• MCAS Percent of Students at Each Achievement Level
• MCAS Annual Comparisons
• Item by Item Results (for each Grade/Subject)
• MCAS Student Growth Report
• MCAS Results by Student Group
• Participation Report
• High School Science and Technology/Engineering Results
• MCAS Open Response Item Results
• ACCESS for ELLs
• SAT Performance
• Advanced Placement Performance
• Advanced Placement Participation

MCAS Annual Comparisons

GRADE 04 - ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 19 14 10 11 PROFICIENT 57 59 54 47 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 21 22 29 32 WARNING 4 5 7 9

GRADE 04 - MATHEMATICS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 28 29 40 26 PROFICIENT 51 39 32 35 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 18 30 25 33 WARNING 3 2 3 6

GRADE 03 - ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS1 ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 15 29 18 14 PROFICIENT 60 47 54 49 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 20 19 23 33 WARNING 5 5 5 3

GRADE 03 - MATHEMATICS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 21 34 35 29 PROFICIENT 53 39 39 43 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 22 16 20 23 WARNING 3 11 5 5

1 Some students were exempt from the spring 2014 MCAS testing in this subject because they participated in the PARCC field test. This data represents only those students who participated in MCAS.
2 All students participated in the PARCC field tests in ELA and math and were exempt from the spring 2014 MCAS test administration in both subjects.
3 Burlington students in grades 3-8 participated in the PARCC field tests in ELA and math and were exempt from the spring 2014 MCAS test administration in both subjects.