• MCAS Percent of Students at Each Achievement Level
• MCAS Annual Comparisons
• Item by Item Results (for each Grade/Subject)
• MCAS Student Growth Report
• MCAS Results by Student Group
• Participation Report
• High School Science and Technology/Engineering Results
• MCAS Open Response Item Results
• ACCESS for ELLs
• SAT Performance
• Advanced Placement Performance
• Advanced Placement Participation

MCAS Annual Comparisons

GRADE 10 - ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 31 34 50 29 PROFICIENT 55 56 43 59 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 10 7 5 8 FAILING 4 3 3 3

GRADE 10 - MATHEMATICS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 36 40 50 36 PROFICIENT 40 42 28 26 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 18 14 17 31 FAILING 6 4 6 7

GRADE 10 - SCIENCE AND TECH/ENG ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 4 8 15 10 PROFICIENT 53 57 47 47 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 39 29 31 40 FAILING 4 5 7 3

GRADE 08 - ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 17 8 9 8 PROFICIENT 58 69 64 68 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 17 17 24 19 WARNING 9 7 3 5

GRADE 08 - MATHEMATICS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 20 16 9 10 PROFICIENT 18 20 25 20 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 36 35 36 34 WARNING 27 28 30 37

GRADE 08 - SCIENCE AND TECH/ENG ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 1 2 2 1 PROFICIENT 29 25 19 21 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 44 44 58 49 WARNING 26 29 21 29

GRADE 07 - ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 4 6 5 5 PROFICIENT 66 47 64 60 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 27 42 23 31 WARNING 2 4 8 4

GRADE 07 - MATHEMATICS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 17 12 5 3 PROFICIENT 25 17 25 24 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 27 48 35 36 WARNING 31 23 35 38

GRADE 06 - ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 9 9 12 10 PROFICIENT 46 40 47 38 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 38 35 32 40 WARNING 7 16 10 12

GRADE 06 - MATHEMATICS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 19 13 12 7 PROFICIENT 34 27 32 31 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 35 37 40 42 WARNING 11 24 16 20

GRADE 05 - ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 7 12 9 8 PROFICIENT 47 40 45 40 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 35 35 38 44 WARNING 12 14 8 8

GRADE 05 - MATHEMATICS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 15 21 18 8 PROFICIENT 29 29 26 30 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 33 34 38 35 WARNING 23 16 18 28

GRADE 05 - SCIENCE AND TECH/ENG ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 4 15 17 18 PROFICIENT 26 23 17 37 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 47 51 46 38 WARNING 23 11 20 7

GRADE 04 - ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 13 6 8 7 PROFICIENT 45 41 45 46 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 34 43 38 40 WARNING 8 11 9 7

GRADE 04 - MATHEMATICS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 7 8 9 12 PROFICIENT 31 26 28 25 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 47 50 53 54 WARNING 15 17 11 10

GRADE 03 - ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 8 9 9 6 PROFICIENT 41 47 41 42 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 45 38 46 45 WARNING 6 6 4 6

GRADE 03 - MATHEMATICS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 5 15 21 18 PROFICIENT 55 37 41 43 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 31 30 25 29 WARNING 9 18 13 9

1 Some students were exempt from the spring 2014 MCAS testing in this subject because they participated in the PARCC field test. This data represents only those students who participated in MCAS.
2 All students participated in the PARCC field tests in ELA and math and were exempt from the spring 2014 MCAS test administration in both subjects.
3 Burlington students in grades 3-8 participated in the PARCC field tests in ELA and math and were exempt from the spring 2014 MCAS test administration in both subjects.