William Joseph Knittle, Principal Mailing Address: 86 Pond Road Rowe, MA 01367
Phone: (413) 512-5100 FAX: (413) 339-8621 Website: http://www.roweschool.org Organization Description: A very small rural school
with a student population
generally around 60 and
is well supported by the
community. We are also a
school of choice with a
third of our students coming from neighboring towns.
This report card contains information required by the federal Elementary and Secondary Education Act (ESEA) for our school and district including: student enrollment and teacher qualifications, student achievement, accountability, and the progress our school is making toward narrowing proficiency gaps for different groups of students.
Enrollment and Educator Data (2014-15 School Year)
Percentage of Teachers Licensed in Teaching Assignment
100.0
100.0
97.4
Total Number of Classes in Core Academic Areas
30
30
346,081
Percentage of Core Academic Classes Taught by Teachers Who are Highly Qualified
73.3
73.3
95.4
Percentage of Core Academic Classes Taught by Teachers Who are Not Highly Qualified
26.7
26.7
4.6
Student/Teacher Ratio
7.9 to 1
7.9 to 1
13.3 to 1
Percentage of Public Elementary and Secondary School Teachers Issued Waivers
-
0.0
0.7
2015 MCAS Results by Student Group by Grade and Subject
NOTE: First-year ELL students are not included in achievement level or CPI results. However, first-year ELL students who took the ACCESS for ELLs test are counted as ELA participants; in addition, first-year ELL students who are present for Mathematics/Science and Technology/Engineering are counted as Mathematics/Science and Technology/Engineering participants. Please see the principal's administration manual (PAM) for details.
NOTE: Since only a portion of students in grades 3-8 participated in 2015 MCAS in ELA and Mathematics, a representative sample of students from across Massachusetts was used to estimate student achievement at the state level in those subjects. NOTE: Spring 2015 results in grades 3-8 ELA and Mathematics are not reported because most or all students in this organization participated in the PARCC test. For district assessment decisions, see http://www.doe.mass.edu/news/news.aspx?id=13541.
Data Under Review or Fewer than 10 students were tested.
2015 PARCC Results by Student Group by Grade and Subject
Achievement Levels: L5 = Level 5: Exceeded Expectations (varies by grade - 850) L4 = Level 4: Met Expectations (750 - varies by grade) L3 = Level 3: Approached Expectations (725-749) L2 = Level 2: Partially met Expectations (700-724) L1 = Level 1: Did not meet Expectations (650-699)
Trans. SGP = Transitional Student Growth Percentile
generated using current PARCC and prior MCAS scores Trans. CPI = Transitional Composite Performance Index
generated using linked PARCC and MCAS scores
NOTE: Since only a portion of students in grades 3-8 participated in 2015 PARCC in ELA/L and Mathematics, a representative sample of students from across Massachusetts was used to estimate student achievement at the state level in those subjects. NOTE: Students who took the Alternate Assessment are included in Mean CPI, but not in achievement level or growth results.
