• MCAS Percent of Students at Each Achievement Level
• MCAS Annual Comparisons
• Item by Item Results (for each Grade/Subject)
• MCAS Student Growth Report
• MCAS Results by Student Group
• Participation Report
• High School Science and Technology/Engineering Results
• MCAS Open Response Item Results
• ACCESS for ELLs
• SAT Performance
• Advanced Placement Performance
• Advanced Placement Participation

MCAS Annual Comparisons

GRADE 08 - ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 30 25 24 14 PROFICIENT 65 69 68 75 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 4 4 7 8 WARNING 1 1 1 2

GRADE 08 - MATHEMATICS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 43 49 37 31 PROFICIENT 40 34 43 38 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 13 12 14 24 WARNING 4 5 7 7

GRADE 08 - SCIENCE AND TECH/ENG ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 21 17 10 16 PROFICIENT 59 61 61 53 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 19 20 27 27 WARNING 2 2 2 3

GRADE 07 - ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 14 18 14 13 PROFICIENT 74 68 71 76 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 10 13 14 10 WARNING 1 1 2 1

GRADE 07 - MATHEMATICS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 32 30 24 29 PROFICIENT 43 39 44 41 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 17 25 24 24 WARNING 8 6 8 6

1 Some students were exempt from the spring 2014 MCAS testing in this subject because they participated in the PARCC field test. This data represents only those students who participated in MCAS.
2 All students participated in the PARCC field tests in ELA and math and were exempt from the spring 2014 MCAS test administration in both subjects.
3 Burlington students in grades 3-8 participated in the PARCC field tests in ELA and math and were exempt from the spring 2014 MCAS test administration in both subjects.