Judy Averill, Principal Mailing Address: 7 Chapel Street Easthampton, MA 01027
Phone: (413) 529-1550 FAX: (413) 529-1599
This report card contains information required by the federal Elementary and Secondary Education Act (ESEA) for our school and district including: student enrollment and teacher qualifications, student achievement, accountability, and the progress our school is making toward narrowing proficiency gaps for different groups of students.
Enrollment and Educator Data (2015-16 School Year)
Percentage of Teachers Licensed in Teaching Assignment
100.0
99.1
97.4
Total Number of Classes in Core Academic Areas
76
491
348,472
Percentage of Core Academic Classes Taught by Teachers Who are Highly Qualified
100.0
97.8
96.3
Percentage of Core Academic Classes Taught by Teachers Who are Not Highly Qualified
0.0
2.2
3.7
Student/Teacher Ratio
13.7 to 1
13.8 to 1
13.2 to 1
Percentage of Public Elementary and Secondary School Teachers Issued Waivers
-
1.8
0.9
This organization is currently closed.
2016 MCAS Results by Student Group by Grade and Subject
NOTE: First-year ELL students are not included in achievement level or CPI results. However, first-year ELL students who took the ACCESS for ELLs test are counted as ELA participants; in addition, first-year ELL students who are present for Mathematics/Science and Technology/Engineering are counted as Mathematics/Science and Technology/Engineering participants. Please see the principal's administration manual (PAM) for details.
NOTE: Spring 2016 results in grades 3-8 ELA and Mathematics are not reported because all students in this organization participated in the PARCC test.
Data Under Review or Fewer than 10 students were tested.
2016 PARCC Results by Student Group by Grade and Subject
Achievement Levels: L5 = Level 5: Exceeded Expectations (varies by grade - 850) L4 = Level 4: Met Expectations (750 - varies by grade) L3 = Level 3: Approached Expectations (725-749) L2 = Level 2: Partially met Expectations (700-724) L1 = Level 1: Did not meet Expectations (650-699)
Trans. SGP = Transitional Student Growth Percentile
generated using current PARCC and prior MCAS scores Trans. CPI = Transitional Composite Performance Index
generated using linked PARCC and MCAS scores
NOTE: Since only a portion of students in grades 3-8 participated in 2016 PARCC in ELA/L and Mathematics, a representative sample of students from across Massachusetts was used to estimate student achievement at the state level in those subjects. NOTE: Students who took the Alternate Assessment are included in Mean CPI, but not in achievement level or growth results.
Data Last Updated on September 24, 2016
GRADE 3 ELA/L
Student Group
School
District
State
Included
Part. Rate
% at Each Level
Trans. CPI
Trans. SGP
Incl. in SGP (#)
Included
Part. Rate
% at Each Level
Trans. CPI
Trans. SGP
Incl. in SGP (#)
Included
Part. Rate
% at Each Level
Trans. CPI
Trans. SGP
Incl. in SGP (#)
#
%
L5
L4
L3
L2
L1
#
%
L5
L4
L3
L2
L1
#
%
L5
L4
L3
L2
L1
Subgroups
High needs
26
97
4
50
31
4
12
85.6
--
--
58
95
3
34
34
14
14
78.9
--
--
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Econ. disadvantaged
18
96
0
56
33
6
6
88.9
--
--
39
93
3
41
36
15
5
83.3
--
--
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
ELL/Formerly ELL
--
--
6
--
--
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Students w/disablities
12
100
8
42
25
0
25
77.1
--
--
29
100
3
21
31
17
28
67.2
--
--
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Afr. Amer./Black
--
--
2
--
--
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Asian
1
--
--
7
--
--
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Hispanic/Latino
5
--
--
15
100
7
27
33
20
13
76.7
--
--
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.