Data Last Updated on September 24, 2015
GRADE 3 ELA/L
Student Group
School
District
State
Included
Part. Rate
% at Each Level
Trans. CPI
Trans. SGP
Incl. in SGP (#)
Included
Part. Rate
% at Each Level
Trans. CPI
Trans. SGP
Incl. in SGP (#)
Included
Part. Rate
% at Each Level
Trans. CPI
Trans. SGP
Incl. in SGP (#)
#
%
L5
L4
L3
L2
L1
#
%
L5
L4
L3
L2
L1
#
%
L5
L4
L3
L2
L1
Subgroups
High needs
5
--
--
5
--
--
12,932
99
2
31
26
23
18
72.0
--
--
Econ. disadvantaged
3
--
--
3
--
--
9,162
99
2
32
26
23
18
72.2
--
--
Students w/disablities
3
--
--
3
--
--
4,570
98
1
19
24
27
30
63.1
--
--
White
11
100
9
55
18
18
0
88.6
--
--
11
100
9
55
18
18
0
88.6
--
--
18,137
99
8
53
21
12
6
86.4
--
--
Male
7
--
--
7
--
--
14,367
99
4
45
23
16
11
80.4
--
--
Female
4
--
--
4
--
--
13,699
99
9
49
21
13
8
84.8
--
--
Non-Disabled
8
--
--
8
--
--
23,496
99
8
53
22
12
6
86.6
--
--
Non-Econ. disadvantaged
8
--
--
8
--
--
18,904
99
9
55
20
10
6
87.6
--
--
All Students
2015
11
100
9
55
18
18
0
88.6
--
--
11
100
9
55
18
18
0
88.6
--
--
28,066
99
7
47
22
14
10
82.5
--
--
GRADE 3 Math
Student Group
School
District
State
Included
Part. Rate
% at Each Level
Trans. CPI
Trans. SGP
Incl. in SGP (#)
Included
Part. Rate
% at Each Level
Trans. CPI
Trans. SGP
Incl. in SGP (#)
Included
Part. Rate
% at Each Level
Trans. CPI
Trans. SGP
Incl. in SGP (#)
#
%
L5
L4
L3
L2
L1
#
%
L5
L4
L3
L2
L1
#
%
L5
L4
L3
L2
L1
Subgroups
High needs
5
--
--
5
--
--
12,960
99
5
31
30
23
11
75.4
--
--
Econ. disadvantaged
3
--
--
3
--
--
9,189
99
4
31
30
23
11
75.4
--
--
Students w/disablities
3
--
--
3
--
--
4,584
98
3
20
27
30
19
66.5
--
--
White
11
100
0
45
36
18
0
84.1
--
--
11
100
0
45
36
18
0
84.1
--
--
18,127
99
13
48
24
11
3
88.9
--
--
Male
7
--
--
7
--
--
14,377
99
12
43
25
14
6
85.1
--
--
Female
4
--
--
4
--
--
13,702
99
11
43
26
15
5
85.5
--
--
Non-Disabled
8
--
--
8
--
--
23,495
99
14
47
25
11
3
89.3
--
--
Non-Econ. disadvantaged
8
--
--
8
--
--
18,890
99
16
49
23
10
3
90.2
--
--
All Students
2015
11
100
0
45
36
18
0
84.1
--
--
11
100
0
45
36
18
0
84.1
--
--
28,079
99
12
43
25
14
6
85.3
--
--
GRADE 4 ELA/L
Student Group
School
District
State
Included
Part. Rate
% at Each Level
Trans. CPI
Trans. SGP
Incl. in SGP (#)
Included
Part. Rate
% at Each Level
Trans. CPI
Trans. SGP
Incl. in SGP (#)
Included
Part. Rate
% at Each Level
Trans. CPI
Trans. SGP
Incl. in SGP (#)
#
%
L5
L4
L3
L2
L1
#
%
L5
L4
L3
L2
L1
#
%
L5
L4
L3
L2
L1
Subgroups
High needs
4
--
3
4
--
3
13,989
98
5
32
33
21
9
66.3
43.0
13,111
Econ. disadvantaged
1
--
1
1
--
1
9,642
99
6
33
33
20
9
66.8
43.0
9,064
Students w/disablities
3
--
2
3
--
2
5,254
98
2
21
32
29
15
57.7
39.0
4,991
White
7
--
5
7
--
5
16,802
99
18
47
23
9
3
82.8
52.0
16,068
Female
7
--
5
7
--
5
13,679
99
19
44
23
10
3
81.0
54.0
12,980
Non-Disabled
4
--
3
4
--
3
22,595
99
18
47
24
8
2
82.9
52.0
21,332
Non-Econ. disadvantaged
