Todd H Bazydlo, Principal Mailing Address: 75 Cypress Avenue Shrewsbury, MA 01545
Phone: (508) 841-8800 FAX: (508) 841-8858 Website: http://schools.shrewsburyma.gov/high
This report card contains information required by the federal Elementary and Secondary Education Act (ESEA) for our school and district including: student enrollment and teacher qualifications, student achievement, accountability, and the progress our school is making toward narrowing proficiency gaps for different groups of students.
Enrollment and Educator Data (2016-17 School Year)
Note: School achievement percentiles (1-99) compare each group’s average scaled score to the average scaled scores of the same group from all public schools across the state. Only students enrolled in the same school since October 1 are included in calculations, and groups with fewer than 10 students do not receive percentiles.
2017 MCAS Results by Student Group by Grade and Subject
NOTE: First-year ELL students are not included in achievement level or CPI results. However, first-year ELL students who took the ACCESS for ELLs test are counted as ELA participants; in addition, first-year ELL students who are present for Mathematics/Science and Technology/Engineering are counted as Mathematics/Science and Technology/Engineering participants.
* Note: Grade 10 Science and Technology/Engineering results represent the highest achievement level attained by students by the end of grade 10. In addition, only students enrolled for two full years in the state/district/school are included in state/district/school achievement level results.
ALL GRADES - SCIENCE AND TECH/ENG
Student Group
School
District
State
Stud. Incl
Part. Rate
% at Each Level
CPI
SGP
Incl. in SGP (#)
Stud. Incl
Part. Rate
% at Each Level
CPI
SGP
Incl. in SGP (#)
Stud. Incl
Part. Rate
% at Each Level
CPI
SGP
Incl. in SGP (#)
#
%
A
P
NI
W
#
%
A
P
NI
W
#
%
A
P
NI
W
Subgroups
Students w/ disabilities
38
98
3
58
29
11
82.2
N/A
N/A
194
98
3
23
45
29
64.0
N/A
N/A
39,271
98
4
18
41
38
59.1
N/A
N/A
EL and Former EL
8
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
65
100
9
29
51
11
73.1
N/A
N/A
20,120
99
3
16
44
37
54.7
N/A
N/A
Econ. Disadvantaged
36
98
36
39
22
3
90.3
N/A
N/A
141
99
13
31
42
14
77.0
N/A
N/A
66,270
99
7
25
43
26
65.2
N/A
N/A
High needs
73
99
19
48
27
5
86.6
N/A
N/A
341
99
8
30
43
19
71.7
N/A
N/A
93,555
99
6
25
43
26
65.2
N/A
N/A
Afr. Amer./Black
5
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
34
100
9
29
35
26
70.6
N/A
N/A
17,823
99
6
25
43
26
64.6
N/A
N/A
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
3
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
460
98
10
31
40
20
71.6
N/A
N/A
Asian
88
100
67
27
5
1
97.7
N/A
N/A
355
99
39
44
15
2
93.4
N/A
N/A
13,554
100
30
38
25
7
86.1
N/A
N/A
Hispanic/Latino
22
100
23
45
27
5
88.6
N/A
N/A
82
100
15
30
39
16
76.2
N/A
N/A
37,380
99
6
24
42
27
63.2
N/A
N/A
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.
9
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
43
100
21
49
23
7
86.6
N/A
N/A
6,659
99
20
35
33
13
79.1
N/A
N/A
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.