1
--
--
2
--
--
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
White
36
97
6
64
19
0
11
91.0
--
--
94
97
2
56
26
6
10
86.7
--
--
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Male
19
100
5
53
21
5
16
84.2
--
--
58
97
2
40
31
12
16
80.6
--
--
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Female
24
96
4
63
29
0
4
93.8
--
--
62
98
3
60
26
6
5
89.1
--
--
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Title I
8
--
--
20
100
0
30
35
15
20
75.0
--
--
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Non-Disabled
31
97
3
65
26
3
3
94.4
--
--
91
97
2
59
27
7
4
90.7
--
--
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Non-Econ. disadvantaged
25
100
8
60
20
0
12
90.0
--
--
81
100
2
54
25
6
12
85.8
--
--
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Former ELL
--
--
2
--
--
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Ever ELL
--
--
7
--
--
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
All Students
2016
43
98
5
58
26
2
9
89.5
--
--
120
98
3
50
28
9
10
85.0
--
--
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
GRADE 3 Math
Student Group
School
District
State
Included
Part. Rate
% at Each Level
Trans. CPI
Trans. SGP
Incl. in SGP (#)
Included
Part. Rate
% at Each Level
Trans. CPI
Trans. SGP
Incl. in SGP (#)
Included
Part. Rate
% at Each Level
Trans. CPI
Trans. SGP
Incl. in SGP (#)
#
%
L5
L4
L3
L2
L1
#
%
L5
L4
L3
L2
L1
#
%
L5
L4
L3
L2
L1
Subgroups
High needs
25
91
4
64
20
12
0
92.0
--
--
55
90
4
44
31
16
5
82.7
--
--
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Econ. disadvantaged
18
92
0
72
17
11
0
93.1
--
--
37
90
3
51
30
14
3
87.2
--
--
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
ELL/Formerly ELL
--
--
6
--
--
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Students w/disablities
11
92
9
55
27
9
0
90.9
--
--
26
93
4
27
31
27
12
69.2
--
--
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Afr. Amer./Black
--
--
2
--
--
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Asian
1
--
--
7
--
--
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Hispanic/Latino
5
--
--
14
93
0
50
21
21
7
78.6
--
--
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.
1
--
--
2
--
--
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
White
35
95
26
54
17
3
0
96.4
--
--
92
95
13
48
28
9
2
90.5
--
--
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Male
18
95
17
61
17
6
0
95.8
--
--
57
93
7
49
32
7
5
89.5
--
--
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Female
24
93
25
46
21
8
0
93.8
--
--
60
97
13
43
32
12
0
90.0
--
--
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Title I
8
--
--
20
100
0
20
55
25
0
80.0
--
--
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Non-Disabled
31
95
26
52
16
6
0
96.0
--
--
91
96
12
52
32
4
0
95.6
--
--
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Non-Econ. disadvantaged
24
96
38
38
21
4
0
95.8
--
--
80
98
14
44
33
8
3
90.9
--
--
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Former ELL
--
--
2
--
--
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Ever ELL
--
--
7
--
--
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
All Students
2016
42
94
21
52
19
7
0
94.6
--
--
117
95
10
46
32
9
3
89.7
--
--
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
GRADE 4 ELA/L
Student Group
School
District
State
Included
Part. Rate
% at Each Level
Trans. CPI
Trans. SGP
Incl. in SGP (#)
Included
Part. Rate
% at Each Level
Trans. CPI
Trans. SGP
Incl. in SGP (#)
Included
Part. Rate
% at Each Level
Trans. CPI
Trans. SGP
Incl. in SGP (#)
#
%
L5
L4
L3
L2
L1
#
%
L5
L4
L3
L2
L1
#
%
L5
L4
L3
L2
L1
Subgroups
High needs
23
100
4
35
48
9
4
75.0
44.0
23
50
100
2
30
32
20
16
62.3
37.0
48
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Econ. disadvantaged
20
100
5
35
45
10
5
75.0
44.0
20
38
100
3
37
34
18
8
69.7
41.0
36
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
ELL/Formerly ELL
1
--
1
4
--
4
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Students w/disablities
6
--
6
19
100
0
5
26
32
37
41.3
--
19
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Afr. Amer./Black
--
--
1
--
--
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Asian
6
--
6
8
--
7
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Hispanic/Latino
5
--
5
10
100
20
40
30
0
10
80.0
--
9
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
White
26
93
8
50
31
8
4
81.7
57.0
