Massachusetts School and District Profiles

Monument Mt Regional High

Districts Schools
Select an Org
print page

2018 Official Accountability Report - Monument Mt Regional High

Organization Information
DISTRICT NAME
Berkshire Hills (06180000)
TITLE I STATUS
Non-Title I School
SCHOOL
Monument Mt Regional High (06180505)
GRADES SERVED
09,10,11,12
REGION
West/Central
FEDERAL DESIGNATION
-

Accountability Information

Overall classificationNot requiring assistance or intervention
Reason for classification
Partially meeting targets
Progress toward improvement targetsAccountability percentile
60% - Partially meeting targets45

Overall results

Progress toward improvement targets
Indicator All students
(High school grades)
Lowest performing students
(High school grades)
Points earned Total possible points Weight % Points earned Total possible points Weight %
AchievementEnglish language arts achievement44-44-
Mathematics achievement34-34-
Science achievement14-04-
Achievement total81247.571267.5
GrowthEnglish language arts growth24-14-
Mathematics growth24-14-
Growth total4822.52822.5
High school completionFour-year cohort graduation rate44----
Extended engagement rate34----
Annual dropout rate34----
High school completion total101220.0---
Progress toward attaining English language proficiencyEnglish language proficiency total------
Additional indicatorsChronic absenteeism44-44-
Advanced coursework completion04----
Additional indicators total4810.04410.0
Weighted total7.110.7-5.610.3-
Percentage of possible points 66%-54%-
Criterion-referenced target percentage60%
Partially meeting targets

Subgroup results

Progress toward improvement targets
Indicator High needs Subgroup
(High school grades)
Points earned Total possible points Weight %
AchievementEnglish language arts achievement44-
Mathematics achievement44-
Science achievement04-
Achievement total81247.5
GrowthEnglish language arts growth14-
Mathematics growth24-
Growth total3822.5
High school completionFour-year cohort graduation rate44-
Extended engagement rate04-
Annual dropout rate04-
High school completion total41220.0
Progress toward attaining English language proficiencyEnglish language proficiency total---
Additional indicatorsChronic absenteeism14-
Advanced coursework completion24-
Additional indicators total3810.0
Weighted total5.610.7-
Percentage of possible points 52%-
Criterion-referenced target percentage52%
Partially meeting targets
Subgroup percentile
This group's overall performance relative to the performance of the same subgroup in schools administering similar assessments 53

Detailed data for each indicator

English language arts achievement - legacy MCAS Composite Performance Index (CPI) - High school
Group 2017 Achievement 2018 Achievement Change 2018 Target N Points Reason
All Students 98.5 99.6 1.1 100.0 1164Exceeded Target
Lowest Performing 94.5 98.3 3.8 96.6 304Exceeded Target
High needs 95.1 100.0 4.9 97.2 354Exceeded Target
Econ. Disadvantaged 94.2 100.0 5.8 95.8 274Exceeded Target
EL and Former EL---- 1--
Students w/ disabilities---- 13--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian---- 2--
Afr. Amer./Black---- 1--
Hispanic/Latino---- 8--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 3--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White 98.8 99.5 0.7 100.0 1024Exceeded Target

Mathematics achievement - legacy MCAS Composite Performance Index (CPI) - High school
Group 2017 Achievement 2018 Achievement Change 2018 Target N Points Reason
All Students 91.7 92.7 1.0 93.6 1163Met Target
Lowest Performing 67.7 71.7 4.0 71.9 303Met Target
High needs 79.3 84.3 5.0 81.5 354Exceeded Target
Econ. Disadvantaged 80.2 86.1 5.9 82.6 274Exceeded Target
EL and Former EL---- 1--
Students w/ disabilities---- 13--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian---- 2--
Afr. Amer./Black---- 1--
Hispanic/Latino---- 8--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 3--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White 92.9 93.6 0.7 95.0 1022Improved Below Target