1
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
1
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
174
99
16
31
34
19
74.6
N/A
N/A
White
266
100
42
49
9
0
97.0
N/A
N/A
853
100
23
47
25
5
87.8
N/A
N/A
133,323
99
20
41
31
8
83.6
N/A
N/A
Male
166
99
46
41
11
2
94.4
N/A
N/A
678
100
25
42
26
7
86.1
N/A
N/A
106,879
99
17
36
33
14
77.8
N/A
N/A
Female
224
100
47
46
7
0
97.9
N/A
N/A
692
100
28
47
21
4
90.1
N/A
N/A
102,501
99
17
37
34
12
78.8
N/A
N/A
EL
4
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
18
100
6
22
56
17
65.3
N/A
N/A
11,915
98
1
7
40
52
43.7
N/A
N/A
Ever EL
52
99
40
40
19
0
93.3
N/A
N/A
191
100
25
40
30
6
85.2
N/A
N/A
34,852
99
8
25
40
26
64.4
N/A
N/A
Migrant
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
43
98
0
16
16
67
41.9
N/A
N/A
All Students
2017
391
100
47
44
9
1
96.4
N/A
N/A
1,371
100
27
44
23
6
88.1
N/A
N/A
209,416
99
17
36
34
13
78.3
N/A
N/A
2016
406
100
55
36
8
0
97.0
N/A
N/A
1,436
100
31
40
23
6
88.8
N/A
N/A
208,262
99
17
37
33
13
78.7
N/A
N/A
2017 Official Accountability Data - Shrewsbury Sr High
Accountability Information
Accountability and Assistance Level
Level 2
Not meeting gap narrowing goals
This school's overall performance relative to other schools in same school type (School percentiles: 1-99)
All students:
82
Lowest performing
Highest performing
This school’s progress toward narrowing proficiency gaps (Cumulative Progress and Performance Index: 1-100)
Student Group (Click group to view subgroup data)
On Target = 75 or higher -
Less progress
More progress
All students
89
Met Target
High needs
67
Did Not Meet Target
Econ. Disadvantaged
-
EL and Former EL
-
Students w/ disabilities
65
Did Not Meet Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.
-
Asian
100
Met Target
Afr. Amer./Black
-
Hispanic/Latino
-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.
-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.
-
White
93
Met Target
Shrewsbury High School: Accountability Data Detail
2017 English Language Arts Proficiency Gap Narrowing
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100
Baseline CPI
2016 CPI
2017 CPI
CPI Change
2017 Target
6 Year Goal
CPI Percentile in School Type
N
PPI Points
Rating
All students
99.1
99.2
99.4
0.2
99.6
99.6
79
416
100
Above Target
High needs
96.8
96.4
97.0
0.6
98.4
98.4
70
82
50
Improved Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged
99.4
97.4
97.5
0.1
99.5
99.7
73
40
100
Above Target
EL and Former EL
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
12
-
-
Students w/ disabilities
94.0
96.4
95.7
-0.7
97.0
97.0
69
41
25
No Change
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Asian
100.0
98.7
98.4
-0.3
100.0
100.0
39
94
100
Above Target
Afr. Amer./Black
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
7
-
-
Hispanic/Latino
97.6
97.0
98.3
1.3
98.4
98.8
87
30
100
Above Target
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
8
-
-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
1
-
-
White
99.3
99.5
99.9
0.4
99.7
99.7
91
276
100
Above Target
2017 Mathematics Proficiency Gap Narrowing
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100
Baseline CPI
2016 CPI
2017 CPI
CPI Change
2017 Target
6 Year Goal
CPI Percentile in School Type
N
PPI Points
Rating
All students
97.7
97.1
97.5
0.4
98.9
98.9
83
415
100
Above Target
High needs
92.6
86.9
90.2
3.3
96.3
96.3
80
82
50
Improved Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged
96.0
94.1
93.1
-1.0
96.7
98.0
84
40
25
No Change
EL and Former EL
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
12
-
-
Students w/ disabilities
89.2
80.7
84.8
4.1
94.6
94.6
77
41
50
Improved Below Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Asian
99.5
98.0
97.8
-0.2
99.8
99.8
47
93
100
Above Target
Afr. Amer./Black
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
7
