• MCAS Percent of Students at Each Achievement Level
• MCAS Annual Comparisons
• Item by Item Results (for each Grade/Subject)
• MCAS Student Growth Report
• MCAS Results by Student Group
• Participation Report
• High School Science and Technology/Engineering Results
• MCAS Open Response Item Results
• ACCESS for ELLs
• SAT Performance
• Advanced Placement Performance
• Advanced Placement Participation

MCAS Annual Comparisons

GRADE 08 - ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 20 23 23 18 PROFICIENT 65 66 62 68 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 11 9 11 10 WARNING 4 3 4 4

GRADE 08 - MATHEMATICS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 22 23 22 18 PROFICIENT 27 34 32 38 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 32 32 28 30 WARNING 18 11 17 14

GRADE 08 - SCIENCE AND TECH/ENG ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 5 5 2 1 PROFICIENT 38 45 30 38 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 46 37 55 45 WARNING 11 13 13 15

GRADE 07 - ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 14 13 16 10 PROFICIENT 65 61 67 69 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 18 24 13 17 WARNING 3 2 4 4

GRADE 07 - MATHEMATICS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 18 19 18 20 PROFICIENT 34 28 38 32 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 36 38 29 27 WARNING 12 15 15 20

1 Some students were exempt from the spring 2014 MCAS testing in this subject because they participated in the PARCC field test. This data represents only those students who participated in MCAS.
2 All students participated in the PARCC field tests in ELA and math and were exempt from the spring 2014 MCAS test administration in both subjects.
3 Burlington students in grades 3-8 participated in the PARCC field tests in ELA and math and were exempt from the spring 2014 MCAS test administration in both subjects.