• MCAS Percent of Students at Each Achievement Level
• MCAS Annual Comparisons
• MCAS Open Response Item Results
• ACCESS for ELLs
• SAT Performance
• Advanced Placement Performance
• Advanced Placement Participation

Related Links:

•  MCAS Results

Did You Know:

• MCAS results are used for
  • Improvements in teaching and learning
  • School and district accountability
  • Student accountability

MCAS Annual Comparisons Data Last Updated on September 26, 2016 More about the data

---

MCAS Annual Comparisons

GRADE 10 - ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 1998 1999 2000 ADVANCED 5 7 7 PROFICIENT 44 40 40 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 37 34 32 FAILING 14 18 21

GRADE 10 - MATHEMATICS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 1998 1999 2000 ADVANCED 4 12 11 PROFICIENT 24 22 24 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 33 27 31 FAILING 39 38 34

GRADE 10 - SCIENCE AND TECH/ENG ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 1998 1999 2000 ADVANCED 1 6 0 PROFICIENT 27 28 27 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 56 46 44 FAILING 17 20 29

 

GRADE 08 - ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 1998 1999 2000 ADVANCED 3 3 3 PROFICIENT 67 66 66 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 23 26 28 WARNING 7 4 4

GRADE 08 - HISTORY ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 1999 2000 ADVANCED 0 0 PROFICIENT 13 5 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 52 60 WARNING 36 35

GRADE 08 - MATHEMATICS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 1998 1999 2000 ADVANCED 10 6 7 PROFICIENT 32 28 25 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 31 38 36 WARNING 26 28 33

 

GRADE 08 - SCIENCE AND TECH/ENG ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 1998 1999 2000 ADVANCED 2 4 3 PROFICIENT 30 27 29 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 41 34 33 WARNING 27 35 35

GRADE 04 - ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 1998 1999 2000 ADVANCED 2 1 2 PROFICIENT 27 29 41 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 68 66 56 WARNING 3 4 1

GRADE 04 - MATHEMATICS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 1998 1999 2000 ADVANCED 25 18 22 PROFICIENT 35 33 48 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 38 42 29 WARNING 2 7 2

 

GRADE 04 - SCIENCE AND TECH/ENG ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 1998 1999 2000 ADVANCED 9 13 25 PROFICIENT 59 62 66 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 31 24 10 WARNING 1 2 0