-
-
Hispanic/Latino
92.9
91.0
91.7
0.7
95.3
96.5
90
30
75
On Target
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
9
-
-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
1
-
-
White
98.2
97.5
98.4
0.9
99.1
99.1
87
275
100
Above Target
2017 Science Proficiency Gap Narrowing
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100
Baseline CPI
2016 CPI
2017 CPI
CPI Change
2017 Target
6 Year Goal
CPI Percentile in School Type
N
PPI Points
Rating
All students
94.7
97.0
96.4
-0.6
97.4
97.4
78
391
75
On Target
High needs
85.3
88.5
86.6
-1.9
92.7
92.7
68
73
25
No Change
Econ. Disadvantaged
91.5
92.4
90.3
-2.1
92.9
95.8
78
36
25
No Change
EL and Former EL
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
8
-
-
Students w/ disabilities
79.1
82.2
82.2
0.0
89.6
89.6
71
38
25
No Change
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Asian
97.7
98.6
97.7
-0.9
98.9
98.9
47
88
100
Above Target
Afr. Amer./Black
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
5
-
-
Hispanic/Latino
94.0
92.9
88.6
-4.3
96.0
97.0
84
22
0
Declined
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
9
-
-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
1
-
-
White
94.9
96.7
97.0
0.3
97.5
97.5
76
266
75
On Target
2017 English Language Arts Extra Credit
Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more)
Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2016 % Advanced
2017 % Advanced
N
PPI Points
2016 % Warning/Failing
2017 % Warning/Failing
N
PPI Points
All students
74.2
69.0
416
0
0.2
0.2
416
0
High needs
28.6
36.6
82
25
1.2
1.2
82
0
Econ. Disadvantaged
46.2
60.0
40
25
0.0
0.0
40
25
EL and Former EL
-
-
12
-
-
-
12
-
Students w/ disabilities
16.3
14.6
41
0
0.0
2.4
41
0
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Asian
82.7
83.0
94
0
0.0
1.1
94
0
Afr. Amer./Black
-
-
7
-
-
-
7
-
Hispanic/Latino
52.0
43.3
30
0
4.0
0.0
30
25
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.
-
-
8
-
-
-
8
-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.
-
-
1
-
-
-
1
-
White
73.3
67.8
276
0
0.0
0.0
276
25
2017 Mathematics Extra Credit
Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more)
Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2016 % Advanced
2017 % Advanced
N
PPI Points
2016 % Warning/Failing
2017 % Warning/Failing
N
PPI Points
All students
77.9
74.2
415
0
1.9
1.0
415
25
High needs
47.6
37.8
82
0
9.8
4.9
82
25
Econ. Disadvantaged
65.8
55.0
40
0
2.6
5.0
40
0
EL and Former EL
-
-
12
-
-
-
12
-
Students w/ disabilities
31.3
17.1
41
0
14.6
9.8
41
25
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Asian
93.3
86.0
93
0
2.7
1.1
93
25
Afr. Amer./Black
-
-
7
-
-
-
7
-
Hispanic/Latino
64.0
43.3
30
0
8.0
3.3
30
25
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.
-
-
9
-
-
-
9
-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.
-
-
1
-
-
-
1
-
White
75.6
74.5
275
0
1.0
0.4
275
25
2017 Science Extra Credit
Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more)
Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2016 % Advanced
2017 % Advanced
N
PPI Points
2016 % Warning/Failing
2017 % Warning/Failing
N
PPI Points
All students
55.2
46.5
391
0
0.2
1.0
391
0
High needs
27.0
19.2
73
0
1.4
5.5
73
0
Econ. Disadvantaged
45.5
36.1
36
0
3.0
2.8
36
0
EL and Former EL
-
-
8
-
-
-
8
-
Students w/ disabilities
8.9
2.6
38
0
2.2
10.5
38
0
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Asian
75.7
67.0
88
0
0.0
1.1
88
0
Afr. Amer./Black
-
-
5
-
-
-
5
-
Hispanic/Latino
52.4
22.7
22
0
4.8
4.5
22
0
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.
-
-
9
-
-
-
9
-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.
-
-
1
-
-
-
1
-
White
50.2
42.5
266
0
0.0
0.0
266
25
2017 English Language Arts Growth
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100
2016 SGP
2017 SGP
SGP Change
6 Year Goal
Met Safe Harbor?