6
--
4
6
--
4
18,207
99
20
47
22
8
3
83.7
54.0
17,259
All Students
2015
7
--
5
7
--
5
27,849
99
15
42
25
12
5
77.8
50.0
26,323
GRADE 4 Math
Student Group
School
District
State
Included
Part. Rate
% at Each Level
Trans. CPI
Trans. SGP
Incl. in SGP (#)
Included
Part. Rate
% at Each Level
Trans. CPI
Trans. SGP
Incl. in SGP (#)
Included
Part. Rate
% at Each Level
Trans. CPI
Trans. SGP
Incl. in SGP (#)
#
%
L5
L4
L3
L2
L1
#
%
L5
L4
L3
L2
L1
#
%
L5
L4
L3
L2
L1
Subgroups
High needs
4
--
3
4
--
3
14,006
99
2
27
33
28
10
67.1
44.0
13,105
Econ. disadvantaged
1
--
1
1
--
1
9,649
99
2
28
33
28
10
66.9
44.0
9,070
Students w/disablities
3
--
2
3
--
2
5,251
98
1
17
29
36
17
59.5
38.0
4,980
White
7
--
5
7
--
5
16,794
99
7
47
28
15
3
80.9
51.0
16,046
Female
7
--
5
7
--
5
13,671
99
6
42
30
18
5
77.6
52.0
12,943
Non-Disabled
4
--
3
4
--
3
22,609
99
8
47
29
14
3
81.6
53.0
21,310
Non-Econ. disadvantaged
6
--
4
6
--
4
18,211
99
9
48
27
13
3
82.5
53.0
17,220
All Students
2015
7
--
5
7
--
5
27,860
99
6
41
29
18
5
77.1
50.0
26,290
GRADE 5 ELA/L
Student Group
School
District
State
Included
Part. Rate
% at Each Level
Trans. CPI
Trans. SGP
Incl. in SGP (#)
Included
Part. Rate
% at Each Level
Trans. CPI
Trans. SGP
Incl. in SGP (#)
Included
Part. Rate
% at Each Level
Trans. CPI
Trans. SGP
Incl. in SGP (#)
#
%
L5
L4
L3
L2
L1
#
%
L5
L4
L3
L2
L1
#
%
L5
L4
L3
L2
L1
Subgroups
White
7
--
7
7
--
7
18,072
99
9
61
20
7
2
90.9
49.0
17,397
Male
4
--
4
4
--
4
14,590
99
5
52
25
13
5
84.5
49.0
13,818
Female
3
--
3
3
--
3
13,902
99
11
58
20
8
3
89.7
52.0
13,232
Non-Disabled
7
--
7
7
--
7
23,993
99
10
61
21
6
2
91.6
51.0
22,837
Non-Econ. disadvantaged
7
--
7
7
--
7
19,835
99
11
61
19
7
2
91.0
52.0
18,870
All Students
2015
7
--
7
7
--
7
28,492
99
8
55
23
10
4
87.0
50.0
27,050
GRADE 5 Math
Student Group
School
District
State
Included
Part. Rate
% at Each Level
Trans. CPI
Trans. SGP
Incl. in SGP (#)
Included
Part. Rate
% at Each Level
Trans. CPI
Trans. SGP
Incl. in SGP (#)
Included
Part. Rate
% at Each Level
Trans. CPI
Trans. SGP
Incl. in SGP (#)
#
%
L5
L4
L3
L2
L1
#
%
L5
L4
L3
L2
L1
#
%
L5
L4
L3
L2
L1
Subgroups
White
7
--
7
7
--
7
18,017
99
11
50
25
11
3
87.3
49.0
17,474
Male
4
--
4
4
--
4
14,582
99
11
43
25
16
5
82.0
49.0
13,915
Female
3
--
3
3
--
3
13,863
99
10
46
26
13
4
84.5
52.0
13,277
Non-Disabled
7
--
7
7
--
7
23,959
99
13
50
25
10
2
88.3
52.0
22,945
Non-Econ. disadvantaged
7
--
7
7
--
7
19,794
99
14
49
24
10
3
87.9
52.0
18,979
All Students
2015
7
--
7
7
--
7
28,445
99
11
44
26
15
5
83.2
50.0
27,192
GRADE 6 ELA/L
Student Group
School
District
State
Included
Part. Rate
% at Each Level
Trans. CPI
Trans. SGP
Incl. in SGP (#)
Included
Part. Rate
% at Each Level
Trans. CPI
Trans. SGP
Incl. in SGP (#)
Included
Part. Rate
% at Each Level
Trans. CPI
Trans. SGP
Incl. in SGP (#)
#
%
L5
L4
L3
L2
L1
#
%
L5
L4
L3
L2
L1
