• MCAS Percent of Students at Each Achievement Level
• MCAS Annual Comparisons
• Item by Item Results (for each Grade/Subject)
• MCAS Student Growth Report
• MCAS Results by Student Group
• Participation Report
• High School Science and Technology/Engineering Results
• MCAS Open Response Item Results
• ACCESS for ELLs
• SAT Performance
• Advanced Placement Performance
• Advanced Placement Participation

MCAS Annual Comparisons

GRADE 10 - ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 22 24 37 32 PROFICIENT 55 67 57 59 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 21 8 5 8 FAILING 2 1 1 1

GRADE 10 - MATHEMATICS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 50 50 57 48 PROFICIENT 30 31 22 32 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 19 14 16 14 FAILING 2 5 5 6

GRADE 10 - SCIENCE AND TECH/ENG ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 15 14 25 20 PROFICIENT 46 57 42 48 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 34 27 29 27 FAILING 5 2 4 5

GRADE 08 - ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 12 9 7 6 PROFICIENT 66 72 70 81 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 18 15 12 11 WARNING 4 4 11 2

GRADE 08 - MATHEMATICS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 19 12 15 12 PROFICIENT 27 33 38 49 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 27 34 25 30 WARNING 27 21 22 9

GRADE 08 - SCIENCE AND TECH/ENG ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 4 5 2 2 PROFICIENT 34 41 40 44 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 46 43 45 44 WARNING 16 11 13 9

GRADE 07 - ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 9 10 9 11 PROFICIENT 64 60 72 52 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 25 21 16 32 WARNING 2 10 4 6

GRADE 07 - MATHEMATICS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 13 13 14 19 PROFICIENT 39 42 50 32 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 30 27 27 24 WARNING 18 18 9 26

GRADE 06 - ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 11 17 10 15 PROFICIENT 61 62 58 58 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 19 15 26 20 WARNING 9 7 7 6

GRADE 06 - MATHEMATICS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 26 31 23 31 PROFICIENT 32 40 43 38 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 24 19 20 20 WARNING 19 9 15 10

GRADE 05 - ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 18 18 22 17 PROFICIENT 62 45 53 55 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 17 25 19 20 WARNING 4 12 6 8

GRADE 05 - MATHEMATICS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 34 28 41 33 PROFICIENT 43 36 32 33 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 15 18 21 22 WARNING 7 18 6 12

GRADE 05 - SCIENCE AND TECH/ENG ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 14 40 48 34 PROFICIENT 56 25 30 38 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 27 24 18 20 WARNING 4 11 4 8

GRADE 04 - ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 6 7 9 10 PROFICIENT 46 48 50 51 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 34 35 34 29 WARNING 14 11 8 9

GRADE 04 - MATHEMATICS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 22 23 21 29 PROFICIENT 33 45 39 32 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 34 26 33 30 WARNING 10 6 7 9

GRADE 03 - ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 13 20 16 16 PROFICIENT 58 59 53 53 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 23 17 26 24 WARNING 6 4 5 6

GRADE 03 - MATHEMATICS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 16 28 39 30 PROFICIENT 57 38 35 43 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 18 23 17 19 WARNING 9 10 10 8

1 Some students were exempt from the spring 2014 MCAS testing in this subject because they participated in the PARCC field test. This data represents only those students who participated in MCAS.
2 All students participated in the PARCC field tests in ELA and math and were exempt from the spring 2014 MCAS test administration in both subjects.
3 Burlington students in grades 3-8 participated in the PARCC field tests in ELA and math and were exempt from the spring 2014 MCAS test administration in both subjects.