• MCAS Percent of Students at Each Achievement Level
• MCAS Annual Comparisons
• Item by Item Results (for each Grade/Subject)
• MCAS Student Growth Report
• MCAS Results by Student Group
• Participation Report
• High School Science and Technology/Engineering Results
• MCAS Open Response Item Results
• ACCESS for ELLs
• SAT Performance
• Advanced Placement Performance
• Advanced Placement Participation

MCAS Annual Comparisons

GRADE 08 - ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 19 16 21 13 PROFICIENT 63 71 61 73 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 15 9 15 9 WARNING 3 4 3 6

GRADE 08 - MATHEMATICS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 22 27 16 11 PROFICIENT 22 36 34 36 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 36 22 31 40 WARNING 19 15 19 13

GRADE 08 - SCIENCE AND TECH/ENG ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 1 2 1 2 PROFICIENT 16 39 31 31 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 61 48 54 51 WARNING 22 12 14 16

GRADE 07 - ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 11 11 7 7 PROFICIENT 69 63 66 64 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 17 22 22 26 WARNING 3 4 5 3

GRADE 07 - MATHEMATICS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 18 13 15 10 PROFICIENT 36 37 31 32 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 30 31 36 35 WARNING 15 18 18 22

1 Some students were exempt from the spring 2014 MCAS testing in this subject because they participated in the PARCC field test. This data represents only those students who participated in MCAS.
2 All students participated in the PARCC field tests in ELA and math and were exempt from the spring 2014 MCAS test administration in both subjects.
3 Burlington students in grades 3-8 participated in the PARCC field tests in ELA and math and were exempt from the spring 2014 MCAS test administration in both subjects.