#
%
L5
L4
L3
L2
L1
Subgroups
High needs
9
--
9
9
--
9
11,861
97
4
33
34
20
9
75.2
48.0
11,059
Econ. disadvantaged
8
--
8
8
--
8
8,245
98
5
36
33
19
8
77.2
48.0
7,714
Students w/disablities
2
--
2
2
--
2
4,469
97
1
17
34
31
17
63.0
41.0
4,180
White
12
100
0
58
33
8
0
91.7
--
12
12
100
0
58
33
8
0
91.7
--
12
17,887
98
13
54
23
8
2
90.0
49.0
17,247
Male
3
--
3
3
--
3
14,219
98
8
45
28
14
5
83.0
46.0
13,472
Female
9
--
9
9
--
9
13,786
98
16
52
22
8
2
90.3
54.0
13,160
Title I
1
--
1
1
--
1
10,159
98
6
38
32
17
7
79.1
52.0
9,507
Non-Disabled
10
100
0
70
20
10
0
92.5
--
10
10
100
0
70
20
10
0
92.5
--
10
23,536
98
14
54
23
7
1
91.5
52.0
22,452
Non-Econ. disadvantaged
4
--
4
4
--
4
19,760
98
15
54
22
7
2
90.6
51.0
18,918
All Students
2015
12
100
0
58
33
8
0
91.7
--
12
12
100
0
58
33
8
0
91.7
--
12
28,005
98
12
48
25
11
4
86.6
50.0
26,632
GRADE 6 Math
Student Group
School
District
State
Included
Part. Rate
% at Each Level
Trans. CPI
Trans. SGP
Incl. in SGP (#)
Included
Part. Rate
% at Each Level
Trans. CPI
Trans. SGP
Incl. in SGP (#)
Included
Part. Rate
% at Each Level
Trans. CPI
Trans. SGP
Incl. in SGP (#)
#
%
L5
L4
L3
L2
L1
#
%
L5
L4
L3
L2
L1
#
%
L5
L4
L3
L2
L1
Subgroups
High needs
9
--
9
9
--
9
11,827
98
3
28
33
26
10
67.4
47.0
11,071
Econ. disadvantaged
8
--
8
8
--
8
8,225
98
3
30
34
24
9
69.2
47.0
7,745
Students w/disablities
2
--
2
2
--
2
4,431
97
1
14
29
37
19
54.8
43.0
4,175
White
12
100
17
25
50
8
0
89.6
--
12
12
100
17
25
50
8
0
89.6
--
12
17,851
98
10
50
27
11
3
85.5
49.0
17,273
Male
3
--
3
3
--
3
14,197
98
10
42
27
15
6
79.9
47.0
13,504
Female
9
--
9
9
--
9
13,769
98
10
45
28
13
4
82.7
53.0
13,156
Title I
1
--
1
1
--
1
10,178
98
5
33
33
21
8
72.1
52.0
9,572
Non-Disabled
10
100
20
30
50
0
0
92.5
--
10
10
100
20
30
50
0
0
92.5
--
10
23,535
99
11
49
28
10
2
86.7
52.0
22,485
Non-Econ. disadvantaged
4
--
4
4
--
4
19,741
98
12
50
25
10
3
86.4
51.0
18,915
All Students
2015
12
100
17
25
50
8
0
89.6
--
12
12
100
17
25
50
8
0
89.6
--
12
27,966
98
10
44
28
14
5
81.2
50.0
26,660
GRADES 3-8 ELA/L
Student Group
School
District
State
Included
Part. Rate
% at Each Level
Trans. CPI
Trans. SGP
Incl. in SGP (#)
Included
Part. Rate
% at Each Level
Trans. CPI
Trans. SGP
Incl. in SGP (#)
Included
Part. Rate
% at Each Level
Trans. CPI
Trans. SGP
Incl. in SGP (#)
#
%
L5
L4
L3
L2
L1
#
%
L5
L4
L3
L2
L1
#
%
L5
L4
L3
L2
L1
Subgroups
High needs
18
100
6
50
33
11
0
86.1
--
12
18
100
6
50
33
11
0
86.1
--
12
75,453
98
4
34
30
20
11
74.7
47.0
58,256
Econ. disadvantaged
12
100
0
67
25
8
0
93.8
--
9
12
100
0
67
25
8
0
93.8
--
9
53,000
98
5
36
30
19
11
76.0
47.0
41,006
Students w/disablities
8
--
4
8
--
4
27,853
97
2
20
30
29
20
64.6
42.0
21,857
White
37
100
8
49
27
16
0
84.5
36.0
24
37
100
8
49
27
16
0
84.5
36.0
24
106,666
98
15
52
21
9
3
89.2
50.0
84,823
Male
14
100
7
50
21
21
0
87.5
--
7
14
100
7
50
21
21
0
