Massachusetts School and District Profiles

Monument Mt Regional High

Districts
Schools

2019

2019 Official Accountability Report - Monument Mt Regional High

Organization Information

DISTRICT NAME
Berkshire Hills (06180000)

TITLE I STATUS
Non-Title I School

SCHOOL
Monument Mt Regional High (06180505)

GRADES SERVED
09,10,11,12

REGION
West/Central

FEDERAL DESIGNATION
-

Accountability Information

Overall classification

Not requiring assistance or intervention

Reason for classification

Moderate progress toward targets

Progress toward improvement targets	Accountability percentile
42% - Moderate progress toward targets	41

OVERALL RESULTS
SUBGROUP RESULTS
DETAILED DATA FOR EACH INDICATOR

Overall progress toward improvement targets

	2018	2019
Annual criterion-referenced target percentage	60%	29%
Weight	40%	60%
Cumulative criterion-referenced target percentage (2018 x 40%) + (2019 x 60%)	42%
	Moderate progress toward targets

2019 Points awarded

2019 Progress toward improvement targets
Indicator		All students (High school grades)			Lowest performing students (High school grades)
Indicator		Points earned	Total possible points	Weight %	Points earned	Total possible points	Weight %
Achievement	English language arts achievement	4	4	-	0	4	-
	Mathematics achievement	1	4	-	0	4	-
	Science achievement	0	4	-	0	4	-
	Achievement total	5	12	47.5	0	12	67.5
Growth	English language arts growth	3	4	-	2	4	-
	Mathematics growth	3	4	-	2	4	-
	Growth total	6	8	22.5	4	8	22.5
High school completion	Four-year cohort graduation rate	0	4	-	-	-	-
	Extended engagement rate	3	4	-	-	-	-
	Annual dropout rate	0	4	-	-	-	-
	High school completion total	3	12	20.0	-	-	-
Progress toward attaining English language proficiency	English language proficiency total	-	-	-	-	-	-
Additional indicators	Chronic absenteeism	4	4	-	4	4	-
	Advanced coursework completion	2	4	-	-	-	-
	Additional indicators total	6	8	10.0	4	4	10.0
Weighted total		4.9	10.7	-	1.3	10.3	-
Percentage of possible points		46%		-	13%		-
2019 Annual criterion-referenced target percentage		29%

2018 Points awarded

2018 Progress toward improvement targets
Indicator		All students (High school grades)			Lowest performing students (High school grades)
Indicator		Points earned	Total possible points	Weight %	Points earned	Total possible points	Weight %
Achievement	English language arts achievement	4	4	-	4	4	-
	Mathematics achievement	3	4	-	3	4	-
	Science achievement	1	4	-	0	4	-
	Achievement total	8	12	47.5	7	12	67.5
Growth	English language arts growth	2	4	-	1	4	-
	Mathematics growth	2	4	-	1	4	-
	Growth total	4	8	22.5	2	8	22.5
High school completion	Four-year cohort graduation rate	4	4	-	-	-	-
	Extended engagement rate	3	4	-	-	-	-
	Annual dropout rate	3	4	-	-	-	-
	High school completion total	10	12	20.0	-	-	-
Progress toward attaining English language proficiency	English language proficiency total	-	-	-	-	-	-
Additional indicators	Chronic absenteeism	4	4	-	4	4	-
	Advanced coursework completion	0	4	-	-	-	-
	Additional indicators total	4	8	10.0	4	4	10.0
Weighted total		7.1	10.7	-	5.6	10.3	-
Percentage of possible points		66%		-	54%		-
2018 Annual criterion-referenced target percentage		60%

Overall progress toward improvement targets

	2018	2019
Annual criterion-referenced target percentage	52%	22%
Weight	40%	60%
Cumulative criterion-referenced target percentage (2018 x 40%) + (2019 x 60%)	34%
	Moderate progress toward targets

