• MCAS Percent of Students at Each Achievement Level
• MCAS Annual Comparisons
• Item by Item Results (for each Grade/Subject)
• MCAS Student Growth Report
• MCAS Results by Student Group
• Participation Report
• High School Science and Technology/Engineering Results
• MCAS Open Response Item Results
• ACCESS for ELLs
• SAT Performance
• Advanced Placement Performance
• Advanced Placement Participation

MCAS Annual Comparisons

GRADE 08 - ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 46 31 35 34 PROFICIENT 46 62 56 59 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 6 5 6 5 WARNING 2 2 3 2

GRADE 08 - MATHEMATICS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 47 47 51 36 PROFICIENT 29 30 28 39 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 16 16 15 18 WARNING 8 7 6 7

GRADE 08 - SCIENCE AND TECH/ENG ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 12 10 13 14 PROFICIENT 51 51 51 56 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 33 32 30 26 WARNING 4 7 6 4

GRADE 07 - ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 35 33 30 24 PROFICIENT 55 59 61 65 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 8 8 9 9 WARNING 1 1 1 2

GRADE 07 - MATHEMATICS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 44 44 40 27 PROFICIENT 34 34 35 44 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 17 16 17 20 WARNING 5 6 7 10

1 Some students were exempt from the spring 2014 MCAS testing in this subject because they participated in the PARCC field test. This data represents only those students who participated in MCAS.
2 All students participated in the PARCC field tests in ELA and math and were exempt from the spring 2014 MCAS test administration in both subjects.
3 Burlington students in grades 3-8 participated in the PARCC field tests in ELA and math and were exempt from the spring 2014 MCAS test administration in both subjects.