Patrick D Fraine, Principal Mailing Address: 70 Manomet Point Rd Plymouth, MA 02360
Phone: (508) 830-4380 FAX: (508) 830-4387
This report card contains information required by the federal Elementary and Secondary Education Act (ESEA) for our school and district including: student enrollment and teacher qualifications, student achievement, accountability, and the progress our school is making toward narrowing proficiency gaps for different groups of students.
Enrollment and Educator Data (2015-16 School Year)
Percentage of Teachers Licensed in Teaching Assignment
100.0
99.5
97.4
Total Number of Classes in Core Academic Areas
145
3,521
348,472
Percentage of Core Academic Classes Taught by Teachers Who are Highly Qualified
93.1
93.2
96.3
Percentage of Core Academic Classes Taught by Teachers Who are Not Highly Qualified
6.9
6.8
3.7
Student/Teacher Ratio
12.5 to 1
12.1 to 1
13.2 to 1
Percentage of Public Elementary and Secondary School Teachers Issued Waivers
-
0.0
0.9
2016 MCAS Results by Student Group by Grade and Subject
NOTE: First-year ELL students are not included in achievement level or CPI results. However, first-year ELL students who took the ACCESS for ELLs test are counted as ELA participants; in addition, first-year ELL students who are present for Mathematics/Science and Technology/Engineering are counted as Mathematics/Science and Technology/Engineering participants. Please see the principal's administration manual (PAM) for details.
NOTE: Spring 2016 results in grades 3-8 ELA and Mathematics are not reported because all students in this organization participated in the PARCC test.
2016 PARCC Results by Student Group by Grade and Subject
Achievement Levels: L5 = Level 5: Exceeded Expectations (varies by grade - 850) L4 = Level 4: Met Expectations (750 - varies by grade) L3 = Level 3: Approached Expectations (725-749) L2 = Level 2: Partially met Expectations (700-724) L1 = Level 1: Did not meet Expectations (650-699)
Trans. SGP = Transitional Student Growth Percentile
generated using current PARCC and prior MCAS scores Trans. CPI = Transitional Composite Performance Index
generated using linked PARCC and MCAS scores
NOTE: Since only a portion of students in grades 3-8 participated in 2016 PARCC in ELA/L and Mathematics, a representative sample of students from across Massachusetts was used to estimate student achievement at the state level in those subjects. NOTE: Students who took the Alternate Assessment are included in Mean CPI, but not in achievement level or growth results.
Data Last Updated on September 24, 2016
GRADE 3 ELA/L
Student Group
School
District
State
Included
Part. Rate
% at Each Level
Trans. CPI
Trans. SGP
Incl. in SGP (#)
Included
Part. Rate
% at Each Level
Trans. CPI
Trans. SGP
Incl. in SGP (#)
Included
Part. Rate
% at Each Level
Trans. CPI
Trans. SGP
Incl. in SGP (#)
#
%
L5
L4
L3
L2
L1
#
%
L5
L4
L3
L2
L1
#
%
L5
L4
L3
L2
L1
Subgroups
High needs
20
96
0
55
25
15
5
86.3
--
--
230
98
1
33
23
23
21
71.8
--
--
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Econ. disadvantaged
15
94
0
60
27
13
0
91.7
--
--
171
99
1
39
22
21
18
75.7
--
--
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Students w/disablities
7
--
--
95
99
1
15
18
28
38
58.5
--
--
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Hispanic/Latino
1
--
--
22
96
0
27
27
18
27
70.7
--
--
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.