26
85
97
9
41
28
14
7
75.0
37.0
81
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Male
18
100
6
44
33
11
6
75.0
--
18
46
98
7
39
33
11
11
70.7
42.0
43
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Female
19
91
16
47
37
0
0
90.8
--
19
59
97
14
42
25
14
5
79.7
36.0
55
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Title I
12
100
0
17
67
17
0
70.8
--
12
21
100
0
10
62
29
0
63.1
37.0
21
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Non-Disabled
31
94
13
52
29
6
0
86.3
58.0
31
86
97
13
49
29
8
1
83.7
44.0
79
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Non-Econ. disadvantaged
17
89
18
59
24
0
0
92.6
--
17
67
96
15
43
25
9
7
79.0
40.0
62
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Former ELL
1
--
1
3
--
3
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Ever ELL
1
--
1
4
--
4
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
All Students
2016
37
95
11
46
35
5
3
83.1
55.0
37
105
97
10
41
29
12
8
75.7
40.0
98
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
GRADE 4 Math
Student Group
School
District
State
Included
Part. Rate
% at Each Level
Trans. CPI
Trans. SGP
Incl. in SGP (#)
Included
Part. Rate
% at Each Level
Trans. CPI
Trans. SGP
Incl. in SGP (#)
Included
Part. Rate
% at Each Level
Trans. CPI
Trans. SGP
Incl. in SGP (#)
#
%
L5
L4
L3
L2
L1
#
%
L5
L4
L3
L2
L1
#
%
L5
L4
L3
L2
L1
Subgroups
High needs
23
100
0
52
30
17
0
83.7
57.0
23
50
100
2
36
26
26
10
71.6
42.0
48
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Econ. disadvantaged
20
100
0
60
25
15
0
86.3
60.0
20
38
100
3
47
24
21
5
79.6
45.0
36
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
ELL/Formerly ELL
1
--
1
4
--
4
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Students w/disablities
6
--
6
19
100
0
11
32
37
21
55.0
--
19
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Afr. Amer./Black
--
--
1
--
--
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Asian
6
--
6
8
--
7
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Hispanic/Latino
5
--
5
10
100
0
60
0
30
10
77.5
--
9
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
White
26
93
8
50
35
8
0
87.5
57.0
26
85
97
12
47
24
14
4
82.8
53.0
81
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Male
18
100
0
61
28
11
0
87.5
--
18
46
98
7
52
26
9
7
81.9
52.0
43
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Female
19
91
16
47
26
11
0
88.2
--
19
59
97
14
47
17
19
3
83.5
53.0
55
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Title I
12
100
0
25
58
17
0
77.1
--
12
21
100
0
14
52
29
5
65.5
50.0
21
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Non-Disabled
31
94
10
61
23
6
0
91.1
57.0
31
86
97
13
58
19
9
1
89.2
56.0
79
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Non-Econ. disadvantaged
17
89
18
47
29
6
0
89.7
--
17
67
96
15
51
19
10
4
84.6
55.0
62
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Former ELL
1
--
1
3
--
3
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Ever ELL
1
--
1
4
--
4
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
All Students
2016
37
95
8
54
27
11
0
87.8
57.0
37
105
97
10
50
21
14
5
82.8
53.0
98
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
GRADES 3-8 ELA/L
Student Group
School
District
State
Included
Part. Rate
% at Each Level
Trans. CPI
Trans. SGP
Incl. in SGP (#)
Included
Part. Rate
% at Each Level
Trans. CPI
Trans. SGP
Incl. in SGP (#)
Included
Part. Rate
% at Each Level
Trans. CPI
Trans. SGP
Incl. in SGP (#)
#
%
L5
L4
L3
L2
L1
#
%
L5
L4
L3
L2
L1
#
%
L5
L4
L3
L2
L1
Subgroups
High needs
49
98
4
43
39
6
8
80.6
44.0
23
301
97
2
32
33
23
11
73.9
41.0
223
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Econ. disadvantaged
38
98
3
45
39
8
5
81.6
44.0
20
214
98
2
38
32
21
6
78.2
40.0
161
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
ELL/Formerly ELL
1
--
1
24
100
0
25
38
21
17
65.6
--
17
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Students w/disablities
18
100
6
33
39
0
22
73.6
--
6
142
97
1
13
31
35
21
60.1
43.0
102
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Afr. Amer./Black
--
--
12
100
0
58
8
33
0
81.3
--
9
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Asian
7
--
6
31
100
6
52
26
13
3
84.7
66.0
22
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Hispanic/Latino
10
100
10
30
50
10
0
80.0
--
5
76
99
7
39
29
17
8
79.6
48.0
54
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.