N
PPI Points
Rating
All students
46.0
48.0
2.0
51.0
No
349
50
Below Target
High needs
47.0
49.5
2.5
51.0
No
66
50
Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged
54.0
45.0
-9.0
51.0
No
32
50
Below Target
EL and Former EL
-
-
-
51.0
-
8
-
-
Students w/ disabilities
47.0
52.0
5.0
51.0
No
35
75
On Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.
-
-
-
51.0
-
-
-
-
Asian
62.0
55.0
-7.0
51.0
No
79
75
On Target
Afr. Amer./Black
-
-
-
51.0
-
4
-
-
Hispanic/Latino
63.5
46.5
-17.0
51.0
No
24
50
Below Target
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.
-
-
-
51.0
-
6
-
-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.
-
-
-
51.0
-
1
-
-
White
42.5
43.0
0.5
51.0
Yes
235
75
On Target
2017 Mathematics Growth
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100
2016 SGP
2017 SGP
SGP Change
6 Year Goal
Met Safe Harbor?
N
PPI Points
Rating
All students
53.0
57.0
4.0
51.0
No
360
75
On Target
High needs
60.0
53.5
-6.5
51.0
No
66
75
On Target
Econ. Disadvantaged
58.0
47.5
-10.5
51.0
No
32
50
Below Target
EL and Former EL
-
-
-
51.0
-
8
-
-
Students w/ disabilities
63.0
51.0
-12.0
51.0
No
35
75
On Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.
-
-
-
51.0
-
-
-
-
Asian
69.0
66.0
-3.0
51.0
No
77
100
Above Target
Afr. Amer./Black
-
-
-
51.0
-
4
-
-
Hispanic/Latino
55.5
52.0
-3.5
51.0
No
24
75
On Target
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.
-
-
-
51.0
-
8
-
-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.
-
-
-
51.0
-
1
-
-
White
48.0
56.0
8.0
51.0
Yes
246
75
On Target
2017 Extra credit for English language proficiency growth
2017 SGPA
2017 Target
SGPA N Included
PPI Points
All students
71.0
60.0
27
25
High needs
71.0
60.0
27
25
EL and Former EL
-
60.0
27
-
2016 4-Year Cohort Graduation Rate
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100
2015 Rate
2016 Rate
Change
Annual Target
6 Year Goal
N
PPI Points
Rating
All students
96.2
96.8
0.6
80.0
90.0
405
100
Above Target
High needs
91.0
92.6
1.6
80.0
90.0
122
75
On Target
Econ. Disadvantaged
-
-
-
80.0
90.0
-
-
-
EL and Former EL
-
-
-
80.0
90.0
5
-
-
Students w/ disabilities
89.7
89.8
0.1
80.0
90.0
59
75
On Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.
-
-
-
80.0
90.0
1
-
-
Asian
100.0
98.4
-1.6
80.0
90.0
61
100
Above Target
Afr. Amer./Black
-
-
-
80.0
90.0
12
-
-
Hispanic/Latino
-
-
-
80.0
90.0
17
-
-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.
-
-
-
80.0
90.0
7
-
-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.
-
-
-
80.0
90.0
-
-
-
White
96.3
97.1
0.8
80.0
90.0
307
100
Above Target
2015 5-Year Cohort Graduation Rate
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100
2014 Rate
2015 Rate
Change
Annual Target
6 Year Goal
N
PPI Points
Rating
All students
95.9
96.2
0.3
85.0
95.0
425
100
Above Target
High needs
90.2
91.0
0.8
85.0
95.0
134
75
On Target
Econ. Disadvantaged
-
-
-
85.0
95.0
-
-
-
EL and Former EL
-
-
-
85.0
95.0
9
-
-
Students w/ disabilities
84.8
89.7
4.9
85.0
95.0
68
75
On Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.
