Peter M Dufresne, Principal Mailing Address: 319 Brookfield Rd Fiskdale, MA 01518-1098
Phone: (508) 347-9301 FAX: (508) 347-1061 Website: http://www.tantasqua.org/ths
This report card contains information required by the federal Elementary and Secondary Education Act (ESEA) for our school and district including: student enrollment and teacher qualifications, student achievement, accountability, and the progress our school is making toward narrowing proficiency gaps for different groups of students.
Enrollment and Educator Data (2015-16 School Year)
Percentage of Teachers Licensed in Teaching Assignment
100.0
99.3
97.4
Total Number of Classes in Core Academic Areas
652
892
348,472
Percentage of Core Academic Classes Taught by Teachers Who are Highly Qualified
100.0
100.0
96.3
Percentage of Core Academic Classes Taught by Teachers Who are Not Highly Qualified
0.0
0.0
3.7
Student/Teacher Ratio
9.7 to 1
13.3 to 1
13.2 to 1
Percentage of Public Elementary and Secondary School Teachers Issued Waivers
-
0.0
0.9
2016 MCAS Results by Student Group by Grade and Subject
NOTE: First-year ELL students are not included in achievement level or CPI results. However, first-year ELL students who took the ACCESS for ELLs test are counted as ELA participants; in addition, first-year ELL students who are present for Mathematics/Science and Technology/Engineering are counted as Mathematics/Science and Technology/Engineering participants. Please see the principal's administration manual (PAM) for details.
* Note: Grade 10 Science and Technology/Engineering results represent the highest achievement level attained by students by the end of grade 10. In addition, only students enrolled for two full years in the state/district/school are included in state/district/school achievement level results.
ALL GRADES - ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS
Student Group
School
District
State
Stud. Incl
Part. Rate
% at Each Level
CPI
SGP
Incl. in SGP (#)
Stud. Incl
Part. Rate
% at Each Level
CPI
SGP
Incl. in SGP (#)
Stud. Incl
Part. Rate
% at Each Level
CPI
SGP
Incl. in SGP (#)
#
%
A
P
NI
W
#
%
A
P
NI
W
#
%
A
P
NI
W
Subgroups
Students w/ disabilities
6
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
EL and Former EL
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Econ. Disadvantaged
27
100
30
63
4
4
99.1
33.5
26
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
High needs
31
100
26
68
3
3
99.2
33.5
30
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Afr. Amer./Black
1
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Asian
3
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Hispanic/Latino
2
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.
3
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
White
154
100
58
40
1
1
99.4
36.0
150
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Male
76
100
53
45
1
1
98.7
37.0
76
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Female
87
100
63
36
0
1
100.0
31.0
83
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
EL
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Ever EL
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
All Students
2016
163
100
58
40
1
1
99.4
36.0
159
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
2015
200
100
66
32
1
2
98.8
50.0
185
895
100
27
58
11
3
93.9
41.0
848
216,396
99
-
-
-
-
-
50.0
175,934
ALL GRADES - MATHEMATICS
Student Group
School
District
State
Stud. Incl
Part. Rate
% at Each Level
CPI
SGP
Incl. in SGP (#)
Stud. Incl
Part. Rate
% at Each Level
CPI
SGP
Incl. in SGP (#)
Stud. Incl
Part. Rate
% at Each Level
CPI
SGP
Incl. in SGP (#)
#
%
A
P
NI
W
#
%
A
P
NI
W
#
%
A
P
NI
W
Subgroups
Students w/ disabilities
6
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
EL and Former EL
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Econ. Disadvantaged
27
100
52
37
7
4
98.1
51.0
26
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
High needs
31
100
48
32
10
10
92.7
50.0
30
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Afr. Amer./Black
1
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Asian
3
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Hispanic/Latino
2
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.