1
--
--
12
100
17
17
50
0
17
81.3
--
8
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
White
62
95
6
58
24
3
8
87.1
57.0
26
549
97
6
46
29
13
6
84.8
43.0
429
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Male
37
100
5
49
27
8
11
79.7
--
18
311
96
4
39
32
16
9
79.6
39.0
239
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Female
43
94
9
56
33
0
2
92.4
--
19
369
98
8
51
25
11
4
87.9
49.0
283
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Title I
20
100
0
20
60
10
10
72.5
--
12
59
100
2
22
51
19
7
74.6
39.0
38
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Non-Disabled
62
96
8
58
27
5
2
90.3
58.0
31
538
98
8
54
28
8
2
90.5
45.0
420
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Non-Econ. disadvantaged
42
95
12
60
21
0
7
91.1
--
17
466
97
9
49
27
10
6
86.8
47.0
361
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Former ELL
1
--
1
19
100
0
32
37
16
16
68.4
--
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Ever ELL
1
--
1
38
100
0
32
32
26
11
71.7
43.0
30
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
All Students
2016
80
97
8
53
30
4
6
86.6
55.0
37
680
97
6
45
29
14
6
84.1
44.0
522
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
2015
76
100
12
50
20
13
5
82.9
74.0
36
677
96
7
47
25
14
6
83.6
55.0
540
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
GRADES 3-8 MATH
Student Group
School
District
State
Included
Part. Rate
% at Each Level
Trans. CPI
Trans. SGP
Incl. in SGP (#)
Included
Part. Rate
% at Each Level
Trans. CPI
Trans. SGP
Incl. in SGP (#)
Included
Part. Rate
% at Each Level
Trans. CPI
Trans. SGP
Incl. in SGP (#)
#
%
L5
L4
L3
L2
L1
#
%
L5
L4
L3
L2
L1
#
%
L5
L4
L3
L2
L1
Subgroups
High needs
48
95
2
58
25
15
0
88.0
57.0
23
298
96
2
27
28
27
16
63.3
40.0
221
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Econ. disadvantaged
38
96
0
66
21
13
0
89.5
60.0
20
212
97
1
35
29
23
11
69.5
40.0
159
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
ELL/Formerly ELL
1
--
1
24
96
0
25
38
21
17
67.7
--
17
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Students w/disablities
17
94
6
41
35
18
0
83.8
--
6
139
95
1
9
21
36
33
44.3
33.0
102
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Afr. Amer./Black
--
--
12
100
0
25
50
25
0
75.0
--
9
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Asian
7
--
6
31
100
6
48
29
10
6
86.3
54.0
22
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Hispanic/Latino
10
93
0
50
10
40
0
80.0
--
5
75
97
3
35
28
20
15
69.7
48.0
53
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.
1
--
--
12
100
0
25
42
25
8
70.8
--
7
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
White
61
94
18
52
25
5
0
92.6
57.0
26
544
96
8
39
29
17
7
76.9
45.0
425
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Male
36
98
8
61
22
8
0
91.7
--
18
310
96
5
37
31
17
9
75.0
39.0
238
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Female
43
92
21
47
23
9
0
91.3
--
19
364
97
8
39
27
18
7
77.6
49.0
278
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Title I
20
100
0
30
50
20
0
77.5
--
12
59
100
0
20
49
29
2
72.0
42.0
38
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Non-Disabled
62
94
18
56
19
6
0
93.5
57.0
31
535
97
8
46
31
13
1
84.9
47.0
414
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Non-Econ. disadvantaged
41
93
29
41
24
5
0
93.3
--
17
462
96
9
40
29
15
6
79.6
46.0
357
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Former ELL
1
--
1
19
95
0
21
37
21
21
64.5
--
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Ever ELL
1
--
1
38
97
3
26
34
18
18
66.4
49.0
30
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
All Students
2016
79
94
15
53
23
9
0
91.5
57.0
37
674
97
7
38
29
18
8
76.4
45.0
516
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
2015
76
100
12
43
33
11
1
87.5
68.0
36
673
96
5
35
33
18
8
73.8
42.0
539
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
2016 Accountability Data - Maple
Accountability Information
Accountability and Assistance Level
Level 1
Meeting gap narrowing goals
This school's overall performance relative to other schools in same school type (School percentiles: 1-99)
All students:
59
Lowest performing
Highest performing
This school’s progress toward narrowing proficiency gaps (Cumulative Progress and Performance Index: 1-100)
Student Group (Click group to view subgroup data)
On Target = 75 or higher -
Less progress
More progress
All students
76
Met Target
High needs
80
Met Target
Econ. Disadvantaged
-
EL and Former EL
-
Students w/ disabilities
-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.
