Peter J Crowell, Principal Mailing Address: 276 Station Avenue South Yarmouth, MA 02664
Phone: (508) 760-5600 FAX: (508) 760-5601 Organization Description: K-3
This report card contains information required by the federal Elementary and Secondary Education Act (ESEA) for our school and district including: student enrollment and teacher qualifications, student achievement, accountability, and the progress our school is making toward narrowing proficiency gaps for different groups of students.
Enrollment and Educator Data (2015-16 School Year)
Percentage of Teachers Licensed in Teaching Assignment
100.0
99.3
97.4
Total Number of Classes in Core Academic Areas
161
1,386
348,472
Percentage of Core Academic Classes Taught by Teachers Who are Highly Qualified
100.0
99.4
96.3
Percentage of Core Academic Classes Taught by Teachers Who are Not Highly Qualified
0.0
0.6
3.7
Student/Teacher Ratio
11.0 to 1
10.5 to 1
13.2 to 1
Percentage of Public Elementary and Secondary School Teachers Issued Waivers
-
0.3
0.9
2016 MCAS Results by Student Group by Grade and Subject
NOTE: First-year ELL students are not included in achievement level or CPI results. However, first-year ELL students who took the ACCESS for ELLs test are counted as ELA participants; in addition, first-year ELL students who are present for Mathematics/Science and Technology/Engineering are counted as Mathematics/Science and Technology/Engineering participants. Please see the principal's administration manual (PAM) for details.
NOTE: Spring 2016 results in grades 3-8 ELA and Mathematics are not reported because all students in this organization participated in the PARCC test.
Data Under Review or Fewer than 10 students were tested.
2016 PARCC Results by Student Group by Grade and Subject
Achievement Levels: L5 = Level 5: Exceeded Expectations (varies by grade - 850) L4 = Level 4: Met Expectations (750 - varies by grade) L3 = Level 3: Approached Expectations (725-749) L2 = Level 2: Partially met Expectations (700-724) L1 = Level 1: Did not meet Expectations (650-699)
Trans. SGP = Transitional Student Growth Percentile
generated using current PARCC and prior MCAS scores Trans. CPI = Transitional Composite Performance Index
generated using linked PARCC and MCAS scores
NOTE: Since only a portion of students in grades 3-8 participated in 2016 PARCC in ELA/L and Mathematics, a representative sample of students from across Massachusetts was used to estimate student achievement at the state level in those subjects. NOTE: Students who took the Alternate Assessment are included in Mean CPI, but not in achievement level or growth results.
Data Last Updated on September 24, 2016
GRADE 3 ELA/L
Student Group
School
District
State
Included
Part. Rate
% at Each Level
Trans. CPI
Trans. SGP
Incl. in SGP (#)
Included
Part. Rate
% at Each Level
Trans. CPI
Trans. SGP
Incl. in SGP (#)
Included
Part. Rate
% at Each Level
Trans. CPI
Trans. SGP
Incl. in SGP (#)
#
%
L5
L4
L3
L2
L1
#
%
L5
L4
L3
L2
L1
#
%
L5
L4
L3
L2
L1
Subgroups
High needs
46
98
2
17
41
20
20
72.5
--
--
146
99
2
22
34
18
25
71.5
--
--
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Econ. disadvantaged
40
98
3
18
48
15
18
74.4
--
--
126
98
2
23
36
17
22
72.7
--
--
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
ELL/Formerly ELL
11
100
0
18
45
0
36
69.2
--
--
36
100
0
11
33
11
44
56.6
--
--
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Students w/disablities
12
100
0
0
17
42
42
56.3
--
--
34
98
0
12
18
26
44
62.5
--
--
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.
2
--
--
7
--
--
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Afr. Amer./Black
7
--
--
16
100
0
25
19
25
31
67.1
--
--
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Asian
1
--
--
7
--
--
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Hispanic/Latino
10
100
0
20
40
10
30
70.0
--
--
26
100
0
19
31
8
42
59.6
--
--
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.
