• MCAS Percent of Students at Each Achievement Level
• MCAS Annual Comparisons
• Item by Item Results (for each Grade/Subject)
• MCAS Student Growth Report
• MCAS Results by Student Group
• Participation Report
• High School Science and Technology/Engineering Results
• MCAS Open Response Item Results
• ACCESS for ELLs
• SAT Performance
• Advanced Placement Performance
• Advanced Placement Participation

MCAS Annual Comparisons

GRADE 10 - ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 27 36 40 45 PROFICIENT 62 55 55 46 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 7 9 5 6 FAILING 4 0 0 2

GRADE 10 - MATHEMATICS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 48 42 57 55 PROFICIENT 30 44 31 34 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 18 14 9 8 FAILING 4 1 3 3

GRADE 10 - SCIENCE AND TECH/ENG ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 15 7 10 24 PROFICIENT 54 44 58 50 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 29 49 32 23 FAILING 2 0 0 3

GRADE 08 - ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 9 16 7 10 PROFICIENT 62 62 58 67 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 24 16 25 11 WARNING 5 7 10 12

GRADE 08 - MATHEMATICS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 19 17 9 4 PROFICIENT 20 41 32 27 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 37 27 28 36 WARNING 25 16 32 33

GRADE 08 - SCIENCE AND TECH/ENG ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 3 1 1 3 PROFICIENT 36 31 24 30 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 46 54 54 49 WARNING 15 14 21 18

1 Some students were exempt from the spring 2014 MCAS testing in this subject because they participated in the PARCC field test. This data represents only those students who participated in MCAS.
2 All students participated in the PARCC field tests in ELA and math and were exempt from the spring 2014 MCAS test administration in both subjects.
3 Burlington students in grades 3-8 participated in the PARCC field tests in ELA and math and were exempt from the spring 2014 MCAS test administration in both subjects.