• MCAS Percent of Students at Each Achievement Level
• MCAS Annual Comparisons
• Item by Item Results (for each Grade/Subject)
• MCAS Student Growth Report
• MCAS Results by Student Group
• Participation Report
• High School Science and Technology/Engineering Results
• MCAS Open Response Item Results
• ACCESS for ELLs
• SAT Performance
• Advanced Placement Performance
• Advanced Placement Participation

MCAS Annual Comparisons

GRADE 10 - ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 31 30 35 39 PROFICIENT 57 57 54 53 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 8 10 7 6 FAILING 3 3 4 2

GRADE 10 - MATHEMATICS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 48 49 43 54 PROFICIENT 30 28 33 26 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 17 16 14 13 FAILING 6 7 10 7

GRADE 10 - SCIENCE AND TECH/ENG ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 13 18 10 17 PROFICIENT 49 47 53 47 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 33 31 31 31 FAILING 5 4 6 4

GRADE 08 - ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 7 13 13 10 PROFICIENT 67 69 68 70 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 18 14 13 13 WARNING 8 4 6 6

GRADE 08 - MATHEMATICS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 16 24 35 23 PROFICIENT 29 37 34 37 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 35 26 17 27 WARNING 21 13 14 14

GRADE 08 - SCIENCE AND TECH/ENG ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 3 4 3 3 PROFICIENT 33 41 40 42 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 49 41 46 44 WARNING 15 14 12 11

GRADE 07 - ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 11 14 13 14 PROFICIENT 59 60 60 64 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 25 20 22 17 WARNING 5 6 5 6

GRADE 07 - MATHEMATICS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 20 25 22 20 PROFICIENT 38 39 32 38 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 28 23 30 25 WARNING 14 14 16 17

GRADE 06 - ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 12 16 14 14 PROFICIENT 61 51 54 54 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 20 23 24 22 WARNING 7 9 8 10

GRADE 06 - MATHEMATICS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 32 33 34 30 PROFICIENT 38 35 36 34 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 20 20 20 23 WARNING 11 11 10 12

GRADE 05 - ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 8 14 13 19 PROFICIENT 55 49 48 43 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 28 25 28 30 WARNING 9 12 11 9

GRADE 05 - MATHEMATICS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 25 27 34 34 PROFICIENT 34 36 32 31 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 27 25 22 21 WARNING 14 12 12 13

GRADE 05 - SCIENCE AND TECH/ENG ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 6 15 14 12 PROFICIENT 32 35 35 35 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 45 38 39 41 WARNING 16 12 13 12

GRADE 04 - ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 15 23 17 26 PROFICIENT 48 43 45 42 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 29 25 30 23 WARNING 8 9 9 9

GRADE 04 - MATHEMATICS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 21 23 19 27 PROFICIENT 37 36 35 38 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 37 33 39 25 WARNING 6 8 6 9

GRADE 03 - ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 14 19 18 15 PROFICIENT 49 43 44 44 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 29 30 31 30 WARNING 7 7 7 10

GRADE 03 - MATHEMATICS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 22 25 45 36 PROFICIENT 54 39 33 39 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 18 24 15 17 WARNING 7 12 8 9

1 Some students were exempt from the spring 2014 MCAS testing in this subject because they participated in the PARCC field test. This data represents only those students who participated in MCAS.
2 All students participated in the PARCC field tests in ELA and math and were exempt from the spring 2014 MCAS test administration in both subjects.
3 Burlington students in grades 3-8 participated in the PARCC field tests in ELA and math and were exempt from the spring 2014 MCAS test administration in both subjects.