-
Asian
-
Afr. Amer./Black
-
Hispanic/Latino
-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.
-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.
-
White
75
Met Target
Maple: Accountability Data Detail
2016 English Language Arts Proficiency Gap Narrowing
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100
Baseline CPI
2015 CPI
2016 CPI
CPI Change
2016 Target
6 Year Goal
CPI Percentile in School Type
N
PPI Points
Rating
All students
76.8
82.9
86.6
3.7
86.5
88.4
55
80
75
On Target
High needs
65.7
71.2
80.6
9.4
80.0
82.9
72
49
75
On Target
Econ. Disadvantaged
71.4
71.4
81.6
10.2
73.8
85.7
73
38
100
Above Target
EL and Former EL
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
1
-
-
Students w/ disabilities
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
18
-
-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Asian
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
7
-
-
Afr. Amer./Black
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Hispanic/Latino
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
10
-
-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
1
-
-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
White
80.4
81.7
87.1
5.4
88.6
90.2
44
62
50
Improved Below Target
2016 Mathematics Proficiency Gap Narrowing
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100
Baseline CPI
2015 CPI
2016 CPI
CPI Change
2016 Target
6 Year Goal
CPI Percentile in School Type
N
PPI Points
Rating
All students
83.6
87.5
91.5
4.0
90.4
91.8
78
79
75
On Target
High needs
75.6
81.8
88.0
6.2
85.8
87.8
93
48
100
Above Target
Econ. Disadvantaged
83.9
83.9
89.5
5.6
85.2
92.0
95
38
100
Above Target
EL and Former EL
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
1
-
-
Students w/ disabilities
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
17
-
-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Asian
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
7
-
-
Afr. Amer./Black
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Hispanic/Latino
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
10
-
-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
1
-
-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
White
83.8
87.3
92.6
5.3
90.6
91.9
78
61
100
Above Target
2016 Science Proficiency Gap Narrowing
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100
Baseline CPI
2015 CPI
2016 CPI
CPI Change
2016 Target
6 Year Goal
CPI Percentile in School Type
N
PPI Points
Rating
All students
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
High needs
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Econ. Disadvantaged
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
EL and Former EL
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Students w/ disabilities
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Asian
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Afr. Amer./Black
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Hispanic/Latino
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
White
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
2016 English Language Arts Extra Credit
Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more)
Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015 % Advanced
2016 % Advanced
N
PPI Points
2015 % Warning/Failing
2016 % Warning/Failing
N
PPI Points
All students
9.2
15.0
80
25
5.3
6.3
80
0
High needs
3.0
10.2
49
25
12.1
10.2
49
25
Econ. Disadvantaged
3.6
7.9
38
25
10.7
10.5
38
0
EL and Former EL
-
-
1
-
-
-
1
-
Students w/ disabilities
-
-
18
-
-
-
18
-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Asian
-
-
7
-
-
-
7
-
Afr. Amer./Black
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Hispanic/Latino
-
-
10
-
-
-
10
-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.
-
-
1
-
-
-
1
-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
White
7.9
16.1
62
25
6.3
8.1
62
0
2016 Mathematics Extra Credit
Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more)
Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015 % Advanced
2016 % Advanced
N
PPI Points
2015 % Warning/Failing
2016 % Warning/Failing
N
PPI Points
All students
28.9
38.0
79
25
1.3
1.3
79
0
High needs
21.2
29.2
48
25
0.0
2.1
48
0
Econ. Disadvantaged
17.9
26.3
38
25
0.0
0.0
38
25
EL and Former EL
-
-
1
-
-
-
1
-
Students w/ disabilities
-
-
17
-
-
-
17
-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Asian
-
-
7
-
-
-
7
-
Afr. Amer./Black
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Hispanic/Latino
-
-
10
-
-
-
10
-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.