5
--
--
15
100
0
53
13
27
7
80.0
--
--
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
White
74
99
1
42
34
16
7
83.6
--
--
182
99
3
40
32
15
9
83.2
--
--
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Male
50
100
0
22
44
16
18
74.1
--
--
133
99
0
28
35
16
21
73.9
--
--
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Female
49
98
2
53
27
14
4
87.5
--
--
120
99
6
46
24
15
9
83.8
--
--
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Title I
21
100
0
10
24
38
29
57.1
--
--
56
100
0
9
23
34
34
55.8
--
--
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Non-Disabled
87
99
1
43
38
11
7
85.1
--
--
219
100
3
40
32
14
11
81.7
--
--
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Non-Econ. disadvantaged
59
100
0
51
27
15
7
84.7
--
--
127
100
3
50
24
14
9
84.2
--
--
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
ELL
10
100
0
10
50
0
40
66.7
--
--
32
100
0
6
31
13
50
52.9
--
--
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Former ELL
1
--
--
4
--
--
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Ever ELL
12
100
0
25
42
0
33
71.4
--
--
37
100
0
14
32
11
43
57.7
--
--
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
All Students
2016
99
99
1
37
35
15
11
80.6
--
--
253
99
3
36
30
15
15
78.5
--
--
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
GRADE 3 Math
Student Group
School
District
State
Included
Part. Rate
% at Each Level
Trans. CPI
Trans. SGP
Incl. in SGP (#)
Included
Part. Rate
% at Each Level
Trans. CPI
Trans. SGP
Incl. in SGP (#)
Included
Part. Rate
% at Each Level
Trans. CPI
Trans. SGP
Incl. in SGP (#)
#
%
L5
L4
L3
L2
L1
#
%
L5
L4
L3
L2
L1
#
%
L5
L4
L3
L2
L1
Subgroups
High needs
46
98
11
33
35
11
11
82.5
--
--
146
99
5
34
35
13
12
79.3
--
--
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Econ. disadvantaged
40
98
13
35
35
5
13
84.1
--
--
126
98
6
36
33
12
13
79.4
--
--
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
ELL/Formerly ELL
11
100
0
45
36
9
9
80.8
--
--
36
100
0
25
39
19
17
68.4
--
--
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Students w/disablities
12
100
0
0
33
33
33
62.5
--
--
34
98
3
12
38
21
26
70.5
--
--
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.
2
--
--
7
--
--
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Afr. Amer./Black
7
--
--
16
100
6
25
38
19
13
80.3
--
--
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Asian
1
--
--
7
--
--
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Hispanic/Latino
10
100
10
40
30
10
10
80.0
--
--
26
100
4
23
35
19
19
63.5
--
--
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.