Science achievement - legacy MCAS Composite Performance Index (CPI) - High school
Group 2017 Achievement 2018 Achievement Change 2018 Target N Points Reason
All Students 94.5 92.3 -2.2 96.3 1131No Change
Lowest Performing 82.3 73.3 -9.0 86.4 300Declined
High needs 86.7 83.3 -3.4 89.3 360Declined
Econ. Disadvantaged 86.5 85.7 -0.8 88.8 281No Change
EL and Former EL---- 1--
Students w/ disabilities---- 14--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian---- 2--
Afr. Amer./Black---- 1--
Hispanic/Latino---- 8--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 2--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White 95.2 94.8 -0.4 97.0 1001No Change

English language arts growth - High school
Group 2018 Mean SGP 2018 Target N Points Reason
All Students 41.8 50.0 982Below Target
Lowest Performing 35.7 50.0 281Below Target
High needs 37.6 50.0 351Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged 34.3 50.0 271Below Target
EL and Former EL-- 1--
Students w/ disabilities-- 13--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-----
Asian-- 1--
Afr. Amer./Black-- 1--
Hispanic/Latino-- 7--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.-- 2--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-----
White 41.6 50.0 872Below Target

Mathematics growth - High school
Group 2018 Mean SGP 2018 Target N Points Reason
All Students 47.7 50.0 982Below Target
Lowest Performing 34.7 50.0 281Below Target
High needs 43.4 50.0 352Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged 39.3 50.0 271Below Target
EL and Former EL-- 1--
Students w/ disabilities-- 13--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-----
Asian-- 1--
Afr. Amer./Black-- 1--
Hispanic/Latino-- 7--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.-- 2--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-----
White 48.6 50.0 872Below Target

Four-year cohort graduation rate - High school
Group 2016 Rate (%) 2017 Rate (%) Change Target (%) N Points Reason
All Students 90.3 95.2 4.9 92.3 1464Exceeded Target
Lowest Performing-------
High needs 81.9 92.1 10.2 85.7 634Exceeded Target
Econ. Disadvantaged 83.3 92.2 8.9 87.1 514Exceeded Target
EL and Former EL---- 1--
Students w/ disabilities---- 26--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.---- 1--
Asian---- 2--
Afr. Amer./Black---- 4--
Hispanic/Latino---- 3--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 2--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.---- 1--
White 89.5 95.5 6.0 91.9 1334Exceeded Target

Extended engagement rate - High school
Group 2015 Rate (%) 2016 Rate (%) Change Target (%) N Points Reason
All Students 97.7 95.1 -2.6 99.7 1443Met Target
Lowest Performing-------
High needs 94.4 91.7 -2.7 97.5 720Declined
Econ. Disadvantaged 93.9 92.6 -1.3 97.1 540Declined
EL and Former EL---- 5--
Students w/ disabilities---- 28--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian---- 4--
Afr. Amer./Black---- 3--
Hispanic/Latino---- 6--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 7--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White 97.3 95.2 -2.1 99.3 1243Met Target

Annual dropout rate - High school
Group 2016 Rate (%) 2017 Rate (%) Change Target (%) N Points Reason
All Students 0.4 0.7 -0.3 1.0 5363Met Target
Lowest Performing-------
High needs 0.0 1.9 -1.9 1.0 1570Declined
Econ. Disadvantaged 0.0 1.7 -1.7 1.0 1150Declined
EL and Former EL---- 6--
Students w/ disabilities---- 66--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.---- 1--
Asian---- 10--
Afr. Amer./Black---- 10--
Hispanic/Latino---- 26--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 13--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.---- 1--
White 0.4 0.4 0.0 1.0 4753Met Target

Progress toward attaining English language proficiency - High school
Group 2017 Rate (%) 2018 Rate (%) Change Target N Points Reason
All Students-------
Lowest Performing-------
High needs-------
Econ. Disadvantaged-------
EL and Former EL-------
Students w/ disabilities-------
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian-------
Afr. Amer./Black-------
Hispanic/Latino-------
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.-------
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White-------

