Massachusetts School and District Profiles

Winthrop School

Districts Schools
Select an Org
print page

2018 Official Accountability Report - Winthrop School

Organization Information
DISTRICT NAME
Hamilton-Wenham (06750000)
TITLE I STATUS
Title I School
SCHOOL
Winthrop School (06750015)
GRADES SERVED
PK,K,01,02,03,04,05
REGION
Coastal
FEDERAL DESIGNATION
-

Accountability Information

Overall classificationNot requiring assistance or intervention
Reason for classification
Meeting targets
Progress toward improvement targetsAccountability percentile
85% - Meeting targets87

Overall results

Progress toward improvement targets
Indicator All students
(Non-high school grades)
Lowest performing students
(Non-high school grades)
Points earned Total possible points Weight % Points earned Total possible points Weight %
AchievementEnglish language arts achievement44-44-
Mathematics achievement34-34-
Science achievement44----
Achievement total111267.57867.5
GrowthEnglish language arts growth34-34-
Mathematics growth34-34-
Growth total6822.56822.5
High school completionFour-year cohort graduation rate------
Extended engagement rate------
Annual dropout rate------
High school completion total------
Progress toward attaining English language proficiencyEnglish language proficiency total------
Additional indicatorsChronic absenteeism44-04-
Advanced coursework completion------
Additional indicators total4410.00410.0
Weighted total9.210.3-6.17.6-
Percentage of possible points 89%-80%-
Criterion-referenced target percentage85%
Meeting targets

Subgroup results

Progress toward improvement targets
Indicator High needs Subgroup
(Non-high school grades)
Points earned Total possible points Weight %
AchievementEnglish language arts achievement---
Mathematics achievement---
Science achievement---
Achievement total---
GrowthEnglish language arts growth---
Mathematics growth---
Growth total---
High school completionFour-year cohort graduation rate---
Extended engagement rate---
Annual dropout rate---
High school completion total---
Progress toward attaining English language proficiencyEnglish language proficiency total---
Additional indicatorsChronic absenteeism---
Advanced coursework completion---
Additional indicators total---
Weighted total---
Percentage of possible points --
Criterion-referenced target percentage-
-
Subgroup percentile
This group's overall performance relative to the performance of the same subgroup in schools administering similar assessments -

Detailed data for each indicator

English language arts achievement - Next-Generation MCAS average composite scaled score - Non-high school
Group 2017 Achievement 2018 Achievement Change 2018 Target N Points Reason
All Students 508.1 512.0 3.9 509.6 1304Exceeded Target
Lowest Performing 494.7 502.1 7.4 499.4 224Exceeded Target
High needs---- 20--
Econ. Disadvantaged---- 10--
EL and Former EL---- 1--
Students w/ disabilities---- 11--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.---- 1--
Asian---- 2--
Afr. Amer./Black---- 5--
Hispanic/Latino---- 5--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 2--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White 508.2 511.7 3.5 509.8 1154Exceeded Target

Mathematics achievement - Next-Generation MCAS average composite scaled score - Non-high school
Group 2017 Achievement 2018 Achievement Change 2018 Target N Points Reason
All Students 509.3 508.1 -1.2 510.7 1303Met Target
Lowest Performing 496.6 499.2 2.6 500.2 223Met Target
High needs---- 20--
Econ. Disadvantaged---- 10--
EL and Former EL---- 1--
Students w/ disabilities---- 11--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.---- 1--
Asian---- 2--
Afr. Amer./Black---- 5--
Hispanic/Latino---- 5--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 2--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White 510.0 508.0 -2.0 511.5 1153Met Target

Science achievement - legacy MCAS Composite Performance Index (CPI) - Non-high school
Group 2017 Achievement 2018 Achievement Change 2018 Target N Points Reason
All Students 85.9 91.7 5.8 88.3 454Exceeded Target
Lowest Performing-------
High needs---- 3--
Econ. Disadvantaged---- 2--
EL and Former EL---- 1--
Students w/ disabilities-------
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian-------
Afr. Amer./Black---- 2--
Hispanic/Latino---- 2--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.-------
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White 89.1 90.9 1.8 91.5 414Exceeded Target

English language arts growth - Non-high school
Group 2018 Mean SGP 2018 Target N Points Reason
All Students 51.9 50.0 723Met Target
Lowest Performing 51.5 50.0 223Met Target
High needs-- 6--
Econ. Disadvantaged-- 4--
EL and Former EL-- 1--
Students w/ disabilities-- 1--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-----
Asian-- 1--
Afr. Amer./Black-- 3--
Hispanic/Latino-- 2--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.-- 1--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-----
White 52.3 50.0 653Met Target