3
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
White
152
99
74
18
6
2
97.2
50.0
148
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Male
75
100
79
16
3
3
97.3
50.0
75
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Female
86
99
71
20
8
1
97.4
52.0
82
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
EL
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Ever EL
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
All Students
2016
161
99
75
18
6
2
97.4
50.0
157
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
2015
200
100
70
22
5
4
96.6
52.5
186
891
99
41
33
17
10
87.0
48.0
853
216,363
99
-
-
-
-
-
50.0
176,568
ALL GRADES - SCIENCE AND TECH/ENG
Student Group
School
District
State
Stud. Incl
Part. Rate
% at Each Level
CPI
SGP
Incl. in SGP (#)
Stud. Incl
Part. Rate
% at Each Level
CPI
SGP
Incl. in SGP (#)
Stud. Incl
Part. Rate
% at Each Level
CPI
SGP
Incl. in SGP (#)
#
%
A
P
NI
W
#
%
A
P
NI
W
#
%
A
P
NI
W
Subgroups
Students w/ disabilities
4
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
69
96
6
10
52
32
58.7
N/A
N/A
38,109
98
3
18
41
38
59.7
N/A
N/A
EL and Former EL
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
2
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
18,594
99
3
16
43
39
54.1
N/A
N/A
Econ. Disadvantaged
23
100
39
48
13
0
96.7
N/A
N/A
95
97
14
37
36
14
78.7
N/A
N/A
61,476
98
6
26
43
25
65.8
N/A
N/A
High needs
26
100
38
42
19
0
95.2
N/A
N/A
149
98
11
28
42
18
72.3
N/A
N/A
89,857
98
6
25
43
26
65.4
N/A
N/A
Afr. Amer./Black
1
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
4
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
17,761
99
5
24
44
27
63.9
N/A
N/A
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
1
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
422
98
9
33
40
19
71.9
N/A
N/A
Asian
3
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
5
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
13,043
99
30
39
23
7
86.8
N/A
N/A
Hispanic/Latino
2
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
27
100
19
33
37
11
79.6
N/A
N/A
35,316
99
5
24
42
28
62.9
N/A
N/A
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.
3
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
12
100
17
33
50
0
79.2
N/A
N/A
6,053
99
19
36
33
12
79.5
N/A
N/A
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
208
100
18
32
32
18
75.8
N/A
N/A
White
141
100
40
51
9
0
96.8
N/A
N/A
519
99
16
48
31
5
85.9
N/A
N/A
135,382
99
20
42
30
8
84.1
N/A
N/A
Male
70
100
47
47
6
0
98.6
N/A
N/A
286
100
21
44
29
6
86.4
N/A
N/A
106,211
99
17
37
33
14
78.4
N/A
N/A
Female
80
100
35
54
11
0
95.6
N/A
N/A
282
99
12
49
34
5
84.8
N/A
N/A
102,022
99
17
37
34
12
79.1
N/A
N/A
EL
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
11,822
98
1
8
39
51
45.3
N/A
N/A
Ever EL
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
7
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
33,065
99
8
25
40
27
64.2
N/A
N/A
All Students
2016
150
100
41
51
9
0
97.0
N/A
N/A
568
99
17
47
31
5
85.6
N/A
N/A
208,262
99
17
37
33
13
78.7
N/A
N/A
2015
182
100
38
37
23
2
92.6
N/A
N/A
593
100
15
48
32
4
86.1
N/A
N/A
210,454
99
15
39
33
12
79.4
N/A
N/A
2016 Accountability Data - Tantasqua Regional Sr High
Accountability Information
Accountability and Assistance Level
Level 1
Meeting gap narrowing goals
This school's overall performance relative to other schools in same school type (School percentiles: 1-99)
All students:
67
Lowest performing
Highest performing
This school’s progress toward narrowing proficiency gaps (Cumulative Progress and Performance Index: 1-100)
Student Group (Click group to view subgroup data)
On Target = 75 or higher -
Less progress
More progress
All students
88
Met Target
High needs
88
Met Target
Econ. Disadvantaged
-
EL and Former EL
-
Students w/ disabilities
-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.
-
Asian
-
Afr. Amer./Black
-
Hispanic/Latino
-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.
-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.