5
--
--
15
100
0
60
27
7
7
93.3
--
--
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
White
74
99
19
46
27
7
1
93.1
--
--
182
99
13
47
28
7
5
89.4
--
--
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Male
50
100
10
40
32
10
8
86.8
--
--
133
99
8
38
35
10
10
84.2
--
--
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Female
49
98
22
49
20
6
2
93.0
--
--
120
99
13
51
22
9
5
87.9
--
--
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Title I
21
100
0
14
67
14
5
84.5
--
--
56
100
0
16
50
18
16
70.5
--
--
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Non-Disabled
87
99
18
51
25
5
1
94.8
--
--
219
100
11
49
27
8
5
89.0
--
--
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Non-Econ. disadvantaged
59
100
19
51
20
10
0
93.5
--
--
127
100
14
53
24
7
2
92.3
--
--
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
ELL
10
100
0
40
40
10
10
79.2
--
--
32
100
0
19
41
22
19
64.7
--
--
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Former ELL
1
--
--
4
--
--
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Ever ELL
12
100
8
42
33
8
8
82.1
--
--
37
100
3
24
38
19
16
69.2
--
--
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
All Students
2016
99
99
16
44
26
8
5
89.8
--
--
253
99
10
44
28
9
8
85.9
--
--
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
GRADES 3-8 ELA/L
Student Group
School
District
State
Included
Part. Rate
% at Each Level
Trans. CPI
Trans. SGP
Incl. in SGP (#)
Included
Part. Rate
% at Each Level
Trans. CPI
Trans. SGP
Incl. in SGP (#)
Included
Part. Rate
% at Each Level
Trans. CPI
Trans. SGP
Incl. in SGP (#)
#
%
L5
L4
L3
L2
L1
#
%
L5
L4
L3
L2
L1
#
%
L5
L4
L3
L2
L1
Subgroups
High needs
46
98
2
17
41
20
20
72.5
--
--
760
99
3
32
34
19
11
75.8
43.0
557
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Econ. disadvantaged
40
98
3
18
48
15
18
74.4
--
--
612
99
4
34
34
17
10
77.5
43.0
438
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
ELL/Formerly ELL
11
100
0
18
45
0
36
69.2
--
--
156
98
1
28
33
21
17
67.3
51.0
103
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Students w/disablities
12
100
0
0
17
42
42
56.3
--
--
227
98
0
14
32
32
22
63.3
40.0
181
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.
2
--
--
34
100
9
35
26
15
15
79.3
38.0
25
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Afr. Amer./Black
7
--
--
116
99
2
36
29
19
14
75.6
41.0
93
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Asian
1
--
--
29
97
10
59
24
7
0
93.3
71.0
21
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Hispanic/Latino
10
100
0
20
40
10
30
70.0
--
--
133
100
3
29
32
20
17
69.8
42.0
98
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.
5
--
--
71
100
4
45
30
15
6
81.3
49.0
54
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
White
74
99
1
42
34
16
7
83.6
--
--
1,000
99
10
46
28
12
5
85.7
46.0
769
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Male
50
100
0
22
44
16
18
74.1
--
--
686
99
6
37
32
17
9
79.0
42.0
511
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Female
49
98
2
53
27
14
4
87.5
--
--
698
99
10
50
25
10
4
87.2
50.0
550
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Title I
21
100
0
10
24
38
29
57.1
--
--
500
99
8
39
26
18
10
79.3
41.0
413
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Non-Disabled
87
99
1
43
38
11
7
85.1
--
--
1,157
99
10
49
28
10
4
87.6
47.0
880
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Non-Econ. disadvantaged
59
100
0
51
27
15
7
84.7
--
--
772
99
11
50
24
11
4
87.6
48.0
623
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
ELL
10
100
0
10
50
0
40
66.7
--
--
110
98
0
14
35
27
25
57.7
51.0
62
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Former ELL
1
--
--
46
100
2
63
28
7
0
90.8
41.0
41
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Ever ELL
12
100
0
25
42
0
33
71.4
--
--
190
99
3
33
31
18
15
71.8
51.0
136
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
All Students
2016
99
99
1
37
35
15
11
80.6
--
--
1,384
99
8
43
28
14
7
83.1
46.0
1,061
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
2015
104
99
5
46
21
17
11
82.4
--
--
1,339
97
8
45
28
12
7
83.7
49.0
1,039
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
GRADES 3-8 MATH
Student Group
School
District
State
Included
Part. Rate
% at Each Level
Trans. CPI
Trans. SGP
Incl. in SGP (#)
Included
Part. Rate
% at Each Level
Trans. CPI
Trans. SGP
Incl. in SGP (#)
Included
Part. Rate
% at Each Level
Trans. CPI
Trans. SGP
Incl. in SGP (#)
#
%
L5
L4
L3
L2
L1
#
%
L5
L4
L3
L2
L1
#
%
L5
L4
L3
L2
L1
Subgroups
High needs
46
98
11
33
35
11
11
82.5
--
--
757
99
4
27
35
22
11
69.3
38.0
557
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Econ. disadvantaged
40
98
13
35
35
5
13
84.1
--
--
609
99
5
30
35
20
11
71.1
40.0
438
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
ELL/Formerly ELL
11
100
0
45
36
9
9
80.8
--
--
156
100
3
20
37
26
15
63.5
37.0
103
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Students w/disablities
12
100
0
0
33
33
33
62.5
--
--
226
98
0
10
34
34
21
57.1
31.0
181
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.