Mathematics growth - Non-high school
Group 2018 Mean SGP 2018 Target N Points Reason
All Students 52.5 50.0 723Met Target
Lowest Performing 58.6 50.0 223Met Target
High needs-- 6--
Econ. Disadvantaged-- 4--
EL and Former EL-- 1--
Students w/ disabilities-- 1--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-----
Asian-- 1--
Afr. Amer./Black-- 3--
Hispanic/Latino-- 2--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.-- 1--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-----
White 51.8 50.0 653Met Target

Progress toward attaining English language proficiency - Non-high school
Group 2017 Rate (%) 2018 Rate (%) Change Target N Points Reason
All Students-------
Lowest Performing-------
High needs-------
Econ. Disadvantaged-------
EL and Former EL-------
Students w/ disabilities-------
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian-------
Afr. Amer./Black-------
Hispanic/Latino-------
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.-------
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White-------

Chronic absenteeism - Non-high school
Group 2017 Rate (%) 2018 Rate (%) Change Target N Points Reason
All Students 2.7 2.3 0.4 1.6 2184Exceeded Target
Lowest Performing 0.0 4.5 -4.5 0.0 220Declined
High needs---- 46--
Econ. Disadvantaged---- 16--
EL and Former EL---- 3--
Students w/ disabilities---- 32--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.---- 3--
Asian---- 6--
Afr. Amer./Black---- 8--
Hispanic/Latino---- 8--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 4--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White 3.1 2.1 1.0 1.8 1894Exceeded Target

Assessment participation
Group English language arts Mathematics Science
Enrolled Assessed % Met Target? Years in Rate Enrolled Assessed % Met Target? Years in Rate Enrolled Assessed % Met Target? Years in Rate
All Students 130 130100Yes 1 130 130100Yes 1 45 45100Yes 1
Lowest Performing---------------
High needs 20 20100Yes 1 20 20100Yes 1 3----
Econ. Disadvantaged 10---- 10---- 2----
EL and Former EL 1---- 1---- 1----
Students w/ disabilities 11---- 11---- 0----
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. 1---- 1---- 0----
Asian 2---- 2---- 0----
Afr. Amer./Black 5---- 5---- 2----
Hispanic/Latino 5---- 5---- 2----
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. 2---- 2---- 0----
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.---------------
White 115 115100Yes 1 115 115100Yes 1 41 41100Yes 1


About this Report

Overall classification: All Massachusetts districts and schools with sufficient data are classified into one of two accountability categories: districts and schools requiring assistance or intervention, and districts and schools without required assistance or intervention. The reason(s) for the district or school's classification are noted on this report.

Progress toward improvement targets: The criterion-referenced target percentage combines information about achievement, growth, high school completion, English learner progress, advanced coursework completion, and chronic absenteeism into a single number between 0 and 100. For a group to be considered to be meeting targets it must have a criterion-referenced target percentage of 75% or higher.

The criterion-referenced target percentage is calculated by dividing the weighted total points earned by the weighted total possible points. The calculation for each is displayed below.

Weighted total of points earned = (Total achievement points earned x Achievement weight) + (Total growth points earned x Growth weight) + (Total high school completion points earned x high school completion weight) + (EL progress points earned x EL progress weight) + (Total additional indicator points earned x Additional indicator weight)

Weighted total of possible points = (Total achievement possible points x Achievement weight) + (Total growth possible points x Growth weight) + (Total high school completion possible points x high school completion weight) + (EL progress possible points x EL progress weight) + (Total additional indicator possible points x Additional indicator weight)

Accountability percentile: An accountability percentile between 1 and 99 is reported for most schools. This number is an indication of the school's overall performance relative to other schools that serve similar grades, and is calculated using data for all accountability indicators. School percentiles are not calculated for districts.

Determination of need for special education technical assistance or intervention: The U.S. Department of Education requires Massachusetts to determine which districts (including single school districts) have specific needs for technical assistance or intervention in the area of special education. A district's determination is based on four categories: Meets Requirements (MR); Needs Assistance (NA); Needs Intervention (NI); and Needs Substantial Intervention (NSI). In most cases these categories correspond to the district's results, except when the district has specific compliance needs. This designation helps signal whether outcomes for all students in the district indicate progress, including that of students with disabilities, or whether technical assistance and/or intervention is needed to improve outcomes for all children, especially students with disabilities.


Resources
Interpretive Materials Interpretive Materials
Glossary of 2018 Accountability Terms Glossary of 2018 Accountability Terms

School and District Profiles