2
--
--
23
96
9
39
22
13
17
78.3
--
--
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
White
45
100
7
64
16
11
2
91.1
--
--
548
99
3
53
21
13
10
84.1
--
--
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Male
22
100
0
82
14
5
0
95.5
--
--
306
98
2
48
22
13
15
80.8
--
--
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Female
26
97
12
50
19
15
4
87.5
--
--
304
99
4
54
21
15
6
85.8
--
--
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Title I
8
--
--
144
99
2
41
22
17
17
75.9
--
--
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Non-Disabled
41
98
7
71
17
5
0
95.1
--
--
515
99
3
57
22
11
6
88.3
--
--
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Non-Econ. disadvantaged
33
100
9
67
12
9
3
90.9
--
--
439
99
4
56
21
11
8
86.3
--
--
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
All Students
2016
48
98
6
65
17
10
2
91.1
--
--
610
99
3
51
21
14
11
83.3
--
--
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
GRADE 3 Math
Student Group
School
District
State
Included
Part. Rate
% at Each Level
Trans. CPI
Trans. SGP
Incl. in SGP (#)
Included
Part. Rate
% at Each Level
Trans. CPI
Trans. SGP
Incl. in SGP (#)
Included
Part. Rate
% at Each Level
Trans. CPI
Trans. SGP
Incl. in SGP (#)
#
%
L5
L4
L3
L2
L1
#
%
L5
L4
L3
L2
L1
#
%
L5
L4
L3
L2
L1
Subgroups
High needs
20
96
10
70
15
5
0
95.0
--
--
228
98
7
33
27
21
11
76.6
--
--
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Econ. disadvantaged
15
94
13
73
7
7
0
96.7
--
--
169
98
8
38
25
20
8
81.0
--
--
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Students w/disablities
7
--
--
93
97
3
22
22
31
23
61.9
--
--
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Hispanic/Latino
1
--
--
22
100
5
27
18
32
18
69.6
--
--
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.
2
--
--
23
96
17
39
30
4
9
87.0
--
--
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
White
45
100
22
62
13
2
0
97.8
--
--
544
98
13
51
20
12
4
88.6
--
--
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Male
22
100
18
73
9
0
0
100.0
--
--
305
98
15
46
19
13
7
85.1
--
--
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Female
26
97
23
58
15
4
0
96.2
--
--
301
98
11
52
21
13
3
89.9
--
--
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Title I
8
--
--
143
99
9
41
25
21
3
83.4
--
--
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Non-Disabled
41
98
24
66
10
0
0
100.0
--
--
513
98
15
54
19
10
1
92.5
--
--
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Non-Econ. disadvantaged
33
100
24
61
15
0
0
98.5
--
--
437
98
15
54
18
10
3
90.1
--
--
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
All Students
2016
48
98
21
65
13
2
0
97.9
--
--
606
98
13
49
20
13
5
87.5
--
--
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
GRADE 4 ELA/L
Student Group
School
District
State
Included
Part. Rate
% at Each Level
Trans. CPI
Trans. SGP
Incl. in SGP (#)
Included
Part. Rate
% at Each Level
Trans. CPI
Trans. SGP
Incl. in SGP (#)
Included
Part. Rate
% at Each Level
Trans. CPI
Trans. SGP
Incl. in SGP (#)
#
%
L5
L4
L3
L2
L1
#
%
L5
L4
L3
L2
L1
#
%
L5
L4
L3
L2
L1
Subgroups
High needs
23
100
9
57
17
13
4
81.5
49.0
22
244
100
4
36
30
20
10
69.4
49.0
228
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Econ. disadvantaged
17
100
12
59
18
12
0
85.3
--
16
165
99
5
45
27
16
7
75.6
52.0
153
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Students w/disablities
9
--
9
109
100
1
16
33
32
18
55.6
42.0
100
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Hispanic/Latino
1
--
1
26
100
4
27
35
23
12
66.1
41.0
24
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.