2
--
--
34
100
3
38
32
21
6
72.1
59.0
25
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Afr. Amer./Black
7
--
--
118
100
3
21
33
25
18
63.5
25.0
93
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Asian
1
--
--
29
100
17
52
21
10
0
90.8
65.0
21
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Hispanic/Latino
10
100
10
40
30
10
10
80.0
--
--
132
99
2
29
28
28
13
65.7
40.0
97
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.
5
--
--
71
100
3
35
39
17
6
77.8
46.0
54
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
White
74
99
19
46
27
7
1
93.1
--
--
997
99
8
41
32
13
6
80.2
41.0
769
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Male
50
100
10
40
32
10
8
86.8
--
--
685
99
7
36
32
17
9
75.6
36.0
512
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Female
49
98
22
49
20
6
2
93.0
--
--
697
99
7
40
32
15
6
78.9
45.0
548
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Title I
21
100
0
14
67
14
5
84.5
--
--
500
99
4
31
37
18
10
71.3
41.0
415
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Non-Disabled
87
99
18
51
25
5
1
94.8
--
--
1,156
99
8
44
31
13
5
81.8
43.0
879
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Non-Econ. disadvantaged
59
100
19
51
20
10
0
93.5
--
--
773
99
8
45
29
13
5
82.1
43.0
622
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
ELL
10
100
0
40
40
10
10
79.2
--
--
110
100
0
14
35
31
21
57.1
38.0
62
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Former ELL
1
--
--
46
100
9
35
41
13
2
79.3
37.0
41
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Ever ELL
12
100
8
42
33
8
8
82.1
--
--
190
100
5
24
36
22
14
67.1
42.0
136
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
All Students
2016
99
99
16
44
26
8
5
89.8
--
--
1,382
99
7
38
32
16
7
77.3
41.0
1,060
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
2015
104
99
12
38
35
14
1
89.0
--
--
1,341
97
5
40
32
17
5
77.5
54.0
1,051
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
2016 Accountability Data - Station Avenue Elementary
Accountability Information
Accountability and Assistance Level
Level 1
2016 Level held harmless
This school's overall performance relative to other schools in same school type (School percentiles: 1-99)
All students:
-
This school’s progress toward narrowing proficiency gaps (Cumulative Progress and Performance Index: 1-100)
Student Group (Click group to view subgroup data)
On Target = 75 or higher -
Less progress
More progress
All students
66
Did Not Meet Target
High needs
74
Did Not Meet Target
Econ. Disadvantaged
-
EL and Former EL
-
Students w/ disabilities
-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.
-
Asian
-
Afr. Amer./Black
-
Hispanic/Latino
-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.
-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.