87.5
--
7
86,094
98
9
44
25
14
7
82.4
47.0
67,648
Female
23
100
9
48
30
13
0
82.6
--
17
23
100
9
48
30
13
0
82.6
--
17
82,963
98
17
49
20
9
4
88.5
54.0
65,651
Title I
1
--
1
1
--
1
64,569
98
6
37
29
18
10
77.2
49.0
48,893
Non-Disabled
29
100
7
59
21
14
0
87.9
33.0
20
29
100
7
59
21
14
0
87.9
33.0
20
141,204
98
15
52
22
8
3
89.9
52.0
111,442
Non-Econ. disadvantaged
25
100
12
40
28
20
0
80.0
--
15
25
100
12
40
28
20
0
80.0
--
15
116,057
98
17
52
20
8
3
89.7
52.0
92,293
All Students
2015
37
100
8
49
27
16
0
84.5
36.0
24
37
100
8
49
27
16
0
84.5
36.0
24
169,057
98
13
47
23
12
6
85.4
50.0
133,299
GRADES 3-8 MATH
Student Group
School
District
State
Included
Part. Rate
% at Each Level
Trans. CPI
Trans. SGP
Incl. in SGP (#)
Included
Part. Rate
% at Each Level
Trans. CPI
Trans. SGP
Incl. in SGP (#)
Included
Part. Rate
% at Each Level
Trans. CPI
Trans. SGP
Incl. in SGP (#)
#
%
L5
L4
L3
L2
L1
#
%
L5
L4
L3
L2
L1
#
%
L5
L4
L3
L2
L1
Subgroups
High needs
18
100
0
33
39
28
0
77.8
--
12
18
100
0
33
39
28
0
77.8
--
12
75,225
98
3
28
31
26
11
67.4
46.0
58,231
Econ. disadvantaged
12
100
0
33
50
17
0
85.4
--
9
12
100
0
33
50
17
0
85.4
--
9
52,851
98
3
30
31
25
11
68.5
46.0
41,003
Students w/disablities
8
--
4
8
--
4
27,719
97
2
16
28
35
20
56.7
42.0
21,868
White
37
100
8
35
38
19
0
81.8
49.0
24
37
100
8
35
38
19
0
81.8
49.0
24
106,309
98
10
48
26
12
4
84.1
50.0
84,943
Male
14
100
14
36
36
14
0
83.9
--
7
14
100
14
36
36
14
0
83.9
--
7
85,895
98
10
41
26
16
6
78.8
48.0
67,806
Female
23
100
4
35
39
22
0
80.4
--
17
23
100
4
35
39
22
0
80.4
--
17
82,686
98
9
44
27
15
5
81.0
52.0
65,569
Title I
1
--
1
1
--
1
64,472
98
5
32
31
23
9
71.2
49.0
48,914
Non-Disabled
29
100
10
38
45
7
0
87.9
52.0
20
29
100
10
38
45
7
0
87.9
52.0
20
140,862
98
11
48
27
12
3
84.9
52.0
111,507
Non-Econ. disadvantaged
25
100
12
36
32
20
0
80.0
--
15
25
100
12
36
32
20
0
80.0
--
15
115,730
98
12
48
25
11
3
85.1
52.0
92,372
All Students
2015
37
100
8
35
38
19
0
81.8
49.0
24
37
100
8
35
38
19
0
81.8
49.0
24
168,581
98
10
43
27
16
6
79.9
50.0
133,375
2015 Accountability Data - Rowe Elementary
Accountability Information
Accountability and Assistance Level
Level 1
2015 Level held harmless
This school's determination of need for special education technical assistance or intervention
Meets Requirements (MR)
This school's overall performance relative to other schools in same school type (School percentiles: 1-99)
All students:
57
Lowest performing
Highest performing
This school’s progress toward narrowing proficiency gaps (Cumulative Progress and Performance Index: 1-100)
Student Group (Click group to view subgroup data)
On Target = 75 or higher -
Less progress
More progress
All students
53
Did Not Meet Target
High needs
-
Econ. Disadvantaged
-
EL and Former EL
-
Students w/ disabilities
-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.
