Yes
-
-
-
-
NOTE: In 2016, assessment participation was calculated two ways: First, the 2016 participation rate for each subgroup in each subject area test was calculated. If the actual 2016 participation rate was lower than 95 percent for any group in any subject, that rate was compared to the average of the most recent two years of assessment participation data for that group and subject. The higher of the two resulting rates was factored into the assignment of the school or district's 2016 accountability and assistance level.
2015 Massachusetts and Nationwide NAEP Results by Student Group Average Scaled Scores and Percentages of Students at Each Achievement Level
NAEP, or the National Assessment of Educational Progress, is often called the "Nation's Report Card." It is the only measure of student achievement in the United States that allows you to compare the performance of students in Massachusetts with the performance of students across the nation or in other states. Students take the NAEP in reading and mathematics every two years. When reviewing these results, it is important to keep in mind that the NAEP results are based on a small sample of students across Massachusetts, not the population of Massachusetts students. For more information, please visit http://www.doe.mass.edu/mcas/naep/faq.html.
The following symbols are used to denote the NAEP achievement levels: A for Advanced, P+ for Proficient and above, B+ for Basic and above, BB for Below Basic. The symbol "#" means that the estimated number of students rounds to zero.
GRADE LEVEL 4 - READING
Student Group
Massachusetts
National Public
Avg. Scaled Score
% at Each Level
Avg. Scaled Score
% at Each Level
A
P+
B+
BB
% Assessed
A
P+
B+
BB
% Assessed
All Students
235
14
50
82
18
100
221
8
35
68
32
100
Stud. w/ Disab
209
2
20
55
45
18
186
2
12
33
67
13
LEP
200
1
12
44
56
9
189
1
8
32
68
11
African American/Black
217
3
25
65
35
7
206
2
18
51
49
15
Asian/Pacific Islander
249
31
68
89
11
6
238
19
53
81
19
5
Hispanic/Latino
215
3
25
61
39
19
208
3
21
54
46
26
White
242
17
58
89
11
65
232
11
46
79
21
49
Econ. Disadvantaged
220
5
29
67
33
42
209
3
21
56
44
55
GRADE LEVEL 4 - MATHEMATICS
Student Group
Massachusetts
National Public
Avg. Scaled Score
% at Each Level
Avg. Scaled Score
% at Each Level
A
P+
B+
BB
% Assessed
A
P+
B+
BB
% Assessed
All Students
251
13
54
90
10
100
240
7
39
81
19
100
Stud. w/ Disab
231
4
25
74
26
18
217
2
16
54
46
13
LEP
223
2
17
65
35
9
218
1
15
57
43
11
African American/Black
230
1
26
73
27
7
224
1
19
65
35
15
Asian/Pacific Islander
273
38
81
98
2
6
256
22
61
90
10
5
Hispanic/Latino
232
3
28
74
26
19
230
3
26
73
27
26
White
256
15
62
95
5
65
248
10
51
90
10
49
Econ. Disadvantaged
236
4
31
80
20
42
229
2
24
72
28
55
GRADE LEVEL 8 - READING
Student Group
Massachusetts
National Public
Avg. Scaled Score
% at Each Level
Avg. Scaled Score
% at Each Level
A
P+
B+
BB
% Assessed
A
P+
B+
BB
% Assessed
All Students
274
6
46
83
17
100
264
3
33
75
25
100
Stud. w/ Disab
245
1
15
54
46
18
229
#
8
36
64
12
LEP
225
#
6
35
65
5
223
#
3
28
72
6
African American/Black
252
1
18
63
37
9
247
1
15
58
42
15
Asian/Pacific Islander
290
18
64
90
10
7
279
9
50
85
15
6
Hispanic/Latino
249
#
17
61
39
14
253
1
20
65
35
25
White
281
7
53
90
10
67
273
4
42
84
16
51
Econ. Disadvantaged
260
3
28
71
29
44
253
1
20
64
36
52
GRADE LEVEL 8 - MATHEMATICS
Student Group
Massachusetts
National Public
Avg. Scaled Score
% at Each Level
Avg. Scaled Score
% at Each Level
A
P+
B+
BB
% Assessed
A
P+
B+
BB
% Assessed
All Students
297
18
51
81
19
100
281
8
32
70
30
100
Stud. w/ Disab
264
3
16
51
49
18
246
1
8
32
68
12
LEP
251
2
10
38
62
6
246
1
5
31
69
6
African American/Black
268
4
22
54
46
9
260
1
12
47
53
15
Asian/Pacific Islander
324
44
73
94
6
7
305
25
58
86
14
6
Hispanic/Latino
271
4
24
61
39
15
269
3
19
60
40
25
White
304
20
59
88
12
66
291
10
42
81
19
51
Econ. Disadvantaged
279
7
31
67
33
43
268
2
18
58
42
52
Participation Rates for Students with Disabilities and for English Language Learner Students
The NAEP program has always endeavored to assess all students selected for testing. In all NAEP schools, accommodations are provided as necessary for students with disabilities and/or English language learners. School staff who are familiar with these students are asked a series of questions to help them decide whether each student should participate in the assessment and whether the student needs accommodations.