Chronic absenteeism - High school
Group 2017 Rate (%) 2018 Rate (%) Change Target N Points Reason
All Students 44.9 41.0 3.9 43.0 5254Exceeded Target
Lowest Performing 51.5 43.3 8.2 46.0 304Exceeded Target
High needs 54.2 54.3 -0.1 51.6 1751No Change
Econ. Disadvantaged 55.2 57.3 -2.1 51.5 1100Declined
EL and Former EL---- 10--
Students w/ disabilities---- 66--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian---- 11--
Afr. Amer./Black---- 11--
Hispanic/Latino---- 36--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 20--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.---- 2--
White 43.9 40.9 3.0 41.9 4454Exceeded Target

Advanced coursework completion - High school
Group 2017 Rate (%) 2018 Rate (%) Change Target N Points Reason
All Students 59.7 55.0 -4.7 65.8 2710Declined
Lowest Performing-------
High needs 27.0 30.0 3.0 35.0 802Improved Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged 31.7 34.4 2.7 42.0 642Improved Below Target
EL and Former EL---- 4--
Students w/ disabilities---- 29--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian---- 5--
Afr. Amer./Black---- 5--
Hispanic/Latino---- 16--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 11--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White 60.6 55.6 -5.0 67.0 2340Declined

Assessment participation
Group English language arts Mathematics Science
Enrolled Assessed % Met Target? Years in Rate Enrolled Assessed % Met Target? Years in Rate Enrolled Assessed % Met Target? Years in Rate
All Students 121 11998Yes 1 120 11898Yes 1 120 11999Yes 1
Lowest Performing---------------
High needs 39 3897Yes 1 38 3797Yes 1 38 38100Yes 1
Econ. Disadvantaged 30 2997Yes 1 29 2897Yes 1 29 29100Yes 1
EL and Former EL 2---- 2---- 2----
Students w/ disabilities 14---- 14---- 14----
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.---------------
Asian 2---- 2---- 2----
Afr. Amer./Black 1---- 1---- 1----
Hispanic/Latino 9---- 9---- 9----
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. 3---- 3---- 3----
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.---------------
White 106 10498Yes 1 105 10398Yes 1 105 10499Yes 1


About this Report

Overall classification: All Massachusetts districts and schools with sufficient data are classified into one of two accountability categories: districts and schools requiring assistance or intervention, and districts and schools without required assistance or intervention. The reason(s) for the district or school's classification are noted on this report.

Progress toward improvement targets: The criterion-referenced target percentage combines information about achievement, growth, high school completion, English learner progress, advanced coursework completion, and chronic absenteeism into a single number between 0 and 100. For a group to be considered to be meeting targets it must have a criterion-referenced target percentage of 75% or higher.

The criterion-referenced target percentage is calculated by dividing the weighted total points earned by the weighted total possible points. The calculation for each is displayed below.

Weighted total of points earned = (Total achievement points earned x Achievement weight) + (Total growth points earned x Growth weight) + (Total high school completion points earned x high school completion weight) + (EL progress points earned x EL progress weight) + (Total additional indicator points earned x Additional indicator weight)

Weighted total of possible points = (Total achievement possible points x Achievement weight) + (Total growth possible points x Growth weight) + (Total high school completion possible points x high school completion weight) + (EL progress possible points x EL progress weight) + (Total additional indicator possible points x Additional indicator weight)

Accountability percentile: An accountability percentile between 1 and 99 is reported for most schools. This number is an indication of the school's overall performance relative to other schools that serve similar grades, and is calculated using data for all accountability indicators. School percentiles are not calculated for districts.

Determination of need for special education technical assistance or intervention: The U.S. Department of Education requires Massachusetts to determine which districts (including single school districts) have specific needs for technical assistance or intervention in the area of special education. A district's determination is based on four categories: Meets Requirements (MR); Needs Assistance (NA); Needs Intervention (NI); and Needs Substantial Intervention (NSI). In most cases these categories correspond to the district's results, except when the district has specific compliance needs. This designation helps signal whether outcomes for all students in the district indicate progress, including that of students with disabilities, or whether technical assistance and/or intervention is needed to improve outcomes for all children, especially students with disabilities.


Resources
Interpretive Materials Interpretive Materials
Glossary of 2018 Accountability Terms Glossary of 2018 Accountability Terms

School and District Profiles