3
--
3
27
100
22
37
15
19
7
75.9
43.0
27
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
White
58
98
19
55
17
7
2
86.2
65.0
56
578
100
16
49
22
8
3
83.6
61.0
553
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Male
32
97
9
47
28
13
3
77.3
51.0
32
336
100
10
46
26
12
6
77.5
50.0
320
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Female
30
100
30
63
7
0
0
96.7
80.0
28
313
100
22
49
19
7
2
87.3
68.0
300
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Title I
15
100
0
33
33
27
7
63.3
--
15
127
100
7
36
27
20
9
70.1
47.0
124
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Non-Disabled
53
98
23
57
17
4
0
89.6
69.0
51
540
100
19
54
21
5
1
88.3
65.0
520
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Non-Econ. disadvantaged
45
98
22
53
18
4
2
87.2
65.0
44
484
100
19
49
21
8
3
84.5
61.0
467
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
All Students
2016
62
98
19
55
18
6
2
86.7
63.0
60
649
100
16
48
23
10
4
82.2
60.0
620
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
GRADE 4 Math
Student Group
School
District
State
Included
Part. Rate
% at Each Level
Trans. CPI
Trans. SGP
Incl. in SGP (#)
Included
Part. Rate
% at Each Level
Trans. CPI
Trans. SGP
Incl. in SGP (#)
Included
Part. Rate
% at Each Level
Trans. CPI
Trans. SGP
Incl. in SGP (#)
#
%
L5
L4
L3
L2
L1
#
%
L5
L4
L3
L2
L1
#
%
L5
L4
L3
L2
L1
Subgroups
High needs
23
100
0
57
35
4
4
82.6
20.0
22
246
100
2
34
33
21
11
69.7
43.0
228
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Econ. disadvantaged
17
100
0
65
29
6
0
88.2
--
16
167
99
2
41
32
18
7
74.6
44.0
153
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Students w/disablities
9
--
9
111
100
0
19
30
31
21
57.7
36.0
101
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Hispanic/Latino
1
--
1
26
100
4
27
31
35
4
66.1
49.0
24
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.
3
--
3
28
100
7
50
11
18
14
74.1
35.0
26
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
White
59
100
0
64
25
8
2
86.0
26.0
57
579
100
8
52
25
11
4
83.3
48.0
550
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Male
33
100
0
61
24
12
3
82.6
28.0
33
336
100
7
48
25
14
5
80.2
45.0
318
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Female
30
100
3
67
27
3
0
90.8
26.0
28
315
100
8
54
24
11
3
84.0
51.0
298
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Title I
15
100
0
27
40
27
7
66.7
--
15
127
100
1
29
35
26
9
67.7
37.0
125
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Non-Disabled
54
100
2
70
20
7
0
90.3
29.0
52
540
100
9
57
24
9
1
87.7
49.0
515
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Non-Econ. disadvantaged
46
100
2
63
24
9
2
85.9
31.0
45
484
100
10
54
22
11
3
84.7
48.0
463
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
All Students
2016
63
100
2
63
25
8
2
86.5
26.0
61
651
100
8
51
25
13
4
82.0
47.0
616
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
GRADE 5 ELA/L
Student Group
School
District
State
Included
Part. Rate
% at Each Level
Trans. CPI
Trans. SGP
Incl. in SGP (#)
Included
Part. Rate
% at Each Level
Trans. CPI
Trans. SGP
Incl. in SGP (#)
Included
Part. Rate
% at Each Level
Trans. CPI
Trans. SGP
Incl. in SGP (#)
#
%
L5
L4
L3
L2
L1
#
%
L5
L4
L3
L2
L1
#
%
L5
L4
L3
L2
L1
Subgroups
High needs
24
100
0
46
21
25
8
79.2
59.0
24
225
100
2
28
33
26
11
71.5
45.0
207
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Econ. disadvantaged
11
100
0
45
36
9
9
86.4
--
11
149
100
3
31
35
22
9
74.8
45.0
133
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Students w/disablities
16
100
0
44
13
31
13
73.4
--
16
127
100
0
16
31
36
17
61.8
41.0
119
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Asian
3
--
3
10
100
20
80
0
0
0
100.0
--
10
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.
