• MCAS Percent of Students at Each Achievement Level
• MCAS Annual Comparisons
• Item by Item Results (for each Grade/Subject)
• MCAS Student Growth Report
• MCAS Results by Student Group
• Participation Report
• High School Science and Technology/Engineering Results
• MCAS Open Response Item Results
• ACCESS for ELLs
• SAT Performance
• Advanced Placement Performance
• Advanced Placement Participation

MCAS Annual Comparisons

GRADE 08 - ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 25 20 23 21 PROFICIENT 60 71 67 69 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 13 8 8 6 WARNING 2 1 2 3

GRADE 08 - MATHEMATICS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 20 23 19 16 PROFICIENT 38 38 39 41 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 27 31 27 31 WARNING 14 7 14 12

GRADE 08 - SCIENCE AND TECH/ENG ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 4 6 2 3 PROFICIENT 40 44 34 48 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 47 42 52 41 WARNING 10 9 11 8

GRADE 07 - ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 12 18 13 16 PROFICIENT 70 63 72 70 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 17 17 11 13 WARNING 1 2 3 2

GRADE 07 - MATHEMATICS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 19 24 27 26 PROFICIENT 40 40 41 39 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 29 28 25 24 WARNING 12 7 7 10

1 Some students were exempt from the spring 2014 MCAS testing in this subject because they participated in the PARCC field test. This data represents only those students who participated in MCAS.
2 All students participated in the PARCC field tests in ELA and math and were exempt from the spring 2014 MCAS test administration in both subjects.
3 Burlington students in grades 3-8 participated in the PARCC field tests in ELA and math and were exempt from the spring 2014 MCAS test administration in both subjects.