• MCAS Percent of Students at Each Achievement Level
• MCAS Annual Comparisons
• MCAS Open Response Item Results
• ACCESS for ELLs
• SAT Performance
• Advanced Placement Performance
• Advanced Placement Participation

Related Links:

•  MCAS Results

Did You Know:

• MCAS results are used for
  • Improvements in teaching and learning
  • School and district accountability
  • Student accountability

MCAS Annual Comparisons Data Last Updated on September 26, 2016 More about the data

---

MCAS Annual Comparisons

GRADE 10 - ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 1998 1999 2000 ADVANCED 6 7 12 PROFICIENT 49 33 42 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 34 42 28 FAILING 10 18 18

GRADE 10 - MATHEMATICS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 1998 1999 2000 ADVANCED 14 15 23 PROFICIENT 26 18 24 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 30 26 29 FAILING 29 41 24

GRADE 10 - SCIENCE AND TECH/ENG ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 1998 1999 2000 ADVANCED 3 5 6 PROFICIENT 30 28 36 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 51 45 42 FAILING 16 21 16

 

GRADE 08 - ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 1998 1999 2000 ADVANCED 6 4 6 PROFICIENT 64 64 72 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 25 27 19 WARNING 5 6 4

GRADE 08 - HISTORY ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 1999 2000 ADVANCED 1 1 PROFICIENT 10 11 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 54 59 WARNING 35 29

GRADE 08 - MATHEMATICS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 1998 1999 2000 ADVANCED 19 9 23 PROFICIENT 30 36 34 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 26 34 28 WARNING 26 21 15

 

GRADE 08 - SCIENCE AND TECH/ENG ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 1998 1999 2000 ADVANCED 3 5 9 PROFICIENT 37 32 43 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 36 33 32 WARNING 24 30 17

GRADE 04 - ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 1998 1999 2000 ADVANCED 1 0 1 PROFICIENT 21 30 27 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 71 64 67 WARNING 8 6 4

GRADE 04 - MATHEMATICS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 1998 1999 2000 ADVANCED 19 25 20 PROFICIENT 31 35 42 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 40 35 32 WARNING 10 5 6

 

GRADE 04 - SCIENCE AND TECH/ENG ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 1998 1999 2000 ADVANCED 8 13 21 PROFICIENT 53 59 60 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 35 27 18 WARNING 4 1 1