-
-
1
-
-
-
1
-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
White
25.4
39.3
61
25
1.6
1.6
61
0
2016 Science Extra Credit
Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more)
Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015 % Advanced
2016 % Advanced
N
PPI Points
2015 % Warning/Failing
2016 % Warning/Failing
N
PPI Points
All students
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
High needs
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Econ. Disadvantaged
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
EL and Former EL
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Students w/ disabilities
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Asian
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Afr. Amer./Black
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Hispanic/Latino
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
White
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
2016 English Language Arts Growth
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100
2015 SGP
2016 SGP
SGP Change
6 Year Goal
Met Safe Harbor?
N
PPI Points
Rating
All students
73.5
55.0
-18.5
51.0
No
37
75
On Target
High needs
29.0
44.0
15.0
51.0
Yes
23
100
Above Target
Econ. Disadvantaged
-
-
-
51.0
-
20
-
-
EL and Former EL
-
-
-
51.0
-
1
-
-
Students w/ disabilities
-
-
-
51.0
-
6
-
-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.
-
-
-
51.0
-
-
-
-
Asian
-
-
-
51.0
-
6
-
-
Afr. Amer./Black
-
-
-
51.0
-
-
-
-
Hispanic/Latino
-
-
-
51.0
-
5
-
-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.
-
-
-
51.0
-
-
-
-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.
-
-
-
51.0
-
-
-
-
White
75.0
56.5
-18.5
51.0
Yes
26
75
On Target
2016 Mathematics Growth
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100
2015 SGP
2016 SGP
SGP Change
6 Year Goal
Met Safe Harbor?
N
PPI Points
Rating
All students
68.0
57.0
-11.0
51.0
Yes
37
75
On Target
High needs
66.0
57.0
-9.0
51.0
Yes
23
75
On Target
Econ. Disadvantaged
-
-
-
51.0
-
20
-
-
EL and Former EL
-
-
-
51.0
-
1
-
-
Students w/ disabilities
-
-
-
51.0
-
6
-
-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.
-
-
-
51.0
-
-
-
-
Asian
-
-
-
51.0
-
6
-
-
Afr. Amer./Black
-
-
-
51.0
-
-
-
-
Hispanic/Latino
-
-
-
51.0
-
5
-
-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.
-
-
-
51.0
-
-
-
-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.
-
-
-
51.0
-
-
-
-
White
71.0
57.0
-14.0
51.0
Yes
26
75
On Target
2016 Extra credit for English language proficiency growth
2016 SGPA
2016 Target
SGPA N Included
PPI Points
All students
-
60.0
-
-
High needs
-
60.0
-
-
EL and Former EL
-
60.0
-
-
2016 Assessment Participation
English Language Arts
Mathematics
Science
Enrolled
Assessed
%
Met Target (95%)
Enrolled
Assessed
%
Met Target (95%)
Enrolled
Assessed
%
Met Target (95%)
All students
90
87
97
Yes
90
85
97
Yes
-
-
-
-
High needs
57
56
98
Yes
57
54
95
Yes
-
-
-
-
Econ. Disadvantaged
46
45
98
Yes
46
44
96
Yes
-
-
-
-
EL and Former EL
2
-
-
-
2
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Students w/ disabilities
18
-
-
-
18
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Asian
7
-
-
-
7
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Afr. Amer./Black
3
-
-
-
3
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Hispanic/Latino
14
-
-
-
14
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.
1
-
-
-
1
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
White
65
62
95
Yes
65
61
97
Yes
-
-
-
-
NOTE: In 2016, assessment participation was calculated two ways: First, the 2016 participation rate for each subgroup in each subject area test was calculated. If the actual 2016 participation rate was lower than 95 percent for any group in any subject, that rate was compared to the average of the most recent two years of assessment participation data for that group and subject. The higher of the two resulting rates was factored into the assignment of the school or district's 2016 accountability and assistance level.
2015 Massachusetts and Nationwide NAEP Results by Student Group Average Scaled Scores and Percentages of Students at Each Achievement Level
NAEP, or the National Assessment of Educational Progress, is often called the "Nation's Report Card." It is the only measure of student achievement in the United States that allows you to compare the performance of students in Massachusetts with the performance of students across the nation or in other states. Students take the NAEP in reading and mathematics every two years. When reviewing these results, it is important to keep in mind that the NAEP results are based on a small sample of students across Massachusetts, not the population of Massachusetts students. For more information, please visit http://www.doe.mass.edu/mcas/naep/faq.html.