2019 Points awarded

2019 Progress toward improvement targets
Indicator		High needs Subgroup (High school grades)
Indicator		Points earned	Total possible points	Weight %
Achievement	English language arts achievement	0	4	-
	Mathematics achievement	0	4	-
	Science achievement	0	4	-
	Achievement total	0	12	47.5
Growth	English language arts growth	3	4	-
	Mathematics growth	3	4	-
	Growth total	6	8	22.5
High school completion	Four-year cohort graduation rate	0	4	-
	Extended engagement rate	3	4	-
	Annual dropout rate	0	4	-
	High school completion total	3	12	20.0
Progress toward attaining English language proficiency	English language proficiency total	-	-	-
Additional indicators	Chronic absenteeism	4	4	-
	Advanced coursework completion	0	4	-
	Additional indicators total	4	8	10.0
Weighted total		2.4	10.7	-
Percentage of possible points		22%		-
2019 Annual criterion-referenced target percentage		22%

2018 Points awarded

2018 Progress toward improvement targets
Indicator		High needs Subgroup (High school grades)
Indicator		Points earned	Total possible points	Weight %
Achievement	English language arts achievement	4	4	-
	Mathematics achievement	4	4	-
	Science achievement	0	4	-
	Achievement total	8	12	47.5
Growth	English language arts growth	1	4	-
	Mathematics growth	2	4	-
	Growth total	3	8	22.5
High school completion	Four-year cohort graduation rate	4	4	-
	Extended engagement rate	0	4	-
	Annual dropout rate	0	4	-
	High school completion total	4	12	20.0
Progress toward attaining English language proficiency	English language proficiency total	-	-	-
Additional indicators	Chronic absenteeism	1	4	-
	Advanced coursework completion	2	4	-
	Additional indicators total	3	8	10.0
Weighted total		5.6	10.7	-
Percentage of possible points		52%		-
2018 Annual criterion-referenced target percentage		52%

Subgroup percentile

This group's overall performance relative to the performance of the same subgroup in schools serving similar grades

Detailed data for each indicator

English language arts achievement - MCAS Composite Performance Index (CPI) - High school
About the Data
Group	2018 Achievement	2019 Achievement	Change	2019 Target	N	Points	Reason
All Students	99.6	98.2	-1.4	100.0	123	4	Exceeded Target
Lowest Performing	98.3	92.2	-6.1	100.0	29	0	Declined
High needs	100.0	95.6	-4.4	100.0	40	0	Declined
Econ. Disadvantaged	100.0	94.8	-5.2	100.0	29	0	Declined
EL and Former EL	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Students w/ disabilities	-	-	-	-	22	-	-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Asian	-	-	-	-	3	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black	-	-	-	-	3	-	-
Hispanic/Latino	-	-	-	-	9	-	-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.	-	-	-	-	6	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.	-	-	-	-	2	-	-
White	99.5	97.8	-1.7	100.0	100	4	Exceeded Target

Mathematics achievement - MCAS Composite Performance Index (CPI) - High school
About the Data
Group	2018 Achievement	2019 Achievement	Change	2019 Target	N	Points	Reason
All Students	92.7	91.0	-1.7	94.5	122	1	No Change
Lowest Performing	71.7	66.1	-5.6	75.8	28	0	Declined
High needs	84.3	80.1	-4.2	86.9	39	0	Declined
Econ. Disadvantaged	86.1	86.2	0.1	88.7	29	2	Improved Below Target
EL and Former EL	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Students w/ disabilities	-	-	-	-	21	-	-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Asian	-	-	-	-	3	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black	-	-	-	-	3	-	-
Hispanic/Latino	-	-	-	-	9	-	-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.	-	-	-	-	6	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.	-	-	-	-	2	-	-
White	93.6	90.2	-3.4	95.6	99	0	Declined

Science achievement - MCAS Composite Performance Index (CPI) - High school
About the Data
Group	2018 Achievement	2019 Achievement	Change	2019 Target	N	Points	Reason
All Students	92.3	89.0	-3.3	94.2	116	0	Declined
Lowest Performing	73.3	62.1	-11.2	76.5	29	0	Declined
High needs	83.3	77.7	-5.6	85.7	37	0	Declined
Econ. Disadvantaged	85.7	83.3	-2.4	88.0	27	1	No Change
EL and Former EL	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Students w/ disabilities	-	-	-	-	20	-	-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Asian	-	-	-	-	3	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black	-	-	-	-	2	-	-
Hispanic/Latino	-	-	-	-	9	-	-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.	-	-	-	-	6	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.	-	-	-	-	2	-	-
White	94.8	88.0	-6.8	96.6	94	0	Declined

