• MCAS Percent of Students at Each Achievement Level
• MCAS Annual Comparisons
• Item by Item Results (for each Grade/Subject)
• MCAS Student Growth Report
• MCAS Results by Student Group
• Participation Report
• High School Science and Technology/Engineering Results
• MCAS Open Response Item Results
• ACCESS for ELLs
• SAT Performance
• Advanced Placement Performance
• Advanced Placement Participation

MCAS Annual Comparisons

GRADE 05 - ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 20 14 16 20 PROFICIENT 51 49 55 54 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 19 26 23 16 WARNING 10 12 6 10

GRADE 05 - MATHEMATICS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 30 20 28 27 PROFICIENT 32 36 32 34 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 22 25 33 29 WARNING 15 19 7 10

GRADE 05 - SCIENCE AND TECH/ENG ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 9 19 22 12 PROFICIENT 42 36 40 42 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 35 31 31 42 WARNING 14 14 8 3

GRADE 04 - ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 4 8 9 7 PROFICIENT 34 57 42 35 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 42 28 34 45 WARNING 20 8 15 13

GRADE 04 - MATHEMATICS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 9 19 8 9 PROFICIENT 37 41 29 27 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 39 32 51 50 WARNING 15 7 12 14

1 Some students were exempt from the spring 2014 MCAS testing in this subject because they participated in the PARCC field test. This data represents only those students who participated in MCAS.
2 All students participated in the PARCC field tests in ELA and math and were exempt from the spring 2014 MCAS test administration in both subjects.
3 Burlington students in grades 3-8 participated in the PARCC field tests in ELA and math and were exempt from the spring 2014 MCAS test administration in both subjects.