2
--
2
21
100
5
33
43
14
5
81.0
--
19
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
White
52
100
19
50
17
10
4
90.4
66.0
52
491
100
9
49
26
11
4
86.0
49.0
470
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Male
30
100
7
63
17
10
3
90.0
57.0
30
302
100
6
42
32
15
5
81.5
45.0
288
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Female
27
100
33
37
15
11
4
89.8
65.0
27
248
100
12
55
20
9
4
89.5
53.0
233
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Title I
13
100
0
46
38
15
0
88.5
--
13
95
100
3
44
27
18
7
80.3
46.0
85
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Non-Disabled
41
100
27
54
17
2
0
96.3
58.0
41
423
100
11
57
25
5
1
92.4
50.0
402
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Non-Econ. disadvantaged
46
100
24
52
11
11
2
90.8
66.0
46
401
100
10
54
23
9
3
88.9
50.0
388
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
All Students
2016
57
100
19
51
16
11
4
89.9
59.0
57
550
100
9
48
27
13
5
85.1
48.0
521
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
GRADE 5 Math
Student Group
School
District
State
Included
Part. Rate
% at Each Level
Trans. CPI
Trans. SGP
Incl. in SGP (#)
Included
Part. Rate
% at Each Level
Trans. CPI
Trans. SGP
Incl. in SGP (#)
Included
Part. Rate
% at Each Level
Trans. CPI
Trans. SGP
Incl. in SGP (#)
#
%
L5
L4
L3
L2
L1
#
%
L5
L4
L3
L2
L1
#
%
L5
L4
L3
L2
L1
Subgroups
High needs
24
100
4
29
33
29
4
74.0
49.0
24
225
100
3
21
33
30
13
65.2
45.0
207
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Econ. disadvantaged
11
100
0
36
36
27
0
79.5
--
11
149
100
4
24
36
23
12
69.4
40.0
133
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Students w/disablities
16
100
6
25
25
38
6
67.2
--
16
127
100
1
12
28
41
19
53.9
41.0
119
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Asian
3
--
3
10
100
20
70
10
0
0
100.0
--
10
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.
2
--
2
21
100
0
29
48
14
10
76.2
--
18
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
White
52
100
12
44
29
13
2
87.5
47.0
51
491
100
8
41
29
17
5
81.8
47.0
464
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Male
30
100
13
43
30
10
3
88.3
47.0
30
302
100
9
36
28
20
6
78.8
43.0
286
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Female
27
100
11
52
22
15
0
88.9
48.0
26
248
100
6
44
31
15
5
83.0
49.0
229
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Title I
13
100
0
15
54
23
8
76.9
--
12
95
100
2
27
38
23
9
72.6
47.0
86
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Non-Disabled
41
100
15
56
27
2
0
97.0
44.0
40
423
100
9
48
30
10
2
89.1
48.0
396
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Non-Econ. disadvantaged
46
100
15
50
24
9
2
90.8
49.0
45
401
100
9
46
27
15
3
84.9
47.0
382
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
All Students
2016
57
100
12
47
26
12
2
88.6
47.0
56
550
100
7
40
29
17
6
80.7
47.0
515
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
GRADES 3-8 ELA/L
Student Group
School
District
State
Included
Part. Rate
% at Each Level
Trans. CPI
Trans. SGP
Incl. in SGP (#)
Included
Part. Rate
% at Each Level
Trans. CPI
Trans. SGP
Incl. in SGP (#)
Included
Part. Rate
% at Each Level
Trans. CPI
Trans. SGP
Incl. in SGP (#)
#
%
L5
L4
L3
L2
L1
#
%
L5
L4
L3
L2
L1
#
%
L5
L4
L3
L2
L1
Subgroups
High needs
67
99
3
52
21
18
6
82.1
56.0
46
1,309
99
3
32
30
22
13
73.2
44.0
997
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Econ. disadvantaged
43
98
5
56
26
12
2
87.8
52.0
27
882
99
4
38
28
18
11
77.2
45.0
646
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Students w/disablities
32
100
0
41
16
31
13
71.1
57.0
25
677
99
1
14
31
32
22
61.8
41.0
539
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Asian
3
--
3
45
100
16
49
24
11
0
90.0
51.0
39
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Hispanic/Latino
2
--
1
112
98
3
29
31
24
13
71.5
41.0
75
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.
