• MCAS Percent of Students at Each Achievement Level
• MCAS Annual Comparisons
• Item by Item Results (for each Grade/Subject)
• MCAS Student Growth Report
• MCAS Results by Student Group
• Participation Report
• High School Science and Technology/Engineering Results
• MCAS Open Response Item Results
• ACCESS for ELLs
• SAT Performance
• Advanced Placement Performance
• Advanced Placement Participation

MCAS Annual Comparisons

GRADE 10 - ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 45 41 41 46 PROFICIENT 42 48 50 48 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 9 6 7 3 FAILING 4 4 2 3

GRADE 10 - MATHEMATICS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 55 50 48 50 PROFICIENT 27 32 31 32 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 13 12 14 13 FAILING 5 6 7 5

GRADE 10 - SCIENCE AND TECH/ENG ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 25 19 23 25 PROFICIENT 47 51 47 49 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 25 25 26 22 FAILING 3 6 4 4

GRADE 08 - ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 25 23 26 20 PROFICIENT 56 65 60 65 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 13 9 12 9 WARNING 7 3 3 5

GRADE 08 - MATHEMATICS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 25 24 25 14 PROFICIENT 26 33 41 41 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 24 31 21 29 WARNING 26 12 13 17

GRADE 08 - SCIENCE AND TECH/ENG ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 3 5 6 5 PROFICIENT 41 41 44 46 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 42 40 42 36 WARNING 14 13 8 12

GRADE 07 - ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 20 21 19 19 PROFICIENT 63 60 63 60 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 14 16 12 15 WARNING 3 3 5 5

GRADE 07 - MATHEMATICS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 22 30 23 18 PROFICIENT 40 33 37 40 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 28 29 23 29 WARNING 9 9 16 13

GRADE 06 - ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 25 26 23 29 PROFICIENT 49 50 52 53 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 19 18 20 13 WARNING 7 6 5 5

GRADE 06 - MATHEMATICS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 27 27 23 29 PROFICIENT 35 36 45 38 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 24 24 24 21 WARNING 14 13 8 12

GRADE 05 - ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 16 12 26 26 PROFICIENT 56 47 48 39 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 20 31 19 27 WARNING 8 9 7 8

GRADE 05 - MATHEMATICS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 19 18 23 21 PROFICIENT 39 36 32 27 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 27 31 32 34 WARNING 14 16 14 18

GRADE 05 - SCIENCE AND TECH/ENG ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 20 32 37 24 PROFICIENT 37 31 35 31 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 36 31 22 36 WARNING 7 7 6 9

GRADE 04 - ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 4 14 5 6 PROFICIENT 44 47 43 38 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 41 29 40 42 WARNING 11 9 12 14

GRADE 04 - MATHEMATICS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 11 18 15 11 PROFICIENT 36 41 32 33 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 45 32 42 42 WARNING 9 9 12 14

GRADE 03 - ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 12 18 7 11 PROFICIENT 52 41 40 47 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 29 34 43 35 WARNING 7 8 10 7

GRADE 03 - MATHEMATICS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 15 25 25 29 PROFICIENT 55 33 39 37 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 21 24 24 22 WARNING 9 18 13 12

1 Some students were exempt from the spring 2014 MCAS testing in this subject because they participated in the PARCC field test. This data represents only those students who participated in MCAS.
2 All students participated in the PARCC field tests in ELA and math and were exempt from the spring 2014 MCAS test administration in both subjects.
3 Burlington students in grades 3-8 participated in the PARCC field tests in ELA and math and were exempt from the spring 2014 MCAS test administration in both subjects.