-
Asian
-
Afr. Amer./Black
-
Hispanic/Latino
-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.
-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.
-
White
52
Did Not Meet Target
Rowe Elementary: Accountability Data Detail
2015 English Language Arts Proficiency Gap Narrowing
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100
Baseline CPI
2014 CPI
2015 CPI
CPI Change
2015 Target
6 Year Goal
CPI Percentile in School Type
N
PPI Points
Rating
All students
87.1
91.1
84.5
-6.6
91.4
93.6
46
37
0
Declined
High needs
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
18
-
-
Econ. Disadvantaged
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
12
-
-
EL and Former EL
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Students w/ disabilities
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
8
-
-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Asian
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Afr. Amer./Black
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Hispanic/Latino
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
White
86.6
-
84.5
-0.2
91.1
93.3
31
37
25
No Change
2015 Mathematics Proficiency Gap Narrowing
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100
Baseline CPI
2014 CPI
2015 CPI
CPI Change
2015 Target
6 Year Goal
CPI Percentile in School Type
N
PPI Points
Rating
All students
87.9
89.5
81.8
-7.7
91.9
94.0
42
37
0
Declined
High needs
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
18
-
-
Econ. Disadvantaged
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
12
-
-
EL and Former EL
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Students w/ disabilities
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
8
-
-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Asian
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Afr. Amer./Black
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Hispanic/Latino
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
White
87.5
-
81.8
-9.0
91.7
93.8
27
37
0
Declined
2015 Science Proficiency Gap Narrowing
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100
Baseline CPI
2014 CPI
2015 CPI
CPI Change
2015 Target
6 Year Goal
CPI Percentile in School Type
N
PPI Points
Rating
All students
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
7
-
-
High needs
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Econ. Disadvantaged
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
EL and Former EL
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Students w/ disabilities
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Asian
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Afr. Amer./Black
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Hispanic/Latino
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
White
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
7
-
-
2015 English Language Arts Extra Credit
Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more)
Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2014 % Advanced
2015 % Advanced
N
PPI Points
2014 % Warning/Failing
2015 % Warning/Failing
N
PPI Points
All students
19.4
10.8
37
0
0.0
2.7
37
0
High needs
-
-
18
-
-
-
18
-
Econ. Disadvantaged
-
-
12
-
-
-
12
-
EL and Former EL
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Students w/ disabilities
-
-
8
-
-
-
8
-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Asian
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Afr. Amer./Black
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Hispanic/Latino
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
White
16.1
10.8
37
0
6.5
2.7
37
25
2015 Mathematics Extra Credit
Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more)
Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2014 % Advanced
2015 % Advanced
N
PPI Points
2014 % Warning/Failing
2015 % Warning/Failing
N
PPI Points
All students
45.2
27.0
37
0
6.5
8.1
37
0
High needs
-
-
18
-
-
-
18
-
Econ. Disadvantaged
-
-
12
-
-
-
12
-
EL and Former EL
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Students w/ disabilities
-
-
8
-
-
-
8
-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Asian
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Afr. Amer./Black
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Hispanic/Latino
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
White
26.7
27.0
37
0
3.3
8.1
37
0
2015 Science Extra Credit
Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more)
Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2014 % Advanced
2015 % Advanced
N
PPI Points
2014 % Warning/Failing
2015 % Warning/Failing
N
PPI Points
All students
-
-
7
-
-
-
7
-
High needs
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Econ. Disadvantaged
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
EL and Former EL
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Students w/ disabilities
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Asian
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Afr. Amer./Black
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Hispanic/Latino
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
White
-
-
7
-
-
-
7
-
2015 English Language Arts Growth
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100
2014 SGP
2015 SGP
SGP Change
6 Year Goal
Met Safe Harbor?
