• MCAS Percent of Students at Each Achievement Level
• MCAS Annual Comparisons
• Item by Item Results (for each Grade/Subject)
• MCAS Student Growth Report
• MCAS Results by Student Group
• Participation Report
• High School Science and Technology/Engineering Results
• MCAS Open Response Item Results
• ACCESS for ELLs
• SAT Performance
• Advanced Placement Performance
• Advanced Placement Participation

MCAS Annual Comparisons

GRADE 08 - ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 37 36 36 29 PROFICIENT 59 60 59 66 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 4 3 3 4 WARNING 1 0 1 1

GRADE 08 - MATHEMATICS1 ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 50 54 48 35 PROFICIENT 31 30 35 42 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 15 13 13 19 WARNING 3 3 5 5

GRADE 08 - SCIENCE AND TECH/ENG ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 11 17 7 13 PROFICIENT 60 60 57 60 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 26 20 31 23 WARNING 3 3 5 4

GRADE 07 - ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS1 ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 27 32 24 25 PROFICIENT 67 60 68 68 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 5 7 7 6 WARNING 0 1 1 2

GRADE 07 - MATHEMATICS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 57 50 47 48 PROFICIENT 33 34 35 37 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 8 13 13 12 WARNING 2 3 4 4

1 Some students were exempt from the spring 2014 MCAS testing in this subject because they participated in the PARCC field test. This data represents only those students who participated in MCAS.
2 All students participated in the PARCC field tests in ELA and math and were exempt from the spring 2014 MCAS test administration in both subjects.
3 Burlington students in grades 3-8 participated in the PARCC field tests in ELA and math and were exempt from the spring 2014 MCAS test administration in both subjects.