The following symbols are used to denote the NAEP achievement levels: A for Advanced, P+ for Proficient and above, B+ for Basic and above, BB for Below Basic. The symbol "#" means that the estimated number of students rounds to zero.
GRADE LEVEL 4 - READING
Student Group
Massachusetts
National Public
Avg. Scaled Score
% at Each Level
Avg. Scaled Score
% at Each Level
A
P+
B+
BB
% Assessed
A
P+
B+
BB
% Assessed
All Students
235
14
50
82
18
100
221
8
35
68
32
100
Stud. w/ Disab
209
2
20
55
45
18
186
2
12
33
67
13
LEP
200
1
12
44
56
9
189
1
8
32
68
11
African American/Black
217
3
25
65
35
7
206
2
18
51
49
15
Asian/Pacific Islander
249
31
68
89
11
6
238
19
53
81
19
5
Hispanic/Latino
215
3
25
61
39
19
208
3
21
54
46
26
White
242
17
58
89
11
65
232
11
46
79
21
49
Econ. Disadvantaged
220
5
29
67
33
42
209
3
21
56
44
55
GRADE LEVEL 4 - MATHEMATICS
Student Group
Massachusetts
National Public
Avg. Scaled Score
% at Each Level
Avg. Scaled Score
% at Each Level
A
P+
B+
BB
% Assessed
A
P+
B+
BB
% Assessed
All Students
251
13
54
90
10
100
240
7
39
81
19
100
Stud. w/ Disab
231
4
25
74
26
18
217
2
16
54
46
13
LEP
223
2
17
65
35
9
218
1
15
57
43
11
African American/Black
230
1
26
73
27
7
224
1
19
65
35
15
Asian/Pacific Islander
273
38
81
98
2
6
256
22
61
90
10
5
Hispanic/Latino
232
3
28
74
26
19
230
3
26
73
27
26
White
256
15
62
95
5
65
248
10
51
90
10
49
Econ. Disadvantaged
236
4
31
80
20
42
229
2
24
72
28
55
GRADE LEVEL 8 - READING
Student Group
Massachusetts
National Public
Avg. Scaled Score
% at Each Level
Avg. Scaled Score
% at Each Level
A
P+
B+
BB
% Assessed
A
P+
B+
BB
% Assessed
All Students
274
6
46
83
17
100
264
3
33
75
25
100
Stud. w/ Disab
245
1
15
54
46
18
229
#
8
36
64
12
LEP
225
#
6
35
65
5
223
#
3
28
72
6
African American/Black
252
1
18
63
37
9
247
1
15
58
42
15
Asian/Pacific Islander
290
18
64
90
10
7
279
9
50
85
15
6
Hispanic/Latino
249
#
17
61
39
14
253
1
20
65
35
25
White
281
7
53
90
10
67
273
4
42
84
16
51
Econ. Disadvantaged
260
3
28
71
29
44
253
1
20
64
36
52
GRADE LEVEL 8 - MATHEMATICS
Student Group
Massachusetts
National Public
Avg. Scaled Score
% at Each Level
Avg. Scaled Score
% at Each Level
A
P+
B+
BB
% Assessed
A
P+
B+
BB
% Assessed
All Students
297
18
51
81
19
100
281
8
32
70
30
100
Stud. w/ Disab
264
3
16
51
49
18
246
1
8
32
68
12
LEP
251
2
10
38
62
6
246
1
5
31
69
6
African American/Black
268
4
22
54
46
9
260
1
12
47
53
15
Asian/Pacific Islander
324
44
73
94
6
7
305
25
58
86
14
6
Hispanic/Latino
271
4
24
61
39
15
269
3
19
60
40
25
White
304
20
59
88
12
66
291
10
42
81
19
51
Econ. Disadvantaged
279
7
31
67
33
43
268
2
18
58
42
52
Participation Rates for Students with Disabilities and for English Language Learner Students
The NAEP program has always endeavored to assess all students selected for testing. In all NAEP schools, accommodations are provided as necessary for students with disabilities and/or English language learners. School staff who are familiar with these students are asked a series of questions to help them decide whether each student should participate in the assessment and whether the student needs accommodations.