English language arts growth - High school
About the Data
Group	2019 Mean SGP	N	Points	Reason
All Students	52.9	96	3	Typical Growth - High
Lowest Performing	45.6	24	2	Typical Growth - Low
High needs	51.8	35	3	Typical Growth - High
Econ. Disadvantaged	54.0	24	3	Typical Growth - High
EL and Former EL	-	-	-	-
Students w/ disabilities	-	18	-	-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.	-	-	-	-
Asian	-	1	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black	-	3	-	-
Hispanic/Latino	-	8	-	-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.	-	6	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.	-	2	-	-
White	50.4	76	3	Typical Growth - High

Mathematics growth - High school
About the Data
Group	2019 Mean SGP	N	Points	Reason
All Students	57.1	97	3	Typical Growth - High
Lowest Performing	40.1	23	2	Typical Growth - Low
High needs	53.3	35	3	Typical Growth - High
Econ. Disadvantaged	58.8	25	3	Typical Growth - High
EL and Former EL	-	-	-	-
Students w/ disabilities	-	18	-	-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.	-	-	-	-
Asian	-	1	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black	-	3	-	-
Hispanic/Latino	-	8	-	-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.	-	6	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.	-	2	-	-
White	55.7	77	3	Typical Growth - High

Four-year cohort graduation rate - High school
About the Data
Group	2017 Rate (%)	2018 Rate (%)	Change	Target (%)	N	Points	Reason
All Students	95.2	89.8	-5.4	97.3	128	0	Declined
Lowest Performing	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
High needs	92.1	79.6	-12.5	96.0	54	0	Declined
Econ. Disadvantaged	92.2	76.7	-15.5	96.3	43	0	Declined
EL and Former EL	-	-	-	-	1	-	-
Students w/ disabilities	-	-	-	-	23	-	-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Asian	-	-	-	-	5	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Hispanic/Latino	-	-	-	-	8	-	-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.	-	-	-	-	5	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White	95.5	88.2	-7.3	98.0	110	0	Declined

Extended engagement rate - High school
About the Data
Group	2016 Rate (%)	2017 Rate (%)	Change	Target (%)	N	Points	Reason
All Students	95.1	96.6	1.5	97.0	146	3	Met Target
Lowest Performing	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
High needs	91.7	95.2	3.5	95.0	63	3	Met Target
Econ. Disadvantaged	92.6	94.1	1.5	95.5	51	2	Improved Below Target
EL and Former EL	-	-	-	-	1	-	-
Students w/ disabilities	-	-	-	-	26	-	-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.	-	-	-	-	1	-	-
Asian	-	-	-	-	2	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black	-	-	-	-	4	-	-
Hispanic/Latino	-	-	-	-	3	-	-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.	-	-	-	-	2	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.	-	-	-	-	1	-	-
White	95.2	97.0	1.8	97.0	133	3	Met Target

Annual dropout rate - High school
About the Data
Group	2017 Rate (%)	2018 Rate (%)	Change	Target (%)	N	Points	Reason
All Students	0.7	1.4	0.7	1.0	517	0	Declined
Lowest Performing	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
High needs	1.9	2.5	0.6	1.7	157	0	Declined
Econ. Disadvantaged	1.7	2.5	0.8	1.5	121	0	Declined
EL and Former EL	-	-	-	-	5	-	-
Students w/ disabilities	-	-	-	-	66	-	-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Asian	-	-	-	-	10	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black	-	-	-	-	10	-	-
Hispanic/Latino	-	-	-	-	34	-	-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.	-	-	-	-	20	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.	-	-	-	-	2	-	-
White	0.4	1.4	1.0	1.0	441	0	Declined

Progress toward attaining English language proficiency - High school
About the Data
Group	2018 Rate (%)	2019 Rate (%)	Change	Target	N	Points	Reason
All Students	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Lowest Performing	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
High needs	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Econ. Disadvantaged	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
EL and Former EL	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Students w/ disabilities	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Asian	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Hispanic/Latino	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White	-	-	-	-	-	-	-