-
White
84
Met Target
Tantasqua Regional Sr High: Accountability Data Detail
2016 English Language Arts Proficiency Gap Narrowing
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100
Baseline CPI
2015 CPI
2016 CPI
CPI Change
2016 Target
6 Year Goal
CPI Percentile in School Type
N
PPI Points
Rating
All students
97.0
98.8
99.4
0.6
98.3
98.5
81
163
100
Above Target
High needs
89.2
92.9
99.2
6.3
93.7
94.6
95
31
100
Above Target
Econ. Disadvantaged
94.8
94.8
99.1
4.3
95.2
97.4
91
27
100
Above Target
EL and Former EL
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Students w/ disabilities
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
6
-
-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Asian
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
3
-
-
Afr. Amer./Black
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
1
-
-
Hispanic/Latino
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
2
-
-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
3
-
-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
White
97.2
98.6
99.4
0.8
98.4
98.6
69
154
100
Above Target
2016 Mathematics Proficiency Gap Narrowing
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100
Baseline CPI
2015 CPI
2016 CPI
CPI Change
2016 Target
6 Year Goal
CPI Percentile in School Type
N
PPI Points
Rating
All students
95.7
96.6
97.4
0.8
97.5
97.9
83
161
75
On Target
High needs
87.5
85.7
92.7
7.0
92.7
93.8
91
31
75
On Target
Econ. Disadvantaged
87.9
87.9
98.1
10.2
88.9
94.0
98
27
100
Above Target
EL and Former EL
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Students w/ disabilities
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
6
-
-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Asian
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
3
-
-
Afr. Amer./Black
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
1
-
-
Hispanic/Latino
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
2
-
-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
3
-
-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
White
95.9
97.3
97.2
-0.1
97.6
98.0
75
152
75
On Target
2016 Science Proficiency Gap Narrowing
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100
Baseline CPI
2015 CPI
2016 CPI
CPI Change
2016 Target
6 Year Goal
CPI Percentile in School Type
N
PPI Points
Rating
All students
90.4
92.6
97.0
4.4
94.4
95.2
83
150
100
Above Target
High needs
77.9
84.2
95.2
11.0
87.1
89.0
95
26
100
Above Target
Econ. Disadvantaged
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
23
-
-
EL and Former EL
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Students w/ disabilities
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
4
-
-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Asian
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
3
-
-
Afr. Amer./Black
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
1
-
-
Hispanic/Latino
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
2
-
-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
3
-
-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
White
90.6
93.9
96.8
2.9
94.5
95.3
75
141
100
Above Target
2016 English Language Arts Extra Credit
Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more)
Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015 % Advanced
2016 % Advanced
N
PPI Points
2015 % Warning/Failing
2016 % Warning/Failing
N
PPI Points
All students
65.5
58.3
163
0
1.0
0.6
163
25
High needs
42.9
25.8
31
0
5.7
0.0
31
25
Econ. Disadvantaged
51.7
29.6
27
0
3.4
0.0
27
25
EL and Former EL
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Students w/ disabilities
-
-
6
-
-
-
6
-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Asian
-
-
3
-
-
-
3
-
Afr. Amer./Black
-
-
1
-
-
-
1
-
Hispanic/Latino
-
-
2
-
-
-
2
-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.
-
-
3
-
-
-
3
-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
White
68.5
57.8
154
0
1.1
0.6
154
25
2016 Mathematics Extra Credit
Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more)
Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015 % Advanced
2016 % Advanced
N
PPI Points
2015 % Warning/Failing
2016 % Warning/Failing
N
PPI Points
All students
70.0
74.5
161
0
2.0
1.2
161
25
High needs
48.6
48.4
31
0
11.4
6.5
31
25
Econ. Disadvantaged
55.2
51.9
27
0
10.3
0.0
27
25
EL and Former EL
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Students w/ disabilities
-
-
6
-
-
-
6
-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Asian
-
-
3
-
-
-
3
-
Afr. Amer./Black
-
-
1
-
-
-
1
-
Hispanic/Latino
-
-
2
-
-
-
2
-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.
