• MCAS Percent of Students at Each Achievement Level
• MCAS Annual Comparisons
• Item by Item Results (for each Grade/Subject)
• MCAS Student Growth Report
• MCAS Results by Student Group
• Participation Report
• High School Science and Technology/Engineering Results
• MCAS Open Response Item Results
• ACCESS for ELLs
• SAT Performance
• Advanced Placement Performance
• Advanced Placement Participation

MCAS Annual Comparisons

GRADE 10 - ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 43 42 51 56 PROFICIENT 49 54 42 43 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 4 3 3 0 FAILING 4 1 4 1

GRADE 10 - MATHEMATICS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 61 73 68 65 PROFICIENT 30 19 20 27 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 5 7 4 6 FAILING 4 2 7 2

GRADE 10 - SCIENCE AND TECH/ENG ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 15 17 19 30 PROFICIENT 57 59 53 50 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 22 22 22 18 FAILING 5 2 6 2

GRADE 08 - ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 10 17 17 12 PROFICIENT 74 68 68 75 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 13 12 12 9 WARNING 4 3 3 4

GRADE 08 - MATHEMATICS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 19 21 26 20 PROFICIENT 31 33 37 45 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 32 31 24 23 WARNING 18 14 13 12

GRADE 08 - SCIENCE AND TECH/ENG ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 2 2 4 5 PROFICIENT 33 34 35 43 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 51 46 47 43 WARNING 15 17 15 9

GRADE 07 - ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 17 21 10 5 PROFICIENT 64 61 69 76 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 16 14 17 16 WARNING 4 4 4 3

GRADE 07 - MATHEMATICS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 23 29 25 13 PROFICIENT 35 32 43 37 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 29 26 21 36 WARNING 13 12 11 13

GRADE 06 - ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 20 21 9 14 PROFICIENT 62 60 63 59 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 16 14 24 20 WARNING 3 5 4 6

GRADE 06 - MATHEMATICS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 27 34 23 25 PROFICIENT 37 44 39 37 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 24 15 30 29 WARNING 12 6 8 10

GRADE 05 - ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 22 15 16 24 PROFICIENT 58 55 54 50 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 17 24 25 21 WARNING 4 6 5 5

GRADE 05 - MATHEMATICS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 31 29 26 40 PROFICIENT 42 41 42 32 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 20 20 23 19 WARNING 8 9 10 9

GRADE 05 - SCIENCE AND TECH/ENG ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 14 15 14 23 PROFICIENT 40 40 36 37 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 41 38 43 32 WARNING 5 7 7 8

GRADE 04 - ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 5 12 9 17 PROFICIENT 55 51 55 50 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 33 30 29 27 WARNING 6 8 6 7

GRADE 04 - MATHEMATICS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 16 22 21 23 PROFICIENT 43 40 36 36 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 35 30 37 33 WARNING 6 8 6 8

GRADE 03 - ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 14 20 12 20 PROFICIENT 58 49 53 50 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 22 27 31 24 WARNING 6 3 4 7

GRADE 03 - MATHEMATICS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 11 30 26 31 PROFICIENT 56 34 37 45 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 24 27 28 17 WARNING 9 9 9 6

1 Some students were exempt from the spring 2014 MCAS testing in this subject because they participated in the PARCC field test. This data represents only those students who participated in MCAS.
2 All students participated in the PARCC field tests in ELA and math and were exempt from the spring 2014 MCAS test administration in both subjects.
3 Burlington students in grades 3-8 participated in the PARCC field tests in ELA and math and were exempt from the spring 2014 MCAS test administration in both subjects.