Chronic absenteeism - High school
About the Data
Group	2018 Rate (%)	2019 Rate (%)	Change	Target	N	Points	Reason
All Students	41.0	20.1	-20.9	38.7	536	4	Exceeded Target
Lowest Performing	43.3	3.4	-39.9	37.5	29	4	Exceeded Target
High needs	54.5	35.6	-18.9	50.7	177	4	Exceeded Target
Econ. Disadvantaged	57.3	43.9	-13.4	52.2	114	4	Exceeded Target
EL and Former EL	-	-	-	-	18	-	-
Students w/ disabilities	-	-	-	-	72	-	-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.	-	-	-	-	1	-	-
Asian	-	-	-	-	10	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black	-	-	-	-	10	-	-
Hispanic/Latino	-	-	-	-	43	-	-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.	-	-	-	-	17	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.	-	-	-	-	2	-	-
White	40.9	17.4	-23.5	38.4	453	4	Exceeded Target

Advanced coursework completion - High school
About the Data
Group	2018 Rate (%)	2019 Rate (%)	Change	Target	N	Points	Reason
All Students	55.2	57.9	2.7	61.7	247	2	Improved Below Target
Lowest Performing	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
High needs	34.9	33.8	-1.1	42.3	71	0	Declined
Econ. Disadvantaged	39.4	35.0	-4.4	47.2	60	0	Declined
EL and Former EL	-	-	-	-	4	-	-
Students w/ disabilities	-	-	-	-	23	-	-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Asian	-	-	-	-	3	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black	-	-	-	-	5	-	-
Hispanic/Latino	-	-	-	-	14	-	-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.	-	-	-	-	9	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White	56.0	60.2	4.2	62.5	216	2	Improved Below Target

Assessment participation - All students
About the Data
Group	English language arts					Mathematics					Science
Group	Enrolled	Assessed	%	Met Target?	Years in Rate	Enrolled	Assessed	%	Met Target?	Years in Rate	Enrolled	Assessed	%	Met Target?	Years in Rate
All Students	127	126	99	Yes	1	125	124	99	Yes	1	127	127	100	Yes	1

Assessment participation - Subgroups
About the Data
Group	English language arts		Mathematics		Science		Overall
Group	Enrolled	Assessed	Enrolled	Assessed	Enrolled	Assessed	Total Enrolled	Total Assessed	%	Met Target?	Years in Rate
High needs	43	42	41	40	43	43	127	125	98	Yes	1
Econ. Disadvantaged	32	31	31	30	32	32	95	93	98	Yes	1
EL and Former EL	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Students w/ disabilities	23	23	21	21	23	23	67	67	100	Yes	1
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Asian	4	3	4	3	4	4	12	-	-	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black	3	3	3	3	3	3	9	-	-	-	-
Hispanic/Latino	9	9	9	9	9	9	27	-	-	-	-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.	6	6	6	6	6	6	18	-	-	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.	2	2	2	2	2	2	6	-	-	-	-
White	103	103	101	101	103	103	307	307	100	Yes	1

About this Report

Overall classification: All Massachusetts districts and schools with sufficient data are classified into one of two accountability categories: districts and schools requiring assistance or intervention, and districts and schools not requiring assistance or intervention. The reason(s) for the district's or school's classification are noted on this report.

Progress toward improvement targets: The criterion-referenced target percentage combines multiple years of data related to achievement, growth, high school completion, English learner progress, advanced coursework completion, and chronic absenteeism into a single number between 0 and 100. For a group to be considered to be meeting targets it must have a cumulative criterion-referenced target percentage of 75% or higher.

The annual criterion-referenced target percentage is calculated by dividing the weighted total points earned by the weighted total possible points. The calculation for each is displayed below.

Weighted total of points earned = (Total achievement points earned x Achievement weight) + (Total growth points earned x Growth weight) + (Total high school completion points earned x high school completion weight) + (EL progress points earned x EL progress weight) + (Total additional indicator points earned x Additional indicator weight)

The cumulative criterion-referenced target percentage represents a weighted average of the annual criterion-referenced target percentages. At a minimum, a group must have an annual criterion-referenced target percentage for the most recent year in order to receive a cumulative percentage.

Accountability percentile: An accountability percentile between 1 and 99 is reported for most schools. This number is an indication of the school's overall performance relative to other schools that serve similar grades, and is calculated using multiple years of data for all accountability indicators. School percentiles are not calculated for districts.

Resources

Interpretive Materials

Glossary of 2019 Accountability Terms