-
-
3
-
-
-
3
-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
White
71.9
73.7
152
0
1.7
1.3
152
25
2016 Science Extra Credit
Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more)
Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015 % Advanced
2016 % Advanced
N
PPI Points
2015 % Warning/Failing
2016 % Warning/Failing
N
PPI Points
All students
38.5
40.7
150
0
0.5
0.0
150
25
High needs
20.0
38.5
26
25
3.3
0.0
26
25
Econ. Disadvantaged
-
-
23
-
-
-
23
-
EL and Former EL
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Students w/ disabilities
-
-
4
-
-
-
4
-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Asian
-
-
3
-
-
-
3
-
Afr. Amer./Black
-
-
1
-
-
-
1
-
Hispanic/Latino
-
-
2
-
-
-
2
-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.
-
-
3
-
-
-
3
-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
White
39.1
39.7
141
0
0.6
0.0
141
25
2016 English Language Arts Growth
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100
2015 SGP
2016 SGP
SGP Change
6 Year Goal
Met Safe Harbor?
N
PPI Points
Rating
All students
50.0
36.0
-14.0
51.0
Yes
159
75
On Target
High needs
63.0
33.5
-29.5
51.0
Yes
30
75
On Target
Econ. Disadvantaged
63.5
33.5
-30.0
51.0
Yes
26
75
On Target
EL and Former EL
-
-
-
51.0
-
-
-
-
Students w/ disabilities
-
-
-
51.0
-
5
-
-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.
-
-
-
51.0
-
-
-
-
Asian
-
-
-
51.0
-
3
-
-
Afr. Amer./Black
-
-
-
51.0
-
1
-
-
Hispanic/Latino
-
-
-
51.0
-
2
-
-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.
-
-
-
51.0
-
3
-
-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.
-
-
-
51.0
-
-
-
-
White
52.0
36.0
-16.0
51.0
Yes
150
75
On Target
2016 Mathematics Growth
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100
2015 SGP
2016 SGP
SGP Change
6 Year Goal
Met Safe Harbor?
N
PPI Points
Rating
All students
52.5
50.0
-2.5
51.0
Yes
157
75
On Target
High needs
44.0
50.0
6.0
51.0
Yes
30
75
On Target
Econ. Disadvantaged
50.0
51.0
1.0
51.0
Yes
26
75
On Target
EL and Former EL
-
-
-
51.0
-
-
-
-
Students w/ disabilities
-
-
-
51.0
-
5
-
-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.
-
-
-
51.0
-
-
-
-
Asian
-
-
-
51.0
-
3
-
-
Afr. Amer./Black
-
-
-
51.0
-
1
-
-
Hispanic/Latino
-
-
-
51.0
-
2
-
-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.
-
-
-
51.0
-
3
-
-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.
-
-
-
51.0
-
-
-
-
White
54.5
50.0
-4.5
51.0
No
148
50
Below Target
2016 Extra credit for English language proficiency growth
2016 SGPA
2016 Target
SGPA N Included
PPI Points
All students
-
60.0
-
-
High needs
-
60.0
-
-
EL and Former EL
-
60.0
-
-
2015 4-Year Cohort Graduation Rate
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100
2014 Rate
2015 Rate
Change
Annual Target
6 Year Goal
N
PPI Points
Rating
All students
91.7
91.7
0.0
80.0
90.0
192
75
On Target
High needs
79.3
80.0
0.7
80.0
90.0
45
75
On Target
Econ. Disadvantaged
-
-
-
80.0
90.0
-
-
-
EL and Former EL
-
-
-
80.0
90.0
-
-
-
Students w/ disabilities
-
-
-
80.0
90.0
14
-
-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.
-
-
-
80.0
90.0
-
-
-
Asian
-
-
-
80.0
90.0
4
-
-
Afr. Amer./Black
-
-
-
80.0
90.0
-
-
-
Hispanic/Latino
-
-
-
80.0
90.0
8
-
-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.
-
-
-
80.0
90.0
4
-
-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.