-
White
70
Did Not Meet Target
Station Avenue Elementary: Accountability Data Detail
2016 English Language Arts Proficiency Gap Narrowing
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100
Baseline CPI
2015 CPI
2016 CPI
CPI Change
2016 Target
6 Year Goal
CPI Percentile in School Type
N
PPI Points
Rating
All students
86.1
82.4
80.6
-1.8
91.9
93.1
14
103
25
No Change
High needs
76.2
75.4
72.5
-2.9
86.1
88.1
42
50
0
Declined
Econ. Disadvantaged
75.7
75.7
74.4
-1.3
77.7
87.9
37
41
25
No Change
EL and Former EL
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
13
-
-
Students w/ disabilities
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
16
-
-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
2
-
-
Asian
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
2
-
-
Afr. Amer./Black
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
8
-
-
Hispanic/Latino
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
10
-
-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
5
-
-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
White
87.2
86.4
83.6
-2.8
92.5
93.6
20
76
0
Declined
2016 Mathematics Proficiency Gap Narrowing
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100
Baseline CPI
2015 CPI
2016 CPI
CPI Change
2016 Target
6 Year Goal
CPI Percentile in School Type
N
PPI Points
Rating
All students
86.4
89.0
89.8
0.8
92.1
93.2
47
103
50
Improved Below Target
High needs
79.9
86.6
82.5
-4.1
88.3
90.0
66
50
0
Declined
Econ. Disadvantaged
87.2
87.2
84.1
-3.1
88.3
93.6
63
41
0
Declined
EL and Former EL
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
13
-
-
Students w/ disabilities
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
16
-
-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
2
-
-
Asian
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
2
-
-
Afr. Amer./Black
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
8
-
-
Hispanic/Latino
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
10
-
-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
5
-
-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
White
86.9
90.8
93.1
2.3
92.4
93.5
52
76
75
On Target
2016 Science Proficiency Gap Narrowing
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100
Baseline CPI
2015 CPI
2016 CPI
CPI Change
2016 Target
6 Year Goal
CPI Percentile in School Type
N
PPI Points
Rating
All students
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
High needs
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Econ. Disadvantaged
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
EL and Former EL
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Students w/ disabilities
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Asian
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Afr. Amer./Black
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Hispanic/Latino
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
White
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
2016 English Language Arts Extra Credit
Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more)
Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015 % Advanced
2016 % Advanced
N
PPI Points
2015 % Warning/Failing
2016 % Warning/Failing
N
PPI Points
All students
11.4
1.0
103
0
8.6
7.8
103
0
High needs
3.6
2.0
50
0
16.1
14.0
50
25
Econ. Disadvantaged
5.4
2.4
41
0
16.2
14.6
41
0
EL and Former EL
-
-
13
-
-
-
13
-
Students w/ disabilities
-
-
16
-
-
-
16
-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.
-
-
2
-
-
-
2
-
Asian
-
-
2
-
-
-
2
-
Afr. Amer./Black
-
-
8
-
-
-
8
-
Hispanic/Latino
-
-
10
-
-
-
10
-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.
-
-
5
-
-
-
5
-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
White
17.6
1.3
76
0
4.4
5.3
76
0
2016 Mathematics Extra Credit
Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more)
Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015 % Advanced
2016 % Advanced
N
PPI Points
2015 % Warning/Failing
2016 % Warning/Failing
N
PPI Points
All students
26.7
39.8
103
25
3.8
5.8
103
0
High needs
12.5
24.0
50
25
7.1
12.0
50
0
Econ. Disadvantaged
16.2
26.8
41
25
2.7
12.2
41
0
EL and Former EL
-
-
13
-
-
-
13
-
Students w/ disabilities
-
-
16
-
-
-
16
-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.
-
-
2
-
-
-
2
-
Asian
-
-
2
-
-
-
2
-
Afr. Amer./Black
-
-
8
-
-
-
8
-
Hispanic/Latino
-
-
10
-
-
-
10
-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.
-
-
5
-
-
-
5
-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
White
38.2
44.7
76
25
2.9
1.3
76
25
2016 Science Extra Credit
Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more)
Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015 % Advanced
2016 % Advanced
N
PPI Points
2015 % Warning/Failing
2016 % Warning/Failing
N
PPI Points
All students
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
High needs
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Econ. Disadvantaged
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
EL and Former EL
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Students w/ disabilities
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Asian
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Afr. Amer./Black
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Hispanic/Latino
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
White
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
2016 English Language Arts Growth
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100
2015 SGP
2016 SGP
SGP Change
6 Year Goal
Met Safe Harbor?