7
--
5
138
97
14
37
26
14
9
81.8
50.0
112
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
White
155
99
15
56
17
9
3
89.0
65.0
108
3,135
99
11
50
24
10
5
86.9
48.0
2,461
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Male
84
99
6
62
20
10
2
86.6
55.0
62
1,813
99
6
44
27
14
8
81.8
43.0
1,421
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Female
83
99
25
51
13
8
2
91.6
71.0
55
1,683
99
16
52
21
8
3
90.3
54.0
1,310
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Title I
36
100
0
36
33
25
6
73.6
48.0
28
369
99
4
40
25
18
12
75.2
46.0
209
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Non-Disabled
135
99
19
60
17
4
0
93.3
65.0
92
2,818
99
13
56
23
6
2
92.1
50.0
2,192
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Non-Econ. disadvantaged
124
99
19
56
14
8
2
89.5
65.0
90
2,613
99
13
52
23
9
4
88.8
49.0
2,085
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
All Students
2016
167
99
16
56
17
9
2
89.1
61.0
117
3,496
99
11
48
24
11
6
85.9
48.0
2,731
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
2015
166
100
12
48
25
11
4
84.3
54.0
102
3,449
99
9
45
27
12
6
84.2
39.0
2,677
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
GRADES 3-8 MATH
Student Group
School
District
State
Included
Part. Rate
% at Each Level
Trans. CPI
Trans. SGP
Incl. in SGP (#)
Included
Part. Rate
% at Each Level
Trans. CPI
Trans. SGP
Incl. in SGP (#)
Included
Part. Rate
% at Each Level
Trans. CPI
Trans. SGP
Incl. in SGP (#)
#
%
L5
L4
L3
L2
L1
#
%
L5
L4
L3
L2
L1
#
%
L5
L4
L3
L2
L1
Subgroups
High needs
67
99
4
51
28
13
3
83.2
36.0
46
1,307
98
3
27
30
26
14
65.7
46.0
987
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Econ. disadvantaged
43
98
5
60
23
12
0
89.0
33.0
27
882
99
3
33
31
21
11
70.4
46.0
638
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Students w/disablities
32
100
3
31
34
25
6
70.3
47.0
25
674
98
1
14
26
37
23
52.0
44.0
532
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Asian
3
--
3
45
100
13
60
20
7
0
92.2
48.0
39
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Hispanic/Latino
2
--
1
111
98
2
28
28
31
12
66.0
51.0
75
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.
7
--
5
140
98
6
37
29
16
11
73.8
40.0
110
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
White
156
100
10
57
23
8
1
89.9
38.0
108
3,127
99
7
47
28
13
5
81.7
47.0
2,443
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Male
85
100
9
58
22
8
2
89.1
39.0
63
1,810
99
7
44
27
16
7
78.3
44.0
1,420
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Female
83
99
12
59
22
7
0
91.9
33.0
54
1,679
99
6
49
28
13
4
82.7
52.0
1,290
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Title I
36
100
0
28
44
22
6
75.0
41.0
27
368
99
4
34
32
23
7
75.3
40.0
211
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Non-Disabled
136
99
13
65
19
4
0
95.2
36.0
92
2,813
99
8
54
28
9
1
87.8
48.0
2,178
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Non-Econ. disadvantaged
125
100
13
58
22
6
2
91.0
42.0
90
2,605
99
7
51
26
12
4
83.9
48.0
2,072
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
All Students
2016
168
99
11
58
22
8
1
90.5
38.0
117
3,489
99
6
46
27
14
6
80.4
47.0
2,710
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
2015
162
98
10
57
18
10
4
88.6
39.0
98
3,431
98
5
43
31
16
6
78.6
45.0
2,675
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
2016 Accountability Data - Manomet Elementary
Accountability Information
Accountability and Assistance Level
Level 1
2016 Level held harmless
This school's overall performance relative to other schools in same school type (School percentiles: 1-99)
All students:
75
Lowest performing
Highest performing
This school’s progress toward narrowing proficiency gaps (Cumulative Progress and Performance Index: 1-100)
Student Group (Click group to view subgroup data)
On Target = 75 or higher -
Less progress
More progress
All students
74
Did Not Meet Target
High needs
82
Met Target
Econ. Disadvantaged
-
EL and Former EL
-
Students w/ disabilities
83
Met Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.
-
Asian
-
Afr. Amer./Black
-
Hispanic/Latino
-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.
-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.