-
-
-
80.0
90.0
-
-
-
White
91.8
90.9
-0.9
80.0
90.0
176
75
On Target
2014 5-Year Cohort Graduation Rate
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100
2013 Rate
2014 Rate
Change
Annual Target
6 Year Goal
N
PPI Points
Rating
All students
95.8
93.9
-1.9
85.0
95.0
181
75
On Target
High needs
87.5
84.5
-3.0
85.0
95.0
58
0
Declined
Econ. Disadvantaged
-
-
-
85.0
95.0
-
-
-
EL and Former EL
-
-
-
85.0
95.0
-
-
-
Students w/ disabilities
-
-
-
85.0
95.0
21
-
-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.
-
-
-
85.0
95.0
-
-
-
Asian
-
-
-
85.0
95.0
6
-
-
Afr. Amer./Black
-
-
-
85.0
95.0
2
-
-
Hispanic/Latino
-
-
-
85.0
95.0
9
-
-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.
-
-
-
85.0
95.0
5
-
-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.
-
-
-
85.0
95.0
-
-
-
White
96.4
93.7
-2.7
85.0
95.0
159
75
On Target
2015 Annual Dropout Rate
0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20
Baseline Rate
2014 Rate
2015 Rate
Change
Annual Target
6 Year Goal
Dropout Percentile in School Type
N
PPI Points
Rating
All students
1.6
0.9
0.9
0.0
0.9
0.8
55
764
75
On Target
High needs
4.5
1.9
1.9
0.0
2.6
2.3
52
106
75
On Target
Econ. Disadvantaged
2.6
-
-
-
-
1.3
-
78
-
-
EL and Former EL
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Students w/ disabilities
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
35
-
-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Asian
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
15
-
-
Afr. Amer./Black
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
4
-
-
Hispanic/Latino
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
27
-
-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
21
-
-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
White
1.5
0.7
1.0
-0.3
0.9
0.8
41
697
25
No Change
2016 Assessment Participation
English Language Arts
Mathematics
Science
Enrolled
Assessed
%
Met Target (95%)
Enrolled
Assessed
%
Met Target (95%)
Enrolled
Assessed
%
Met Target (95%)
All students
171
171
100
Yes
170
169
99
Yes
171
171
100
Yes
High needs
34
34
100
Yes
34
34
100
Yes
34
34
100
Yes
Econ. Disadvantaged
29
29
100
Yes
29
29
100
Yes
29
-
-
-
EL and Former EL
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Students w/ disabilities
7
-
-
-
7
-
-
-
7
-
-
-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Asian
3
-
-
-
3
-
-
-
3
-
-
-
Afr. Amer./Black
1
-
-
-
1
-
-
-
1
-
-
-
Hispanic/Latino
2
-
-
-
2
-
-
-
2
-
-
-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.
3
-
-
-
3
-
-
-
3
-
-
-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
White
162
162
100
Yes
161
160
99
Yes
162
162
100
Yes
NOTE: In 2016, assessment participation was calculated two ways: First, the 2016 participation rate for each subgroup in each subject area test was calculated. If the actual 2016 participation rate was lower than 95 percent for any group in any subject, that rate was compared to the average of the most recent two years of assessment participation data for that group and subject. The higher of the two resulting rates was factored into the assignment of the school or district's 2016 accountability and assistance level.
2015 Massachusetts and Nationwide NAEP Results by Student Group Average Scaled Scores and Percentages of Students at Each Achievement Level
NAEP, or the National Assessment of Educational Progress, is often called the "Nation's Report Card." It is the only measure of student achievement in the United States that allows you to compare the performance of students in Massachusetts with the performance of students across the nation or in other states. Students take the NAEP in reading and mathematics every two years. When reviewing these results, it is important to keep in mind that the NAEP results are based on a small sample of students across Massachusetts, not the population of Massachusetts students. For more information, please visit http://www.doe.mass.edu/mcas/naep/faq.html.
The following symbols are used to denote the NAEP achievement levels: A for Advanced, P+ for Proficient and above, B+ for Basic and above, BB for Below Basic. The symbol "#" means that the estimated number of students rounds to zero.
