• MCAS Percent of Students at Each Achievement Level
• MCAS Annual Comparisons
• Item by Item Results (for each Grade/Subject)
• MCAS Student Growth Report
• MCAS Results by Student Group
• Participation Report
• High School Science and Technology/Engineering Results
• MCAS Open Response Item Results
• ACCESS for ELLs
• SAT Performance
• Advanced Placement Performance
• Advanced Placement Participation

MCAS Annual Comparisons

GRADE 08 - ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 16 15 24 11 PROFICIENT 73 73 64 76 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 10 9 9 9 WARNING 2 3 3 3

GRADE 08 - MATHEMATICS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 33 37 27 27 PROFICIENT 31 37 43 37 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 26 19 20 27 WARNING 9 7 10 9

GRADE 08 - SCIENCE AND TECH/ENG ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 7 8 4 7 PROFICIENT 48 50 53 46 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 39 36 38 40 WARNING 5 7 5 8

GRADE 07 - ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 19 17 14 10 PROFICIENT 68 66 71 74 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 12 13 12 15 WARNING 2 4 3 2

GRADE 07 - MATHEMATICS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 28 18 27 22 PROFICIENT 39 43 41 45 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 22 29 25 23 WARNING 10 10 7 11

1 Some students were exempt from the spring 2014 MCAS testing in this subject because they participated in the PARCC field test. This data represents only those students who participated in MCAS.
2 All students participated in the PARCC field tests in ELA and math and were exempt from the spring 2014 MCAS test administration in both subjects.
3 Burlington students in grades 3-8 participated in the PARCC field tests in ELA and math and were exempt from the spring 2014 MCAS test administration in both subjects.