-
White
71
Did Not Meet Target
Manomet Elementary: Accountability Data Detail
2016 English Language Arts Proficiency Gap Narrowing
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100
Baseline CPI
2015 CPI
2016 CPI
CPI Change
2016 Target
6 Year Goal
CPI Percentile in School Type
N
PPI Points
Rating
All students
88.1
84.3
89.1
4.8
93.1
94.1
66
167
50
Improved Below Target
High needs
79.1
69.2
82.1
12.9
87.8
89.6
79
67
50
Improved Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged
72.5
72.5
87.8
15.3
74.8
86.3
93
43
100
Above Target
EL and Former EL
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Students w/ disabilities
66.4
55.8
71.1
15.3
80.4
83.2
68
32
50
Improved Below Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Asian
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
3
-
-
Afr. Amer./Black
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Hispanic/Latino
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
2
-
-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
7
-
-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
White
87.8
83.8
89.0
5.2
92.9
93.9
55
155
50
Improved Below Target
2016 Mathematics Proficiency Gap Narrowing
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100
Baseline CPI
2015 CPI
2016 CPI
CPI Change
2016 Target
6 Year Goal
CPI Percentile in School Type
N
PPI Points
Rating
All students
89.4
88.6
90.5
1.9
93.8
94.7
73
168
50
Improved Below Target
High needs
84.7
74.6
83.2
8.6
91.1
92.4
81
67
50
Improved Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged
78.9
78.9
89.0
10.1
80.7
89.5
94
43
100
Above Target
EL and Former EL
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Students w/ disabilities
78.1
62.5
70.3
7.8
87.2
89.1
66
32
50
Improved Below Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Asian
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
3
-
-
Afr. Amer./Black
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Hispanic/Latino
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
2
-
-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
7
-
-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
White
89.5
88.0
89.9
1.9
93.9
94.8
62
156
50
Improved Below Target
2016 Science Proficiency Gap Narrowing
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100
Baseline CPI
2015 CPI
2016 CPI
CPI Change
2016 Target
6 Year Goal
CPI Percentile in School Type
N
PPI Points
Rating
All students
91.7
92.4
88.6
-3.8
95.2
95.9
78
57
0
Declined
High needs
85.2
-
-
-
-
92.6
-
24
-
-
Econ. Disadvantaged
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
11
-
-
EL and Former EL
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Students w/ disabilities
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
16
-
-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Asian
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
3
-
-
Afr. Amer./Black
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Hispanic/Latino
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
2
-
-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
White
91.5
92.4
88.5
-3.9
95.0
95.8
67
52
0
Declined
2016 English Language Arts Extra Credit
Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more)
Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015 % Advanced
2016 % Advanced
N
PPI Points
2015 % Warning/Failing
2016 % Warning/Failing
N
PPI Points
All students
15.1
23.4
167
25
7.8
5.4
167
25
High needs
5.0
13.4
67
25
21.7
11.9
67
25
Econ. Disadvantaged
7.5
14.0
43
25
17.5
7.0
43
25
EL and Former EL
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Students w/ disabilities
0.0
9.4
32
25
36.7
18.8
32
25
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Asian
-
-
3
-
-
-
3
-
Afr. Amer./Black
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Hispanic/Latino
-
-
2
-
-
-
2
-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.
-
-
7
-
-
-
7
-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
White
14.9
22.6
155
25
7.8
5.2
155
25
2016 Mathematics Extra Credit
Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more)
Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015 % Advanced
2016 % Advanced
N
PPI Points
2015 % Warning/Failing
2016 % Warning/Failing
N
PPI Points
All students
32.7
39.3
168
25
6.2
3.6
168
25
High needs
19.0
23.9
67
25
17.2
7.5
67
25
Econ. Disadvantaged
23.7
27.9
43
25
10.5
2.3
43
25
EL and Former EL
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Students w/ disabilities
6.7
12.5
32
25
33.3
15.6
32
25
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Asian
-
-
3
-
-
-
3
-
Afr. Amer./Black
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Hispanic/Latino
-
-
2
-
-
-
2
-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.
-
-
7
-
-
-
7
-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
White
31.6
37.8
156
25
6.6
3.8
156
25
2016 Science Extra Credit
Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more)
Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015 % Advanced
2016 % Advanced
N
PPI Points
2015 % Warning/Failing
2016 % Warning/Failing
N
PPI Points
All students
32.6
35.1
57
0
0.0
1.8
57
0
High needs
-
-
24
-
-
-
24
-
Econ. Disadvantaged
-
-
11
-
-
-
11
-
EL and Former EL
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Students w/ disabilities
-
-
16
-
-
-
16
-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Asian
-
-
3
-
-
-
3
-
Afr. Amer./Black
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Hispanic/Latino
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.