GRADE LEVEL 4 - READING
Student Group
Massachusetts
National Public
Avg. Scaled Score
% at Each Level
Avg. Scaled Score
% at Each Level
A
P+
B+
BB
% Assessed
A
P+
B+
BB
% Assessed
All Students
235
14
50
82
18
100
221
8
35
68
32
100
Stud. w/ Disab
209
2
20
55
45
18
186
2
12
33
67
13
LEP
200
1
12
44
56
9
189
1
8
32
68
11
African American/Black
217
3
25
65
35
7
206
2
18
51
49
15
Asian/Pacific Islander
249
31
68
89
11
6
238
19
53
81
19
5
Hispanic/Latino
215
3
25
61
39
19
208
3
21
54
46
26
White
242
17
58
89
11
65
232
11
46
79
21
49
Econ. Disadvantaged
220
5
29
67
33
42
209
3
21
56
44
55
GRADE LEVEL 4 - MATHEMATICS
Student Group
Massachusetts
National Public
Avg. Scaled Score
% at Each Level
Avg. Scaled Score
% at Each Level
A
P+
B+
BB
% Assessed
A
P+
B+
BB
% Assessed
All Students
251
13
54
90
10
100
240
7
39
81
19
100
Stud. w/ Disab
231
4
25
74
26
18
217
2
16
54
46
13
LEP
223
2
17
65
35
9
218
1
15
57
43
11
African American/Black
230
1
26
73
27
7
224
1
19
65
35
15
Asian/Pacific Islander
273
38
81
98
2
6
256
22
61
90
10
5
Hispanic/Latino
232
3
28
74
26
19
230
3
26
73
27
26
White
256
15
62
95
5
65
248
10
51
90
10
49
Econ. Disadvantaged
236
4
31
80
20
42
229
2
24
72
28
55
GRADE LEVEL 8 - READING
Student Group
Massachusetts
National Public
Avg. Scaled Score
% at Each Level
Avg. Scaled Score
% at Each Level
A
P+
B+
BB
% Assessed
A
P+
B+
BB
% Assessed
All Students
274
6
46
83
17
100
264
3
33
75
25
100
Stud. w/ Disab
245
1
15
54
46
18
229
#
8
36
64
12
LEP
225
#
6
35
65
5
223
#
3
28
72
6
African American/Black
252
1
18
63
37
9
247
1
15
58
42
15
Asian/Pacific Islander
290
18
64
90
10
7
279
9
50
85
15
6
Hispanic/Latino
249
#
17
61
39
14
253
1
20
65
35
25
White
281
7
53
90
10
67
273
4
42
84
16
51
Econ. Disadvantaged
260
3
28
71
29
44
253
1
20
64
36
52
GRADE LEVEL 8 - MATHEMATICS
Student Group
Massachusetts
National Public
Avg. Scaled Score
% at Each Level
Avg. Scaled Score
% at Each Level
A
P+
B+
BB
% Assessed
A
P+
B+
BB
% Assessed
All Students
297
18
51
81
19
100
281
8
32
70
30
100
Stud. w/ Disab
264
3
16
51
49
18
246
1
8
32
68
12
LEP
251
2
10
38
62
6
246
1
5
31
69
6
African American/Black
268
4
22
54
46
9
260
1
12
47
53
15
Asian/Pacific Islander
324
44
73
94
6
7
305
25
58
86
14
6
Hispanic/Latino
271
4
24
61
39
15
269
3
19
60
40
25
White
304
20
59
88
12
66
291
10
42
81
19
51
Econ. Disadvantaged
279
7
31
67
33
43
268
2
18
58
42
52
Participation Rates for Students with Disabilities and for English Language Learner Students
The NAEP program has always endeavored to assess all students selected for testing. In all NAEP schools, accommodations are provided as necessary for students with disabilities and/or English language learners. School staff who are familiar with these students are asked a series of questions to help them decide whether each student should participate in the assessment and whether the student needs accommodations.