N
PPI Points
Rating
All students
-
-
-
51.0
-
-
-
-
High needs
-
-
-
51.0
-
-
-
-
Econ. Disadvantaged
-
-
-
51.0
-
-
-
-
EL and Former EL
-
-
-
51.0
-
-
-
-
Students w/ disabilities
-
-
-
51.0
-
-
-
-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.
-
-
-
51.0
-
-
-
-
Asian
-
-
-
51.0
-
-
-
-
Afr. Amer./Black
-
-
-
51.0
-
-
-
-
Hispanic/Latino
-
-
-
51.0
-
-
-
-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.
-
-
-
51.0
-
-
-
-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.
-
-
-
51.0
-
-
-
-
White
-
-
-
51.0
-
-
-
-
2016 Mathematics Growth
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100
2015 SGP
2016 SGP
SGP Change
6 Year Goal
Met Safe Harbor?
N
PPI Points
Rating
All students
-
-
-
51.0
-
-
-
-
High needs
-
-
-
51.0
-
-
-
-
Econ. Disadvantaged
-
-
-
51.0
-
-
-
-
EL and Former EL
-
-
-
51.0
-
-
-
-
Students w/ disabilities
-
-
-
51.0
-
-
-
-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.
-
-
-
51.0
-
-
-
-
Asian
-
-
-
51.0
-
-
-
-
Afr. Amer./Black
-
-
-
51.0
-
-
-
-
Hispanic/Latino
-
-
-
51.0
-
-
-
-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.
-
-
-
51.0
-
-
-
-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.
-
-
-
51.0
-
-
-
-
White
-
-
-
51.0
-
-
-
-
2016 Extra credit for English language proficiency growth
2016 SGPA
2016 Target
SGPA N Included
PPI Points
All students
59.0
60.0
27
0
High needs
59.0
60.0
27
0
EL and Former EL
-
60.0
27
-
2016 Assessment Participation
English Language Arts
Mathematics
Science
Enrolled
Assessed
%
Met Target (95%)
Enrolled
Assessed
%
Met Target (95%)
Enrolled
Assessed
%
Met Target (95%)
All students
109
108
99
Yes
109
108
99
Yes
-
-
-
-
High needs
55
54
98
Yes
55
54
98
Yes
-
-
-
-
Econ. Disadvantaged
46
45
98
Yes
46
45
98
Yes
-
-
-
-
EL and Former EL
13
-
-
-
13
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Students w/ disabilities
18
-
-
-
18
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.
2
-
-
-
2
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Asian
2
-
-
-
2
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Afr. Amer./Black
8
-
-
-
8
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Hispanic/Latino
10
-
-
-
10
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.
5
-
-
-
5
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
White
82
81
99
Yes
82
81
99
Yes
-
-
-
-
NOTE: In 2016, assessment participation was calculated two ways: First, the 2016 participation rate for each subgroup in each subject area test was calculated. If the actual 2016 participation rate was lower than 95 percent for any group in any subject, that rate was compared to the average of the most recent two years of assessment participation data for that group and subject. The higher of the two resulting rates was factored into the assignment of the school or district's 2016 accountability and assistance level.
2015 Massachusetts and Nationwide NAEP Results by Student Group Average Scaled Scores and Percentages of Students at Each Achievement Level
NAEP, or the National Assessment of Educational Progress, is often called the "Nation's Report Card." It is the only measure of student achievement in the United States that allows you to compare the performance of students in Massachusetts with the performance of students across the nation or in other states. Students take the NAEP in reading and mathematics every two years. When reviewing these results, it is important to keep in mind that the NAEP results are based on a small sample of students across Massachusetts, not the population of Massachusetts students. For more information, please visit http://www.doe.mass.edu/mcas/naep/faq.html.
The following symbols are used to denote the NAEP achievement levels: A for Advanced, P+ for Proficient and above, B+ for Basic and above, BB for Below Basic. The symbol "#" means that the estimated number of students rounds to zero.