-
-
-
85.0
95.0
1
-
-
Asian
100.0
100.0
0.0
85.0
95.0
69
100
Above Target
Afr. Amer./Black
-
-
-
85.0
95.0
5
-
-
Hispanic/Latino
-
-
-
85.0
95.0
23
-
-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.
-
-
-
85.0
95.0
7
-
-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.
-
-
-
85.0
95.0
-
-
-
White
96.0
96.3
0.3
85.0
95.0
320
100
Above Target
2016 Annual Dropout Rate
0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20
Baseline Rate
2015 Rate
2016 Rate
Change
Annual Target
6 Year Goal
Dropout Percentile in School Type
N
PPI Points
Rating
All students
1.0
0.4
0.4
0.0
0.5
0.5
73
1668
75
On Target
High needs
3.3
1.0
0.3
0.7
1.7
1.7
89
322
75
On Target
Econ. Disadvantaged
1.8
1.8
0.0
1.8
1.7
0.9
89
129
100
Above Target
EL and Former EL
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
32
-
-
Students w/ disabilities
3.1
1.0
0.5
0.5
1.6
1.6
80
182
75
On Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
2
-
-
Asian
0.0
0.3
0.3
0.0
0.0
0.0
26
307
75
On Target
Afr. Amer./Black
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
35
-
-
Hispanic/Latino
9.2
1.1
0.0
1.1
4.6
4.6
86
101
100
Above Target
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
41
-
-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
2
-
-
White
0.7
0.4
0.3
0.1
0.4
0.4
73
1180
75
On Target
2017 Assessment Participation
English Language Arts
Mathematics
Science
Enrolled
Assessed
%
Met Target
Enrolled
Assessed
%
Met Target
Enrolled
Assessed
%
Met Target
All students
432
431
100
Yes
431
428
99
Yes
432
431
100
Yes
High needs
93
93
100
Yes
92
91
99
Yes
93
92
99
Yes
Econ. Disadvantaged
48
48
100
Yes
47
47
100
Yes
48
47
98
Yes
EL and Former EL
19
-
-
-
18
-
-
-
19
-
-
-
Students w/ disabilities
42
42
100
Yes
42
42
100
Yes
42
41
98
Yes
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Asian
94
94
100
Yes
94
93
99
Yes
94
94
100
Yes
Afr. Amer./Black
9
-
-
-
8
-
-
-
9
-
-
-
Hispanic/Latino
35
35
100
Yes
35
35
100
Yes
35
35
100
Yes
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.
9
-
-
-
9
-
-
-
9
-
-
-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.
1
-
-
-
1
-
-
-
1
-
-
-
White
284
284
100
Yes
284
282
99
Yes
284
283
100
Yes
NOTE: In 2017, assessment participation was calculated two ways: First, the 2017 participation rate for each subgroup in each subject area test was calculated. If the actual 2017 participation rate was lower than 95 percent (high schools) or 90 percent (schools and districts administering Next-Generation MCAS test in grades 3-8) for any group in any subject, that rate was compared to the average of the most recent two years of assessment participation data for that group and subject. The higher of the two resulting rates was factored into the assignment of the school or district's 2017 accountability and assistance level.
2015 Massachusetts and Nationwide NAEP Results by Student Group Average Scaled Scores and Percentages of Students at Each Achievement Level
NAEP, or the National Assessment of Educational Progress, is often called the "Nation's Report Card." It is the only measure of student achievement in the United States that allows you to compare the performance of students in Massachusetts with the performance of students across the nation or in other states. Students take the NAEP in reading and mathematics every two years. When reviewing these results, it is important to keep in mind that the NAEP results are based on a small sample of students across Massachusetts, not the population of Massachusetts students. For more information, please visit http://www.doe.mass.edu/mcas/naep/faq.html.
The following symbols are used to denote the NAEP achievement levels: A for Advanced, P+ for Proficient and above, B+ for Basic and above, BB for Below Basic. The symbol "#" means that the estimated number of students rounds to zero.
