• MCAS Percent of Students at Each Achievement Level
• MCAS Annual Comparisons
• Item by Item Results (for each Grade/Subject)
• MCAS Student Growth Report
• MCAS Results by Student Group
• Participation Report
• High School Science and Technology/Engineering Results
• MCAS Open Response Item Results
• ACCESS for ELLs
• SAT Performance
• Advanced Placement Performance
• Advanced Placement Participation

MCAS Annual Comparisons

GRADE 05 - ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 13 16 17 26 PROFICIENT 50 56 57 56 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 29 22 21 18 WARNING 8 7 5 0

GRADE 05 - MATHEMATICS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 23 38 62 49 PROFICIENT 48 31 24 33 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 25 20 12 18 WARNING 4 11 2 0

GRADE 05 - SCIENCE AND TECH/ENG ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 13 18 14 41 PROFICIENT 42 38 48 33 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 42 36 33 26 WARNING 2 9 5 0

GRADE 04 - ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS1 ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 ADVANCED 9 16 26 PROFICIENT 50 52 60 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 33 25 6 WARNING 9 7 9

GRADE 04 - MATHEMATICS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 28 27 34 29 PROFICIENT 46 43 53 56 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 20 25 13 13 WARNING 7 5 0 2

GRADE 03 - ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 17 29 24 20 PROFICIENT 55 42 64 54 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 29 24 11 20 WARNING 0 4 0 7

GRADE 03 - MATHEMATICS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 27 42 69 54 PROFICIENT 63 42 29 33 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 10 13 0 11 WARNING 0 2 2 2

1 Some students were exempt from the spring 2014 MCAS testing in this subject because they participated in the PARCC field test. This data represents only those students who participated in MCAS.
2 All students participated in the PARCC field tests in ELA and math and were exempt from the spring 2014 MCAS test administration in both subjects.
3 Burlington students in grades 3-8 participated in the PARCC field tests in ELA and math and were exempt from the spring 2014 MCAS test administration in both subjects.