GRADE LEVEL 4 - READING
Student Group
Massachusetts
National Public
Avg. Scaled Score
% at Each Level
Avg. Scaled Score
% at Each Level
A
P+
B+
BB
% Assessed
A
P+
B+
BB
% Assessed
All Students
235
14
50
82
18
100
221
8
35
68
32
100
Stud. w/ Disab
209
2
20
55
45
18
186
2
12
33
67
13
LEP
200
1
12
44
56
9
189
1
8
32
68
11
African American/Black
217
3
25
65
35
7
206
2
18
51
49
15
Asian/Pacific Islander
249
31
68
89
11
6
238
19
53
81
19
5
Hispanic/Latino
215
3
25
61
39
19
208
3
21
54
46
26
White
242
17
58
89
11
65
232
11
46
79
21
49
Econ. Disadvantaged
220
5
29
67
33
42
209
3
21
56
44
55
GRADE LEVEL 4 - MATHEMATICS
Student Group
Massachusetts
National Public
Avg. Scaled Score
% at Each Level
Avg. Scaled Score
% at Each Level
A
P+
B+
BB
% Assessed
A
P+
B+
BB
% Assessed
All Students
251
13
54
90
10
100
240
7
39
81
19
100
Stud. w/ Disab
231
4
25
74
26
18
217
2
16
54
46
13
LEP
223
2
17
65
35
9
218
1
15
57
43
11
African American/Black
230
1
26
73
27
7
224
1
19
65
35
15
Asian/Pacific Islander
273
38
81
98
2
6
256
22
61
90
10
5
Hispanic/Latino
232
3
28
74
26
19
230
3
26
73
27
26
White
256
15
62
95
5
65
248
10
51
90
10
49
Econ. Disadvantaged
236
4
31
80
20
42
229
2
24
72
28
55
GRADE LEVEL 8 - READING
Student Group
Massachusetts
National Public
Avg. Scaled Score
% at Each Level
Avg. Scaled Score
% at Each Level
A
P+
B+
BB
% Assessed
A
P+
B+
BB
% Assessed
All Students
274
6
46
83
17
100
264
3
33
75
25
100
Stud. w/ Disab
245
1
15
54
46
18
229
#
8
36
64
12
LEP
225
#
6
35
65
5
223
#
3
28
72
6
African American/Black
252
1
18
63
37
9
247
1
15
58
42
15
Asian/Pacific Islander
290
18
64
90
10
7
279
9
50
85
15
6
Hispanic/Latino
249
#
17
61
39
14
253
1
20
65
35
25
White
281
7
53
90
10
67
273
4
42
84
16
51
Econ. Disadvantaged
260
3
28
71
29
44
253
1
20
64
36
52
GRADE LEVEL 8 - MATHEMATICS
Student Group
Massachusetts
National Public
Avg. Scaled Score
% at Each Level
Avg. Scaled Score
% at Each Level
A
P+
B+
BB
% Assessed
A
P+
B+
BB
% Assessed
All Students
297
18
51
81
19
100
281
8
32
70
30
100
Stud. w/ Disab
264
3
16
51
49
18
246
1
8
32
68
12
LEP
251
2
10
38
62
6
246
1
5
31
69
6
African American/Black
268
4
22
54
46
9
260
1
12
47
53
15
Asian/Pacific Islander
324
44
73
94
6
7
305
25
58
86
14
6
Hispanic/Latino
271
4
24
61
39
15
269
3
19
60
40
25
White
304
20
59
88
12
66
291
10
42
81
19
51
Econ. Disadvantaged
279
7
31
67
33
43
268
2
18
58
42
52
Participation Rates for Students with Disabilities and for English Language Learner Students
The NAEP program has always endeavored to assess all students selected for testing. In all NAEP schools, accommodations are provided as necessary for students with disabilities and/or English language learners. School staff who are familiar with these students are asked a series of questions to help them decide whether each student should participate in the assessment and whether the student needs accommodations.