-
-
2
-
-
-
2
-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
White
32.6
34.6
52
0
0.0
1.9
52
0
2016 English Language Arts Growth
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100
2015 SGP
2016 SGP
SGP Change
6 Year Goal
Met Safe Harbor?
N
PPI Points
Rating
All students
54.0
61.0
7.0
51.0
Yes
117
100
Above Target
High needs
40.0
56.0
16.0
51.0
Yes
46
100
Above Target
Econ. Disadvantaged
-
-
-
51.0
-
27
-
-
EL and Former EL
-
-
-
51.0
-
-
-
-
Students w/ disabilities
-
-
-
51.0
-
25
-
-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.
-
-
-
51.0
-
-
-
-
Asian
-
-
-
51.0
-
3
-
-
Afr. Amer./Black
-
-
-
51.0
-
-
-
-
Hispanic/Latino
-
-
-
51.0
-
1
-
-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.
-
-
-
51.0
-
5
-
-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.
-
-
-
51.0
-
-
-
-
White
56.0
65.0
9.0
51.0
Yes
108
100
Above Target
2016 Mathematics Growth
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100
2015 SGP
2016 SGP
SGP Change
6 Year Goal
Met Safe Harbor?
N
PPI Points
Rating
All students
38.5
38.0
-0.5
51.0
No
117
25
Below Target
High needs
29.0
36.0
7.0
51.0
Yes
46
75
On Target
Econ. Disadvantaged
-
-
-
51.0
-
27
-
-
EL and Former EL
-
-
-
51.0
-
-
-
-
Students w/ disabilities
-
-
-
51.0
-
25
-
-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.
-
-
-
51.0
-
-
-
-
Asian
-
-
-
51.0
-
3
-
-
Afr. Amer./Black
-
-
-
51.0
-
-
-
-
Hispanic/Latino
-
-
-
51.0
-
1
-
-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.
-
-
-
51.0
-
5
-
-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.
-
-
-
51.0
-
-
-
-
White
38.0
38.0
0.0
51.0
No
108
25
Below Target
2016 Extra credit for English language proficiency growth
2016 SGPA
2016 Target
SGPA N Included
PPI Points
All students
-
60.0
-
-
High needs
-
60.0
-
-
EL and Former EL
-
60.0
-
-
2016 Assessment Participation
English Language Arts
Mathematics
Science
Enrolled
Assessed
%
Met Target (95%)
Enrolled
Assessed
%
Met Target (95%)
Enrolled
Assessed
%
Met Target (95%)
All students
173
171
99
Yes
173
172
99
Yes
58
58
100
Yes
High needs
71
70
99
Yes
71
70
99
Yes
25
25
100
Yes
Econ. Disadvantaged
47
46
98
Yes
47
46
98
Yes
12
-
-
-
EL and Former EL
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Students w/ disabilities
34
34
100
Yes
34
34
100
Yes
17
-
-
-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Asian
3
-
-
-
3
-
-
-
3
-
-
-
Afr. Amer./Black
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Hispanic/Latino
2
-
-
-
2
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.
9
-
-
-
9
-
-
-
2
-
-
-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
White
159
158
99
Yes
159
159
100
Yes
53
53
100
Yes
NOTE: In 2016, assessment participation was calculated two ways: First, the 2016 participation rate for each subgroup in each subject area test was calculated. If the actual 2016 participation rate was lower than 95 percent for any group in any subject, that rate was compared to the average of the most recent two years of assessment participation data for that group and subject. The higher of the two resulting rates was factored into the assignment of the school or district's 2016 accountability and assistance level.
2015 Massachusetts and Nationwide NAEP Results by Student Group Average Scaled Scores and Percentages of Students at Each Achievement Level
NAEP, or the National Assessment of Educational Progress, is often called the "Nation's Report Card." It is the only measure of student achievement in the United States that allows you to compare the performance of students in Massachusetts with the performance of students across the nation or in other states. Students take the NAEP in reading and mathematics every two years. When reviewing these results, it is important to keep in mind that the NAEP results are based on a small sample of students across Massachusetts, not the population of Massachusetts students. For more information, please visit http://www.doe.mass.edu/mcas/naep/faq.html.
