• MCAS Percent of Students at Each Achievement Level
• MCAS Annual Comparisons
• Item by Item Results (for each Grade/Subject)
• MCAS Student Growth Report
• MCAS Results by Student Group
• Participation Report
• High School Science and Technology/Engineering Results
• MCAS Open Response Item Results
• ACCESS for ELLs
• SAT Performance
• Advanced Placement Performance
• Advanced Placement Participation

MCAS Annual Comparisons

GRADE 08 - ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 24 21 21 17 PROFICIENT 61 66 60 72 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 12 11 13 8 WARNING 3 3 6 3

GRADE 08 - MATHEMATICS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 48 41 40 35 PROFICIENT 27 32 26 31 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 15 18 20 25 WARNING 11 10 14 9

GRADE 08 - SCIENCE AND TECH/ENG ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 18 11 7 18 PROFICIENT 55 54 48 51 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 21 27 35 28 WARNING 6 8 9 3

GRADE 07 - ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 23 17 26 20 PROFICIENT 61 63 62 69 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 12 17 11 9 WARNING 4 3 1 2

GRADE 07 - MATHEMATICS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 34 32 37 33 PROFICIENT 40 31 36 37 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 15 25 20 22 WARNING 11 11 7 8

GRADE 06 - ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 ADVANCED 20 26 PROFICIENT 58 58 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 18 13 WARNING 5 4

GRADE 06 - MATHEMATICS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 ADVANCED 40 47 PROFICIENT 31 32 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 18 12 WARNING 12 10

1 Some students were exempt from the spring 2014 MCAS testing in this subject because they participated in the PARCC field test. This data represents only those students who participated in MCAS.
2 All students participated in the PARCC field tests in ELA and math and were exempt from the spring 2014 MCAS test administration in both subjects.
3 Burlington students in grades 3-8 participated in the PARCC field tests in ELA and math and were exempt from the spring 2014 MCAS test administration in both subjects.