N
PPI Points
Rating
All students
52.0
36.0
-16.0
51.0
No
24
25
Below Target
High needs
-
-
-
51.0
-
12
-
-
Econ. Disadvantaged
-
-
-
51.0
-
9
-
-
EL and Former EL
-
-
-
51.0
-
-
-
-
Students w/ disabilities
-
-
-
51.0
-
4
-
-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.
-
-
-
51.0
-
-
-
-
Asian
-
-
-
51.0
-
-
-
-
Afr. Amer./Black
-
-
-
51.0
-
-
-
-
Hispanic/Latino
-
-
-
51.0
-
-
-
-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.
-
-
-
51.0
-
-
-
-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.
-
-
-
51.0
-
-
-
-
White
-
-
-
51.0
-
24
-
-
2015 Mathematics Growth
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100
2014 SGP
2015 SGP
SGP Change
6 Year Goal
Met Safe Harbor?
N
PPI Points
Rating
All students
51.5
48.5
-3.0
51.0
No
24
50
Below Target
High needs
-
-
-
51.0
-
12
-
-
Econ. Disadvantaged
-
-
-
51.0
-
9
-
-
EL and Former EL
-
-
-
51.0
-
-
-
-
Students w/ disabilities
-
-
-
51.0
-
4
-
-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.
-
-
-
51.0
-
-
-
-
Asian
-
-
-
51.0
-
-
-
-
Afr. Amer./Black
-
-
-
51.0
-
-
-
-
Hispanic/Latino
-
-
-
51.0
-
-
-
-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.
-
-
-
51.0
-
-
-
-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.
-
-
-
51.0
-
-
-
-
White
-
-
-
51.0
-
24
-
-
2015 Extra credit for English language proficiency growth
2015 SGPA
2015 Target
SGPA N Included
PPI Points
All students
-
60
-
-
High needs
-
60
-
-
EL and Former EL
-
60
-
-
2015 Assessment Participation
English Language Arts
Mathematics
Science
Enrolled
Assessed
%
Met Target (95%)
Enrolled
Assessed
%
Met Target (95%)
Enrolled
Assessed
%
Met Target (95%)
All students
37
37
100
Yes
37
37
100
Yes
7
-
-
-
High needs
18
-
-
-
18
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Econ. Disadvantaged
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
EL and Former EL
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Students w/ disabilities
8
-
-
-
8
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Asian
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Afr. Amer./Black
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Hispanic/Latino
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
White
37
37
100
Yes
37
37
100
Yes
7
-
-
-
2015 Massachusetts and Nationwide NAEP Results by Student Group Average Scaled Scores and Percentages of Students at Each Achievement Level
NAEP, or the National Assessment of Educational Progress, is often called the "Nation's Report Card." It is the only measure of student achievement in the United States that allows you to compare the performance of students in Massachusetts with the performance of students across the nation or in other states. Students take the NAEP in reading and mathematics every two years. When reviewing these results, it is important to keep in mind that the NAEP results are based on a small sample of students across Massachusetts, not the population of Massachusetts students. For more information, please visit http://www.doe.mass.edu/mcas/naep/faq.html.
The following symbols are used to denote the NAEP achievement levels: A for Advanced, P+ for Proficient and above, B+ for Basic and above, BB for Below Basic. The symbol "#" means that the estimated number of students rounds to zero.
