• MCAS Percent of Students at Each Achievement Level
• MCAS Annual Comparisons
• Item by Item Results (for each Grade/Subject)
• MCAS Student Growth Report
• MCAS Results by Student Group
• Participation Report
• High School Science and Technology/Engineering Results
• MCAS Open Response Item Results
• ACCESS for ELLs
• SAT Performance
• Advanced Placement Performance
• Advanced Placement Participation

MCAS Annual Comparisons

GRADE 10 - ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 35 55 66 54 PROFICIENT 56 41 32 39 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 7 1 1 5 FAILING 1 2 1 2

GRADE 10 - MATHEMATICS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 46 61 61 49 PROFICIENT 33 28 31 32 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 17 9 6 13 FAILING 3 2 3 6

GRADE 10 - SCIENCE AND TECH/ENG ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 12 21 24 17 PROFICIENT 47 49 49 53 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 38 27 26 24 FAILING 2 3 2 5

GRADE 08 - ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 32 22 21 10 PROFICIENT 53 59 60 65 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 10 15 14 18 WARNING 5 4 6 8

GRADE 08 - MATHEMATICS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 28 21 19 4 PROFICIENT 26 28 35 24 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 26 34 30 36 WARNING 21 17 17 37

GRADE 08 - SCIENCE AND TECH/ENG ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 1 3 1 1 PROFICIENT 34 38 33 24 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 46 37 50 51 WARNING 19 22 16 24

1 Some students were exempt from the spring 2014 MCAS testing in this subject because they participated in the PARCC field test. This data represents only those students who participated in MCAS.
2 All students participated in the PARCC field tests in ELA and math and were exempt from the spring 2014 MCAS test administration in both subjects.
3 Burlington students in grades 3-8 participated in the PARCC field tests in ELA and math and were exempt from the spring 2014 MCAS test administration in both subjects.