The following symbols are used to denote the NAEP achievement levels: A for Advanced, P+ for Proficient and above, B+ for Basic and above, BB for Below Basic. The symbol "#" means that the estimated number of students rounds to zero.
GRADE LEVEL 4 - READING
Student Group
Massachusetts
National Public
Avg. Scaled Score
% at Each Level
Avg. Scaled Score
% at Each Level
A
P+
B+
BB
% Assessed
A
P+
B+
BB
% Assessed
All Students
235
14
50
82
18
100
221
8
35
68
32
100
Stud. w/ Disab
209
2
20
55
45
18
186
2
12
33
67
13
LEP
200
1
12
44
56
9
189
1
8
32
68
11
African American/Black
217
3
25
65
35
7
206
2
18
51
49
15
Asian/Pacific Islander
249
31
68
89
11
6
238
19
53
81
19
5
Hispanic/Latino
215
3
25
61
39
19
208
3
21
54
46
26
White
242
17
58
89
11
65
232
11
46
79
21
49
Econ. Disadvantaged
220
5
29
67
33
42
209
3
21
56
44
55
GRADE LEVEL 4 - MATHEMATICS
Student Group
Massachusetts
National Public
Avg. Scaled Score
% at Each Level
Avg. Scaled Score
% at Each Level
A
P+
B+
BB
% Assessed
A
P+
B+
BB
% Assessed
All Students
251
13
54
90
10
100
240
7
39
81
19
100
Stud. w/ Disab
231
4
25
74
26
18
217
2
16
54
46
13
LEP
223
2
17
65
35
9
218
1
15
57
43
11
African American/Black
230
1
26
73
27
7
224
1
19
65
35
15
Asian/Pacific Islander
273
38
81
98
2
6
256
22
61
90
10
5
Hispanic/Latino
232
3
28
74
26
19
230
3
26
73
27
26
White
256
15
62
95
5
65
248
10
51
90
10
49
Econ. Disadvantaged
236
4
31
80
20
42
229
2
24
72
28
55
GRADE LEVEL 8 - READING
Student Group
Massachusetts
National Public
Avg. Scaled Score
% at Each Level
Avg. Scaled Score
% at Each Level
A
P+
B+
BB
% Assessed
A
P+
B+
BB
% Assessed
All Students
274
6
46
83
17
100
264
3
33
75
25
100
Stud. w/ Disab
245
1
15
54
46
18
229
#
8
36
64
12
LEP
225
#
6
35
65
5
223
#
3
28
72
6
African American/Black
252
1
18
63
37
9
247
1
15
58
42
15
Asian/Pacific Islander
290
18
64
90
10
7
279
9
50
85
15
6
Hispanic/Latino
249
#
17
61
39
14
253
1
20
65
35
25
White
281
7
53
90
10
67
273
4
42
84
16
51
Econ. Disadvantaged
260
3
28
71
29
44
253
1
20
64
36
52
GRADE LEVEL 8 - MATHEMATICS
Student Group
Massachusetts
National Public
Avg. Scaled Score
% at Each Level
Avg. Scaled Score
% at Each Level
A
P+
B+
BB
% Assessed
A
P+
B+
BB
% Assessed
All Students
297
18
51
81
19
100
281
8
32
70
30
100
Stud. w/ Disab
264
3
16
51
49
18
246
1
8
32
68
12
LEP
251
2
10
38
62
6
246
1
5
31
69
6
African American/Black
268
4
22
54
46
9
260
1
12
47
53
15
Asian/Pacific Islander
324
44
73
94
6
7
305
25
58
86
14
6
Hispanic/Latino
271
4
24
61
39
15
269
3
19
60
40
25
White
304
20
59
88
12
66
291
10
42
81
19
51
Econ. Disadvantaged
279
7
31
67
33
43
268
2
18
58
42
52
Participation Rates for Students with Disabilities and for English Language Learner Students
The NAEP program has always endeavored to assess all students selected for testing. In all NAEP schools, accommodations are provided as necessary for students with disabilities and/or English language learners. School staff who are familiar with these students are asked a series of questions to help them decide whether each student should participate in the assessment and whether the student needs accommodations.