GRADE LEVEL 4 - READING
Student Group
Massachusetts
National Public
Avg. Scaled Score
% at Each Level
Avg. Scaled Score
% at Each Level
A
P+
B+
BB
% Assessed
A
P+
B+
BB
% Assessed
All Students
235
14
50
82
18
100
221
8
35
68
32
100
Stud. w/ Disab
209
2
20
55
45
18
186
2
12
33
67
13
LEP
200
1
12
44
56
9
189
1
8
32
68
11
African American/Black
217
3
25
65
35
7
206
2
18
51
49
15
Asian/Pacific Islander
249
31
68
89
11
6
238
19
53
81
19
5
Hispanic/Latino
215
3
25
61
39
19
208
3
21
54
46
26
White
242
17
58
89
11
65
232
11
46
79
21
49
Econ. Disadvantaged
220
5
29
67
33
42
209
3
21
56
44
55
GRADE LEVEL 4 - MATHEMATICS
Student Group
Massachusetts
National Public
Avg. Scaled Score
% at Each Level
Avg. Scaled Score
% at Each Level
A
P+
B+
BB
% Assessed
A
P+
B+
BB
% Assessed
All Students
251
13
54
90
10
100
240
7
39
81
19
100
Stud. w/ Disab
231
4
25
74
26
18
217
2
16
54
46
13
LEP
223
2
17
65
35
9
218
1
15
57
43
11
African American/Black
230
1
26
73
27
7
224
1
19
65
35
15
Asian/Pacific Islander
273
38
81
98
2
6
256
22
61
90
10
5
Hispanic/Latino
232
3
28
74
26
19
230
3
26
73
27
26
White
256
15
62
95
5
65
248
10
51
90
10
49
Econ. Disadvantaged
236
4
31
80
20
42
229
2
24
72
28
55
GRADE LEVEL 8 - READING
Student Group
Massachusetts
National Public
Avg. Scaled Score
% at Each Level
Avg. Scaled Score
% at Each Level
A
P+
B+
BB
% Assessed
A
P+
B+
BB
% Assessed
All Students
274
6
46
83
17
100
264
3
33
75
25
100
Stud. w/ Disab
245
1
15
54
46
18
229
#
8
36
64
12
LEP
225
#
6
35
65
5
223
#
3
28
72
6
African American/Black
252
1
18
63
37
9
247
1
15
58
42
15
Asian/Pacific Islander
290
18
64
90
10
7
279
9
50
85
15
6
Hispanic/Latino
249
#
17
61
39
14
253
1
20
65
35
25
White
281
7
53
90
10
67
273
4
42
84
16
51
Econ. Disadvantaged
260
3
28
71
29
44
253
1
20
64
36
52
GRADE LEVEL 8 - MATHEMATICS
Student Group
Massachusetts
National Public
Avg. Scaled Score
% at Each Level
Avg. Scaled Score
% at Each Level
A
P+
B+
BB
% Assessed
A
P+
B+
BB
% Assessed
All Students
297
18
51
81
19
100
281
8
32
70
30
100
Stud. w/ Disab
264
3
16
51
49
18
246
1
8
32
68
12
LEP
251
2
10
38
62
6
246
1
5
31
69
6
African American/Black
268
4
22
54
46
9
260
1
12
47
53
15
Asian/Pacific Islander
324
44
73
94
6
7
305
25
58
86
14
6
Hispanic/Latino
271
4
24
61
39
15
269
3
19
60
40
25
White
304
20
59
88
12
66
291
10
42
81
19
51
Econ. Disadvantaged
279
7
31
67
33
43
268
2
18
58
42
52
Participation Rates for Students with Disabilities and for English Language Learner Students
The NAEP program has always endeavored to assess all students selected for testing. In all NAEP schools, accommodations are provided as necessary for students with disabilities and/or English language learners. School staff who are familiar with these students are asked a series of questions to help them decide whether each student should participate in the assessment and whether the student needs accommodations.