GRADE LEVEL 4 - READING
Student Group
Massachusetts
National Public
Avg. Scaled Score
% at Each Level
Avg. Scaled Score
% at Each Level
A
P+
B+
BB
% Assessed
A
P+
B+
BB
% Assessed
All Students
235
14
50
82
18
100
221
8
35
68
32
100
Stud. w/ Disab
209
2
20
55
45
18
186
2
12
33
67
13
LEP
200
1
12
44
56
9
189
1
8
32
68
11
African American/Black
217
3
25
65
35
7
206
2
18
51
49
15
Asian/Pacific Islander
249
31
68
89
11
6
238
19
53
81
19
5
Hispanic/Latino
215
3
25
61
39
19
208
3
21
54
46
26
White
242
17
58
89
11
65
232
11
46
79
21
49
Econ. Disadvantaged
220
5
29
67
33
42
209
3
21
56
44
55
GRADE LEVEL 4 - MATHEMATICS
Student Group
Massachusetts
National Public
Avg. Scaled Score
% at Each Level
Avg. Scaled Score
% at Each Level
A
P+
B+
BB
% Assessed
A
P+
B+
BB
% Assessed
All Students
251
13
54
90
10
100
240
7
39
81
19
100
Stud. w/ Disab
231
4
25
74
26
18
217
2
16
54
46
13
LEP
223
2
17
65
35
9
218
1
15
57
43
11
African American/Black
230
1
26
73
27
7
224
1
19
65
35
15
Asian/Pacific Islander
273
38
81
98
2
6
256
22
61
90
10
5
Hispanic/Latino
232
3
28
74
26
19
230
3
26
73
27
26
White
256
15
62
95
5
65
248
10
51
90
10
49
Econ. Disadvantaged
236
4
31
80
20
42
229
2
24
72
28
55
GRADE LEVEL 8 - READING
Student Group
Massachusetts
National Public
Avg. Scaled Score
% at Each Level
Avg. Scaled Score
% at Each Level
A
P+
B+
BB
% Assessed
A
P+
B+
BB
% Assessed
All Students
274
6
46
83
17
100
264
3
33
75
25
100
Stud. w/ Disab
245
1
15
54
46
18
229
#
8
36
64
12
LEP
225
#
6
35
65
5
223
#
3
28
72
6
African American/Black
252
1
18
63
37
9
247
1
15
58
42
15
Asian/Pacific Islander
290
18
64
90
10
7
279
9
50
85
15
6
Hispanic/Latino
249
#
17
61
39
14
253
1
20
65
35
25
White
281
7
53
90
10
67
273
4
42
84
16
51
Econ. Disadvantaged
260
3
28
71
29
44
253
1
20
64
36
52
GRADE LEVEL 8 - MATHEMATICS
Student Group
Massachusetts
National Public
Avg. Scaled Score
% at Each Level
Avg. Scaled Score
% at Each Level
A
P+
B+
BB
% Assessed
A
P+
B+
BB
% Assessed
All Students
297
18
51
81
19
100
281
8
32
70
30
100
Stud. w/ Disab
264
3
16
51
49
18
246
1
8
32
68
12
LEP
251
2
10
38
62
6
246
1
5
31
69
6
African American/Black
268
4
22
54
46
9
260
1
12
47
53
15
Asian/Pacific Islander
324
44
73
94
6
7
305
25
58
86
14
6
Hispanic/Latino
271
4
24
61
39
15
269
3
19
60
40
25
White
304
20
59
88
12
66
291
10
42
81
19
51
Econ. Disadvantaged
279
7
31
67
33
43
268
2
18
58
42
52
Participation Rates for Students with Disabilities and for English Language Learner Students
The NAEP program has always endeavored to assess all students selected for testing. In all NAEP schools, accommodations are provided as necessary for students with disabilities and/or English language learners. School staff who are familiar with these students are asked a series of questions to help them decide whether each student should participate in the assessment and whether the student needs accommodations.